|
|||||||||||||||
Sexually
Transmitted Diseases > Program Guidelines > Medical and Laboratory Services
Program Operations Guidelines for STD Prevention
Sections on this page:
PROVIDING STAT LABORATORY SERVICES IN COMPLIANCE WITH CLIAThe Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA '88) are federal minimum quality standards for all laboratory testing. On February 28, 1992, regulations implementing CLIA were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 57, No. 40, February 28, 1992, Rules and Regulations, pp. 7137-7288. Tables summarizing the personnel requirements for moderate (including Provider Performed Microscopy) and high complexity laboratories are contained in Appendix ML-A, as well as instructions for obtaining a complete list of categorized test systems, a list of waived test systems from the Internet, and a brief history of CLIA. Appendix ML-A also discusses the opportunity for an exemption to the certification requirements for limited public health testing. Recommendations
VENIPUNCTUREVenipuncture skills are desired and very often required of STD staff, including Disease Intervention Specialists (DIS). Venipuncture is often performed to obtain a blood specimen for STD/HIV testing. This is a safe procedure when performed correctly by individuals who have received proper training. Training and certification (if necessary) for proficiency in venipuncture is usually obtained by working with a licensed physician or other persons skilled in venipuncture. In many areas the STD staff may perform venipuncture only under a physician's standing order and must adhere to all the stipulations outlined in the standing order. Observation and practice is required to become skilled and self-confident in the art of venipuncture. Several of the STD/HIV Prevention Training Centers (PTCs) offer training in venipuncture techniques. Other opportunities for training include on-the-job, one-on-one training in a clinical practicum with a health care worker properly qualified to train and certify (if necessary), or local private providers who can be contractors (e.g., Red Cross, blood banks, community colleges). The training provider may be a city or county clinic or health department, state health department, local hospital, school of medical technology in a college or university, or a Red Cross training program. A sample training program is included in Appendix ML-F. When performing venipuncture, the STD staff should always be aware that this procedure is being done under the legal authority of the local health officer. The staff must become familiar with the relevant legal authorities and adhere to the procedural requirements of the health department Laboratory Director. It is imperative that the staff exercise the utmost care and professional judgment in the application of venipuncture procedures. If a needle-stick injury occurs, the injured employee should immediately contact their supervisor and follow local health care worker occupational exposure policies (see section on emergency procedures). In addition, for Federal employees, immediate notification of the exposure should be provided to the CDC Office of Health and Safety. Venipuncture in the field (field bloods) is most commonly performed by DIS on members of identified groups at high risk of syphilis and HIV infection; partners of known syphilis or HIV positive patients; associates of known syphilis patients (including cluster suspects); and previously examined persons for whom a physician desires another serologic test only. Each program area should determine their priorities for field bloods. Professional judgment may compel the DIS to draw a blood specimen from an individual who clearly is in need of clinical evaluation or treatment. It would be prudent for the DIS to extract a specimen when the opportunity presents itself, if it appears the individual is deemed unreliable or expresses reluctance to accept medical services. Such applications of field venipuncture must be considered judiciously and in context with local policies. When these situations arise, the DIS must report such activities to the supervisor at the earliest opportunity. Recommendations
DISEASE INTERVENTION SPECIALIST SERVICES IN MEDICAL FACILITIESThe work performed by disease intervention specialists (DIS) is essential to the successful operation of a STD clinic. DIS reinforce the education and counseling messages provided by the STD clinician during the examination. More importantly, they interview and counsel patients and perform investigations to locate people who may be at risk for STD and refer them for examination, treatment, and counseling (see the chapter on partner services for more detail on DIS activities outside the clinic). It is appropriate for the DIS to offer a full range of intervention services in a single session rather than ask a patient to repeat the same information to several people. Because STD-related information is sensitive, the patient's transition between clinical care and the STD interview or HIV prevention counseling session must be smooth and appear to be natural extensions of each other. Recommendations
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURESQuality assurance activities and programs within clinics are important functions that ensure a minimal standard of acceptable clinical care, clinic management, and clinic operations. A well designed quality assurance program provides opportunity for clinic personnel from diverse areas to interact in the process of objectively reviewing clinical, management, and operations outcomes. The results of quality assurance activities should be used to modify clinic policy and procedures in an effort to improve clinical care, clinic management, and/or clinic operations. Recommendations
REPORTINGMorbidity Epidemiologic surveillance is the continuing and systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of health data in the process of describing and monitoring a health event. Surveillance reporting permits a program to fulfill its mandated function of informing the public about a health problem, and facilitates basic program planning, implementation, and evaluation to determine public health action. State law specifies which diseases to report and which practitioner or facility is responsible for reporting diseases and situations (e.g., child abuse) to the official state agency. Reportable STDs mandated by state laws and included in federal and other voluntary surveillance systems usually include cases of gonorrhea, chlamydia, syphilis, chancroid, lymphogranuloma venereum, and granuloma inguinale. Some states also require reporting of HIV, PID, or genital herpes. Uniform STD surveillance case definitions are vital to the management of disease prevention programs. Case definitions may differ from diagnostic criteria meant to assist the clinician in arriving at a certainty of diagnosis for a given patient and disease. (See Surveillance and Data Management for further information.) Sexual Abuse and Assault The management of STDs in children and the suspected sexual abuse of children requires close cooperation between clinic personnel and child protection authorities. Some diseases, such as gonorrhea and syphilis are virtually 100% indicative of sexual contact if diagnosed in children after the neonatal period. The association of other STDs in children and the occurrence of child sexual abuse is not definitive. Most STD clinic personnel lack experience in the management of suspected child sexual abuse evaluations. Suspected victims of child sexual assault or abuse should be examined by a provider trained and/or certified to do such evaluations. Alternatively, suspected victims can be referred to an Emergency Department where trained clinicians are on call 24 hours/day. Clinic protocols should address referral policy and clinic staff should facilitate a referral, if necessary, in a manner that minimizes the victim's discomfort and anxiety. Domestic Violence The US Department of Justice estimates that 55% of women are raped and/or physically assaulted during their lifetime.(U.S. Department of Justice, 1998) Overall, estimates of numbers of women who experience abuse annually in the United States range from 8 to 12 percent. (Wilt, 1996) Many believe that these estimates are low. Victims and their abusers, more often than not, know each other and frequently live in the same household. The term domestic violence generally refers to violence and abuse within the home but also includes violence and/or abuse between people who know each other regardless of where the abusive event(s) takes place. Physical violence and abuse is only one method that an abuser may utilize to maintain control over the victim. Other abuse tactics include emotional and verbal abuse, isolation, and threats and intimidation. (U. S. Department of Justice, Website) Risk factors for domestic violence and abuse, such as young age, and drug and alcohol abuse are frequently the same as those for having a STD. This suggests, at least, that screening for domestic violence and abuse in venues where there is screening and treatment for STDs would lead to the identification of intervention opportunities for what is a universal health care problem. The federal Violence Against Women Act, passed as part of the Violent Crime Control Law Enforcement Act of 1994, established the National Domestic Violence Hotline. This nationwide, toll free hotline serves victims of domestic violence by providing local referral information. The hotline can be reached by dialing 1-800-799-SAFE or 1- 800-787-3224 (TDD). A Community Checklist: Important Steps to End Violence Against Women, (Department of Justice, 1995) identified several strategies that health care professionals can employ to intervene effectively into the problem of domestic violence in their communities and amongst their clients. These include:
Recommendations Disease Morbidity
Sexual Assault and Abuse
Domestic Violence
SCREENINGBecause many sexually-transmitted diseases are asymptomatic, seeking care when symptoms occur is unlikely to lead to detection of most infections. Therefore, screening is critical for early detection and treatment. Although persons with STDs may not specifically seek infection-related treatment services, they do visit several health care settings for other purposes. These visits are an opportunity to diagnose and treat STDs. Examples of healthcare settings in which this screening can take place are family planning clinics, prenatal clinics, emergency rooms and walk-in clinics, community and migrant-worker health centers, clinics for adolescents, school-based clinics, clinics in correctional facilities, and primary-care provider offices. Screening criteria have been defined in national guidelines. But, in the absence of well-defined screening criteria, prevalence of infections should be assessed in clinical settings that serve people who are potentially at risk. In populations where the prevalence is high (i.e., >2%), routine screening should be implemented. Previously described examples of populations at risk are people who abuse illicit drugs, who have more than one sex partner per year, who are entering correctional facilities, and who live in communities with high rates of STDs. Determination of risk should also take into account the prevalence of HIV infection in the population being considered. Early detection and treatment of STDs among HIV-infected persons can be effective and cost-beneficial in reducing HIV transmission for three reasons: most STDs promote increased shedding of HIV (Cohen, 1997); the number of HIV-infected persons is smaller than the number of persons at risk for becoming infected; and HIV-infected persons often receive regular medical care. All HIV-infected persons who are having unprotected sex should be screened for other sexually-transmitted infections, including gonorrhea, chlamydial infection, syphilis, and trichomoniasis. Persons with HIV/AIDS should be assessed for genital herpes, informed about the symptoms of herpes, and counseled particularly to avoid sex during periods with symptoms of reactivation of genital herpes, which are associated with higher rates of HIV viral shedding (Schacker, 1998). Sexually active, HIV-infected persons should be screened annually. If the person's risk behavior, risk behavior of the person's partner(s), and the incidence of STDs in the local population place the HIV-infected person at greater risk for another sexually-transmitted infection, screening should occur more frequently. Guidelines for screening for the major sexually transmitted pathogens and for screening specific population groups (e.g., adolescents) have been recently published (U.S. Preventive Task Force, 1996; American Medical Association, 1992). The Advisory Committee for HIV and STD Prevention endorses these existing screening guidelines and extends them to include the following recommendations:
Page last modified: August 16, 2007 Page last reviewed: August 16, 2007 Historical Document Content Source: Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||