Exhibit 300 (BY2009) - PHIN: National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network (NEPHTN), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

PART ONE

OVERVIEW

1. Date of Submission:: 2008-02-04

2. Agency:: 009

3. Bureau:: 20

4. Name of this Capital Asset:: CDC PHIN: National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network (NEPHTN)

5. Unique Project Identifier:: 009-20-01-03-01-0615-00

6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2009?: Mixed Life Cycle

7. What was the first budget year this investment was submitted to OMB?: FY2002

8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this closes in part or in whole an identified agency performance gap.: In 2002, Congress appropriated funds to CDC to develop a NEPHTN to address a critical national envtl health gap: the lack of information to document links between envtl hazards and diseases for use in reducing & preventing the burden of environmentally related diseases. The NEPTHN melds data from envtl hazard monitoring and human exposure & health effect surveillance into a network of standardized electronic data systems. It is the first national effort to provide the U.S. with standardized data from multiple health, exposure, and hazard information systems for possible linkage as part of routine surveillance activities. It will be a distributed, secure, web-based network that provides access to data collected across a variety of agencies and will include state-based network components. By bringing health & envtl data together and making them readily accessible, exchangeable, nationally consistent/standardized, and linkable, the NEPHTN will reduce the time & resources (in both FTEs & cost) needed by federal, state & local health depts and others to identify and respond to envtl health issues including creating data-driven envtl health policies . Health care providers can use NEPHTN information to target care & preventive services and the public can use this information to better understand what is occurring in their communities. Thus, this supports CDC's goals to ensure healthy people in every stage of life (Objective (O): promote social and physical environments that are accessible; that support health, safety, and development); healthy people in healthy places (O: support a robust, sustainable capacity to provide access to and ensure receipt of essential public health services ); and people prepared for emerging health threats (O: integrate and enhance existing surveillance systems) and NCEH's efforts to prevent illness, disability and death from interactions between people and the envt. A large portion of this investment goes into extramural projects: through FY05, CDC funded state & local planning/capacity building; infrastructure enhancement; and data linkage pilot projects. In FY06, CDC funded state & local health depts to begin constructing statewide networks that will be components of NEPHTN. Extramural dollars are not reflected (per OMB request) in the Summary of Spending table. Extramural & intramural dollars can't be separated from PM strategies/analysis described in other parts of the 300 (e.g. Alt analysis).

9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?: yes

9.a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval?: 2007-06-26

10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?: yes

11.a. What is the current FAC-P/PM certification level of the project/program manager?: Senior/Expert-level

12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project.: no

12.a. Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)?: yes

12.b. Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only): no

13. Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives?: yes

If yes, select the initiatives that apply:

Initiative Name
Expanded E-Government

13.a. Briefly and specifically describe for each selected how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s)? (e.g. If E-Gov is selected, is it an approved shared service provider or the managing partner?): E-gov is supported by aligning with federal architecture, technology, & data standards & advancing use of standards & specifications such as federal geospatial standards to improve system interoperability & data comparability at the federal, state, & local levels. This will provide citizens with better, more accessible environmental health information. Efforts also focus on automating exchange of envt & health data with EPA & re-use of EPA Exchange Network vocabularies, schema, & services.

14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)?: yes

14.a. If yes, does this investment address a weakness found during the PART review?: no

14.b. If yes, what is the name of the PARTed program?: 2007: CDC - Environmental Health

14.c. If yes, what rating did the PART receive?: Adequate

15. Is this investment for information technology?: yes

16. What is the level of the IT Project (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)?: Level 2

17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council's PM Guidance): (1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment

18. Is this investment identified as high risk on the Q4 - FY 2007 agency high risk report (per OMB memorandum M-05-23)?: no

19. Is this a financial management system?: no

19.a.2. If no, what does it address?: environmental health surveillance and integration

20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2009 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)

Area	Percentage
Hardware	4
Software	1
Services	8
Other	88

21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?: n/a

22. Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions.

Name	Alice M. Brown
Phone Number	770-488-8223
Title	IT Security Project Manager
Email	AMBrown1@cdc.gov

23. Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval?: no

24. Does this investment directly support one of the GAO High Risk Areas?: no

SUMMARY OF SPEND

1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated Government FTE Cost, and should be excluded from the amounts shown for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. The total estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report. All amounts represent Budget Authority Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing partner and partner agencies). Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented.

Cost Type	Py-1 & Earlier -2006	PY 2007	CY 2008	BY 2009
Planning Budgetary Resources	8.292	1.632	0.832	0.708
Acquisition Budgetary Resources	0.000	1.088	1.942	1.981
Maintenance Budgetary Resources	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.142
Government FTE Cost	2.458	0.644	0.656	0.670
# of FTEs	12	6	6	6

2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?: yes

2.a. If "yes," how many and in what year?: Ideally, for FY07, FY08, and FY09 the investment will require 3 additional FTEs each year. However, given the availability of FTEs and the current HHS hiring restrictions, it is not anticipated that additional FTEs will be available. For this reason, the summary of spending estimates does not currently include the cost of additional desired FTEs. (additional note regarding SoS table: # of FTEs for FY02-FY05 represents the average annual number)

PERFORMANCE

In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300, performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the agency's mission and strategic goals, and performance measures (indicators) must be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and external performance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative measure.

Agencies must use the following table to report performance goals and measures for the major investment and use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding Measurement Area and Measurement Grouping identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for each of the four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov. The table can be extended to include performance measures for years beyond FY 2009.

Row	Fiscal Year	Strategic Goal Supported	Measurement Area	Measurement Grouping	Measurement Indicator	Baseline	Planned Improvement to the Baseline	Actual Results
1	2005	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of assessments (data linkage projects) completed examining the possible association between a health effect and an environmental exposure and/or hazard	0 (FY03)	13	21
2	2005	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of public health actions, developed using EPHT data, that prevent or control potential adverse health effects from environmental exposures	0	7	21
3	2005	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Innovation and Improvement	# of collaborations among multidisciplinary environmental and health agencies/organizations	0 (FY02)	+4	7
4	2005	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	External Data Sharing	# of EH data systems that are interoperable	0 (FY04)	2	2
5	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Standardization or Tagging	# of state public health departments that meet EPHT/PHIN standards and procedures for data collection, use, and reporting for EPHT data.	0 (FY05)	+12	9
6	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Standardization or Tagging	# of statewide EPHT networks that meet EPHT/PHIN standards	0 (FY05)	+12	0
7	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of health and environmental workforce trained in EPHT principles and practices	0 (FY05)	+100	135
8	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	New Customers and Market Penetration	% of environmental and pubic health professional demonstrating an awareness of EPHT	9.8% (FY05)	+10%	+17.7%
9	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Official Information Dissemination	# of states with established EPHT risk communications strategies that meet CDC guidelines	0 (FY05)	+12	0
10	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of assessments (data linkage projects) completed examining the possible association between a health effect and an environmental exposure and/or hazard	0 (FY03)	17	30
11	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of public health actions, developed using EPHT data, that prevent or control potential adverse health effects from environmental exposures	0 (FY04)	5	17
12	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Innovation and Improvement	# of collaborations among multidisciplinary environmental and health agencies/organizations	0 (FY02)	+4	+4
13	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of public health actions, developed using EPHT data, that prevent or control potential adverse health effects from environmental exposures	0 (FY04)	10	+17
14	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Standardization or Tagging	% of states whose data is integrated into the National EPHT Network	0 (FY05)	+4%	0
15	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of health and environmental workforce trained in EPHT principles and practices	0 (FY05)	+150	+229
16	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	New Customers and Market Penetration	% of environmental and pubic health professional demonstrating an awareness of EPHT	9.8% (FY05)	+15%	+15%
17	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Official Information Dissemination	# of states with established EPHT risk communications strategies that meet CDC guidelines	0(FY05)	+5	8
18	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Innovation and Improvement	# of collaborations among multidisciplinary environmental and health agencies/organizations	0 (FY02)	+2	0
19	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of public health actions, developed using EPHT data, that prevent or control potential adverse health effects from environmental exposures	0 (FY04)	+12	TBD
20	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Standardization or Tagging	% of states whose data is integrated into the National EPHT Network	0 (FY05)	+16%	TBD
21	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of health and environmental workforce trained in EPHT principles and practices	0 (FY05)	+200	TBD
22	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	New Customers and Market Penetration	% of environmental and pubic health professional demonstrating an awareness of EPHT	9.8% (FY05)	+20%	TBD
23	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Official Information Dissemination	# of states with established EPHT risk communications strategies that meet CDC guidelines	0(FY05)	+5	TBD
24	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Innovation and Improvement	# of collaborations among multidisciplinary environmental and health agencies/organizations	0 (FY02)	+2	TBD
25	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of public health actions, developed using EPHT data, that prevent or control potential adverse health effects from environmental exposures	0 (FY04)	+14	TBD
26	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Standardization or Tagging	% of states whose data is integrated into the National EPHT Network	0 (FY05)	+10%	TBD
27	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of health and environmental workforce trained in EPHT principles and practices	0 (FY05)	+250	TBD
28	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	New Customers and Market Penetration	% of environmental and pubic health professional demonstrating an awareness of EPHT	9.8% (FY05)	+25%	TBD
29	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Official Information Dissemination	# of states with established EPHT risk communications strategies that meet CDC guidelines	0 (FY05)	+4	TBD
30	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Innovation and Improvement	# of collaborations among multidisciplinary environmental and health agencies/organizations	0 (FY02)	+2	TBD
31	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of public health actions, developed using EPHT data, that prevent or control potential adverse health effects from environmental exposures	0 (FY04)	+15	TBD
32	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Standardization or Tagging	% of states whose data is integrated into the National EPHT Network	0 (FY05)	+4%	TBD
33	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of health and environmental workforce trained in EPHT principles and practices	0 (FY05)	+300	TBD
34	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	New Customers and Market Penetration	% of environmental and pubic health professional demonstrating an awareness of EPHT	9.8% (FY05)	+30%	TBD
35	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Official Information Dissemination	# of states with established EPHT risk communications strategies that meet CDC guidelines	0 (FY05)	+3	TBD
36	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Innovation and Improvement	# of collaborations among multidisciplinary environmental and health agencies/organizations	0 (FY02)	+2	TBD
37	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of public health actions, developed using EPHT data, that prevent or control potential adverse health effects from environmental exposures	TBD (FY10)	+4	TBD
38	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Standardization or Tagging	# of states whose data is integrated into the National EPHT Network	TBD (FY10)	+2	TBD
39	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	New Customers and Market Penetration	# of NEPHTN users	TBD (FY10)	+10%	TBD
40	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Official Information Dissemination	# of states with established EPHT risk communications strategies that meet CDC guidelines	TBD (FY10)	+2	TBD
41	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Innovation and Improvement	# of collaborations among multidisciplinary environmental and health agencies/organizations	TBD (FY10)	+2	TBD
42	2012	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of public health actions, developed using EPHT data, that prevent or control potential adverse health effects from environmental exposures	TBD (FY10)	+5	TBD
43	2012	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Standardization or Tagging	# of states whose data is integrated into the National EPHT Network	TBD (FY10)	+2	TBD
44	2012	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	New Customers and Market Penetration	# of NEPHTN users	TBD (FY10)	+15%	TBD
45	2012	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Official Information Dissemination	# of states with established EPHT risk communications strategies that meet CDC guidelines	TBD (FY10)	+2	TBD
46	2012	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Innovation and Improvement	# of collaborations among multidisciplinary environmental and health agencies/organizations	TBD (FY10)	+2	TBD
47	2013	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	# of public health actions, developed using EPHT data, that prevent or control potential adverse health effects from environmental exposures	TBD (FY10)	+6	TBD
48	2013	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Standardization or Tagging	# of states whose data is integrated into the National EPHT Network	TBD (FY10)	+2	TBD
49	2013	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	New Customers and Market Penetration	# of NEPHTN users	TBD (FY10)	+20%	TBD
50	2013	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Official Information Dissemination	# of states with established EPHT risk communications strategies that meet CDC guidelines	TBD (FY10)	+2	TBD

Enterprise Architecture

In order to successfully address this area of the business case and capital asset plan you must ensure the investment is included in the agency's EA and Capital Planning and Investment Control (CPIC) process, and is mapped to and supports the FEA. You must also ensure the business case demonstrates the relationship between the investment and the business, performance, data, services, application, and technology layers of the agency's EA.

1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?: yes

2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?: yes

2.a. If yes, provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment.: CDC PHIN: National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network (NEPHTN)

3. Is this investment identified in a completed (contains a target architecture) and approved segment architecture?: no

4. Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/. Component: Use existing SRM Components or identify as NEW. A NEW component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM. Reused Name and UPI: A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission. Internal or External Reuse?: Internal reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. External reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government. Funding Percentage: Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for the service.

Row	Agency Component Name	Agency Component Description	Service Type	Component	Internal or External Reuse?	Funding %
1	Query	Defines the set of capabilities that support retrieval of records that satisfy specific query selection criteria.	Search	Query	No Reuse	5
2	Content Publishing and Delivery	Defines the set of capabilities that allow for the propagation of interactive programs.	Content Management	Content Publishing and Delivery	No Reuse	5
3	Knowledge Distribution and Delivery	Defines the set of capabilities that support the transfer of knowledge to the end customer.	Knowledge Management	Knowledge Distribution and Delivery	No Reuse	2
4	Standardized / Canned	Defines the set of capabilities that support the use of pre-conceived or pre-written reports.	Reporting	Standardized / Canned	No Reuse	2
5	Ad Hoc	Defines the set of capabilities that support the use of dynamic reports on an as needed basis.	Reporting	Ad Hoc	No Reuse	2
6	Mathematical	Defines the set of capabilities that support the formulation and mathematical analysis of probabilistic models for random phenomena and the development and investigation of methods and principles for statistical inference.	Analysis and Statistics	Mathematical	No Reuse	10
7	Data Mining	Defines the set of capabilities that provide for the efficient discovery of non-obvious, valuable patterns and relationships within a large collection of data.	Knowledge Discovery	Data Mining	No Reuse	10
8	Graphing / Charting	Defines the set of capabilities that support the presentation of information in the form of diagrams or tables.	Visualization	Graphing / Charting	No Reuse	5
9	Data Warehouse	Defines the set of capabilities that support the archiving and storage of large volumes of data.	Data Management	Data Warehouse	No Reuse	10
10	Data Classification	Defines the set of capabilities that allow the classification of data.	Data Management	Data Classification	No Reuse	5
11	Extraction and Transformation	Defines the set of capabilities that support the manipulation and change of data.	Data Management	Extraction and Transformation	No Reuse	10
12	Loading and Archiving	Defines the set of capabilities that support the population of a data source with external data.	Data Management	Loading and Archiving	No Reuse	4
13	Data Exchange	Defines the set of capabilities that support the interchange of information between multiple systems or applications; includes verification that transmitted data was received unaltered.	Data Management	Data Exchange	No Reuse	15
14	Data Integration	Defines the set of capabilities that support the organization of data from separate data sources into a single source using middleware or application integration and the modification of system data models to capture new information within a single system.	Development and Integration	Data Integration	No Reuse	15

5. To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment. FEA SRM Component: Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications. Service Specification: In the Service Specification field, Agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate.

Row	SRM Component	>Service Area	Service Category	Service Standard	Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name)
1	Data Exchange	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Dependent	DataFerret
2	Data Exchange	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	ISS RealSecure
3	Data Exchange	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Wide Area Network (WAN)	SONET, Bellsouth
4	Data Exchange	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Supporting Network Services	T1
5	Data Exchange	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Supporting Network Services	T3
6	Data Exchange	Component Framework	Security	Certificates / Digital Signatures	VeriSign
7	Extraction and Transformation	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	PHIN Vocabulary and Messaging Specifications
8	Query	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Support Platforms	Platform Independent	Java 2 Enterprise Edition
9	Query	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Java DataBase Connectivity (JDBC)
10	Query	Component Framework	Presentation / Interface	Dynamic Server-Side Display	Java Server Pages
11	Query	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	PHIN Vocabulary and Messaging Specifications
12	Query	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Modeling	Unified Modeling Language
13	Content Publishing and Delivery	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1
14	Knowledge Distribution and Delivery	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	PHIN Vocabulary and Messaging Specifications
15	Standardized / Canned	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Java DataBase Connectivity (JDBC)
16	Ad Hoc	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Java DataBase Connectivity (JDBC)
17	Mathematical	Component Framework	Presentation / Interface	Dynamic Server-Side Display	Java Server Pages
18	Data Mining	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Java DataBase Connectivity (JDBC)
19	Graphing / Charting	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Support Platforms	Platform Independent	Java 2 Enterprise Edition
20	Graphing / Charting	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Java DataBase Connectivity (JDBC)
21	Graphing / Charting	Component Framework	Presentation / Interface	Dynamic Server-Side Display	Java Server Pages
22	Data Warehouse	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Modeling	Unified Modeling Language
23	Data Classification	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	PHIN Vocabulary and Messaging Specifications
24	Loading and Archiving	Component Framework	Data Interchange	Data Exchange	Electronic Business using XML
25	Loading and Archiving	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1
26	Data Integration	Component Framework	Data Interchange	Data Exchange	Electronic Business using XML
27	Data Integration	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Supporting Network Services	EPA Exchange Network - Network Management

6. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?: yes

6.a. If yes, please describe.: This investment leverages: Federal Health Architecture (FHA)

PART TWO

RISK

You should perform a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of the investment's life-cycle, develop a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment's life-cycle.

Answer the following questions to describe how you are managing investment risks.

1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?: yes

1.a. If yes, what is the date of the plan?: 2006-06-30

1.b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?: no

2.b. If no, what is the strategy for managing the risks?: N/A

3. Briefly describe how investment risks are reflected in the life cycle cost estimate and investment schedule:: Based on the risk management plan, the cost and schedule estimates initially developed for FY2009 were adjusted in order to accommodate for the identified risks that have cost or schedule implications. The Risk Management Plan describes how risks associated with the NEPHTN will be managed. It outlines how risk management activities will be performed, recorded, and monitored throughout the lifecycle of the NEPHTN project and provides templates and practices for recording and prioritizing risks. The risk adjusted costs are included in the Summary of Spending table and the risk-adjusted costs and schedule are included in the Cost and Schedule Performance section.

COST & SCHEDULE

1. Does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard 748?: yes

2. Is the CV% or SV% greater than ± 10%?: no

2.b. If yes, explain the variance.

3. Has the investment re-baselined during the past fiscal year?: no