Midcourse Review  >  Table of Contents  > Focus Area 5: Diabetes  >  Disparities Table

Figure 5-2. Disparities Table for Focus Area 5: Diabetes
Disparities from the best group rate for each characteristic at the most recent data point and changes in disparity from the baseline to the most recent data point.

Race and Ethnicity  |  Gender, Education, Location, and Disability


Characteristics: Race and Ethnicity
Population-based objectives American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Native Hawaiian
or other
Pacific Islander		 Two or more races Hispanic or Latino Black non-Hispanic White non-Hispanic Summary index
5-1. Diabetes education: 18+ years
(1998, 1999)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.Baseline data by race and ethnicity are for 1999.		 Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.50-99 percent difference from the best group rate10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
5-2. New cases of diabetes: 18-84 years
(1997-99, 2000-02)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.		 Data not available.Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantData not available.Data not available.50-99 percent difference from the best group rate50-99 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 50-99 percent difference from the best group rate
5-3. Total cases of diabetes
(1997, 2003)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.Baseline data by race and ethnicity are for 1999.		 100 percent or more percent difference from the best group rateLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantData not available.50-99 percent difference from the best group rate Decrease in disparity 10-49 percentage points (10-49 percent difference from the best group rate) 50-99 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 50-99 percent difference from the best group rate
5-4. Diagnosed diabetes: 20+ years
(1988-94, 1999-2000)Measures of variability were not available. Thus, the variability of best group rates was not assessed, and the statistical significance of disparities and changes in disparity over time could not be tested. See Technical Appendix.		 Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Most favorable group rate for specified characteristic, but reliability criterion not met. Data are for Mexican Americans. The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 50-99 percent difference from the best group rateData not available.
5-5. Diabetes-related deaths (1999, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Decrease in disparity 10-49 percentage points (50-99 percent difference from the best group rate). Data are for Asians or Pacific Islanders. Data are for Asians or Pacific Islanders. Data are for Asians or Pacific Islanders. Data are for Asians or Pacific Islanders. Data not available.50-99 percent difference from the best group rate100 percent or more percent difference from the best group rate10-49 percent difference from the best group rate50-99 percent difference from the best group rate
5-6. Diabetes-related deaths: persons with diabetes (1999, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Most favorable group rate for specified characteristic, but reliability criterion not met. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Data not available.
5-7. Cardiovascular deaths: persons with
diabetes (1999, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.		 Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Increase in disparity 10-49 percentage points (50-99 percent difference from the best group rate) Decrease in disparity 10-49 percentage points (10-49 percent difference from the best group rate) 50-99 percent difference from the best group rate
5-10. Lower extremity amputation: persons with diabetes (1997-99, 2001-03)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.10-49 percent difference from the best group rate. Data include persons of Hispanic origin. The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Data include persons of Hispanic origin. Data not available.
5-11. Annual urinary microalbumin measurement: 65+ years with diabetes
(2000, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.		 Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Data not available.Data not available.Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent from the best group rate or not statistically significant. Data include persons of Hispanic origin. Less than 10 percent from the best group rate or not statistically significant. Data include persons of Hispanic origin. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant
5-12. A1C test at least two times a year: 18+ years with diabetes (2000, 2003)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant10-49 percent difference from the best group rate. Data are for Asians or Pacific Islanders. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate. Data are for Asians or Pacific Islanders. Data not available.10-49 percent difference from the best group rateLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
5-13. Annual dilated eye exam: 18+ years with
diabetes (1998, 1999)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.		 Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.
5-14. Annual foot exam: 18+ years with diabetes (1998, 2003)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Most favorable group rate for specified characteristic, but reliability criterion not met. Less than 10 percent from the best group rate or not statistically significant. Data are for Asians or Pacific Islanders. Less than 10 percent from the best group rate or not statistically significant. Data are for Asians or Pacific Islanders. Data not available.10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant
5-15. Annual dental exam: 2+ years with diabetes (1997, 2003)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.10-49 percent difference from the best group rateLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
5-16. Aspirin therapy at least 15 times a month: 40+ years with diabetes (1988-94)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Data not available.
5-17. Daily self-blood-glucose-monitoring: 18+
years with diabetes (1998, 2003)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of greater than or equal to 10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. 		Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant50-99 percent difference from the best group rate: Data are for Asians or Pacific Islanders. 50-99 percent difference from the best group rate: Data are for Asians or Pacific Islanders. Data not available.10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant10-49 percent difference from the best group rate

Notes:

Objectives 5-8 and 5-9 were deleted at the midcourse.

Years in parentheses represent the baseline data year and the most recent data year (if available).

Disparity from the best group rate is defined as the percent difference between the best group rate and each of the other group rates for a characteristic (for example, race and ethnicity). The summary index is the average of these percent differences for a characteristic. Change in disparity is estimated by subtracting the disparity at baseline from the disparity at the most recent data point. Change in the summary index is estimated by subtracting the summary index at baseline from the summary index at the most recent data point. See Technical Appendix for more information.


The best group rate at the most recent data point. The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. The group with
the best rate
for specified characteristic.		 Most favorable group rate for specified characteristic, but reliability criterion not met. Most favorable group rate for specified characteristic, but reliability criterion not met. Best group rate reliability criterion not met. Best group rate reliability criterion not met.    
 
Percent difference from the best group rate
Disparity from the best group rate at the most recent data point. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant Less than 10 percent or not statistically significant 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate 10-49 percent 50-99 percent difference from the best group rate 50-99 percent 100 percent or more percent difference from the best group rate 100 percent or more
   
Increase in disparity (percentage points)
Changes in disparity over time are shown when the change is greater than or equal to 10 percentage points and statistically significant, or when the change is greater than or equal to 10 percentage points and estimates of variability were not available. Increase in disparity: 10-49 percentage points 10-49 Increase in disparity: 50-99 percentage points 50-99 Increase in disparity: 100 or more percentage points 100 or more
 
Decrease in disparity (percentage points)
Decrease in disparity: 10-49 percentage points 10-49 Decrease in disparity: 50-99 percentage points 50-99 Decrease in disparity: 100 or more percentage points 100 or more
Availability of data. Data not available. Data not available. Characteristic not selected for this objective. Characteristic not selected for this objective.

* The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥ 10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
† Measures of variability were not available. Thus, the variability of best group rates was not assessed, and the statistical significance of disparities and changes in disparity over time could not be tested. See Technical Appendix.
1 Baseline data by race and ethnicity are for 1999.
2 Data are for Mexican Americans.
3 Baseline data only.
4 Data are for Asians or Pacific Islanders.
5 Data include persons of Hispanic origin.

<<  Previous—Progress Quotient Chart    |   Table of Contents   |   Next—Disparities Table: Gender, Education, Location, and Disability  >>


[ Top ]