Midcourse Review  >  Table of Contents  > Focus Area 9: Family Planning  >  Disparities Table

Figure 9-2. Disparities Table for Focus Area 9: Family Planning
Disparities from the best group rate for each characteristic at the most recent data point and changes in disparity from the baseline to the most recent data point.



Characteristics: Income and Disability
Population-based objectives Poor Near poor Middle/high income Summary index Persons with disabilities Persons without disabilities
9-1. Intended pregnancies: females
15-44 years (1995)Measures of variability were not available. Thus, the variability of best group rates was not assessed, and the statistical significance of disparities and changes in disparity over time could not be tested. See Technical Appendix.
10-49 percent difference from the best group rate10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rateCharacteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-2. Births within 24 months of a previous birth: females 15-44 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Decrease in disparity 100 or more percentage points (50-99 percent difference from the best group rate). Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Decrease in disparity 50-99 percentage points (10-49 percent difference from the best group rate) Data not available.Data not available.
9-3. Contraceptive use: females 15-44 years at
risk of unintended pregnancy (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
10-49 percent difference from the best group rateMost favorable group rate for specified characteristic, but reliability criterion not met. The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Data not available.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-4. Contraceptive failure: females
15-44 years (1995)Measures of variability were not available. Thus, the variability of best group rates was not assessed, and the statistical significance of disparities and changes in disparity over time could not be tested. See Technical Appendix.
Data not available.50-99 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.
9-6a. Gone to family planning clinic with female partner: unmarried males 15-24 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantData not available.Data not available.
9-6b. Received from family planning clinic birth control counseling: unmarried males 15-24 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantData not available.Data not available.
9-6c. Received advice and counseling from doctor on birth control: unmarried males 15-24 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantData not available.Data not available.
9-7. Pregnancy: females 15-17 years
(1996, 2000)Measures of variability were not available. Thus, the variability of best group rates was not assessed, and the statistical significance of disparities and changes in disparity over time could not be tested. See Technical Appendix.
Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.
9-8a. Abstinence before age 15 years:
females 15-19 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-8b. Abstinence before age 15 years:
males 15-19 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-9a. Abstinence, ages 15-17 years: females
(1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantCharacteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-9b. Abstinence, ages 15-17 years: males
(1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-10a. Condom use at first intercourse: unmarried females 15-17 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-10b. Condom use at first intercourse: unmarried males 15-17 years (1995, 2002) * Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-10c. Condom plus hormonal use at first intercourse: unmarried females 15-17 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant Increase in disparity 10-49 percentage points (10-49 percent difference from the best group rate). The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantCharacteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-10d. Condom plus hormonal use at first intercourse: unmarried males 15-17 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantData not available.The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Data not available.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-10e. Condom use at last intercourse: unmarried females 15-17 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-10f. Condom use at last intercourse: unmarried males 15-17 years (1995)Measures of variability were not available. Thus, the variability of best group rates was not assessed, and the statistical significance of disparities and changes in disparity over time could not be tested. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-10g. Condom plus hormonal use at last intercourse: unmarried females 15-17 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-10h. Condom plus hormonal use at last intercourse: unmarried males 15-17 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-11a. Formal abstinence education: females 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-11b. Formal abstinence education: males 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-11c. Formal birth control methods education: females 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantCharacteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-11d. Formal birth control methods education: males 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. 50-99 percent difference from the best group rate50-99 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 50-99 percent difference from the best group rateCharacteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-11i. Informal abstinence education: females 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant10-49 percent difference from the best group rateCharacteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-11j. Informal abstinence education: males 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rateLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rateCharacteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-11k. Informal birth control methods education: females 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rateLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantCharacteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-11l. Informal birth control methods education: males 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rateCharacteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-11o. Informal sexually transmitted disease education: females 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant10-49 percent difference from the best group rateCharacteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-11p. Informal sexually transmitted disease education: males 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantCharacteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
9-12. Problems in conceiving or maintaining a pregnancy: wives 15-44 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.

Notes:

Data for objectives 9-5, 9-11e through h, 9-11m and n, and 9-13 are unavailable or not applicable.

Years in parentheses represent the baseline data year and the most recent data year (if available).

Disparity from the best group rate is defined as the percent difference between the best group rate and each of the other group rates for a characteristic (for example, race and ethnicity). The summary index is the average of these percent differences for a characteristic. Change in disparity is estimated by subtracting the disparity at baseline from the disparity at the most recent data point. Change in the summary index is estimated by subtracting the summary index at baseline from the summary index at the most recent data point. See Technical Appendix for more information.







<<  Previous—Disparities Table: Race and Ethnicity   |   Table of Contents   |   Next—Objectives and Subobjectives  >>


[ Top ]