Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

(1) Perioperative blood transfusion for elective surgery. A national clinical guideline. (2) Perioperative blood transfusion for elective surgery. Update to printed guideline.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Perioperative blood transfusion for elective surgery. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2001 Oct. 34 p. (SIGN publication; no. 54). [173 references]


  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Perioperative blood transfusion for elective surgery. Update to printed guideline. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2004 Aug 31. 1 p. [2 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory and/or warning information has been released.

Drug Withdrawal

  • May 14, 2008, Trasylol (aprotinin injection): Following publication of the Blood conservation using antifibrinolytics: A randomized trial in a cardiac surgery population (BART) study in the May 14, 2008 online issue of The New England Journal of Medicine, Bayer Pharmaceuticals notified the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of their intent to remove all remaining supplies of Trasylol from hospital pharmacies and warehouses. Because Trasylol has been shown to decrease the need for red blood cell transfusions in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, future supplies of Trasylol will continue to be available through the company as an investigational drug under a special treatment protocol.

Additional Notices

  • July 31, 2008, Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs): Amgen and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) informed healthcare professionals of modifications to certain sections of the Boxed Warnings, Indications and Usage, and Dosage and Administration sections of prescribing information for Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs). The changes clarify the FDA-approved conditions for use of ESAs in patients with cancer and revise directions for dosing to state the hemoglobin level at which treatment with an ESA should be initiated.
  • November 8, 2007 and January 3, 2008 Update, Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs): The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) notified healthcare professionals of revised boxed warnings and other safety-related product labeling changes for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) stating serious adverse events, such as tumor growth and shortened survival in patients with advanced cancer and chronic kidney failure.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC): In August 2004 the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) released an update to this guideline, available on the SIGN Web site. None of the following recommendations were affected by the update.

Note from SIGN and NGC: In addition to these evidence-based recommendations, the guideline development group also identifies points of best clinical practice in the original guideline document.

The strength of recommendation grading (A-D) and level of evidence (I++-4) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Risks of Allogeneic Blood Transfusion

Immunomodulation

B: Transfusion of leucodepleted allogeneic blood should not be limited by concerns over increased cancer recurrence or perioperative infection.

Procedural Error

D: The British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH) collaborative guideline for the administration of blood and blood components and management of transfused patients (Transfus Med 1999;9:227-38) should be implemented in all Scottish hospitals where transfusion takes place.

All Risks

D: Given the potential risks, however small, each allogeneic transfusion must have a valid, defined and justifiable indication.

Preoperative Anticoagulant Therapy

D: All surgical and anaesthetic units should have protocols: to prepare anticoagulated patients for all types of surgery; for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in the preoperative period

Haemoglobin Transfusion Thresholds

Preoperative

C: Where possible, anaemia should be corrected prior to major surgery to reduce exposure to allogeneic transfusion.

Postoperative

D: Transfusion is unjustified at haemoglobin levels >100 g/l.

D: Transfusion is required at haemoglobin levels <70 g/l.

C: Patients with cardiovascular disease, or those expected to have covert cardiovascular disease (e.g., elderly patients or those with peripheral vascular disease) are likely to benefit from transfusion when their haemoglobin level falls below 90 g/l.

Aids to Effective Blood Ordering

Predictors of Allogeneic Transfusion

C: When ordering blood, all nine factors (listed below) determining the risk and degree of transfusion should be taken into account, for example by using Mercuriali's formula.

The factors determining risk of allogeneic transfusion are:

  • Low preoperative haemoglobin/hematocrit, either before intervention or on day of surgery
  • Low weight
  • Small height
  • Female sex
  • Age over 65 years
  • Availability of preoperative autologous blood donation
  • Estimated surgical blood loss
  • Type of surgery
  • Primary or revision surgery

Blood Ordering Equations

C: All hospitals should use a maximum surgical blood ordering schedule to provide concentrated red cells.

Transfusion Protocols

D: Transfusion guidelines should be combined with audit and/or educational initiatives to reduce the number of allogeneic transfusions.

Blood Sparing Strategies

Preoperative Autologous Blood Donation

D: Preoperative autologous blood donation should be offered only when it is possible to guarantee admission and operative dates.

B: Preoperative autologous blood donation can be used to reduce allogeneic blood exposure, although it does increase the total number of transfusion episodes.

C: Preoperative autologous blood donation can be used safely in elderly populations with diverse comorbidities.

C: Preoperative autologous blood donation should be targeted to men who present with haemoglobin 110 to 145 g/l and women who present with haemoglobin 130 to 145 g/l.

Erythropoietin

B: Erythropoietin use should be targeted to patients aged under 70 years who are scheduled for major blood losing surgery and who have a presenting haemoglobin <130 g/l.

D: Erythropoietin can be used to prepare patients with objections to allogeneic transfusion for surgery that involves major blood loss.

Combination of Preoperative Autologous Blood Donation and Erythropoietin

B: In fit patients undergoing major surgery, erythropoietin can be used in combination with autologous blood collection to reduce allogeneic transfusion.

B: In fit patients undergoing major surgery, erythropoietin can be used to obtain multiple autologous red cell donations while maintaining an adequate day of surgery haemoglobin.

Acute Normovolemic Haemodilution

D: Acute normovolemic haemodilution should be limited to patients with a haemoglobin level sufficiently high to allow 1,000 ml of blood to be removed, and in whom a relatively low target haemoglobin is deemed appropriate.

Cardiac Surgery

Aprotinin* and Antifibrinolytic Drugs

B: The use of aprotinin or tranexamic acid is recommended for patients undergoing cardiac surgery which carries a high risk of transfusion (e.g. repeat cardiac operations, multiple valve replacements, thoracic aortic operations, patients on preoperative aspirin therapy and procedures with anticipated long bypass times).

*Note: On May 14, 2008, Bayer Pharmaceuticals notified the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of their intent to remove all remaining supplies of Trasylol from hospital pharmacies and warehouses. Because Trasylol has been shown to decrease the need for red blood cell transfusions in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, future supplies of Trasylol will continue to be available through the company as an investigational drug under a special treatment protocol. See the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Web site for more information.

Cell Salvage

C: Reinfusion of washed shed mediastinal blood may be used to reduce allogeneic transfusion in cardiac surgery.

Orthopaedic Surgery

Aprotinin*

B: Aprotinin may be considered to reduce blood loss in hip and knee arthroplasties but its use should be restricted to procedures with an increased risk of high blood loss (e.g., bilateral and revision) and to circumstances when other blood conservation techniques are not appropriate (e.g., treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses).

*Note: On May 14, 2008, Bayer Pharmaceuticals notified the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of their intent to remove all remaining supplies of Trasylol from hospital pharmacies and warehouses. Because Trasylol has been shown to decrease the need for red blood cell transfusions in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, future supplies of Trasylol will continue to be available through the company as an investigational drug under a special treatment protocol. See the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Web site for more information.

Tranexamic Acid

B: Tranexamic acid can be used to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing knee replacement surgery, when other blood conservation techniques are inappropriate and where major blood loss is anticipated.

Cell Salvage

D: Unwashed postoperative salvage using drains should be considered in patients in whom a postoperative blood loss of between 750 ml and 1,500 ml is anticipated (e.g., bilateral joint replacement).

B: Washed intraoperative salvage should be considered in patients in whom an intraoperative blood loss of more than 1,500 ml is anticipated (e.g., major pelvic, spinal or non-infected revision surgery).

B: In orthopaedic surgery, cell salvage using either unwashed or washed red blood cells may be considered as a means of significantly reducing the risk of exposure to allogeneic blood.

Definitions:

Grades of Recommendation

A: At least one meta-analysis, systematic review, or randomized clinical trials rated as 1++, and directly applicable to the target population; or

A body of evidence consisting principally of studies rated as 1+, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results

B: A body of evidence including studies rated as 2++, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 1++ or 1+

C: A body of evidence including studies rated as 2+, directly applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2++

D: Evidence level 3 or 4; or

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2+

Good Practice Points: Recommended best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline development group.

Levels of Evidence:

1++: High quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials, or randomized clinical trials with a very low risk of bias

1+: Well-conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or randomized clinical trials with a low risk of bias

1-: Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or randomized clinical trials with a high risk of bias

2++: High quality systematic reviews of case control or cohort or studies

High quality case control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding or bias and a high probability that the relationship is causal

2+: Well-conducted case control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal

2-: Case control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk that the relationship is not causal

3: Non-analytic studies, e.g. case reports, case series

4: Expert opinion

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The specific type of supporting evidence is explicitly identified in each section of the original guideline document.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Perioperative blood transfusion for elective surgery. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2001 Oct. 34 p. (SIGN publication; no. 54). [173 references]


  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Perioperative blood transfusion for elective surgery. Update to printed guideline. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2004 Aug 31. 1 p. [2 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2001 Oct (addendum released 2004 Aug 31)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network - National Government Agency [Non-U.S.]

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Scottish Executive Health Department

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Not stated

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Guideline Development Group: Dr Pat Tansey (Chairman); Dr Brian McClelland (Methodologist); Mrs Pauline Cumming; Mrs Sandra Gray; Dr Rachel Green; Mr William Hadden; Mr Robin Harbour; Dr Cameron Howie; Mr Robert Jeffrey; Dr Martin Lees; Dr Allan Merry; Mr Robert Murdoch; Dr Dianne Plews; Dr Safia Qureshi; Dr Steve Rogers; Dr Colin Sinclair; Mr John Taylor; Mr George Welch

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All members of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline development groups are required to complete a declaration of interests, both personal and non-personal. A personal interest involves payment to the individual concerned, e.g., consultancies or other fee-paid work commissioned by or shareholdings in the pharmaceutical industry; a non-personal interest involves payment which benefits any group, unit or department for which the individual is responsible, e.g., endowed fellowships or other pharmaceutical industry support. SIGN guideline group members should be able to act as independently of external commercial influences as possible, therefore, individuals who declare considerable personal interests may be asked to withdraw from the group. Details of the declarations of interest of any guideline development group member(s) are available from the SIGN executive.

GUIDELINE STATUS

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

PATIENT RESOURCES

The following is available:

  • Key messages for patients. In: Perioperative blood transfusion for elective surgery. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, 2001 Oct. pp. 25. (SIGN publication; no. 54).

Electronic copies: Available from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) Web site:

Please note: This patient information is intended to provide health professionals with information to share with their patients to help them better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. By providing access to this patient information, it is not the intention of NGC to provide specific medical advice for particular patients. Rather we urge patients and their representatives to review this material and then to consult with a licensed health professional for evaluation of treatment options suitable for them as well as for diagnosis and answers to their personal medical questions. This patient information has been derived and prepared from a guideline for health care professionals included on NGC by the authors or publishers of that original guideline. The patient information is not reviewed by NGC to establish whether or not it accurately reflects the original guideline's content.

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on April 17, 2002. The information was verified by the guideline developer on July 11, 2002. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI on September 28, 2004. The information was verified by the guideline developer on January 26, 2005. This summary was updated by ECRI on February 14, 2006 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on Trasylol (aprotinin). This summary was updated by ECRI on October 4, 2006 following the updated FDA advisory on Trasylol (aprotinin). This summary was updated by ECRI on January 5, 2007 following the updated FDA advisory on Trasylol (aprotinin). This summary was updated by ECRI on January 29, 2007, following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory on erythropoiesis stimulating agents. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on July 9, 2007, following the FDA advisory on erythropoiesis stimulating agents. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on November 12, 2007, following the U.S. market withdrawal of Trasylol (aprotinin). This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on March 21, 2008 following the FDA advisory on Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on August 15, 2008 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory on Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs).

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo