March 28, 2008

It’s Plane to See

web10917-2008_640.jpg

“In Plane View: Abstractions of Flight,” a new exhibition at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum that opened March 21, is a collection of 56 large-format photographs by Carolyn Russo that will toy with your perceptions. These hyper close-ups of aerial icons focus on parts rather than the whole aircraft—reminiscent of O’Keefe’s flowers, Warhol’s soup cans and a Technicolor movie musical.

The images are strikingly bizarre with exceptionally vivid colors, providing an open buffet of eye candy that is a sensory experience that cannot be had by looking at aircraft strung from the ceiling. (Above: these are the grooves within the exhaust cone of the North American X-15. The pattern of light and dark streaks were etched into the exhaust cone by the extremely hot gas expelled through it.)

Russo has been a photographer at the Air and Space Museum since 1988 and began working on the project in 2004, armed with her handheld Hasselblad and a background in portrait photography. The aim was to divine the persona of each aircraft, accentuating qualities that the average tourist would not think to uncover.

“We live with these planes,” Russo said of her subjects. “I see them every day. They become beings.”

“In Plane View” can be found on the ground floor of the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum until January 2, 2009, and a book of Russo’s work is available from powerHouse books.

(Photo by Carolyn Russo/NASM, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution)



Posted By: Jesse Rhodes — Air and Space Museum | Link | Comments (0)



It’s Plane to See

web10917-2008_640.jpg

“In Plane View: Abstractions of Flight,” a new exhibition at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum that opened March 21, is a collection of 56 large-format photographs by Carolyn Russo that will toy with your perceptions. These hyper close-ups of aerial icons focus on parts rather than the whole aircraft—reminiscent of O’Keefe’s flowers, Warhol’s soup cans and a Technicolor movie musical.

The images are strikingly bizarre with exceptionally vivid colors, providing an open buffet of eye candy that is a sensory experience that cannot be had by looking at aircraft strung from the ceiling. (Above: these are the grooves within the exhaust cone of the North American X-15. The pattern of light and dark streaks were etched into the exhaust cone by the extremely hot gas expelled through it.)

Russo has been a photographer at the Air and Space Museum since 1988 and began working on the project in 2004, armed with her handheld Hasselblad and a background in portrait photography. The aim was to divine the persona of each aircraft, accentuating qualities that the average tourist would not think to uncover.

“We live with these planes,” Russo said of her subjects. “I see them every day. They become beings.”

“In Plane View” can be found on the ground floor of the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum until January 2, 2009, and a book of Russo’s work is available from powerHouse books.

(Photo by Carolyn Russo/NASM, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution)



Posted By: Jesse Rhodes — Air and Space Museum | Link | Comments (0)



March 20, 2008

Love Was Not in the Cards For Mei Xiang

panda-ai.jpg

We’ve been keeping an eye on the PandaCam at the Zoo because we heard it was time for a little hanky panky between the pandas. But if anything went on, we missed it.

Should nature not take its proper course, however, the Zoo’s scientists don’t want to waste an opportunity. Female pandas only go into estrus one time a year for just 48 hours.

So yesterday, reproduction scientists Copper Aitken-Palmer, JoGayle Howard, and Pierre Comizzoli (foreground) and zoo veterinarian Carlos Sanchez were part of a large team of experts that performed an artificial insemination this afternoon on Mei Xiang, the Zoo’s female giant panda.

By all reports, if the insemination is successful, Mei Xiang will give birth in the next 90 to 185 days.

(Photograph courtesy of Jessie Cohen / Smithsonian’s National Zoo/March 19, 2008)



Posted By: Beth Py-Lieberman — National Zoo | Link | Comments (1)



March 18, 2008

A Picture Worth More than A Thousand Words

The Smithsonian Photography Initiative is calling its new web-based forum “Click! Photography Changes Everything,” a title that begs the question, how so?

The story behind the somewhat haunting photo of two young boys really drove the point home for me. Elijah and Isaiah, orphans in New Mexico, faced a rocky start. At ages 4 and 5, they were about to be institutionalized because their “high-needs” status prevented them from entering into Foster Care. When a photographer from the Heart Gallery, an organization that uses photography to bring awareness to adoption, snapped some photos of them, she couldn’t get any smiles, only fearful and icy stares. But a couple saw the photo at a Roswell, New Mexico, exhibition and was so moved that they adopted the boys. For Elijah and Isaiah, it was the click that changed everything. To Heart Gallery co-founder Diane Granito, it was a “single, but indicative, moment in their lives captured with compassion and skill” that had the strength to change the way families are formed.

click-logo.jpg

Find more art-affirming stories at the Click! website which launched just last Friday. The site featuring nearly 20 essays from people of all disciplines weighing in on how photography affects who we are, where we go, and what we do, is a facet of a decade-long research project, the Smithsonian Photography Initiative, to make the Institution’s collection of more than 13 million images more accessible to the public. Director Merry Foresta says the stories on Click! “are meant to represent an accumulated archive of different viewpoints and different contexts about photography,” adding that the future holds even more promise of “unique points of view.”



Posted By: Beth Py-Lieberman — Uncategorized | Link | Comments (0)



March 13, 2008

Laurie Anderson Speaks Saturday

laurieanderson.jpg

Laurie Anderson’s career has ranged far and wide since her jump from avant-garde performance artist to 1980s pop music star. In addition to experimenting with electronic instruments like the talking stick and the tape-bow violin, she’s written the Encyclopedia Britannica entry for “New York” and recently served as NASA’s first artist in residence. Anderson will be giving a free lecture on Andy Warhol (sponsored by the National Portrait Gallery and the Smithsonian American Art Museum) at 4:30 in the McEvoy Auditorium on March 15. I got the chance to catch up with her last week.

You started out in the 1960s and 1970s as an artist and you became a pop hit in the 1980s. How was that transition?

I didn’t know anything about the pop world. I was just an artist in New York and I had made a record that I was distributing by mail order. People would call me up on the phone and say, “Can I get this record?” I would go over to a carton, pick it up and go to the post office with it. I had pressed 1,000 records of something I had done on an NEA grant called O Superman. Then I got a call one afternoon from a guy in Britain who said “I’d like to order some records. I’ll need 40,000 Thursday and 40,000 more on Monday.” So I said, “Right. Okay. I’ll get right back to you.”

I called Warner Brothers and said, “Listen, I need to press a bunch of records, could you help me with it?” And they said, “That’s not how we do things at Warner Brothers Records. What we do is you sign an eight-record deal.”

And I was like, “What?”

So anyway, that’s what I did, because I thought that could be interesting. I tried very hard not to be seduced by that kind of world. I tried to have a lot of fun with it and I think I did. You get out of a car and everyone is screaming, it was just funny for me. They were like, “Can I get your autograph? Oh my god!” and “It’s really you.” For me I felt like an anthropologist.

Anthropologist? You’ve also worked in McDonald’s. Is that how you stay fresh, by trying different things?

I had gotten into kind of a rut with my life as an artist. You know how you make these elaborate plans and you start living them out without really getting into the experience?

I thought “How can I escape this trap of just experiencing what I expect?” I try to jump out of my skin. I normally see the world as an artist first, second as a New Yorker and third as a woman. That’s a perspective that I sometimes would like to escape.

So I put myself in places where I don’ t know what to do, I don’t know what to say, I don’t know how to act. I worked on an Amish farm, a place that had no technology at all. I also worked in McDonald’s. They were all really, really fascinating experiences.

You’re coming down to D.C. next week to give a lecture about Andy Warhol and his “Little Electric Chair” series. Why Warhol?

I feel like we are living in Andy’s world now. It’s the world that he defined in so many ways and his obsessions with fame and violence and ego. You just look around and go, “Wow, he was doing that 30 years ago!”

American culture was going that way and he nailed it. It’s completely fascinating how he came up with those categories and American life became that way.

Why the electric chair?

I think for me it combines a lot of things. One was this idea of tabloid stuff. We don’t allow images of people being electrocuted, for example. Another is the factory image, the multiple stuff, it’s a kind of death factory. People pass through that and it involves technology as well in a way, it’s the power of electricity….

Are you running out of time?

I am running out of time. My assistant is waving his hands, saying “You have to go now or you’ll be dead!”

(Photograph courtesy of SAAM. Saturday’s event is part of the American Pictures Distinguished Lecture Series, sponsored by the National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian American Art Museum and the C.V. Starr Center for the Study of the American Experience at Washington College in Chestertown, Maryland.)



Posted By: Kenneth R. Fletcher — Uncategorized | Link | Comments (0)



Next Page »

Advertisement