CBER Presentation

Printable Version
Note: Documents in PDF format require the Adobe Acrobat Reader®. If you experience problems with PDF documents, please download the latest version of the Reader®.

The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) and its Relevance to Cell Therapy

ISCT 6th Annual Somatic Cell Therapy Symposium
9/25-27/2006

Jennifer Catalano
Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
Food and Drug Administration


A Unique Approach

  • ICH was created in 1990
  • Agreement between the EU, Japan and the USA to harmonize different regional requirements for registration of pharmaceutical drug products
  • Unique because joint effort by regulators and associated pharmaceutical industry trade associations

ICH Objectives

  • Elimination of the need to duplicate studies to meet different regulatory requirements
  • More efficient use of resources in the R&D process, as a consequence
  • Quicker access for patients to safe and effective new medicines

Principles of ICH

  • Development of scientific consensus documents through discussions between regulatory and industry experts
  • Wide consultation of the draft consensus documents through normal regulatory channels before a harmonized text is adopted
  • Commitment by regulatory parties to implement the ICH harmonized texts

STATEMENT BY THE ICH STEERING COMMITTEE
TOKYO 1990

  • The Conference will not only look at existing issues but will, based on past experience, seek to minimize future divergence of new registration requirements, as a consequence of technical progress.

Who are the members?

  • Founding members: Reps from the six co-sponsoring parties from the United States, the European Union, and Japan
  • Observers: World Health Organization (WHO), the European Free Trade Area (EFTA), Canada (each observer has a seat on the steering committee as a non-voting member and participates in EWGs)
  • The International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations (IFPMA): represents 56 countries (non-voting member of SC and runs the ICH secretariat)

Six parties directly involved in the decision making process

  • US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
  • Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)
  • European Commission - European Union (EU)
  • European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)
  • Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan (MHLW)
  • Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA)

ICH Steering Committee

  • Determines the policies and procedures for ICH
  • Selects topics for harmonization
  • Monitors the progress of harmonization initiatives
  • Has two members for each of the six co-sponsors, the IFPMA and Observers

Harmonization topics divided into categories

SAFETY
EFFICACY
QUALITY
MULTIDISCIPLINARY

The harmonization output document is called a "guideline"


An ICH Guideline is FDA Guidance


Expert Working Groups

Expert Working Groups: Safety, Efficacy, Quality, Multidisciplinary

Monitors and Facilitates EWGs
An EWG has 6 Topic Leaders - one from each ICH party


Examples of Guidelines

Q1A(R2): Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products (Second Revision)

S1B: Testing for Carcinogenicity of Pharmaceuticals

E4: Dose-Response information to Support Drug Registration

M2: Electronic Standards for the transfer of regulatory information


How to become a bona fide guideline

PART 1: Initiation of Harmonization Action

1.1 Proposal channeled through co-sponsor or observer on SC

1.2 Preparation of Concept Paper

1.3 Selection of Procedure: Most go to Step 2, Maintenance of Existing Guidelines go to ICH Secretariat

PART 2: Full ICH Process for Major Harmonization Topics

2.1 Topic Selection

2.2 Steering Committee Action: Confirm Objectives & Outcome of Harmonization Action

2.3 Expert Working Groups

2.4 Timetable and Action Plan

2.5 Steps in ICH Process


Steps in the ICH Process

STEP 1. Consensus Building: Draft Guideline Circulated for Comment. Sign-off by EWGs.

STEP 2. Start of Regulatory Action: Steering Committee agrees there is scientific consensus to go to next step.

STEP 3. Regulatory Consultation: Guideline leaves ICH process for comments. In the USA it is published as a draft guidance in the Federal Register. Regulatory Rapporteur draws up final document.

STEP 4. Adoption of Tripartite Harmonized Text: SC receives document
Three Regulatory Parties sign to affirm it is recommended for adoption.

STEP 5. Implementation: Regulatory Actions taken and dates of implementation reported to SC & published by Secretariat.


Example Guidelines from ICH Website www.ich.org

Example Guidelines from ICH website


Elements of a Concept Paper

  • Type of action proposed: Is this a new guideline or amendment to an existing one?
  • Perceived problem: In the case of a new field of science, consider problems if harmonization action is not taken
  • Background information
  • Type of Expert Working Group: Will the EWG be comprised of only the six-party group, or will the group be extended?

Relevance to Cell Therapy

  • ICH is a forum for regulatory agreement from multiple countries
  • Cell therapy specific guidelines have yet to be written
  • The concepts from other harmonized guidelines are applicable to cell therapy, and it is important to have a vision of where quality, safety, and efficacy fit into a framework for successful treatment

Examples

  • Q6B: Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Biotechnological/ Biological Products
  • Q5D: Derivation and Characterization of Cell Substrates used for Production of Biotechnological/Biological Products
  • Q5E: Comparability of Biotechnological/ Biological Products Subject to Changes in their Manufacturing Process
  • S6: Preclinical Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology-Derived Pharmaceuticals
 
Updated: November 13, 2006