Skip To Content | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
Seclusion and Restraint: Statement of the Problem and SAMHSA's Response
SAMHSA National Action
Plan on Seclusion and Restraint
Statement of the ProblemThe use of seclusion and restraint on persons with mental health and/or addictive disorders has resulted in deaths and serious physical injury and psychological trauma. In 1998, the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis estimated deaths due to such practices at 150 per annum across the nation. Children have been noted at especially high risk for death and serious injury. Individuals with addictive or co-occurring mental health and addictive disorders also appear to be at risk due, in part, to the possibility of increased agitation. Older adults in nursing homes and other settings also face a reported high risk. The General Accounting Office and the HHS Office of Inspector General both have noted the paucity of known data related to the use of these practices. Research has revealed that the use of seclusion and restraint varies dramatically from facility to facility with a wide range of facility and staff knowledge on how to prevent and avoid such use. While a growing number of stakeholders have developed guidelines on seclusion and restraint, the quality of such have yet to be determined and their widespread application has yet to be documented. There has been widespread agreement that training and technical assistance is a priority need. In 2000, the Children's Health Act was signed into law which established specific requirements - including training - in healthcare (Part H) and non-medical children's residential facilities (Part I). It also required the promulgation of regulations for these settings. It is also known that sentinel events (e.g., deaths and injuries) from restraint and seclusion occur in a number of settings which currently have no national guidelines, such as schools and juvenile justice facilities. In contrast to the mental health field, the addictions field has only begun to examine issues of restraint and seclusion and further analysis and awareness of such concerns appears needed. Finally, the capacity of Protection and Advocacy agencies to respond to allegations of rights violations - including those associated with seclusion and restraint is limited. ResponseSAMHSA has set forth a vision to reduce and ultimately eliminate the use of seclusion and restraint practices for all age groups in behavioral health care settings both institutional and community-based. The agency recognizes that these are to be used solely as safety interventions designed to protect consumer and staff safety. The focus is on identifying and encouraging the application of alternatives to prevent such use. Long-term outcomes include a reduction in seclusion and restraint-related deaths and injuries and in the frequency of use of such interventions while working toward the elimination of these practices. Initial outcomes include an increase in the knowledge, skills, and abilities of consumers, providers, facilities, States, advocates, and others to prevent, reduce, and monitor the use of seclusion and restraint including an increase in the number of States and facilities that implement best practice prevention and reduction guidelines. In reaching this vision and outcomes, SAMHSA - via its organizational goals of Accountability, Capacity and Effectiveness - has identified five (5) domains to focus on:
SAMHSA recognizes that an effective national action plan to reduce and ultimately eliminate seclusion and restraint will take the combined efforts of a range of public and private stakeholders.
|
Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration • 1 Choke Cherry Road • Rockville, MD 20857
* Adobe™ PDF and MS Office™ formatted files require software viewer programs to properly read them. Click here to download these FREE programs now. |