Skip
To Content
|  | |||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
Rhode Island State Treatment Planning Areas |
|
|
Comparison
Table: Click
here to determine where the substance use and/or mental health rates for each
State treatment planning area (substate region) falls in the distribution of
all the treatment planning areas for the Nation by variable and age group. (PDF
format)
Variable
list: links to variables with all State treatment planning areas data for
each variable
Maps of State showing data for variables by State treatment planning areas
State
Data Tables:
| State/Substate Region | Any Illicit Drug Use in Past Month | Any Illicit Drug Use Other Than Marijuana in Past Month | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. NOTE: Any Illicit Drug includes marijuana/hashish, cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or any prescription-type psychotherapeutic used nonmedically. Any Illicit Drug Other Than Marijuana includes cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or any prescription-type psychotherapeutic used nonmedically. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004. | ||||
| Rhode Island | 10.88 | (9.55 - 12.37) | 4.39 | (3.68 - 5.22) |
| Bristol and Newport | 10.35 | (8.05 - 13.20) | 4.16 | (3.10 - 5.56) |
| Kent | 9.32 | (7.37 - 11.72) | 4.02 | (3.01 - 5.35) |
| Providence | 11.08 | (9.43 - 12.97) | 4.48 | (3.65 - 5.49) |
| Washington | 12.54 | (9.93 - 15.71) | 4.68 | (3.57 - 6.11) |
| State/Substate Region | Marijuana Use in Past Month |
Average Annual Rate of First Use of Marijuana1 | Perceptions of Great Risk of Smoking Marijuana Once a Month | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. 1 Average Annual Rate = [100*{(Number of Marijuana Initiates in past 24 months)/[(Number of Marijuana Initiates in past 24 months * 0.5) + Number of persons who never used marijuana]}/2]. Both the computation components, Number of Marijuana Initiates in past 24 months and Number of persons who never used marijuana, are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach. Note that the age group is based on a respondent's age at the time of the interview, not his or her age at first use. The prediction intervals for Average Annual Rate of First Use of Marijuana use a simultaneous solution for First Use of Marijuana and Never Used Marijuana outcomes, which had random effects that were allowed to be correlated across the two outcomes. The associated Markov Chain Monte Carlo chains were used to calculate the posterior variance. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004. | ||||||
| Rhode Island | 9.50 | (8.27 - 10.88) | 2.16 | (1.86 - 2.50) | 33.79 | (30.92 - 36.79) |
| Bristol and Newport | 9.16 | (6.98 - 11.94) | 2.79 | (2.07 - 3.76) | 27.53 | (22.70 - 32.96) |
| Kent | 8.26 | (6.33 - 10.70) | 1.88 | (1.42 - 2.49) | 33.87 | (28.76 - 39.39) |
| Providence | 9.39 | (7.95 - 11.06) | 2.01 | (1.66 - 2.43) | 36.15 | (32.52 - 39.94) |
| Washington | 12.01 | (9.29 - 15.40) | 2.76 | (2.06 - 3.67) | 28.92 | (24.10 - 34.27) |
| State/Substate Region | Marijuana Use in Past Year |
Cocaine Use in Past Year | Nonmedical Use of Pain Relievers in Past Year | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004. | ||||||
| Rhode Island | 15.48 | (13.94 - 17.16) | 3.62 | (2.88 - 4.54) | 5.97 | (5.05 - 7.05) |
| Bristol and Newport | 16.41 | (13.40 - 19.94) | 3.68 | (2.59 - 5.21) | 6.20 | (4.63 - 8.26) |
| Kent | 13.63 | (11.15 - 16.57) | 3.27 | (2.34 - 4.56) | 6.27 | (4.82 - 8.12) |
| Providence | 14.92 | (13.08 - 16.98) | 3.67 | (2.80 - 4.82) | 5.76 | (4.68 - 7.07) |
| Washington | 19.68 | (15.78 - 24.26) | 3.74 | (2.74 - 5.08) | 6.39 | (4.88 - 8.33) |
| State/Substate Region | Alcohol Use in Past Month |
Binge Alcohol Use in Past Month1 |
Perceptions of Great Risk of Having Five or More Drinks of an Alcoholic Beverage Once or Twice a Week | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. 1 Binge Alcohol Use is defined as drinking five or more drinks on the same occasion (i.e., at the same time or within a couple of hours of each other) on at least 1 day in the past 30 days. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004. | ||||||
| Rhode Island | 59.43 | (56.51 - 62.28) | 28.15 | (25.74 - 30.69) | 36.74 | (33.97 - 39.59) |
| Bristol and Newport | 64.00 | (58.03 - 69.57) | 27.98 | (23.91 - 32.44) | 35.12 | (30.40 - 40.16) |
| Kent | 60.59 | (54.77 - 66.13) | 26.60 | (22.93 - 30.62) | 34.81 | (30.16 - 39.76) |
| Providence | 56.72 | (52.96 - 60.41) | 28.20 | (25.26 - 31.33) | 37.80 | (34.42 - 41.30) |
| Washington | 66.23 | (60.60 - 71.43) | 30.16 | (25.95 - 34.72) | 35.83 | (31.04 - 40.92) |
| State/Substate Region | Alcohol Use in Past Month among Persons Aged 12 to 20 | Binge Alcohol Use in Past Month among Persons Aged 12 to 201 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. 1 Binge Alcohol Use is defined as drinking five or more drinks on the same occasion (i.e., at the same time or within a couple of hours of each other) on at least 1 day in the past 30 days. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004. | ||||
| Rhode Island | 37.85 | (35.36 - 40.40) | 27.01 | (24.69 - 29.46) |
| Bristol and Newport | 39.68 | (34.91 - 44.65) | 30.23 | (25.75 - 35.12) |
| Kent | 35.63 | (30.98 - 40.56) | 25.92 | (21.91 - 30.36) |
| Providence | 37.56 | (34.34 - 40.89) | 25.66 | (22.79 - 28.75) |
| Washington | 39.85 | (35.12 - 44.77) | 31.44 | (26.85 - 36.41) |
| State/Substate Region | Cigarette Use in Past Month |
Any Tobacco Product Use in Past Month1 |
Perceptions of Great Risk of Smoking One or More Packs of Cigarettes Per Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. 1 Any Tobacco product includes cigarettes, smokeless tobacco (i.e., chewing tobacco or snuff), cigars, or pipe tobacco. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004. | ||||||
| Rhode Island | 26.33 | (23.99 - 28.81) | 30.13 | (27.62 - 32.76) | 74.84 | (72.37 - 77.16) |
| Bristol and Newport | 25.25 | (21.67 - 29.20) | 31.11 | (26.88 - 35.68) | 76.13 | (72.47 - 79.43) |
| Kent | 28.19 | (24.33 - 32.40) | 32.74 | (28.50 - 37.27) | 72.57 | (68.53 - 76.27) |
| Providence | 26.32 | (23.41 - 29.45) | 29.13 | (26.02 - 32.44) | 75.04 | (72.07 - 77.79) |
| Washington | 25.12 | (21.60 - 28.99) | 30.52 | (26.27 - 35.12) | 75.50 | (71.75 - 78.90) |
| State/Substate Region | Alcohol Dependence in Past Year | Any Illicit Drug Dependence in Past Year1 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. NOTE: Dependence is based on the definition found in the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). 1 Any Illicit Drug includes marijuana/hashish, cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or any prescription-type psychotherapeutic used nonmedically. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004. | ||||
| Rhode Island | 4.21 | (3.42 - 5.16) | 2.73 | (2.16 - 3.44) |
| Bristol and Newport | 4.09 | (2.99 - 5.58) | 2.85 | (1.96 - 4.13) |
| Kent | 3.53 | (2.55 - 4.87) | 2.40 | (1.69 - 3.40) |
| Providence | 4.43 | (3.46 - 5.64) | 2.84 | (2.15 - 3.72) |
| Washington | 4.17 | (3.08 - 5.62) | 2.51 | (1.79 - 3.51) |
| State/Substate Region | Alcohol Dependence or Abuse in Past Year | Any Illicit Drug Dependence or Abuse in Past Year1 | Dependence on or Abuse of Any Illicit Drug or Alcohol in Past Year1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. NOTE: Dependence or abuse is based on definitions found in the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). 1 Any Illicit Drug includes marijuana/hashish, cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or any prescription-type psychotherapeutic used nonmedically. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004. | ||||||
| Rhode Island | 9.66 | (8.37 - 11.12) | 4.01 | (3.30 - 4.86) | 11.51 | (10.17 - 12.99) |
| Bristol and Newport | 10.45 | (8.35 - 13.01) | 4.01 | (2.98 - 5.37) | 12.13 | (9.82 - 14.89) |
| Kent | 8.83 | (6.96 - 11.15) | 3.47 | (2.57 - 4.68) | 10.63 | (8.66 - 12.99) |
| Providence | 9.49 | (8.00 - 11.23) | 4.11 | (3.27 - 5.15) | 11.40 | (9.79 - 13.24) |
| Washington | 10.71 | (8.50 - 13.41) | 4.23 | (3.20 - 5.56) | 12.50 | (10.11 - 15.36) |
| State/Substate Region | Needing But Not Receiving Treatment for Alcohol Use in Past Year1 | Needing But Not Receiving Treatment for Illicit Drug Use in Past Year2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. 1 Needing But Not Receiving Treatment refers to respondents classified as needing treatment for alcohol, but not receiving treatment for an alcohol problem at a specialty facility (i.e., drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities [inpatient or outpatient], hospitals [inpatient only], and mental health centers). 2 Needing But Not Receiving Treatment refers to respondents classified as needing treatment for illicit drugs, but not receiving treatment for an illicit drug problem at a specialty facility (i.e., drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities [inpatient or outpatient], hospitals [inpatient only], and mental health centers). Illicit Drugs include marijuana/hashish, cocaine (including crack), inhalants, hallucinogens, heroin, or prescription-type psychotherapeutic (nonmedical use). Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004. | ||||
| Rhode Island | 8.84 | (7.69 - 10.16) | 3.33 | (2.79 - 3.97) |
| Bristol and Newport | 9.42 | (7.45 - 11.83) | 3.19 | (2.41 - 4.22) |
| Kent | 8.03 | (6.35 - 10.12) | 2.93 | (2.20 - 3.90) |
| Providence | 8.71 | (7.35 - 10.30) | 3.46 | (2.82 - 4.25) |
| Washington | 9.95 | (7.92 - 12.42) | 3.38 | (2.60 - 4.38) |
| State/Substate Region | Serious Psychological Distress in Past Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval | |
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. NOTE: Serious Psychological Distress (SPD) was referred to as Serious Mental Illness (SMI) in prior NSDUH reports. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004. | ||
| Rhode Island | 12.53 | (10.66 - 14.68) |
| Bristol and Newport | 10.37 | (7.94 - 13.44) |
| Kent | 11.62 | (9.00 - 14.88) |
| Providence | 13.41 | (10.98 - 16.28) |
| Washington | 11.78 | (8.99 - 15.30) |
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Click here for text describing the map below.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 340 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2002-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
|
This page was last updated on January 15, 2009. |
* Adobe™ PDF and MS Office™ formatted files require software viewer programs to properly read them.
Click here to download these FREE programs now
| Highlights | Topics | Data | Drugs | Pubs | Short Reports | Treatment | Help | OAS |
