Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

EFNS guidelines on the treatment of cluster headache and other trigeminal-autonomic cephalalgias.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory information has been released.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The levels of evidence (class I-IV) supporting the recommendations and ratings of recommendations (A-C, good practice point) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Table 5. Treatment Recommendations for Cluster Headache, Paroxysmal Hemicrania and Short-lasting Unilateral Neuralgiform Headache Attacks with Conjunctival Injection and Tearing (SUNCT) Syndrome

  Treatment of Choice
Therapy Cluster Headache Paroxysmal Hemicrania SUNCT Syndrome
Acute 100% oxygen, 15 l/min (A)
Sumatriptan 6 mg, subcutaneous (A)
Sumatriptan 20 mg nasal (A)
Zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal (A/B)
Zolmitriptan 10 mg nasal (A/B)
Zolmitriptan 10 mg oral (B)
Zolmitriptan 5 mg oral (B)
Lidocaine intranasal (B)
Octreotide (B)
None None
Preventative Verapamil (A)
Steroids (A)
Lithium carbonate (B)
Methysergide (B)
Topiramate (B)
Ergotamine tartrate (B)
Valproic acid (C)
Melatonin (C)
Baclofen (C)
Indomethacin (A)
Verapamil (C)
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (C)
Lamotrigine (C)

For exact doses see original guideline document (A denotes effective, B denotes probably effective, C denotes possibly effective).

Treatment of Cluster Headache

Level A Recommendation

The first option for the treatment of acute attacks of cluster headache should be the inhalation of 100% oxygen with at least 7 l/min over 15 min (class II trials) or with the subcutaneous injection of 6 mg sumatriptan (class I trials). An alternative would be sumatriptan 20 mg nasal spray or zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray (one class I trial each), with the disadvantage of a slower onset and the advantage of being able to treat more attacks in 24 hours than with injected sumatriptan.

Prophylaxis of cluster headache should be tried first with verapamil at a daily dose of at least 240 mg (maximum dose depends on efficacy or tolerability, electrocardiogram [ECG] controls are obligatory with increasing doses). Although no class I or II trials are available, steroids are clearly effective for treating cluster headache. Therefore, the use of at least 100 mg methylprednisone (or equivalent corticosteroid) given orally or up to 500 mg intravenously (i.v.) per day over 5 days (then tapering down) is recommended.

Level B Recommendation

Intranasal lidocaine (4%) and subcutaneous octreotide (100 micrograms) can be tried for treating acute cluster headache attacks if level A medication is ineffective or contraindicated. Oral administration of zolmitriptan at 5 to 10 mg is effective in some patients (class I trial) but high doses produce more side effects and limit practical use.

Methysergide and lithium are drugs of second choice if verapamil is ineffective or contraindicated. Corticosteroids can be used for short periods where bouts are short or to help establish another medication. Topiramate is promising, but only open trials exist at this point. Melatonin is useful in some patients. Except for lithium, the maximum dose depends on efficacy and tolerability. Ergotamine tartrate is recommended for short-term prophylaxis (class III studies). Despite positive class II studies, pizotifen and intranasal capsaicin should only be used in rare cases because of side effects.

Level C Recommendation

Baclofen 15 to 30 mg and valproic acid showed possible efficacy and can be tried as drugs of third choice.

Good Practice Point

Surgical procedures are not indicated in most of the patients with cluster headache. Patients with intractable chronic cluster headache should be referred to centres with expertise in both destructive and neuromodulatory procedures to be offered all reasonable alternatives before a definitive procedure is conducted.

Treatment of Paroxysmal Hemicrania

Paroxysmal hemicrania is to be treated with indomethacin up to 200 mg (level A recommendation). Alternatively, verapamil and other NSAIDs can be tried (level C recommendation).

Treatment of Short-lasting Unilateral Neuralgiform Headache Attacks with Conjunctival Injection and Tearing (SUNCT) Syndrome

Recent large case series outcomes suggest that lamotrigine is the treatment of choice in SUNCT, followed by topiramate and gabapentin.

Definitions:

Evidence Classification Scheme for a Therapeutic Intervention

Class I: An adequately powered prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial with masked outcome assessment in a representative population or an adequately powered systematic review of prospective randomized controlled clinical trials with masked outcome assessment in representative populations. The following are required:

  1. Randomization concealment
  2. Primary outcome(s) is/are clearly defined
  3. Exclusion/inclusion criteria are clearly defined
  4. Adequate accounting for dropouts and crossovers with numbers sufficiently low to have minimal potential for bias
  5. Relevant baseline characteristics are presented and substantially equivalent among treatment groups or there is appropriate statistical adjustment for differences

Class II: Prospective matched-group cohort study in a representative population with masked outcome assessment that meets a–e above or a randomized, controlled trial in a representative population that lacks one criteria a–e

Class III: All other controlled trials (including well-defined natural history controls or patients serving as own controls) in a representative population, where outcome assessment is independent of patient treatment

Class IV: Evidence from uncontrolled studies, case series, case reports, or expert opinion

Rating of Recommendations

Level A rating (established as effective, ineffective, or harmful) requires at least one convincing class I study or at least two consistent, convincing class II studies.

Level B rating (probably effective, ineffective, or harmful) requires at least one convincing class II study or overwhelming class III evidence.

Level C rating (possibly effective, ineffective, or harmful) requires at least two convincing class III studies.

Good practice point Where there was a lack of evidence but consensus was clear, the Task Force has stated their opinion as good practice points (GPPs).

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for selected recommendations (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2006 Oct

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

European Federation of Neurological Societies - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

European Federation of Neurological Societies

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

European Federation of Neurological Societies Task Force on the Treatment of Cluster Headache and other Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Task Force Members: A. May, Department of Systems Neuroscience, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; M. Leone, Instituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; J. Áfra, National Institute of Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary; M. Linde, Cephalea Pain Centre and Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgren Academy, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; P. S. Sándor, Department of Neurology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; S. Evers, Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; P. J. Goadsby, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The present guidelines were developed without external financial support. None of the authors declares a conflict of interests. The authors report the following financial supports:

Arne May: Salary from the University Hospital of Hamburg; honoraries and research grants by Almirall, AstraZeneca, Bayer Vital, Berlin Chemie, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Cilag, MSD, Pfizer.

Massimo Leone: Salary from the Istituto Nazionale Neurologico C. Besta; honoraries by GlaxoSmithKline, Almirall, Medtronic.

Judit Áfra: Salary by the Hungarian Ministry of Health; honoraries by GlaxoSmithKline.

Mattias Linde: Salary from the Swedish government; honoraries by AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Nycomed, Pfizer.

Peter S. Sándor: Salary from the University Hospital of Zurich; honoraries by AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Cilag, Pfizer, Pharm Allergan.

Stefan Evers: Salary from the government of the State Northrhine-Westphalia; honoraries and research grants by Almirall, AstraZeneca, Berlin Chemie, Boehringer, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen Pharma, Janssen Cilag, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, Pharm Allergan, Pierre Fabre.

Peter J. Goadsby: Salary from the University College of London; honoraries by Almirall, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Pfizer, Medtronic, Advanced Bionics.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available to registered users from the European Federation of Neurological Societies Web site.

Print copies: Available from Arne May MD, Department of Systems Neuroscience, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany; Phone: 040 42803 9189; Fax: 040 42803 9955; E-mail: a.may@uke.uni-hamburg.de

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on April 11, 2007. The information was verified by the guideline developer on May 15, 2007.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the Blackwell-Synergy copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo