|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081007190325im_/http://www.ers.usda.gov/Images/spacer.gif)
AmberWaves
February 2006
> Features
|
Environmental
Credit Trading: Can Farming Benefit? |
by
Marc Ribaudo, Robert Johansson, and
Carol Jones
Environmental
regulations often require firms that
emit pollutants to limit emissions to
a set level or to install specific emission-reducing
technologies. While fairly straightforward,
this command-and-control approach can
be costly both to the firms and to society.
|
|
EU
and U.S. Organic Markets
Face Strong Demand Under Different Policies |
by
Carolyn Dimitri and Lydia Oberholtzer
Organic markets in
the European Union member states and
the U.S. are nearly the same size in
terms of retail sales. At the same time,
their farm sectors differ significantly,
with the EU-15 member states having
more organic farmland and more organic
operations than the U.S.
|
|
The
World Bids Farewell to the Multifiber
Arrangement |
by
Stephen MacDonald
Under the Multifiber
Arrangement (MFA), trade in textiles—that
is, yarn and fabric—and clothing
was managed through quotas. January
1, 2005, marked the end of a 10-year
phaseout of the MFA quotas under the
aegis of the World Trade Organization.
This article examines the origins and
spread of quotas under the MFA and the
impacts of their subsequent elimination.
|
|
Agricultural
Contracting Trading Autonomy for
Risk Reduction |
by
Nigel Key and James MacDonald
Farm production is
shifting from smaller to larger family
farms and from spot (or cash) markets
to contracts. Technological developments
may underlie much of the shift to larger
farms, but expanded use of production
and marketing contracts supports that
shift by reducing financial risks for
farm operators. For farm operators,
contracts provide benefits from reduced
risks, but also result in loss of managerial
control and reduced autonomy. |
|
Food
Stamps and Obesity: Ironic Twist or
Complex Puzzle? |
by
Michele Ver Ploeg, Lisa Mancino, and
Biing-Hwan Lin
The Food Stamp Program
was designed to provide a nutritional
safety net for low-income households
while boosting demand for domestic agricultural
products. As the major nutrition problems
facing the U.S. population have shifted
from too little intake to overconsumption
and obesity, some have questioned whether
food stamps encourage participants to
eat too much. ERS analyses suggest that
the relationship between program participation
and weight is neither uniform across
sex, race and ethnicity, nor consistent
over time. |
|
|
|
|