DOT Logo
Office of Public Affairs

REMARKS FOR
THE HONORABLE NORMAN Y. MINETA
SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION’S “TRANSPORTATION POLICIES AND PRIORITIES FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH CONFERENCE”

WASHINGTON, D.C.
JUNE 12, 2003
NOON

Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you, Bruce for that kind introduction. 

Before I begin, I’d also thank the National Chamber Foundation for its tremendous leadership in helping to ensure the continued strength of American businesses.  I’m honored for the invitation to be here and to share my thoughts with each of you here today. 

As all of you know, just two weeks ago, the President took yet another step to secure the strength of our nation’s economy. 

By signing into law one of the largest tax cuts in history, President Bush has helped provide more than 136 million American taxpayers with substantial tax relief.  

That means more money in the pocketbooks of hardworking Americans, in the dividend checks of the growing number of investors, and in the hands of small business owners to invest in their futures. 

My colleagues throughout the Administration are also working hard to strengthen our economy and improve the quality of life for all Americans.  

We at the Department of Transportation are taking full advantage of the opportunity we share in this reauthorization year to re-shape the future of our transportation system, as we work to ensure that it  continues to lead the world in innovation and economic growth.            

I recently introduced to Congress the President’s new surface transportation reauthorization proposal    the Safe, Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2003, or SAFETEA.  

The President’s proposal is the largest transportation investment in our nation’s history, and for that I am proud.  But our proposal is much more than just a spending plan – it is a blueprint for investment.  

Our proposal is driven by the need for results. 

It will help save thousands of lives each year by reducing the number of preventable injuries and fatalities on our roadways.  

It recognizes that  leaders at the state and local level – not in Washington – know best which roads and bridges to build, and offers them the flexibility they need to make the right transportation choices for their communities.  

And, it provides real funding for something that  I know is vital to you and to your businesses    the creation of an efficient and seamless network of intermodal connectors that will deliver commercial goods faster than it did yesterday, and faster still tomorrow.  

The future health, competitiveness, and economic strength of our freight and shipping systems depend on such a network, and SAFETEA will help create it.  

So, I look forward to working with all of you to ensure its successful passage in the Congress as soon as possible. 

Now anyone picking up a newspaper knows that some on Capitol Hill believe that, despite the challenging economic times, we should impose a fuel tax increase on the American people to pay for an even higher level of spending than the record amount proposed by the President.  

I also know, that some special interests are urging the Congress to simply enact a one or two year bill, with the hope of persuading the Administration to agree on a spending increase later on. 

Well, as all of you know, I’ve spent my entire career as a champion for transportation investment.  But I want to be clear.  President Bush and I oppose the imposition of costly new fuel taxes on the American people.  

And as a former Mayor, let me also say this: enacting anything less than a full six-year reauthorization bill will greatly jeopardize the ability of our nation’s mayors, governors, and local transportation leaders to make important long-term investment decisions for their communities.  

The Congress must meet its responsibility of ensuring that states and localities receive a dedicated, predictable stream of funding.  

Turning away from this responsibility with a    short-term spending bill using existing funding levels would not only jeopardize the development of important local transportation projects, but would also bankrupt the highway trust fund.  

Our nation’s state and local officials cannot afford this, and we should not accept it.  And so, I urge the Congress to pass the President’s six-year proposal in its entirety this year. 

The safety of those Americans traveling on our roads and highways also requires immediate attention.  

Accordingly, one of the most important priorities of our proposal is a commitment to reduce dramatically the number of highway-related fatalities and injuries. 

Last year, motor vehicle crashes resulted in almost 3 million injuries and almost 43,000 fatalities.  

The human costs to the families of these victims are incalculable, but the economic costs are not.  Each year, these preventable crashes cost our nation an average of $230 billion.  We can and must do more to stem that tide of economic loss. 

The best way to reduce significantly these numbers is simple:  Americans must use their safety belts.  That is why our proposal would distribute substantial levels of funding to states that either improve their overall safety belt usage rates, or are willing to enact primary safety belt laws.  

Moreover, our bill will consolidate and enhance our many safety initiatives to create our nation’s most comprehensive highway safety program in history.  But we face other challenges as well. 

Earlier, I mentioned the importance of our network of freight and shipping to the productivity of our nation.  

No one better understands that than the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and I’d like to commend the Chamber on its recently released North American Port and Intermodal Systems Study.  

The study clearly states that now, more than ever, the strength of America’s manufacturing sector depends on an efficient and well-connected national transportation network.  And though we’re making progress, what we need is a revolution. 

Recent estimates indicate that Import/Export Freight Tonnage could double by 2020, and Domestic Freight Tonnage could increase by about 70 percent over that same period.  

International trade now comprises over 25 percent of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product and is expected to rise to one-third in less than 20 years. The days when trade issues could be ignored as irrelevant to overall U.S. wealth creation are long gone. 

We need a revolution that would make intermodal projects like California’s Alameda Corridor and Alaska’s Port of Anchorage the norm, not the exception.  

The first step is to enact the reforms included in President Bush’s proposal, including: 

·       Dedicating more resources for the critical and often neglected “last mile” connecting the National Highway System to intermodal freight facilities, particularly our ports; 

·       Providing greater leverage of Federal dollars through innovative financing; 

·       Encouraging greater private sector investment through tax-exempt private activity bonds for private intermodal freight facilities;   and 

·       Improving the capacity of states to conduct more strategic freight planning. 

One intermodal alternative is the development of a robust short sea shipping system that would aid in the reduction of growing freight congestion on our nation’s rail and highway systems, and lessen the damaging impact on our environment.  

Short sea shipping provides a practical, safe, and efficient means of transporting freight.  Also referred to as coastwise or coastal shipping, it is not a single modal function, but rather a function across all modes of transportation. 

Our nation must also do a better job of completing transportation projects on budget and on time.  Too often, projects that were cutting edge in concept become “catch-up” projects after years of delay.  

Once enacted, our proposal will help state and local leaders to modernize transportation infrastructure more quickly and efficiently in their communities.  

Modernization, however, requires more than improving the speed our system employs to build our highways, bridges, and other infrastructure, it requires a transformation of the system itself. 

Despite today’s advancements in the methods and techniques used to construct our infrastructure, the industry has failed to keep pace with the public’s expectation of, and need for, completion of highway modernization projects measured by months or a short number of years, not decades or generations. 

No level of federal stewardship or funding alone will prevent the potential for a crisis of mobility in the decades ahead.  

To extract the highest value from precious transportation dollars, we must also use technology and innovation aggressively to transform the way that we build our nation’s roads and bridges. 

We at the Department of Transportation will soon have more to say about this topic.  For now, I just want to remark that DOT will be making innovation in how we build and maintain our roads, an important departmental focus in the months and years ahead. 

The need for modernization and innovation does not end with surface transportation.  America’s economy also depends on the success of its world-class aviation system.  

Earlier this year, we introduced the President’s aviation reauthorization proposal called FLIGHT 100, in honor of this year’s centennial anniversary of flight.  

FLIGHT-100 would do much of the same in our skies that SAFETEA would do on our roads.  It provides for innovative project financing, strengthens intermodal connections, and most importantly, promotes the highest possible levels of safety for all Americans.           

As you may know, I recently asked Congress to help improve the competitiveness of our aviation system.   

Our nation must grant our airlines greater access to foreign capital markets by raising the allowed level of foreign ownership for voting stock to 49 percent, with effective control always remaining in U.S. hands.  Let me tell you why. 

I believe this change would provide significant public and economic benefits by granting airlines greater access and entry to the global capital market, and encouraging more efficient, market-driven networks. 

Finally I’d like briefly to touch on intercity rail.  For too long, our nation has been unwilling to address the need for fundamental change in this important system.  

Fear of the unknown, and an unwillingness to challenge the status quo have turned our system of national intercity passenger rail into a muddled patchwork of unfilled promises.  

To those opposing change, I say this:   the romanticizing of our current system is itself a significant obstacle to saving it.  

That is why over the coming weeks the President will submit to the Congress a comprehensive overhaul of AMTRAK and of the tools we use to support intercity passenger rail.    

The Bush Administration is committed to a viable, national intercity passenger rail system that helps support America’s mobility needs.  

Let me close by thanking everyone for coming here today, and for the opportunity of working with you on all of these important issues in the days ahead.  May God bless all of you, and may God continue to bless the United States of America.

# # #


Briefing Room