Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Gender-specific practice guidelines for coronary artery bypass surgery.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Gender-specific practice guidelines for coronary artery bypass surgery. Chicago (IL): Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS); 2004. 20 p. [48 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The levels of evidence (A-C) and classification of recommendations (I-III) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

  1. Use of the Internal Mammary Artery
    • Guideline Panel Conclusion: Use of the internal mammary artery is underutilized in women undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures. The internal mammary artery confers a protective effect that is associated with a significant reduction in CABG mortality as compared to surgical revascularization with venous conduits alone.
    • Ideal Clinical Practice: Whenever it is technically possible, at least one internal mammary artery is used in every coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedure to bypass a stenotic coronary artery. Class I, Level B
  2. Management of Hyperglycemia
    • Guideline Panel Conclusion: Perioperative blood glucose levels > 150 mg/dl are associated with increased operative morbidity and mortality.
    • Ideal Clinical Practice: Perioperative blood glucose levels are maintained in the range of 100-150 mg/dl. Class I, Level B
  3. Management of Anemia
    • Guideline Panel Conclusion: Intraoperative hematocrit levels below 22% are associated with an increased incidence of adverse events.
    • Ideal Clinical Practice: Efforts are made to ensure adequate intraoperative hematocrit levels. Class IIa, Level B
  4. Use of Off-Pump CABG (off-pump coronary artery bypass [OPCAB])
    • Guideline Panel Conclusion: There is no evidence to firmly establish the superiority of OPCAB over conventional CABG in the female patient
    • Ideal Clinical Practice: The indications for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery are the same for women as for men. Class IIa, Level B
  5. Adjustment of anesthetic and sedation medications
    • Guideline Panel Conclusion: Failure to account for body size when administering anesthetic and sedative drugs may over-medicate smaller patients.
    • Ideal Clinical Practice: Anesthetic management and sedative utilization during the perioperative period are tailored to body size. Class IIb, Level C
  6. Optimization of thyroxine treatment for women with hypothyroidism
    • Guideline Panel Conclusion: Low intraoperative levels of levothyroxine and free thyroxin are associated with a high CABG mortality in hypothyroid women.
    • Ideal Clinical Practice: Hypothyroid women undergoing CABG are maintained in a euthyroid state during surgery. Class IIa, Level C
  7. Consideration of preoperative hormone replacement therapy (HRT)
    • Guideline Panel Conclusion: HRT is linked to several complications including serious thromboembolic events. Its use in CABG procedures is of questionable value.
    • Ideal Clinical Practice: Hormone replacement therapy is not used for postmenopausal women undergoing CABG. Class III, Level B

Definitions:

Level of Evidence

Level A: Data derived from multiple randomized clinical trials

Level B: Data derived from a single randomized trial or from nonrandomized trials

Level C: Consensus expert opinion

Classification of Recommendations

Class I: Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a given procedure is useful and effective.

Class II: Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a procedure.

II.a. Weight of evidence favors usefulness/efficacy
II.b. Usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence

Class III: Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that the procedure is not useful/effective.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of evidence supporting the recommendations is specifically stated for each recommendation (see 'Major Recommendations' field).

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Gender-specific practice guidelines for coronary artery bypass surgery. Chicago (IL): Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS); 2004. 20 p. [48 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2004

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Society of Thoracic Surgeons - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Society of Thoracic Surgeons

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Workforce on Evidence-Based Surgery

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Not stated

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Web site.

Print copies: Available from The Society of  Thoracic Surgeons, 633 N. Saint Clair St., Suite 2320, Chicago, IL, USA 60611-3658

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on March 25, 2005. The information was verified by the guideline developer on April 18, 2005.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guidelines may be printed or downloaded for individual and personal use only. Guidelines may not be reproduced in any print or electronic publication or offered for sale or distribution in any format without the express written permission of the Society of thoracic Surgeons.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo