SAMHSA's National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP)

Text version of PowerPoint Presentation [Download PPT file]

Slide # Title & Content
1 SAMHSA's National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP)
Advancing Evidence-based Services Through Improved Decision Support Tools

National Prevention Summit: Promotion, Preparedness, and Promotion
October 26, 2006
2 SAMHSA Vision for NREPP

"NREPP becomes a leading national resource for contemporary and reliable information on the scientific basis and practicality of interventions to prevent and/or treat mental and substance use disorders."

3 NREPP represents:

  • A major agency activity within SAMHSA's Science to Service initiative
  • A decision support tool and valuable resource for state and community-based organizations seeking to identify and select interventions to meet their needs
  • Not a list of approved programs and practices
4 Overview of Review Process

  • Applicant submits intervention materials during open submission process
  • Program Review Manager determines if minimum requirements are met and assigns priority points
  • Interventions meeting minimum requirements in priority areas sent to SAMHSA Centers for approval
  • SAMHSA approved interventions assigned to Review Coordinator who works with the applicant to complete review materials
5 Overview of Review Process (Continued)

  • Intervention materials and summary packets prepared by Review Coordinators sent to two doctoral-level scientific reviewers to rate Strength of Evidence and Readiness for Dissemination dimensions
  • Intervention materials sent to two consumer/family and/or program implementation reviewers to rate Readiness for Dissemination
  • Scores and descriptive information sent to applicants for review and consent to post on NREPP Web site
  • Intervention descriptive summaries and review results uploaded to NREPP Web site
6 Types of Materials Submitted

Strength of Evidence

  • Research articles and published/unpublished evaluation reports
  • Grant final reports
  • Replication reports
  • Implementation manuals
  • Data collection manuals
7 Types of Materials Submitted (Continued)

Readiness for Dissemination

  • Implementation guides, training manuals, presentations and curricula
  • Quality assurance and monitoring protocols and procedures
  • Data collection protocols for process and outcome measures
  • Products and materials adapted for different age/cultural groups
8 Types of Materials Submitted (Continued)

Additional Documents / Narrative To Describe:

  • Costs of implementation: Start-up and maintenance
  • Proprietary components of intervention
  • Implementation history of intervention
  • Unintended or adverse effects of the intervention
  • Contact information
9 Types of NREPP Reviewers

Strength of Evidence Reviewers

  • Doctoral-level researchers and practitioners with scientific evaluation knowledge and experience
Readiness for Dissemination Reviewers
  • Implementation experts and practitioners with service delivery experience; service consumers and/or family members
10 Three Minimum Requirements for NREPP Submission

  1. Demonstrate one or more positive outcomes in mental health and/or substance abuse behavior among individuals, communities, or populations
  2. Demonstrate intervention results have been published in a peer-reviewed publication or documented in a comprehensive evaluation report
  3. Demonstrate materials such as manuals, process guides, and training guides that are available to the public to implement the intervention.
11 Exclusions: These Interventions Should Not Be Submitted

  1. Stand-alone pharmacologic treatments (FDA reviews and approves these). NREPP reviews are limited to on-label use of FDA-approved pharmacotherapy interventions that are combined with one or more psychosocial treatments.
  2. Stand-alone smoking cessation interventions. These are only appropriate for NREPP review when conducted as part of a program for treatment of alcohol or other drugs of abuse.
12 NREPP Priority Point System

1 priority point — Research design
Experimental (e.g., randomized control study) or quasi-experimental (e.g., pre/post with comparison group, or interrupted time series) research design

1 priority point — Priority topic area
Primary outcome(s) of the submitted intervention is (are) in one or more of SAMHSA's Center-specific priority areas.

13 Following Up

More information on NREPP is available through SAMHSA's Web site by clicking on "National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices" on the SAMHSA home page at www.samhsa.gov.

For questions on NREPP or other SAMHSA activities to promote use of evidence-based services, contact:
Kevin D. Hennessy, Ph.D.
Science to Service Coordinator, SAMHSA
Phone: 240-276-2234
E-mail: kevin.hennessy@samhsa.hhs.gov

View list of available presentations