National Cancer Institute
U.S. National Institutes of Health | www.cancer.gov

NCI Home
Cancer Topics
Clinical Trials
Cancer Statistics
Research & Funding
News
About NCI
Clinical Trials (PDQ®)
Patient Version   Health Professional Version
Last Modified: 6/20/2008     First Published: 5/1/1999  
Page Options
Print This Page
E-Mail This Document
Quick Links
Director's Corner

Dictionary of Cancer Terms

NCI Drug Dictionary

Funding Opportunities

NCI Publications

Advisory Boards and Groups

Science Serving People

Español
NCI Highlights
Maintenance Rituximab for Follicular Lymphoma

Azacitidine Improves Survival in MDS

Second Stem Cell Transplant Not Helpful in Myeloma
Phase III Randomized Study of Sentinel Node Dissection With or Without Conventional Axillary Dissection in Women With Clinically Node Negative Breast Cancer

Alternate Title
Basic Trial Information
Objectives
Entry Criteria
Expected Enrollment
Outline
Published Results
Related Publications
Trial Contact Information
Registry Information

Alternate Title

Surgery to Remove Sentinel Lymph Nodes With or Without Removing Lymph Nodes in the Armpit in Treating Women With Breast Cancer

Basic Trial Information

PhaseTypeStatusAgeSponsorProtocol IDs
Phase IIITreatmentClosedNot specifiedNCINSABP-B-32
NCT00003830

Objectives

  1. Compare the long term control of regional disease by sentinel node resection vs sentinel node resection followed by conventional axillary dissection in women with breast cancer who are clinically node negative and pathologically sentinel node negative.
  2. Compare the effect of these two regimens on the overall and disease-free survival of these patients.
  3. Compare the morbidity associated with these two regimens in these patients.
  4. Compare the prognostic value of these two regimens in patients who are sentinel node negative or positive by pathology.
  5. Determine whether a more detailed pathology investigation can identify a group of patients with a potentially increased risk of systemic recurrence who are node negative by pathology.
  6. Determine the technical success rate of sentinel node dissection and the variability of technical success rate in a broad population of surgeons.
  7. Determine the sensitivity of the sentinel node to determine the presence of nodal metastases in these patients.

Objectives of quality of life questionnaire in sentinel node-negative patients:

  1. Compare the severity of self-assessed symptoms and activity limitations of patients treated with these two regimens.
  2. Compare the severity of self-assessed symptoms and activity limitations after breast cancer surgery in patients whose surgery was on the dominant side vs patients whose surgery was on the non-dominant side.
  3. Compare the impact of arm edema, range of motion, and sensory neuropathy on self-assessed measures of daily functioning, symptoms, and overall quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.

Entry Criteria

Disease Characteristics:

  • Resectable invasive adenocarcinoma of the breast, confirmed by 1 of the following:
    • Histologically confirmed by core or open biopsy
    • Confirmed by fine needle aspiration cytology AND positive clinical breast examination and ultrasound or mammography


  • Clinically negative lymph nodes
    • No positive ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes
    • No prior removal of ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes
    • No suspicious palpable nodes in the contralateral axilla or palpable supraclavicular or infraclavicular nodes, unless proven nonmalignant by biopsy


  • No ulceration, erythema, infiltration of the skin or underlying chest wall (complete fixation), peau d'orange, or skin edema of any magnitude
    • Tethering or dimpling of the skin or nipple inversion allowed


  • No bilateral malignancy or mass in the opposite breast that is suspicious for malignancy, unless proven nonmalignant by biopsy


  • No diffuse tumors or multiple malignant tumors in different quadrants of the breast


  • No other prior breast malignancy except lobular carcinoma in situ


  • No prior or concurrent breast implants


  • Hormone receptor status:
    • Not specified


Prior/Concurrent Therapy:

Biologic therapy:

  • No prior immunotherapy for this cancer

Chemotherapy:

  • No prior chemotherapy for this cancer, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy:

  • No prior hormonal therapy for this cancer

Radiotherapy:

  • No prior radiotherapy for this cancer

Surgery:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • No prior breast reduction surgery
  • Prior excisional biopsy or lumpectomy allowed

Patient Characteristics:

Age:

  • Not specified

Sex:

  • Female

Menopausal status:

  • Not specified

Performance status:

  • Not specified

Life expectancy:

  • At least 10 years (excluding diagnosis of cancer)

Hematopoietic:

  • Not specified

Hepatic:

  • No hepatic systemic disease

Renal:

  • No renal systemic disease

Cardiovascular:

  • No cardiovascular systemic disease

Other:

  • No prior malignancy within past 5 years except:
    • Effectively treated squamous cell or basal cell skin cancer
    • Surgically treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix
    • Surgically treated lobular carcinoma in situ of the ipsilateral or contralateral breast
  • No concurrent psychiatric or addictive disorder

Expected Enrollment

5400

Approximately 5,400 patients will be accrued for this study within 4 years.

Outline

This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified according to the surgical treatment plan (lumpectomy vs mastectomy), age (49 and under vs 50 and over), and clinical tumor size (no greater than 2.0 cm vs 2.1-4.0 cm vs at least 4.1 cm). Patients are randomized to one of two surgery arms.

All patients receive technetium (Tc 99m) sulfur colloid injected into normal breast tissue within 1 cm of the primary tumor or biopsy cavity and an intradermal injection of technetium (Tc 99m) sulfur colloid, approximately 0.5-8 hours before surgery. Patients also receive an injection of isosulfan blue dye around the tumor or biopsy cavity after a hot spot is identified with a gamma detector. If a hot spot is not identified, the blue dye is injected after a saline bolus injection.

  • Arm I: Patients undergo sentinel node resection immediately followed by conventional axillary dissection.


  • Arm II: Patients undergo sentinel node resection and an intraoperative examination of sentinel nodes.


Patients with positive sentinel nodes undergo axillary dissection after sentinel node resection.

Patients with cytologically negative sentinel nodes do not undergo axillary dissection.

Patients with cytologically negative but histologically positive sentinel nodes return to surgery for axillary dissection.

Patients with histologically positive sentinel nodes and those in whom the sentinel node is not identified undergo axillary dissection after sentinel node resection.

Patients with pathologically positive, nonaxillary sentinel nodes undergo axillary dissection after sentinel node resection.

Patients with evidence of tumor remaining after surgery undergo a total mastectomy.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at weeks 1-3, and then every 6 months for 3 years or until recurrence.

Patients are followed at 1 and 3 weeks, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.

Published Results

Land SR, Kopec JA, Lee M, et al.: Quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving sentinel-node (SN) biopsy alone or with axillary dissection (AD): results from NSABP protocol B-32. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-9533, 2008.

Julian TB, Anderson SJ, Fourchotte V, et al.: Is completion axillary dissection always required after a positive sentinel node biopsy? NSABP B-32. [Abstract] Breast Cancer Res Treat 106 (1): A-51, S15, 2007.

Julian TB, Anderson SJ, Fourchotte V, et al.: Is intraoperative cytology of sentinel nodes useful and predictive for non-sentinel axillary nodes? NSABP B-32. [Abstract] Breast Cancer Res Treat 106 (1): A-3001, 2007.

Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al.: Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 8 (10): 881-8, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract]

Julian B, Fourchotte V, Anderson S, et al.: Predictive factors that identify patients not requiring a sentinel node biopsy: continued analysis of the NSABP B-32 sentinel node trial. [Abstract] Breast Cancer Res Treat 100 (Suppl 1): A-2003, S80-1, 2006.

Weaver DL, Krag DN, Manna EA, et al.: Detection of occult sentinel lymph node micrometastases by immunohistochemistry in breast cancer. An NSABP protocol B-32 quality assurance study. Cancer 107 (4): 661-7, 2006.[PUBMED Abstract]

Harlow SP, Krag DN, Julian TB, et al.: Prerandomization Surgical Training for the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-32 trial: a randomized phase III clinical trial to compare sentinel node resection to conventional axillary dissection in clinically node-negative breast cancer. Ann Surg 241 (1): 48-54, 2005.[PUBMED Abstract]

Related Publications

Land SR, Ritter MW, Costantino JP, et al.: Compliance with patient-reported outcomes in multicenter clinical trials: methodologic and practical approaches. J Clin Oncol 25 (32): 5113-20, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract]

Trial Contact Information

Trial Lead Organizations

National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project

David Krag, MD, FACS, Protocol chair
Ph: 802-656-5830
Email: David.Krag@uvm.edu

Registry Information
Official Title A Randomized, Phase III Clinical Trial to Compare Sentinel Node Resection to Conventional Axillary Dissection in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients
Trial Start Date 1999-05-17
Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00003830
Date Submitted to PDQ 1999-03-25
Information Last Verified 2003-06-26
NCI Grant/Contract Number U10-CA12027

Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol.

Back to Top

A Service of the National Cancer Institute
Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health USA.gov