Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Evidence-based guidelines for nutritional support of the critically ill: results of a Bi-National Guideline Development Conference.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Doig GS. Evidence-based guidelines for nutritional support of the critically ill: results of a bi-national guideline development conference. Carlton (Australia): Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS); 2005. 282 p. [387 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The levels of evidence (I-IV) and grades of recommendations identifying the type of supporting evidence (A+, A, A-, B+, B, B-) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

The following evidence-based recommendations were ratified at the guideline development conference.

  • Enteral Nutrition (EN) in preference to Standard Care (nothing by mouth [NPO]), Grade B+ recommendation

    5 Level II randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Ratified by positive meta-analysis and validated evidence-based guideline (Algorithms for Critical Care Enteral and Parenteral Therapy [ACCEPT]).

  • Early EN (<24 hours) in preference to delayed EN, Grade B recommendation

    3 Level II RCTs. Ratified by validated evidence-based guideline (ACCEPT).

  • Parenteral Nutrition (PN) in preference to Standard Care (Intravenous [IV] Glucose), Grade B recommendation

    5 Level II RCTs. Ratified by validated evidence-based guideline (ACCEPT).

  • Early EN (<24 hours) in preference to PN, Grade B recommendation

    6 Level II RCTs. Ratified by validated evidence-based guideline (ACCEPT).

  • Early PN (<24 hours) in preference to delayed (>24 hours) EN, Grade B+ recommendation

    5 Level II RCTs. Ratified by positive meta-analysis and validated evidence-based guideline (ACCEPT). The results of the meta-analysis supporting this evidence-based recommendation (EBR) have been published elsewhere.

  • Post-pyloric feeding when gastric feeding not tolerated, Grade B recommendation

    8 Level II RCTs. Ratified by validated evidence-based guideline (ACCEPT).

  • Use of prokinetics when gastric feeding not tolerated, Grade B recommendation

    5 Level II RCTs. Ratified by validated evidence-based guideline (ACCEPT).

  • EN supplemented with PN if 80% of goals not met with EN alone (after attempts at postpyloric feeding and use of prokinetics) by 72 hours, Grade B recommendation

    4 Level II RCTs. Ratified by validated evidence-based guideline (ACCEPT).

  • PN with glutamine vs. standard PN, Grade B- recommendation

    4 Level II RCTs. Ratified by meta-analysis, heterogeneity present.

    Glutamine may be beneficial in select patients. To identify which patients may benefit, each constituent RCT should be reviewed and clinical judgement should be exercised.

  • Management of diarrhoea, Grade B recommendation

    Ratified by validated evidence-based guideline (ACCEPT).

  • Gastric residual values and tolerance, Level B evidence

    Ratified by validated evidence-based guideline (ACCEPT).

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence

Level I: adequately powered* (low false +ve or false -ve), well conducted trials

Level II: small, under-powered (high false +ve and false -ve), well conducted trials

Level III**: non-randomised concurrent (contemporary) controls

Level IV**: non-randomised historical controls

Level V**: case series without controls

*The guideline developers defined power as a measure of the probability that a clinical trial will detect a treatment effect of a given magnitude (X), under the assumption that the treatment effect actually exists. To qualify as a Level I trial (adequately powered), the trialists must have established that it was plausible to assume that the treatment effect of magnitude X actually existed. Data from earlier trials is the best way to establish the plausibility of the magnitude of the expected treatment effect (Halpern, S.D., Karlawish, J.H., and Berlin, J.A. [2002]. The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials. JAMA 288, 358-362).

** These Levels of Evidence were not considered at this guideline conference.

Grades of Recommendations

A+: More than one well conducted, adequately powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) with consistent results between studies (no heterogeneity), Level of Evidence Required: I

A: At least one well conducted, adequately powered RCT, Level of Evidence Required: I

A-: More than one well conducted, adequately powered RCT with inconsistent results (heterogeneity) between studies, Level of Evidence Required: I

B+: More than one well conducted RCT with consistent results between studies, Level of Evidence Required: II

B: At least one well conducted RCT, Level of Evidence Required: II

B-: More than one well conducted RCT with inconsistent results (heterogeneity) between studies, Level of Evidence Required: II

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

Algorithms are provided in the original guideline document for:

  • Intensive care unit feeding
  • Addressing tube feeding associated diarrhea

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations" field).

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Doig GS. Evidence-based guidelines for nutritional support of the critically ill: results of a bi-national guideline development conference. Carlton (Australia): Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS); 2005. 282 p. [387 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2005

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Australian & New Zealand Intensive Care Society - Private Nonprofit Organization

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Australian & New Zealand Intensive Care Foundation

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

ANZICS CTG Feeding Investigators Group

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Primary Authors: Gordon S. Doig, Senior Lecturer in Intensive Care, Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney; Fiona Simpson, Clinical Associate Lecturer, Human Nutrition Unit, School of Molecular and Microbial Biosciences, University of Sydney

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on October 11, 2005. The information was verified by the guideline developer on October 18, 2005.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo