by
Michael T. Kleinman, Ph.D.
Professor,
Department of Community
and Environmental Medicine
University of California, Irvine.
Fall 2000 |
Introduction
Why are Children More Susceptible to Air Pollution Than Adults?
- The Lung's Important Role in Health
- USC Children's Health Study
Which Air Pollutants Have the Greatest Impact on the Health of Children and
Adults?
- Ozone
- Ozone formation
- Ozone Air Quality Standards
- How Ozone Damages Lungs
- Is Ozone-Related Lung Damage Permanent?
- Research and Air Quality Standards
- How to Reduce Ozone Exposure
- Carbon Monoxide
- Who is Most Sensitive to the Health Effects of Carbon Monoxide?
- Air Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide
- Sources of Carbon Monoxide
- Health Effects of Carbon Monoxide
- Prenatal Effects of Carbon Monoxide
- Airborne Particles
- The Challenge of Measuring Particle Pollution
- Sources of Particle Pollution
- Historic Air Pollution Disasters
- Health Effects of Particulate Pollution
- Nitrogen Oxides
- Health Effects of Nitrogen Dioxide
- Improvements in Nitrogen Dioxide Measurements
- Lead
- Sources of Lead Pollution
- Sulfur Oxides
- Diesel Emissions
What Can Be Done to Reduce the Effects of Air Pollution on Children's
Health?
Footnotes
Glossary of terms used in this article.
Air pollution has many effects on the health of both adults and children. The
purpose of this article will be to examine what is known about how air pollution
affects health, especially children's.
Over the past several years the incidence of a number of diseases has
increased greatly. Asthma is perhaps the most important disease with an
increasing incidence, but other diseases, such as allergic reactions, bronchitis
and respiratory infections also have been increasing. The cause of these
increases may be due at least in part to the effects of air pollution. This
review will address the following questions:
- Why are children more susceptible to the effects of air pollution than
adults?
- Which air pollutants have the greatest impact on the health of children
and adults?
- What can be done to reduce the effects of air pollution on children's
health?
[Table of Contents]
In many health effects research studies, children are considered as if they
were small adults. This is not really true. There are many differences between
children and adults in the ways that they respond to air pollution. For example,
children take in more air per unit body weight at a given level of exertion than
do adults. When a child is exercising at maximum levels, such as during a soccer
game or other sports event, they may take in 20 percent to 50 percent more air
-- and more air pollution -- than would an adult in comparable activity.
Another important difference is that children do not necessarily respond to
air pollution in the same way as adults. Adults exposed to low levels of the
pollutant ozone will experience symptoms such as coughing, soreness in their
chests, sore throats, and sometimes headaches. Children, on the other hand, may
not feel the same symptoms, or at least they do not acknowledge them when asked
by researchers. It is currently not known if children actually do not feel the
symptoms or if they ignore them while preoccupied with play activities.
This probably does not mean that children are less sensitive to air pollution
than adults. There are several good studies that show children to have losses in
lung functions even when they don’t cough or feel discomfort. This is important
because symptoms are often warning signals and can be used to trigger protective
behavior. Children may not perceive these warning signals and might not reduce
their activities on smoggy days.
Children also spend more time outside than adults. The average adult, except
for those who work mostly outdoors, spends most of their time indoors -- at
home, work, or even at the gym. Children spend more time outside, and are often
outdoors during periods when air pollution is at its highest.
The typical adult spends 85 percent to 95 percent of their time indoors,
while children may spend less than 80 percent of their time indoors. Children
may also exert themselves harder than adults when playing outside.
Perhaps the most important difference between adults and children is that
children are growing and developing. Along with their increased body size,
children's lungs are growing and changing, too.
The Lung's Important Role in Health
The lung is an extremely complex organ. While most organs in your body are made
up of a few different types of cells, the lung contains more than 40 different
kinds of cells. Each of these cells is important to health and maintaining the
body's fitness.
Air pollution can change the cells in the lung by damaging those that are
most susceptible. If the cells that are damaged are important in the development
of new functional parts of the lung, then the lung may not achieve its full
growth and function as a child matures to adulthood. Although very little
research has been conducted to address this extremely important issue, this
review will discuss the information that is available.
USC Children's Health Study
Recent results from the Children’s Health Study, conducted by investigators at
the University of Southern California, suggest that children with asthma are at
much greater risk of increased asthma symptoms when they live in communities
with higher levels of ozone and particles and participate in three or more
competitive sports. Having said all this, the purpose of this review is not to
discourage children or adults from normal daily activities and outdoor exercise.
Exercise has very important, beneficial outcomes. Appropriate exercise and
prudent exposures of children and adults should be encouraged even in an
environment that may always contain some amount of air pollution.
[Table of Contents]
Ozone is one of the most important air pollutants affecting human health in
regions like Southern California.
Ozone (O3) is a molecule built of three atoms of oxygen linked together in a
very energetic combination. When ozone comes into contact with a surface it
rapidly releases this extra force in the form of chemical energy. When this
happens in biological systems, such as the respiratory tract, this energy can
cause damage to sensitive tissues in the upper and lower airways.
Ozone formation
Because ozone forms as a product of solar energy and photochemical
reactions of pollutants, it is not surprising that the highest concentrations of
ozone in the atmosphere occur when sunlight is most intense. Thus, ozone
generally reaches peak levels during the middle of the day in the summer months.
These types of air pollution patterns are called diurnal and seasonal
variations. The following graph shows that ozone levels in the San Bernardino
Mountains are highest in the summer and fall, and peak in the late afternoon.
Ozone Air Quality Standards
Federal and state agencies have set air quality
standards for ozone. An ozone level greater than 0.08 parts per million (ppm)
averaged over eight hours is considered unhealthful. This level has been set
because both laboratory and community studies have demonstrated measurable
effects of ozone at or above that threshold.
The effects of ozone on people include:
- irritation of the nose and throat;
- increased mucus production and tendency to cough;
- eye irritation and headaches for some; and
- during severe episodes, chest pain and difficulty taking a deep breath
without coughing.
How Ozone Damages Lungs
What happens when you breathe air that is
contaminated with ozone? Like oxygen, ozone is soluble in the fluids that line
the respiratory tract. Therefore some ozone can penetrate into the gas-exchange,
or alveolar, region of the deep lung.
The following photos show how ozone affects the sensitive tissue in the deep
lung. The pictures are from the lungs of rats exposed to ozone in a laboratory
under carefully controlled conditions. The human lung is similar --although not
identical -- to the rat’s lung in terms of the types of cells and the overall
structure of the alveolar region.
Figure 1 shows a magnified view of the structure
of the normal gas-exchange region of the lung. It is called the gas-exchange
region because oxygen inhaled from the air is transferred to the hemoglobin
in blood in small blood vessels located inside the thin walls separating the
alveolar air spaces.
At the same time, carbon dioxide, produced by normal metabolism and dissolved
in the blood, is excreted into the air and expired when you breathe out.
The walls of a normal alveolus are very thin. There are only two layers of
cells and a thin interstitial matrix separating the air in the alveolar space,
or lumen, from the fluid inside the blood vessels. The cells that line the
healthy alveoli are mostly very broad and very thin, and are called Type I lung
cells or Type I pneumocytes. This provides a very large surface area across
which gases can be efficiently transported.
At the same time, carbon dioxide, produced by normal metabolism and dissolved
in the blood, is excreted into the air and expired when you breathe out.
The walls of a normal alveolus are very thin. There are only two layers of
cells and a thin interstitial matrix separating the air in the alveolar space,
or lumen, from the fluid inside the blood vessels. The cells that line the
healthy alveoli are mostly very broad and very thin, and are called Type I lung
cells or Type I pneumocytes. This provides a very large surface area across
which gases can be efficiently transported.
Figure 2 shows the effects of breathing 0.2 ppm ozone for 4 hours. In
Southern California air pollution levels can approach 0.2 ppm -- a Stage 1 ozone
alert -- during the smoggiest summer days. The photo shows evidence of
additional cells, called macrophages, and some material that may be fragments of
ozone-injured alveolar wall cells inside the alveolar space.
Macrophages are immune system cells that respond to the injury of the
delicate cells that line the alveolar lumen. These macrophages play important
roles in protecting the lungs from inhaled bacteria, fungi and viruses, and are
also important in helping to repair lung tissue injury caused by inhaled
pollutants.
Figure 3 shows more extensive damage following exposure a higher
concentration of ozone, 0.6 ppm. The alveolar walls are thicker and there is
evidence of cells infiltrating within the walls. There are more macrophages in
the alveolar spaces and the thin, Type I cells have been damaged and replaced
with thicker Type II, almost cube-shaped cells that are more resistant to the
toxic effects of ozone. All of these changes occurred within 48 hours after
exposure. If exposure continues for more than three days, the evidence of cell
injury seems to be reduced, except for the continuing presence of the Type II
cells.
Is Ozone-Related Lung Damage Permanent?
People actually report that the symptoms they feel when first exposed to ozone
seem to go away, even though their exposure continues.
Following ozone injury, if the lung is not exposed to ozone for approximately
five to seven days, it can for the most part repair itself provided the injury
is not too extensive. However, long-term studies with laboratory animals have
shown that there may be residual and in some cases permanent damage. This damage
might be thought of as accelerated aging of the lung. Thus, frequent exposures
to ozone can cause transient damage. The lung's defenses can repair most but
probably not all of that damage within a relatively short time in most healthy
individuals.
Research and Air Quality Standards
Health scientists probably know more about the effects of ozone on human health
than about any other pollutants. This is because ozone is pervasive in the
environment. Also there are excellent methods of measuring ozone so the
pollutant can be studied using epidemiological methods. The findings of these
epidemiological studies can be verified using well-controlled laboratory studies
with human volunteers and laboratory animals. Thousands of scientific papers on
the health effects of ozone have been published and these have been critically
reviewed in documents that provide the scientific basis for National and State
Ambient Air Quality Standards. (Ambient refers to outdoor air.)
These so-called Criteria Documents are important because they are extensively
reviewed by scientists, public agencies, industry representatives, environmental
groups such as the American Lung Association and the Natural Resources Defense
Council, and the public. National and state ambient air quality standards set
the goals for healthy air quality in Southern California and across the country.
Based upon the most recent studies, it is now apparent that ozone plays an
important role in causing acute health effects, such as heightening asthma
symptoms and developing bronchitis symptoms.
The role of ozone in producing long-term or chronic effects is less clear, at
least from the available epidemiological studies. However, laboratory animal
studies suggest that there can be long-term consequences.
How to Reduce Ozone Exposure
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recommended that ozone should
not exceed 0.08 ppm averaged over an 8-hr period. When ozone exceeds this level,
active children and adults, those with respiratory disease such as asthma, and
other people with unusual susceptibility to ozone should limit prolonged outdoor
exposure.
Incidentally, personal tobacco smoking during periods of high ozone exposure
doubled the risk of asthmatic individuals needing to go to the emergency room
for treatment of asthma symptoms.
[Table of Contents]
Carbon monoxide (CO), a colorless, odorless gas, is a byproduct of
combustion.
When inhaled, carbon monoxide reacts very rapidly with hemoglobin in the
blood, preventing uptake and transport of oxygen. Because carbon monoxide
readily and firmly attaches to hemoglobin, it stays in the blood for a
relatively long time. Thus, during an exposure carbon monoxide concentrations in
blood can rise in a matter of minutes, then stay high for hours.
Who is Most Sensitive to the Health Effects of Carbon Monoxide?
Most of the health effects directly associated with carbon monoxide are most
likely due to decreases in oxygen delivery to vital organs such as the heart and
the brain.
People with heart disease may be especially sensitive to the effects of
carbon monoxide. In addition, people with lung diseases that limit efficient use
of inhaled oxygen, such as asthma and emphysema, may also be susceptible. Even
in people without heart or lung diseases, reduced delivery of oxygen to skeletal
muscles, especially during exercise, can reduce the ability to perform strenuous
work.
At high levels of carbon monoxide exposure, impaired delivery of oxygen to
the central nervous system can reduce the ability to respond quickly to external
stimuli. After exposures that convert 5 percent to 10 percent of the circulating
hemoglobin to carboxyhemoglobin (COHb), people's ability to recognize and react
to flashes of light in a test system are reduced. At 10 percent to 30 percent
carboxyhemoglobin, nausea, headaches, unconsciousness, and sometimes death can
result. The severity of symptoms increases with the concentration of
carboxyhemoglobin.
Air Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide
Both the EPA and the State of California have set air quality standards for
carbon monoxide based on the results of epidemiological and laboratory findings.
Ambient levels of carbon monoxide should not exceed 9 ppm, when averaged over an
8-hour interval, and should not exceed 20 ppm in any one-hour period. (The USEPA
has a slightly higher 1-hour standard of 35 ppm).
Sources of Carbon Monoxide
The major sources of carbon monoxide pollution are automotive exhaust and
emissions from large industrial combustion sources such as electrical power
plants. Because these sources produce many contaminants in addition to carbon
monoxide -- such as fine particles and nitrogen oxides -- it is often difficult
to isolate the health effects of ambient carbon monoxide from those of other
pollutants.
In addition to carbon monoxide generated outside, there are also important
indoor sources of the pollutant. The most important of these are combustion
sources such as gas ovens, gas burners, water heaters, and heating systems.
However, in most cases emissions from well-maintained and vented gas appliances
are small.
Tobacco smoking is a more significant source of carbon monoxide. Tobacco
smoke can contain very high concentrations of carbon monoxide (1,000 ppm to
50,000 ppm). Carbon monoxide levels in the homes of children whose relatives
smoke tobacco products can be higher than the carbon monoxide levels outdoors.
Health Effects of Carbon Monoxide
There are hundreds of cases per year of deaths or severe illness due to carbon
monoxide poisoning from faulty appliances, indoor emissions of automobile
exhaust and industrial exposures. These cases show that carbon monoxide
poisoning causes symptoms very similar to those of the flu. In fact, the true
number of cases is not really known because many people may have been poisoned
slightly and thought that they were just fighting off a cold or the flu. Thus it
is very important to make sure that home appliances are well-maintained and that
all combustion sources are properly vented to the outdoors.
Epidemiological studies have shown significant association between several
health effects and carbon monoxide, although as mentioned earlier it is
difficult to completely isolate carbon monoxide's effects from those of other
air pollutants.
For example, asthmatic children in Taiwan who were exposed to high levels of
traffic-related air pollution -- using carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide as
marker compounds-- reported more respiratory symptoms than children with lower
exposures.
A study of physician office visits in London showed associations between air
pollution and doctor visits for asthma and other lower respiratory disease. For
children, levels of nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, and sulfur dioxide were
associated with increased numbers of medical consultations. However, in adults,
the only consistent association was with levels of airborne particles. This
suggests that children and adults might respond differently to pollution
exposures.
Prenatal Effects of Carbon Monoxide
Carbon monoxide may also have prenatal effects. Pregnant women who were exposed
to high levels of ambient carbon monoxide (5 ppm to 6 ppm) were at increased
risk of having low birth-weight babies. It has long been known that women who
smoke cigarettes during pregnancy have low birth-weight babies, but this is the
first study of similar findings in women exposed to environmental carbon
monoxide.
Babies exposed to carbon monoxide during the maturation of their organs may
suffer permanent changes to those organs. Studies using newborn rats showed that
carbon monoxide exposure could cause changes in the heart muscle tissue. This is
turn could increase the severity of effects of artery constrictions when they
became adults. Other animal studies have shown that long-term carbon monoxide
exposure can contribute to a disease called ventricular hypertrophy, in which
the cells of the heart's ventricle chambers are enlarged and possibly weakened.
[Table of Contents]
Particles, including nitrates, sulfates, carbon1
and acid aerosols2 are a complex group of
pollutants.
Unlike ozone, which has a specific chemical composition, airborne particles
vary in size and composition depending on time and location. Although the
components of particles may have common sources, the types and amounts of
particles collected at any one time and location may be unique.
To add to the problem, gaseous pollutants including ozone, sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide often are present in the atmosphere at the
same time as are particles. It is not always possible to clearly differentiate
between the health effects of the gases, the particles, and possibly the
combination of particles and gases. This complexity presents a tremendous
challenge to the scientific community and to public in trying to understand how
inhaled particles affect human health.
The Challenge of Measuring Particle Pollution
Precisely measuring particulate pollution is more difficult and labor intensive
than measuring gaseous pollutants such as ozone. For this reason, particle
concentrations are not measured on a daily basis in most communities.
Frequently, they are measured once every six days.
Particle samples are collected on filters that are then weighed. Particle
concentrations are reported in terms of micrograms of particles per cubic meter
(µg/m3) of collected air.
Originally, the particle samples were relatively indiscriminate with respect
to particle size and often contained very large particles. These large particles
contributed a great deal to the weighed particle mass, but might not have been
very important with respect to lung health. This is because most of the
particles were too large to penetrate through the nasal and head airways to
reach the lung. A more health-related sample was needed.
After a great deal of scientific consideration it was decided that
particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters3
less than or equal to 10 microns (µm) should be collected. Ambient air quality
standards were developed for this material, which is called PM10.
Sources of Particle Pollution
Researchers noted that the sources of relatively large-size particles (greater
than 3 microns in aerodynamic diameter) were quite distinct from the sources of
particles less than 1 micron in diameter.
The larger, so-called "coarse" particles are mostly produced by mechanical
processes, such as automobile tire wear on the road, industrial cutting,
grinding and pulverizing processes and re-suspension of particles from the
ground or other surfaces by wind and human activities. The chemical composition
of coarse particles may be somewhat similar to the chemical composition of soil
in that area, along with industrial compounds from activities such as mining or
smelting operations. The coarse fraction of urban aerosols also contains bits of
plants, molds, spores and some bacteria. Thus the characteristics of the coarse
particles may vary greatly in different communities.
In contrast, the smaller or so-called "fine" particles in the urban aerosol
come from combustion sources, such as power plants, automobile, truck, bus and
other vehicle exhaust or from the reactions that transform some of the pollutant
gases into solid or liquid particles. These distinctions may be important
because the current air pollution health effects literature suggests, although
not with certainty, that for some key health effects the fine particles are more
important than the coarse particles. These findings have led EPA to propose a
new nationwide PM2.5 standard that would reduce exposure to particles that are
2.5 microns or less in diameter.
Historic Air Pollution Disasters
Epidemiological studies have consistently associated adverse health effects with
exposures to particulate air pollution. Early studies implicated particulate and
sulfur dioxide pollution in the acute illnesses and premature deaths associated
with extremely severe pollution episodes in Donora, Penn., London, and New York
in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s. The particle levels in a four-week pollution
disaster in London in 1955 were more than 50 times higher than the California
standard. Twenty percent of that aerosol was composed of acid sulfates --
probably sulfuric acid. The number of people hospitalized for lung or
heart-related diseases was extraordinarily high, but more importantly there were
more than 4,000 premature, or "excess," deaths in the London population.
Fortunately, major efforts by government agencies, the public, and industries
have made it very unlikely there will ever be a similar episode in modern urban
communities. However, the lessons learned from these disasters are still
relevant. Despite the fact that our levels of airborne particles are much lower
than those that occurred during the disasters, EPA estimates that there are
still more than 6,000 excess deaths in the United States that could be
associated with inhaled particles.
Health Effects of Particulate Pollution
Current ambient levels of PM10 -- 30 to 150 micrograms per cubic meter -- are
associated with increases in the numbers of people that die daily from heart or
lung failure. Most of these deaths are among the elderly. However there is a
strong body of evidence that some children are also adversely affected by
particulate matter.
The American Thoracic Society’s Environmental and Occupational Health
Assembly reviewed current health effects literature. They report that daily
fluctuations in PM10 levels have been related to: • acute respiratory hospital
admissions in children; • school and kindergarten absences; • decreases in peak
lung air flow rates in normal children; and • increased medication use in
children and adults with asthma.
The USC Children’s Health Study suggests that children with asthma living in
a community with high particle concentrations may have suppressed lung growth.
After children moved into cleaner cities their lung growth returned to the
normal rate, but they did not recover the lost potential growth, according to
John Peters, the study's principle investigator.
It is difficult to positively assign a quantitative risk associated with
particulate matter because nearly all studies of its health effects find other
pollutants present that may account for some of the effects.
Part of the problem is due to the nature of the data being collected. The
levels of particulate matter vary during the course of the day and peak values
can be quite high. Few studies have evaluated the effect of these short-term
"spikes." However, at least one epidemiological study of children with asthma
suggested that changes in symptoms and lung function correlate more strongly
with 1-hour peaks than with 24-hour average concentrations.
Other studies, primarily with laboratory animals, suggest that the chemical
composition and surface areas of the particles may be more important than
particle mass. Scientists are continuing to study the health effects of
particles and are developing better methods for measuring the important
constituents. It may be possible in the near future to more accurately assess
the effects of inhaled particles on human health.
[Table of Contents]
Nitrogen oxides are produced during most combustion processes. Mobile sources
and power plants are the major contributors in Southern California.
About 80 percent of the immediately released nitrogen oxide is in the form
nitric oxide (NO). Small amounts of nitrous oxide (N2O) are also produced.
Nitrous oxide is a "greenhouse" gas that is suspected of playing an important
role in global warming.
Nitric oxide reacts with oxygen in the air to produce nitrogen dioxide (NO2).
Further oxidation during the day causes the nitrogen dioxide to form nitric acid
and nitrate particles. In the dark, nitrogen dioxide can react with ozone and
form a very reactive free radical. The free radical then can react with organic
compounds in the air to form nitrogenated organic compounds, some of which have
been shown to be mutagenic and carcinogenic.
Health Effects of Nitrogen Dioxide
Nitrogen dioxide is the most important nitrogen oxide compound with respect to
acute adverse health effects. Under most chemical conditions it is an oxidant,
as is ozone. However, it takes about 10 times more nitrogen dioxide than ozone
to cause significant lung irritation and inflammation.
Nitrogen dioxide differs from ozone in that it suppresses the immune system
to a much greater degree. As discussed below, some epidemiological studies have
shown that children exposed to high levels of ambient nitrogen dioxide may be at
increased risk of respiratory infections. Studies with laboratory animals have
indeed shown that if mice are exposed first to nitrogen dioxide and later to
bacteria at a level that would not infect a healthy control animal, their normal
lung defense mechanisms are suppressed and the bacteria are able to infect the
host.
Average levels of nitrogen dioxide in the United States range from 0.02 to
0.04 ppm. Levels in major urban areas in Southern California may be higher, but
the region has not exceeded the federal standard4
for nitrogen dioxide since 1991.
During the 1970s, one of the first studies relating respiratory illnesses and
changes in lung function to ambient nitrogen dioxide concentrations reported
that children living in areas with high nitrogen dioxide concentrations had
greater incidences of lung-related illness than children living in areas with
lower concentrations. Since then, other epidemiological studies have suggested
that children with asthma are more likely than children without asthma to have
reduced lung function and symptoms of respiratory irritation, such as cough and
sore throat, when outdoor average nitrogen dioxide concentrations exceed about
0.02 ppm.
Some studies also have suggested that children younger than five years old
may be more severely affected by nitrogen dioxide than older children. Several
epidemiological studies have suggested that for children, the most important
effect of ambient exposure to nitrogen dioxide might be increased susceptibility
to respiratory infections and increased severity of responses to inhaled
allergens.
Although many epidemiological studies show significant associations between
outdoor nitrogen dioxide concentrations and adverse health outcomes, some
studies do not corroborate these effects. In part, this is because it is often
difficult to fully account for the influences of indoor sources of nitrogen
dioxide.
Improvements in Nitrogen Dioxide Measurements
More recent studies have used special devices, called passive dosimeters, that
can be worn by children to collect nitrogen dioxide for later analysis. These
measurements give epidemiologists the ability to better assess a child's total
nitrogen dioxide exposure over the course of the day. These studies show that
there can be a great deal of individual variation in exposures, even for
children living in the same communities. Thus, it is not surprising that
epidemiological studies that do not estimate a nitrogen dioxide dose may reach
different conclusions.
However, laboratory studies involving controlled exposures of human
volunteers and laboratory animals have demonstrated plausible effects of
nitrogen dioxide on human health. For example, if one exposes rats or other
animals to nitrogen dioxide, and then examines their respiratory tract tissues,
it is very evident that the pollutant can cause short-term injury similar to
that seen after ozone exposure.
Long-term exposures to high concentrations of nitrogen dioxide can produce
chronic damage to respiratory tract tissue that resembles the lung disease
emphysema.
The pollutant's suppression of immune system functions reduces the ability of
the host to fight off bacterial and viral infections. Human volunteers who
inhaled weakened influenza virus after being exposed to nitrogen dioxide in
laboratories were more susceptible to the infection than a control group that
did not inhale nitrogen dioxide.
Other studies show that nitrogen dioxide decreases the body's ability to
generate antibodies when challenged by pathogens, and may reduce the ability of
the respiratory system to remove foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses
from the lung.
People can be exposed to lead (Pb) through air, food and water. Lead is a
toxic heavy metal that causes nerve damage and impairs the body's ability to
make hemoglobin, leading to a form of anemia.
Sources of Lead Pollution
Large amounts of lead were emitted to the atmosphere when it was used as a
gasoline additive.5 The emitted lead could be inhaled. In addition, lead fallout
from the air caused widespread contamination of soil, plants, food products, and
water.
Lead is often measured in children's blood as an index of environmental
exposure. Even low levels of lead6 in the blood of children aged 6 to 7 are
linked to measurable changes in intelligence quotient and certain
perceptual-motor skills. Higher levels of lead exposure can also result in
kidney damage and may be related to high blood pressure in adults.
[Table of Contents]
Most manmade emissions of the gas sulfur dioxide (SO2) come primarily from
the combustion of fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and diesel fuel.
Most of the sulfur in fossil fuel is converted sulfur dioxide, but a small
amount is also converted to sulfuric acid. In the atmosphere, gaseous sulfur
dioxide can also be converted to sulfuric acid and sulfate-containing particles.
Thus, atmospheric concentrations of sulfur dioxide are often highly associated
with acidic particles, sulfuric acid particles and sulfate particle
concentrations.
The current National Ambient Air Quality Standards for sulfur dioxide are 18
micrograms per cubic meter averaged annually, and 365 micrograms per cubic meter
averaged over 24 hours. Southern California does not exceed the national air
quality standard because its industries primarily burn low-sulfur fuels such as
natural gas. Much of the sulfur oxide air pollution in Southern California is
likely to be associated with diesel emissions.
Sulfur dioxide is a very water-soluble gas and therefore most of the sulfur
dioxide that is inhaled is absorbed in the upper respiratory tract and does not
reach the lung's airways. However, the small amount of sulfur dioxide that does
penetrate into the airways can provoke important health effects, primarily in
individuals with asthma.
For those with asthma, even relatively short-term, low-level exposures to
sulfur dioxide can result in airway constriction leading to difficulty in
breathing and possibly contribute to the severity of an asthmatic attack.
A number of epidemiological studies have shown associations between ambient
sulfur dioxide and rates of mortality (death) and morbidity (illness). However,
because sulfur dioxide is often strongly correlated with fine particles and
especially sulfate-containing particles, it is difficult to separate the effects
of sulfur dioxide from those of the particle compounds.
A study in France found an increase of 2.9 visits to the emergency room for
every 20 micrograms per cubic meter increase in atmospheric sulfur dioxide. The
results pertained to days when the average sulfur dioxide levels were above 68
micrograms per cubic meter but below the U.S. health standard.
In London, asthma and other lower respiratory diseases in children were most
significantly associated with exposures to nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide,
and sulfur dioxide. In adults the only consistent association was with
particulate matter.
Hospital admissions for children with asthma may increase by 20 percent
following acute exposure to ozone peaks and possibly with sulfur dioxide.
Chronic exposure to increased levels of fine particles, sulfur dioxide, and
nitrogen dioxide may be associated with up to threefold increase in nonspecific
respiratory symptoms. Thus, recent literature suggests that sulfur dioxide
affects adults and children differently and that chronic and acute effects may
also be different.
[Table of Contents]
Diesel fuel is burned to power buses, trucks, road-building equipment,
trains, boats and ships and electricity-generating equipment. When diesel fuel
is burned, the exhaust includes both particles and gases. Diesel emissions are
important constituents of ambient air pollution.
What's in Diesel?
Diesel particles consist mainly of elemental carbon and other carbon-containing
compounds. Hundreds of compounds have been identified as constituents of diesel
particles. These include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and other
compounds that have been associated with tumor formation and cancer. In 1998,
the California Air Resources Board designated diesel particulate a
cancer-causing toxic air contaminant.
Diesel particles are microscopic. More than 90 percent of them are less than
1 micron in diameter. Due to their minute size, diesel particles can penetrate
deeply into the lung. There is evidence that once in the lung, diesel particles
may stay there for a long time.
In addition to particles, diesel exhaust contains several gaseous compounds
including carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide and organic vapors,
for example formaldehyde and 1,3-butadiene. Formaldehyde and 1,3-butadiene have
been classified as toxic and hazardous air pollutants. Both have been shown to
cause tumors in animal studies and there is evidence that exposure to high
levels of 1,3-butadiene can cause cancer in humans.
AQMD's recent landmark research project, the Multiple Air Toxics Exposure
Study II, found that diesel particulate is responsible for about 70 percent of
the total cancer risk from all toxic air pollution in the greater Los Angeles
metropolitan area.
Diesel emissions may also be a problem for asthmatics. Some studies suggest
that children with asthma who live near roadways with high amounts of diesel
truck traffic have more asthma attacks and use more asthma medication.
Some human volunteers, exposed to diesel exhaust in carefully controlled
laboratory studies, reported symptoms such as eye and throat irritation,
coughing, phlegm production, difficulty breathing, headache, lightheadedness,
nausea and perception of unpleasant odors. Another laboratory study, in which
volunteers were exposed to relatively high levels of diesel particles for about
an hour, showed that such exposures could cause lung inflammation.
Thus current epidemiological and laboratory evidence suggests that at typical
urban concentrations, diesel exhaust may contribute significantly to the health
effects of air pollution.
[Table of Contents]
After reviewing the literature on how children’s exposures differ from those
of adults, it is evident that:
- children are outdoors more hours per day than most adults;
- they exert themselves to a greater degree while they are outside than most
adults; and
- they participate in more organized activities than adults.
There are definite health benefits to having children participate in outdoor
activities. However, scientific evidence also suggests that air pollution
exposures can injure children’s lungs and other organs.
Air quality information in the form of health reports and air quality
advisories are now a regular part of life in California. One logical step is to
reduce strenuous activities during pollution episodes and try to take advantage
of those hours when airborne pollutant levels are lower.
At the public level there is a long-standing commitment to improve air
quality. When you look at the air pollution levels in California today you can
see that a great deal of progress has been made. There has been a cost for this
progress. For instance, some products are more expensive. In return, the lower
levels of pollutant exposure compared to 20 years ago should decrease the
adverse effect of air pollution on the long-term health of our developing
children.
[Table of Contents]
Footnotes:
- Both elemental and organic. Elemental carbon is pure carbon from
combustion sources, including diesel particulate. Organic carbon is a
semi-volatile hydrocarbon from combustion and some evaporative sources.
- Aerosol is the scientific term used to describe particles suspended in a
fluid, such as air.
- Aerodynamic diameter is used to define particles' size. Particle
deposition on a surface, or in the lung, depends on the particle’s aerodynamic
and diffusion characteristics. A particle's aerodynamic characteristics depend
on its density, shape, actual size, and velocity while its diffusion
characteristics are functions of its size and the density of the air in which
it is suspended.
- 0.053 ppm as an annual average.
- Lead in the form of tetraethyl lead was added to gasoline in the United
States in large amounts from the 1950s until it was banned in the mid-1970s.
- 10 to 30 micrograms per 100 milliliters.
[Table of Contents]
|