Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Lee SJ, Schover LR, Partridge AH, Patrizio P, Wallace WH, Hagerty K, Beck LN, Brennan LV, Oktay K. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2006 Jun 20;24(18):1-15. [167 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Oncologists should address the possibility of infertility with patients treated during their reproductive years. Fertility preservation is often possible, but to preserve the full range of options, fertility preservation approaches should be considered as early as possible during treatment planning.

Summary of Fertility Preservation Options in Males

Intervention Definition Comment Considerations
Sperm cryopreservation (S) after masturbation Freezing sperm obtained through masturbation The most established technique for fertility preservation in men; large cohort studies in men with cancer
  • Outpatient procedure
  • Approximately $1,500 for three samples stored for 3 years, storage fee for additional years*
Sperm cryopreservation (S) after alternative methods of sperm collection Freezing sperm obtained through testicular aspiration or extraction, electroejaculation under sedation, or from a post-masturbation urine sample Small case series and case reports Testicular sperm extraction outpatient surgical procedure
Gonadal shielding during radiation therapy (S) Use of shielding to reduce the dose of radiation delivered to the testicles Case series
  • Only possible with selected radiation fields and anatomy
  • Expertise is required to ensure shielding does not increase dose delivered to the reproductive organs
Testicular tissue cryopreservation; Testis xenografting; Spermatogonial isolation (I) Freezing testicular tissue or germ cells and reimplantation after cancer treatment or maturation in animals Has not been tested in humans; successful application in animal models Outpatient surgical procedure
Testicular suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs or antagonists (I) Use of hormonal therapies to protect testicular tissue during chemotherapy or radiation therapy Studies do not support the effectiveness of this approach  

Abbreviations: S, standard; I, investigational

*Costs are estimates.

Quality of Evidence Supporting Current and Forthcoming Options for Preservation of Fertility in Males

Sperm cryopreservation. Sperm cryopreservation is effective, and oncologists should discuss sperm banking with appropriate patients. It is strongly recommended that sperm be collected before initiation of cancer therapy because the quality of the sample and sperm DNA integrity may be compromised even after a single treatment session. Although planned chemotherapy may limit the number of ejaculates, intracytoplasmic sperm injection allows the successful freezing and future use of a very limited amount of sperm.

Hormonal gonadoprotection. Hormonal therapy in men is not successful in preserving fertility when highly sterilizing chemotherapy is administered.

Other considerations. Men should be advised of a potentially higher risk of genetic damage in sperm stored after initiation of therapy. Testicular tissue or spermatogonial cryopreservation and transplantation or testis xenografting have not yet been tested successfully in humans. Of note, such approaches are also the only methods of fertility preservation potentially available to prepubertal boys.

Fertility Preservation Options in Females

Intervention Definition Comment Considerations*
Embryo cryopreservation (S) Harvesting eggs, in vitro fertilization (IVF), and freezing of embryos for later implantation The most established technique for fertility preservation in women
  • Requires 10-14 days of ovarian stimulation from the beginning of menstrual cycle
  • Outpatient surgical procedure
  • Requires partner or donor sperm
  • Approximately $8,000 per cycle, $350 per year storage fees
Oocyte cryopreservation (I) Harvesting and freezing of unfertilized eggs Small case series and case reports; as of 2005, 120 deliveries reported, approximately 2% live births per thawed oocyte (3-4 times lower than standard IVF)
  • Requires 10-14 days of ovarian stimulation from the beginning of menstrual cycle
  • Outpatient surgical procedure
  • Approximately $8,000 per cycle, $350/yr storage fees
Ovarian cryopreservation and transplantation (I) Freezing of ovarian tissue and reimplantation after cancer treatment Case reports; as of 2005, two live births reported
  • Not suitable when risk of ovarian involvement is high
  • Same day outpatient surgical procedure
Gonadal shielding during radiation therapy (S) Use of shielding to reduce the dose of radiation delivered to the reproductive organs Case series
  • Only possible with selected radiation fields and anatomy
  • Expertise is required to ensure shielding does not increase dose delivered to the reproductive organs
Ovarian transposition (oophoropexy) (S) Surgical repositioning of ovaries away from the radiation field Large cohort studies and case series suggest approximately 50% chance of success due to altered ovarian blood flow and scattered radiation
  • Same day outpatient surgical procedure
  • Transposition should be performed just before radiation therapy to prevent return of ovaries to former position
  • May need repositioning or IVF to conceive
Trachelectomy (S) Surgical removal of the cervix while preserving the uterus Large case series and case reports
  • Inpatient surgical procedure
  • Limited to early stage cervical cancer; no evidence of higher cancer relapse rate in appropriate candidates
  • Expertise may not be widely available
Other conservative gynecologic surgery (S/I) Minimization of normal tissue resection Large case series and case reports
  • Expertise may not be widely available
Ovarian suppression with GnRH analogs or antagonists (I) Use of hormonal therapies to protect ovarian tissue during chemotherapy or radiation therapy Small randomized studies and case series. Larger randomized trials in progress
  • Medication given before and during treatment with chemotherapy
  • Approximately $500/mo

Abbreviations: S, standard; I, investigational; IVF, in vitro fertilization

*Costs are estimates

Quality of Evidence Supporting Current and Forthcoming Options for Preservation of Fertility in Females

Embryo cryopreservation. Embryo cryopreservation is considered an established fertility preservation method because it has routinely been used for storing surplus embryos after in vitro fertilization. Approximately 2 weeks of ovarian stimulation with daily injections of follicle-stimulating hormone is required and must be started within the first 3 days of the menstrual cycle.

Cryopreservation of unfertilized oocytes. Cryopreservation of unfertilized oocytes is an option, particularly for patients without a partner or those with religious or ethical objections to embryo freezing. Ovarian stimulation is required as described in the preceding section. Oocyte cryopreservation should only be performed in centers with the necessary expertise, and the Panel recommends participation in institutional review board (IRB)-approved protocols.

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation procedures should be performed only in centers with the necessary expertise under IRB-approved protocols that include follow-up for recurrent cancer. A concern with reimplanting ovarian tissue is the potential for reintroducing cancer cells, although in fewer than 20 procedures reported thus far, there are no reports of cancer recurrence.

Ovarian suppression. Currently, there is insufficient evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of GnRH analogs and other means of ovarian suppression on fertility preservation. Women interested in this technique are encouraged to participate in clinical trials.

Ovarian transposition. Ovarian transposition (oophoropexy) can be offered when pelvic radiation is administered as cancer treatment. Because of the risk of remigration of the ovaries, this procedure should be performed as close to the radiation treatment as possible.

Conservative gynecologic surgery. It has been suggested that radical trachelectomy be restricted to stage IA2-IB disease with diameter less than 2 cm and invasion less than 10 mm. In the treatment of other gynecologic malignancies, interventions to spare fertility have generally centered on doing less-radical surgery and/or lower-dose chemotherapy with the intent of sparing the reproductive organs as much as possible.

Other considerations. Of special concern in breast and gynecologic malignancies is the possibility that fertility preservation interventions and/or subsequent pregnancy may increase the risk of cancer recurrence. Although several studies have not shown a decrement in survival or an increase in risk of breast cancer recurrence with pregnancy, the studies are all limited by significant biases, and concerns remain for some women and their physicians.

Special Considerations: Fertility Preservation in Children

Use of established methods of fertility preservation (semen cryopreservation and embryo freezing) in postpubertal minor children requires patient assent and parental consent. The modalities available to prepubertal children to preserve their fertility are limited by the sexual immaturity of the children and are essentially experimental. Efforts to preserve fertility of children using experimental methods (e.g., gonadal tissue cryopreservation) should be attempted only under IRB approved protocols.

The Role of the Oncologist in Advising Patients About Fertility Preservation Options

As with other potential complications of cancer treatment, oncologists have a responsibility to inform patients about the risk that their cancer treatment will permanently impair fertility. An algorithm for triaging fertility preservation referrals is presented in the original guideline document and suggested talking points are illustrated in a sidebar.

Oncologists should answer basic questions about whether fertility preservation options decrease the chance of successful cancer treatment, increase the risk of maternal or perinatal complications, or compromise the health of offspring. Patients should be encouraged to participate in registries and clinical studies as available to define further the safety of these interventions and strategies. Currently, women with a history of cancer and cancer treatment should be considered high risk for perinatal complications and would be prudent to seek specialized perinatal care.

Oncologists should refer interested and appropriate patients to reproductive specialists as soon as possible. Referral to psychosocial providers may be beneficial when a patient has moderate to severe distress about potential infertility.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

An algorithm is provided in the original guideline document for Triage of Fertility Preservation Referrals.

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Most recommendations are supported by case reports, case series, and cohort studies. Only a few randomized or definitive trials were found in the literature review.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Lee SJ, Schover LR, Partridge AH, Patrizio P, Wallace WH, Hagerty K, Beck LN, Brennan LV, Oktay K. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2006 Jun 20;24(18):1-15. [167 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2006 Jun 20

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American Society of Clinical Oncology - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

American Society of Clinical Oncology

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Expert Panel

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Panel Members: Stephanie J. Lee, MD MPH (Co-Chair); Kutluk Oktay, MD (Co-Chair); Lawrence V. Brennan, MD; Lindsay Nohr Beck; Ann H. Partridge, MD MPH; Pasquale Patrizio, MD MBE; Leslie R. Schover, PhD; W. Hamish Wallace, MD

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Although all authors completed the disclosure declaration, the following authors or immediate family members indicated a financial interest.

Authors Employment Leadership Consultant Stock Honoraria Research Funds Testimony Other
Stephanie J. Lee*                
Leslie R. Schover*                
Ann H. Partridge     Astra Zeneca (A)          
Pasquale Patrizio*                
W. Hamish Wallace*                
Karen Hagerty*                
Lindsay N. Beck   Fertile Hope (B)            
Lawrence V. Brennan*                
Kutluk Oktay*                
Dollar Amount Codes (A) < $10,000 (B) $10,000–99,000 (C) <$100,000 (N/R) Not Required

*No significant financial relationships to disclose.

No conflict exists for drugs or devices used in a study if they are not being evaluated as part of the investigation. For a detailed description of the disclosure categories, or for more information about American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO's) conflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure Declaration and the Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest section in Information for Contributors.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Web site.

Print copies: Available from American Society of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Policy and Clinical Affairs, 1900 Duke Street, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314; E-mail: guidelines@asco.org.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

Guidelines are available for Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) download from the ASCO Web site.

PATIENT RESOURCES

The following is available:

Please note: This patient information is intended to provide health professionals with information to share with their patients to help them better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. By providing access to this patient information, it is not the intention of NGC to provide specific medical advice for particular patients. Rather we urge patients and their representatives to review this material and then to consult with a licensed health professional for evaluation of treatment options suitable for them as well as for diagnosis and answers to their personal medical questions. This patient information has been derived and prepared from a guideline for health care professionals included on NGC by the authors or publishers of that original guideline. The patient information is not reviewed by NGC to establish whether or not it accurately reflects the original guideline's content.

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on July 27, 2006.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the American Society of Clinical Oncology's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo