![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
![]() |
EID
Home | Ahead of Print | Past
Issues | EID Search | Contact
Us | Announcements | Suggested
Citation | Submit Manuscript
Volume 11, Number 11, November 2005 Anaplasma phagocytophilum–infected Ticks, JapanNorio Ohashi,*† Megumi Inayoshi,*‡ Kayoko Kitamura,* Fumihiko Kawamori,*‡
Daizoh Kawaguchi,* Yuusaku Nishimura,* Hirotaka Naitou,* Midori Hiroi,*‡
and Toshiyuki Masuzawa*† |
|
|
![]() |
|
Back to article | |
Figure 2. Phylogram of Anaplasma phagocytophilum p44/msp2 including Japanese paralogs. A) Cluster from Ixodes persulcatus. B) Cluster from I. ovatus, except for Tick41-1. The tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method. Numbers on the tree indicate bootstrap values for branch points. Japanese p44/msp2 paralogs from I. persulcatus and I. ovatus are underlined and boxed, respectively, in bold. A single star shows p44/msp2 clusters with 99.2%–100% similarities and double stars show a cluster with 85.6% similarity. Two vertical bars and 6 arrows indicate Japanese p44/msp2 clusters and paralogs, respectively, which are distinct from the previously identified p44/msp2 (<73.1% similarity). A horizontal bar indicates percentage of sequence divergence. Accession numbers and location (Japan-Y [Yamanashi], Japan-S [Shizuoka], US [United States], and UK [United Kingdom]) are in parentheses. |
|
|
|
![]() |
EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z |
![]() |
![]() |
This page last reviewed October 14, 2005 |
![]() |
![]() |
Emerging
Infectious Diseases Journal |
![]() |