![Federal Transit Administration - U.S. Department of Transportation](images/032007_presentation_steinmann_img_0.jpg)
FTA New Starts Program Lessons Learned
Topics
- Overview of New Starts Process, Evaluation and Framework
- Strengths and Weaknesses
- New Starts Process Review
- Next Steps
New Starts Program
- Approximately $1.5 billion per year for New Fixed Guideway Systems
and Extensions
- Approximately 1/6 of FTA's Program
- Discretionary Commitments (Full Funding Grant Agreements)
- Statutory Criteria and Process
- FTA Policy Statements 1976, 1978, 1980, 1984
- STURAA Codified Process and Criteria in 1987
- Criteria Broadened in ISTEA in 1991
- Regulation Required in TEA-21 in 1997
- Criteria Further Broadened, Small Starts Created in SAFETEA-LU
in 2003
- FTA's Goal: Deliver valuable projects, on time, on budget while
delivering the projected benefits
New Starts Planning and Project Development Process
![Process diagram of Planning and Project Development Process](images/032007_presentation_steinmann_img_1.jpg)
The FTA New Starts Evaluation and Rating Framework
![Process diagram: FTA New Starts Evaluation and Rating Framework](images/032007_presentation_steinmann_img_2.jpg)
The New Starts Process
Project Development: Typically 6-12 Years
![The New Starts Process](images/032007_presentation_steinmann_img_3.jpg)
Strengths and Weaknesses
- Strengths
- Merit-Based Selection of Projects Respected by Congress
- Projects Delivered on-time and on-budget
- Federal Interests Protected
- Improved Project Quality
- Weaknesses
- Time to Complete Process (But not clear how much is due to New
Starts requirements)
- Complex Process - Outcome not always clear
- Criteria Emphasize Quantifiable Measures - Important non-quantifiable
issues may be not receive sufficient attention
New Starts Process Review
- Initiated June 2006
- Work Completed, Implementation Plan Under Development
- Goals:
- Manage risk, rather than attempting to eliminate risk, and add
value
- Assure proper allocation of risks and responsibilities
- Reduce the time and cost of delivering projects and reduce any
delay due to Federal reviews
- Assure the predictability, transparency, and repeatability of results
- Accommodate possible alternative project delivery methods
- Recommendations
- Internal Organizational Structure and Staffing
- Criteria and Evaluation
- Process Management
- Communications
- Alternative Project Delivery
- Implementation Plan
Next Steps
- Final Policy Guidance for FY 2009
- Streamlined Reporting Requirements
- Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on New Starts and Small Starts
- Final Rule
- Reauthorization