 |
Inspector General's Semiannual Report to Congress, Oct. 1, 2002–March 31, 2003
Appendix A
| Schedule of Reports Issued October 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003 |
| Report No. |
Entity and Title |
Program Dollars or Contract/Grant Amount1 |
Questioned/Unsupported Costs2 |
Funds to Better Use3 |
| 03-1 |
Shoals Entrepreneurial Center, AlabamaKitchen Incubator
|
$98,730 |
|
|
| 03-2 |
Kentucky Department for Local GovernmentKentucky Flex-E Grant |
$377,00 |
|
|
| 03-3 |
Itawamba County Development Council, MississippiSmall Business Entrepreneurship Pilot Project |
$26,750 |
$15,877 |
|
| 03-4 |
Grace Child Development Center, AlabamaCourtland School Readiness Program |
$196,000 |
$2,783 |
$14,660 |
| 03-5 |
Byesville Area Community Development Corporation, OhioByesville Area Entrepreneur Development Partnership (C1) |
$20,000 |
|
|
| 03-6 |
Center for Information Technology Enterprise, Inc., KentuckyTelecommunications Regional Initiative Project |
$249,994 |
|
|
| 03-7 |
University of Alabama Rural Services and Research ProgramBetter Schools Building Better Communities Project |
$197,179 |
|
|
| 03-8 |
Kentucky Department for Local GovernmentKentucky Appalachian Housing Program |
$1,450,000 |
|
|
| 03-9 |
Kentucky Finance and Administrative CabinetAppalachian Kentucky Entrepreneurship Initiative
|
$250,000 |
|
|
| 03-10 |
Byesville Area Community Development Corporation, OhioByesville Area Entrepreneur Development Partnership (I)
|
$48,940 |
|
|
| 03-11 |
Big Sandy Telecommuting Services, Inc., KentuckyBig Sandy Telecommunications Center, Phases II and III |
$453,530 |
|
|
| 03-12 |
Pikeville College School of Osteopathic Medicine, KentuckyAppalachian Osteopathic Postgraduate Training Institute
Consortium |
$370,000 |
|
|
| 03-13 |
Brushy Fork Institute, KentuckyEast Kentucky Leadership Network/Youth Leadership Program
|
$285,750 |
|
|
| Totals |
|
$4,023,873 |
$18,660 |
$14,660 |
1Grant amounts reported are for ARC grant amounts and do not include matching funds.
2A cost the Office of Inspector General has questioned because of an alleged violation of law, regulation, contract, or other agreements governing the expenditure of funds; such cost is not supported by adequate documentation; or the expenditure of funds for the intended purpose is unnecessary or unreasonable. Includes required matching contributions.
3Funds the Office of Inspector General has identified in an audit recommendation that could be used more efficiently by reducing outlays, deobligating program or operational funds, avoiding unnecessary expenditures, or taking other efficiency measures, such as timely use of funds.
|
|