Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Guideline on the use of ipecac syrup in the out-of-hospital management of ingested poisons.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Grades of recommendation (A-D, Z) and levels of evidence (1a-6) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Summary of the Quality of the Evidence

  1. Syrup of ipecac induces vomiting in almost all people to whom it is administered (Grade A evidence).
  2. Ipecac-induced emesis decreases the gastrointestinal absorption of ingested substances although to varying, unpredictable extents (Grade A and B evidence).
  3. The longer the interval between ingestion of the substance and the administration of ipecac syrup, the less the effect. This has been documented for a limited number of substances and the effectiveness in removing ingested materials declines rapidly with time and is substantially reduced after 30 to 90 minutes (Grade A, B and C evidence).
  4. The effectiveness of ipecac syrup in affecting patient outcome has not been studied in adequate clinical trials (No evidence).
  5. The rate of hospitalization of patients with moderate or severe poisonings in whom ipecac has been administered has not been studied (No evidence).
  6. The use of ipecac syrup to induce vomiting is associated with uncommon, serious adverse effects (Grade C evidence).
  7. Patients with eating disorders have abused ipecac syrup. This abuse has led to significant morbidity and mortality (Grade C evidence).

Conclusions of the Consensus Panel

The panel reached consensus that the circumstances in which ipecac-induced emesis is the appropriate or desired method of gastric decontamination are rare. The panel concluded that the use of ipecac syrup might have an acceptable benefit-to-risk ratio in rare situations in which:

  • There is no contraindication to the use of ipecac syrup; and
  • There is substantial risk of serious toxicity to the victim; and
  • There is no alternative therapy available or effective to decrease gastrointestinal absorption (e.g., activated charcoal); and
  • There will be a delay of greater than 1 hour before the patient will arrive at an emergency medical facility and ipecac syrup can be administered within 30 to 90 minutes of the ingestion; and
  • Ipecac syrup administration will not adversely affect more definitive treatment that might be provided at a hospital.

In such circumstances, the administration of ipecac syrup should occur only in response to a specific recommendation from a poison center, emergency department physician, or other qualified medical personnel.

The panel decided not to address the issue of whether ipecac should remain a nonprescription, over-the-counter product. The panel does not support the routine stocking of ipecac in all households with young children but was unable to reach consensus on which households with young children might benefit from stocking ipecac. Instead, the panel concluded that individual practitioners and poison control centers are best able to determine the particular patient population, geographic, and other variables that might influence the decision to recommend having ipecac on hand.

Definitions:

Grades of Recommendation and Levels of Evidence

Grades of Recommendation Levels of Evidence Description of Study Design
A 1a Systematic review (with homogeneity) of randomized clinical trials
  1b Individual randomized clinical trials (with narrow confidence interval)
1c All or none (all patients died before the drug became available, but some now survive on it; or when some patients died before the drug became available, but none now die on it.)
B 2a Systematic review (with homogeneity) of cohort studies
  2b Individual cohort study (including low quality randomized clinical trial)
2c "Outcomes" research
3a Systemic review (with homogeneity) of case-control studies
3b Individual case-control study
C 4 Case series, single case reports (and poor quality cohort and case control studies)
D 5 Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal or based on physiology or bench research
Z 6 Abstracts

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The evidence supporting the conclusions of the consensus panel is identified and graded (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2004

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American Association of Poison Control Centers - Professional Association

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Guidelines for the Management of Poisonings Consensus Panel

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Primary Authors: Anthony S. Manoguerra, PharmD, DABAT, FAACT; Daniel J. Cobaugh, PharmD, DABAT

Panel Members: E. Martin Caravati, MD, MPH, Medical Director, Utah Poison Control Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Gwenn Christianson, RN, MSN, Certified Specialist in Poison Information, Indiana Poison Center, Indianapolis, Indiana; Richard C. Dart, MD, PhD, Medical Director, Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center, Denver, Colorado; Daniel C. Keyes, MD, MPH, Medical Director, North Texas Poison Center, Texas Poison Center Network, Dallas, Texas; Anthony S. Manoguerra, PharmD, Director, California Poison Control System, San Diego Division, San Diego, California; Michael A. McGuigan, MD, CM, MBA, Medical Director, Long Island Regional Poison and Drug Information Center, Mineola, New York; Kent R. Olson, MD, Medical Director, California Poison Control System, San Francisco Division, San Francisco, California; Paul M. Wax, MD, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Arizona

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the American Association of Poison Control Centers Web site.

Print copies: Available from the American Association of Poison Control Centers, 3201 New Mexico Avenue NW, Suite 330, Washington, DC 20016

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on October 27, 2005. The information was verified by the guideline developer on November 28, 2005.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo