Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

The role of endoscopic ultrasound for evaluation of mediastinal adenopathy.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Each recommendation is followed by evidence grades (A-C) identifying the type of supporting evidence. Definitions of the evidence grades are presented at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Recommendations

Endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is indicated for the evaluation of adenopathy and masses of the posterior mediastinum. It is the procedure-of-choice for tissue sampling of such lesions in the subcarinal, subaortic (aortopulmonary window), and periesophageal stations found on cross sectional imaging (computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], or positron emission tomography [PET]). EUS-FNA should also be considered in the preoperative staging of patients with non-small cell lung cancer without definite adenopathy on cross sectional imaging.

Summary

  • EUS-FNA is a safe and accurate method for obtaining a tissue diagnosis in patients with mediastinal adenopathy (B).
  • In patients with non-small cell lung cancer, EUS-FNA is an accurate and cost-saving method for nodal staging in patients with documented posterior mediastinal adenopathy (B).
  • EUS-FNA is the procedure-of-choice for the evaluation of posterior mediastinal nodes and masses seen on cross sectional imaging, and may have a role in the preoperative staging of patients with non-small cell lung cancer without mediastinal abnormalities on cross sectional imaging (C).

Definitions

A - Prospective controlled trials
B - Observational studies
C - Expert opinion

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and classified for the recommendations using the following scheme:

A = Prospective controlled trials
B = Observational studies
C = Expert opinion

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2003 Dec

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Standards of Practice Committee

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Committee Members: Douglas O. Faigel, MD (Chair); Todd H. Baron, MD (Vice Chair); Brian C. Jacobson MD, MPH; William K. Hirota, MD; Jay L. Goldstein, MD; Jonathan A. Leighton, MD; J. Shawn Mallery, MD; J. Patrick Waring, MD

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Web site.

Print copies: Available from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1520 Kensington Road, Suite 202, Oak Brook, IL 60523

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on October 15, 2004. The information was verified by the guideline developer on November 5, 2004.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo