USDA Economic Research Service Briefing Room
" "  
Link: Bypass USDA Left navigation.
Search ERS

Browse by Subject
Diet, Health & Safety
Farm Economy
Farm Practices & Management
Food & Nutrition Assistance
Food Sector
Natural Resources & Environment
Policy Topics
Research & Productivity
Rural Economy
Trade and International Markets
Also Browse By


or

""

 


 
Briefing Rooms

Rural Development Strategies: Education and Training

Contents
 

In today's global economy, U.S. businesses compete with businesses from countries where wages and labor skill levels are relatively low. To survive, U.S. businesses may reduce wages or use more labor-saving technology to save on labor costs. Such efforts, however, may not be sufficient to keep industry going in many places. Alternatively, businesses may make adjustments in the products or services they sell to make better use of a comparative advantage that benefits the U.S. economy—a highly educated and high-skilled labor force.

Such adjustments have been easier for urban areas than for rural areas, where the labor force is relatively less educated. This gap in skills largely stems from migration of educated rural youth to urban areas where the returns to education are higher. Historically, this movement has not hurt rural areas because traditional rural jobs in agriculture, mining, timber, and other such industries have not required much in the way of education for their laborers. The same holds true for most other rural jobs, including the manufacturing and service jobs that came to dominate the rural economy in the 20th century. Technological change and globalization, however, have ushered in an era in which employees are required to have a higher level of skills and education.

While rural America has made improvements in educational attainment in recent years, it still lags behind urban areas. This puts rural areas at an economic disadvantage as workers' wages tend to be associated with their education levels. In 2002, for example, average weekly earnings of workers in rural (nonmetro) areas totaled $782 for college graduate, $438 for those with a high school degree but not a college degree, and $355 for those lacking a high school degree.

Chart showing educational attainment. d

In addition, employment growth in recent years has favored high-skill over low-skill service jobs, and lower education levels have become a disadvantage for rural manufacturing job growth, as most manufacturers today are seeking to locate in places where the labor force is more highly educated.

Employment growth by sector in metro and nonmetro areas, 1990-2000 d

 

Chart showing  change in manufacturing jobs in nonmetro low-and high-education counties.  Percent change in number of jobs. d

Education's Contribution to Rural Economic Development

A 1997 ERS study found that higher education levels contributed positively to the growth of total rural earnings (see What Makes Rural Communities Grow?). More recent research examining education's impact on various measures of economic development also found several ways that education had a positive effect on rural economic growth and well-being:

  • A well-educated workforce facilitates the adoption of new ways of producing goods or providing services among local businesses.
  • Prospective employers may view a well-educated local labor force as an asset when choosing among alternative locations for new establishments.
  • Highly skilled firm managers and workers with school-age children prefer to live in places with good school systems.
  • Higher educational levels are almost always tied to geographic clusters of certain key industries, which in some cases have generated major economic growth in rural areas.

Recognition of this link between education and economic development has led to an increase in rural development strategies that focus on educational improvement. Such approaches may be particularly beneficial to rural areas that have most of the ingredients needed for development in place, but find their potential limited by their populations' relatively low education levels (see Education as a Rural Development Strategy).

Strategies To Improve Rural School Performance

To adjust to these new economic realities, many rural communities are making efforts to upgrade their schools. While some places endeavor to attract better teachers, provide teachers with more training, and build new and improved schools and facilities, such approaches can be prohibitively expensive.

Rural communities are increasingly turning to alternative approaches to improving school performance by embracing the capabilities of computers and advanced telecommunications. For example, some rural schools are enabling students to take advanced science classes through distance learning. Such approaches may especially appeal to smaller schools and schools with limited resources.

Some rural schools are encouraging more local residents to volunteer as teaching assistants or tutors. The pool of volunteers may draw from anyone in the community, including retirees, or members of local organizations, such as faith-based institutions. Community involvement is critical in attracting the individuals and organizations needed to perform these roles.

Bridging the Gap Between Schools and Local Labor Requirements

Some rural schools have tried adopting curricula that encourage students to identify more with the community's challenges, including programs that help students create small businesses or participate in local businesses and other institutions. These kinds of curricula have multiple objectives, including (1) to help the student to acquire problem-solving and entrepreneurial skills, (2) to assist local businesses and institutions, and (3) to give students more reason to identify with the local community. Strong identification with a community is particularly important to areas with declining populations.

Other strategies linked to rural economic development make use of apprenticeships and school-to-work programs. These initiatives engage area employers to formally work with schools and training programs to streamline the process by which youths acquire education and skills that can lead to productive employment with local businesses (see The Role of Education: Promoting the Economic & Social Vitality of Rural America).

Community colleges and land grant universities can also play an important role in rural economic development. In addition to providing basic education and training, these institutions can help local firms or industries directly by developing new industrial products and processes, identifying new markets, and providing specialized training for the workforce and for community leaders (see Rural Community Colleges: Creating Educational Hybrids for the New Economy). They can also help improve local quality of life by providing a more intellectually stimulating environment that can help to attract or retain creative employees and entrepreneurs instrumental in driving economic development.

For more information on rural education and training, see the Rural Labor and Education Briefing Room. See also related links and recommended readings on topics covering education as a rural development strategy.

 

For more information, contact: Richard Reeder

Web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov

Updated date: October 23, 2006