![]() |
|
Testimony
May 19, 2003Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Senator Breaux, and Members of the Committee, for the opportunity to address a critical priority for our society, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and public health � that of preventing disease and preserving health among our nation's growing number of older adults. CDC shares the priority that this Committee has placed on ensuring that the health of our nation's seniors receives appropriate and equitable attention as reflected in the scheduling of this hearing. In my remarks today, I would like to focus on the opportunities of known prevention measures to reduce unnecessary illness, disability, and premature death among older Americans, including the critical role that Medicare-covered preventive services play in helping to preserve health and the quality of life for our nation's seniors. I would also like to highlight an innovative local model program that has demonstrated remarkable success in ensuring that seniors receive potentially life-saving preventive services. Implications of an Aging SocietyIn 1900, only three million people in this country were over the age of 65. As you well know, that picture has changed dramatically a century later. Eight short years from now, the leading edge of the baby-boomers will reach age 65 and the number of older adults will increase rapidly. In the next 25 years, the population over age 65 will more than double, to 70 million older adults. This unprecedented aging of the U.S. population will present societal and economic challenges unlike anything our society has ever had to address. Current health and aging trends have enormous implications for public health, the health care system, and our existing network of social and aging services. In terms of health care, a look at a few numbers makes the point clear: a 65-year-old costs four times what a 40-year-old costs in terms of health care dollars. Seniors already account for one-third of all health care dollars spent in the United States -- over $300 billion each year. The ongoing debate about how to rein in the growth in health care costs including Medicare has occurred during the phase of a slow, gradual increase in our number of older adults. We will soon be paddling against a relentlessly rising tide, when the first wave of 76 million baby boomers reaches Medicare age. These numbers are sobering, compelling, and require urgent action. We cannot begin to stem skyrocketing health care costs, much less adequately ameliorate priority health problems, without addressing in a fundamentally more aggressive manner the prevention of disease and disability among older Americans. Increased emphasis on disease prevention and health promotion opportunities for aging and older adults is one of the few avenues available to address the looming impact of chronic disease and other illnesses, disabling injuries, and long-term health care costs among older Americans. Recent CDC projections of just one major disease�diabetes�illustrate the magnitude of what we face if we do not take action now. The number of U.S. adults with diagnosed diabetes (including women with gestational diabetes) has increased 61 percent since 1991 and is projected to more than double by 2050. Diabetes costs the nation nearly $132 billion a year. The average yearly health care cost for a person with diabetes was $13,243 in 2002, compared with $2,560 for a person without diabetes. Diabetes costs represented 11 percent of national health care expenditures during 2002. Even more alarming for our health care system and for Medicare is that the greatest increase in diabetes cases over the next 50 years will be among those 75 years of age and older�a projected increase of 336 percent. This is just one example of how the aging of our nation could greatly increase national health care costs if we do not identify and apply preventive measures now. The Role of Public Health and CDCThe 35 year increase in life expectancy for Americans in the 20th century represents a remarkable societal achievement. The same effort that led to these unprecedented gains needs to be mobilized to make added years of life for Americans as healthy and independent as possible. The goal of public health in aging, and that of CDC, is to extend health, functional independence, and health-related quality of life for as long as possible, and compress and delay periods of illness and disability so that individuals can maximize their senior years in good health, and families can maximize the years they enjoy with their senior family members. Research has shown that poor health does not have to be an inevitable consequence of growing older. Death is inevitable, but, for many people, it need not be preceded by a slow, painful, and disability-ridden decline. Our nation will continue to age � that we cannot change - but we can delay and in many cases prevent illness and disability.v Older Americans today are likely to either need to or want to work past "retirement age." They must be healthy to do so and workplaces must promote continued health. As the U.S. population continues to age, the number of workers 55 years and older will also increase dramatically. These workers will be more susceptible to a variety of occupational illnesses and injuries. Therefore, we need to better understand this increased susceptibility and what can be done in the workplace to reduce the increased risk. For example, older workers are at greater risk of a fatal accident because of a slip.or fall than younger workers. Prevention strategies need to focus on how these types of injuries can be reduced. While continuing to pursue technologic advances and assuring access to health care are essential, there is also much to be gained from more widely applying prevention strategies with demonstrated effectiveness. The evidence is convincing if not overwhelming that prevention is worth the investment for the health and safety of older adults. A recent Institute of Medicine report noted that the return on investment in medical care for cardiovascular disease reaped benefits at 4 to 1, but investment in behavioral change returned a remarkable 30 to 1 advantage. It is imperative that we bring the health advantages of prevention to older adults around the country. CDC has identified the following critical priorities for the agency in addressing the health of our nation's seniors:
CDC and the public health community in our states and communities have a continued role to play in bringing the benefits of prevention to our nation's seniors. Working closely with other federal agencies, such as the Administration on Aging, public health brings the focus on health, the knowledge of what works, and the links to the clinical community. What CDC brings to the table is its well-recognized scientific expertise, long-standing experience in prevention research, ability to evaluate health promotion programs and identify those that work, established public health network and ability to work with states and communities to implement disease prevention and health promotion programs, and unique surveillance capacity to better guide programmatic efforts.
CDC working with other DHHS agencies and public health, can help close that gap. We can provide public education about the value of preventive services to seniors. We can identify how to modify national delivery of preventive services to make services more accessible to seniors (for example, providing services at times and in places that are convenient for seniors taking into account their transportation needs and combining services to minimize the need for multiple visits). We can influence help educate physicians to promote use of preventive services by seniors. When a 68-year-old woman visits her doctor's office, she is generally there for a specific complaint--her arthritis, her heart disease, her diabetes, or perhaps some combination of chronic or other conditions. The question of whether she has had her flu and pneumonia vaccine may never come up. The recommendation that she be screened for colorectal cancer may not enter into the conversation during what is likely to be a very brief office visit when other health matters are more urgent. Specific recommendations from a physician are critical in increasing use of preventive services by seniors. An Example of SuccessThere is good news in that many of these challenges are being successfully addressed by small programs operating on minimal dollars in limited geographic areas of the country. Among the most innovative models is a program covering a 4-county area in portions of Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New York. The Sickness Prevention Achieved through Regional Collaboration -- or SPARC -- program is conducted by a non-profit organization that acts as a local bridge among local public health departments, the medical community, and community-based organizations to increase the use of Medicare's clinical preventive services -- chronic disease screenings and adult immunizations -- among the older population. One of SPARC's especially effective strategies has been to promote and help the medical community to combine preventive services for ease of access. SPARC has demonstrated great success in enhancing the provision of preventive services within clinical practices, facilitating public access to prevention, and establishing local accountability for the delivery of services. SPARC does not deliver preventive services but helps local communities do a better job of providing the services themselves. SPARC's advantages include:
One local provider in a SPARC community has said of the program, "SPARC frees us to take care of sick patients." Local health departments see the benefit as well. One local health department staffer commented to my staff, "The program is well-thought out and grounded in science. They provide so much of the infrastructure and keep us focused on preventive strategies in the midst of so many competing priorities. SPARC expands our ability to do good public health work." Through rigorous evaluation supported in part by CDC, SPARC achievements include:
SPARC's mission in relation to older adults is clear and well-defined. It does not provide a new service; it does not compete with the medical care system. Rather, its one overarching aim is to increase the use of Medicare-covered clinical preventive services. It does so by providing critically needed coordination and linkage between the clinical care world, the social services world, and the older adults themselves in the communities that it serves. In a very fragmented system, SPARC provides the focal point and the glue to ensure that the Congress' intent is fulfilled -- that the nation's older adults receive potentially life-saving preventive services. SPARC represents a particularly noteworthy catalyst for enabling an effective community-based response to a national priority. SPARC is currently available on an extremely limited basis in a very specific geographic area. There is nothing unique about the area that SPARC serves. These same results can be achieved elsewhere. In fact, its impact may be even greater in more rural and isolated communities. SPARC is a good example of the role that public health and CDC plays nationally in supporting local efforts to change the course of health for our seniors. CDC is just beginning to do in aging what we have done in so many other public health areas. We evaluate public health programs in the field (as we did with SPARC), identify those that work, and make these programs available to states and local communities throughout the country. Current CDC EffortsIn recent years, CDC has placed increased priority on addressing the health of seniors and collaborated closely with its sister agencies--AoA, CMS, NIH, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Recently, CDC and AoA, through state-based counterparts--the state Chronic Disease Directors and the National Association of State Units on Aging-- conducted an assessment among state-based staff in the public health and aging networks to better determine priorities, needs, and collaboration around older adult health in the states. Respondents indicated that support at the national level for science-based, health promotion/disease prevention programs for older adults is a key priority for the states. CDC can play a critical role in identifying, disseminating, and implementing effective programs in states and local communities. Support to States and CommunitiesIn response to this assessment, CDC and AoA have jointly funded 10 states to have their state public health and aging offices work together on projects designed to improve older adult health. Thirty-one states applied for an average of $10,000. The ten funded states are now targeting such issues as promoting regular physical activity and increasing the use of clinical preventive services. A key requirement of our grants is that state units on aging and state health departments must work together, a first in many of the funded states. To further support efforts in states and communities, CDC has initiated work with several key national organizations, such as the National Council on the Aging, the American Society on Aging, and the Center for Medicare Education at the American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging to establish national-level resources on which states can readily draw. Among anticipated outcomes of work with these organizations are the development of a "best practices" compendium for older adult health; web-based modules addressing key health issues for older adults; and effective communication tools related to Medicare-covered preventive services for the public, caregivers, and providers. CDC also supports 36 states to improve the quality of life for people with arthritis. Arthritis is the leading cause of disability affecting almost 70 million Americans. CDC-funded states are developing action plans with partners such as Arthritis Foundation affiliates, conducting pilot projects, and building arthritis programs. In many states, such programs are geared towards increasing the number of Americans who can take advantage of the demonstrated benefits of the Arthritis Self-Help Course and physical activity programs for people with arthritis. In addition, CDC and NIH co-funds research to better determine why arthritis occurs and progresses. CDC is supporting research to find effective strategies to improve the quality of life among persons with arthritis. Determining what works in prevention and getting it out to states and communities
Monitoring Health Status and Risk Factors Among Older AdultsThe aging network, state health departments, and national health and aging organizations need critical surveillance data on older adult health to better target their programmatic efforts. CDC currently provides information to health and aging professionals on how to use its web-based surveillance data on older adults. However, the nation's rapidly changing demographics require new thinking about key health indicators for this population. To advance efforts in this area, CDC is committed to developing better measures of older adult health and quality of life, providing critically-needed data analyses and reports to states and communities, and better delineating existing and projected health disparities. In conclusion, I would like to thank the Committee again for its leadership and commitment to the health of our nation's seniors. Positively impacting the health of older adults offers some of our most promising prevention opportunities. We know that even the oldest of the elderly can benefit from prevention. While quality medical treatment for diseases is critically important, our nation needs a better balance between treating diseases and preventing them. There is much we can do to prevent diseases and conditions that contribute so heavily to disability, the need for long-term care, and to our spiraling health care costs. Older adults have never had a more urgent need for prevention, nor has our society. We look forward to working with you to have the healthiest older adults in history. Thank you. Last Revised: May 21, 2003 |
![]() |