Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Rt-PA Infusion Versus Catheter Exchange for Dialysis Catheter Malfunction Due to Fibrin Sheath
This study has been terminated.
Study NCT00194181   Information provided by University of Pennsylvania
First Received: September 12, 2005   Last Updated: July 14, 2006   History of Changes
This Tabular View shows the required WHO registration data elements as marked by

September 12, 2005
July 14, 2006
March 2003
 
 
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00194181 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
 
 
 
Rt-PA Infusion Versus Catheter Exchange for Dialysis Catheter Malfunction Due to Fibrin Sheath
Randomized Prospective Trial of Rt-PA Infusion Versus Catheter Exchange for Treatment of Dialysis Catheter Malfunction Due to Fibrin Sheath Formation

Treating central venous dialysis catheter malfunction due to fibrin sheath formation with rt-PA(TPA)infusion will give equal patency rates in a more cost effective manner when compared to catheter exchange.

Subjects are randomized to TPA infusion or catheter exchange and then followed for catheter function at the post treatment dialysis session, 30-day dialysis session and 60-day dialysis session. Costs and treatment results will be compared.

Patients who come to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Presbyterian Medical Center or American Access in Northeast Philadelphia with a dialysis catheter that's not functioning well, will be screened for this study.

If the patient qualifies and consents to participate, an envelope will be opened that tells us to exchange the catheter for a new one OR infuse TPA (clot-dissolving drug) into the 2 ports for two and a half hours. Some dialysis patients have had a TPA "dwell" at the dialysis clinic to help increase blood flow during dialysis. The motion of the "infusion" of TPA is expected to be more effective than a "dwell" that sits still. Also, there is more TPA used during "infusion" than during the "dwell".

Once the catheter is functioning, the patient goes home as usual and follow-up is done by phone after the next dialysis session, at 30 days and at 60 days. Follow-up is done to check for flow rates during dialysis and to check for any problems related to the catheter treatment. Participation is complete after the 60-day follow-up phone call.

 
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
  • Dialysis Catheter Fibrin Sheath
  • Clotted Dialysis Catheter
  • Catheter Malfunction
Drug: TPA Infusion
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Terminated
40
March 2005
 

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with tunneled hemodialysis catheters who have clinical evidence of catheter tip clot and fibrin sheath formation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Malpositioned or kinked catheter requiring catheter change
  • Complete thrombosis of the catheterized vein
  • Evidence of catheter related infection
  • GI bleed within 6 weeks
  • Cerebral Infarct within 6 months
  • Major surgery within 4 weeks
  • Platelet count below 25000
  • INR above 2.0
  • Sepsis
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to give consent
Both
18 Years and older
No
 
United States
 
 
NCT00194181
 
 
University of Pennsylvania
Genentech
Principal Investigator: S. William Stavropoulos, MD University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
July 2006

 †    Required WHO trial registration data element.
††   WHO trial registration data element that is required only if it exists.