CFDA Number: | 84.318X - Enhancing Education Through Technology |
Program Goal: To facilitate the comprehensive and integrated use of educational technology into instruction and curricula to improve teaching and student achievement. |
Objective 8.1 of 3: Fully integrate technology into the curricula and instruction in all schools by December 31, 2006 (FY 2007) to enhance teaching and learning. . |
Indicator 8.1.1 of 1: Curriculum Integration: The percentage of districts receiving Educational Technology State Grants (EETT) funds that have effectively and fully integrated technology, as identified by states, will increase. | ||||||||||||||||||
Targets and Performance Data | Assessment of Progress | Sources and Data Quality | ||||||||||||||||
|
Explanation: The FY 2004 target is to establish a baseline. The target for FY 2005 is the baseline plus 5%. |
Additional Source Information: State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA), Consolidated Performance Report; Program Monitoring. Frequency: Annually. Collection Period: 2003 - 2004 Data Available: November 2005 Validated By: No Formal Verification. |
Objective 8.2 of 3: To help ensure that students and teachers in high-poverty, high-need schools have access to educational technology comparable to that of students and teachers in other schools. |
Indicator 8.2.1 of 1: Internet access in high poverty classrooms: Internet access in high-poverty school classrooms will be comparable to that in other schools. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Targets and Performance Data | Assessment of Progress | Sources and Data Quality | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Explanation: The number of high-poverty schools with Internet access continues to rise. As high-poverty schools increasingly obtain access to the Internet, it is likely that their classroom connections will subsequently increase. |
Source 1: NCES Survey/Assessment Survey/Assessment: Fast Response Survey System. References: National Center for Education Statistics Study - Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms. Source 2: Other Other: National Evaluation. Sponsor: Policy and Program Studies Service- National Educational Technology Trends Study (NETTS). Date Sponsored: 06/06/2003. Additional Source Information: Consolidated Performance Report, Program Monitoring Frequency: Annually. Collection Period: 2003 - 2004 Data Available: October 2005 Validated By: No Formal Verification. Limitations: Poverty measures are based on data on free and reduced-price lunches, which may underestimate school poverty levels, particularly for older students and immigrant students. |
Objective 8.3 of 3: To provide professional development opportunities for teachers, principals and school administrators to develop capacity to effectively integrate technology into teaching and learning. |
Indicator 8.3.1 of 1: Professional Development: In districts that receive funding from the State Grant program, the percentage of teachers that meet their state technology standards will increase. | ||||||||||||||||||
Targets and Performance Data | Assessment of Progress | Sources and Data Quality | ||||||||||||||||
|
Explanation: The FY 2004 target is to establish a baseline. The target for FY 2005 is the baseline plus 5%. |
Additional Source Information: Consolidated Performance Report, Program Monitoring, State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA). Frequency: Annually. Collection Period: 2003 - 2004 Data Available: November 2005 Validated By: No Formal Verification. |