Your browser does not support CSS and therefor you are seeing
a plain, functional page rather than the modern, designed site. The site is
fully functional this way, just not as nice to look at. To see this site as it
was intended, please upgrade to a modern browser like
Mozilla Firefox,
Opera,
Netscape (7 or higher) or Internet
Explorer (6 or higher).
Search General Jurisdiction
| 01/13/2009 | Wheeler | RAFAL FILIPCZYK v. THE UNITED STATES (08-643C) | Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Inability to Review Contract Appeals Boards Decisions; No Claim for Money Damages |
| 01/13/2009 | Lettow | DAVID WHALEN, et al., v. UNITED STATES (07-707C) | Suit by air traffic control specialists for compensation for overtime labor under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 201-219;motion for conditional certification of a collective action and for authorization of notice to similarly situated... |
| 01/12/2009 | Sweeney | RICHARD ROY BUSER v. THE UNITED STATES (08-587T) | Pro Se; Subject Matter Jurisdiction;28 U.S.C § 1491; In Forma Pauperis;Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1);Failure to State a Claim, RCFC 12(b)(6);Tax Refund Claim; Full Payment Rule;Flora; Res Judicata; Injunctive Relief;Wrongful Levy Claim, 26... |
| 01/12/2009 | Miller, C. | CONNIE E. YANT, et al., v. THE UNITED STATES (08-77C) | Civilian pay; RCFC 12(b)(1)motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on gender balance of preferred class; RCFC 56 motion for summary judgment; Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)(1)(2000); consent to motion for summary judgment... |
| 01/09/2009 | Allegra | NORTH STAR ALASKA HOUSING CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES (98-168C, 02-1632C & 03-2699C) | Motion for attorney’s fees and litigation expenses; “Bad faith” exception to the American Rule; 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b); Centex construed; Agency’s prelitigation “bad faith” conduct in injecting bias into the contract claim process does not... |
| 01/07/2009 | Merow | YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES (98-126C) | YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES |
| 01/07/2009 | Wheeler | TEKNOWLEDGE CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES (06-310C) | Government Contract Cost Principles; Allocability of Indirect Costs; Development of Software Not Purchased by the Government; Failure to Show Nexus of Cost to a Government Contract; FAR 31.201-4 |
| 01/06/2009 | Wheeler | AUSTIN INVESTMENT FUND, LLC, by and through its Tax Matters Partner,RICOBENE LLC, Plaintiff, & BRUCE ELIEFF and KATHY ABRAHAMSON, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. THE UNITED STATES (06-844T) | Motion for Remand, De Novo Review, Administrative Procedures Act, Readjustment of Partnership Items |
| 12/31/2008 | Merow | HERNANDEZ, KROONE AND ASSOCIATES, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES (07-165C) | HERNANDEZ, KROONE AND ASSOCIATES, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES |
| 12/31/2008 | Braden | BRIAN ALAN BLAKLEY d/b/a TCS v. THE UNITED STATES (06-749T) | Attorney Fees;Equal Access to Justice Act,28 U.S.C. § 2412;Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. §§ 6511(a), 6532(a),7430, 7422(a);National Firearms Act,26 U.S.C. § 5801 et. seq.;Tax Refund,28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1);Transfer Tax;Tucker Act,28 U.S.C. § 1491 |
Printer-friendly version of this page