On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:58:49 EDT, Eric Paris said:

> I also decided to leave the name ipccreate even though this does not
> clearly express that the patch does not cover posix message queues. The
> only name that seemed descriptive enough was sysvipccreate which just
> seemed incredibly long for little to no gain. I will address the issue
> of controlling posix message queue explicit labeling in a future patch.

Will that require another bit?

> A note of interest, this only leaves 1 bit in the process security
> class. I don't currently have any plans to use any more, but it is
> something to remember.

Does anybody have a good plan for what to do when we run out?

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.



application/pgp-signature attachment: stored