edsitement/neh logospacer gif top spacer gif
SearchSitemapContact UsCalendarHome
Subject Catalogue
Art & CultureLiterature & Language ArtsForeign LanguageHistory & Social Studies
header bottom spacer gifAll Lesson PlansAll Subject CategoriesEDSITEment-reviewed websites
subject catalogue thinkfinity logo Natinal Endowment for the Humanities home page
Open Printable Lesson Plan
 



 
 

 

Subject Areas
History and Social Studies
   U.S. History - Civil War and Reconstruction
Literature and Language Arts
   Biography
   Essay
 
Time Required
 Two to three class periods
 
Skills
 information gathering and research skills
primary document analysis
critical thinking
historical analysis
Internet skills
 
Additional Data
 Date updated: 12/28/05
 
Additional Student/Teacher Resources
 Student Launchpad Activity 1

Student Launchpad Activity 2
 
Date Posted
 2/17/2003
 
Feedback
  Send us your thoughts about this lesson!
 
Email this Lesson
  Send this lesson to friends or colleagues
 

Evaluating Eyewitness Reports

Introduction

This lesson offers students experience in drawing historical meaning from eyewitness accounts that present a range of different perspectives. Students begin with a case study including alternative reports of a single event: the Great Chicago Fire of 1871. Students compare two newspaper reports on the fire and two memoirs of the fire written many decades later, with an eye on how these accounts complement and compete with one another, and how these sources can be used to draw historical meaning from them. Students then apply the lessons learned in their investigation of the eyewitness accounts of the Chicago fire by considering a unique eyewitness account: the diary kept by a Confederate girl when her Tennessee town was occupied by Union troops during the Civil War.

Guiding Question

  • How can we evaluate eyewitness accounts of historical events and periods, and what historical meanings can be drawn from them?

Learning Objectives

When students have completed this lesson they will have:
  • Gained experience in working with eyewitness accounts of historical events.
  • Gained experience in the evaluation of historical evidence.
  • Become familiar with some of the uses of historical evidence within different kinds of history.
  • Recognize that historical evidence may raise questions rather than provide answers about a past event.

Preparing to Teach This Lesson

Suggested Activities

1. Extra! Extra! Fire Destroys Chicago! : Analyzing Newspaper Accounts

2. Right Before My Eyes: Analyzing Eyewitness Accounts

1. Extra! Extra! Fire Destroys Chicago! : Analyzing Newspaper Accounts

Distribute copies of the Written Document Analysis Worksheet, from the website Digital Classroom, to the class. Discuss with students how they can use the worksheet to gather together various kinds of information in an historical document, including facts about the document itself (date, author, audience, etc.) and facts about the past. Explain that in this lesson students will use the worksheet to examine a variety of historical eyewitness reports, first comparing several reports of a single dramatic event, then evaluating the unique account of a different, more complex historical situation.

Have students read the following two newspaper accounts of the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, The Great Chicago Fire and the Web of Memory. The first reading is The Tribune Reports to Chicago on Its Own Destruction, and is a front page report from the Chicago Tribune published two days after the fire, on October 11, 1871. The second account is an excerpt from an article that was published by the Chicago Evening Post on October 17, 1871. Once students have finished reading the two newspaper articles, have them work individually or in groups to analyze these two reports using the Written Document Analysis Worksheet. Compare their responses to selected sections of the worksheet in a class discussion. Have students work on answering the following questions, which are also available as a Student Launchpad:

  • Do the reporters agree in their description of where the fire began and how it spread?
  • Do they mention the same landmarks of destruction and havens of safety?
  • Do they disagree on any questions of fact?
  • Compare the reporters' selection of episodes:
  • Do they highlight similar incidents?
  • Do they focus on similar scenes of human interest?
  • Do they share a vocabulary for evoking these dramatic moments?
  • Ask students to offer possible reasons for any differences they may note.
  • Are the reporters addressing different audiences?
  • Aiming at different effects?
  • Offering different perspectives on the significance of the fire?
Finally, discuss how an historian might use these alternative accounts of the Chicago Fire.
  • What is the advantage of having two accounts?
  • How do they supplement one another?
  • To what extent can they be combined?
  • In what respect can they be set in contrast or played off against one another?
  • In what sense can they be considered primarily objective accounts or the records of two personal experiences?
  • What questions did they pose that the authors of these reports left unanswered?
Because both of these newspaper accounts refer often to the streets and districts of Chicago, students may find it helpful to have a map of the city available as they read. A map of the fire is available from the EDSITEment-reviewed website The Great Chicago Fire and the Web of Memory, as well as a number of illustrations of the events described in the two newspaper reports.

2. Right Before My Eyes: Analyzing Eyewitness Accounts

Next have students read two personal accounts of the Chicago Fire included in the collection of the The Great Chicago Fire and the Web of Memory, which includes recollections from 21 survivors of the fire. The narratives of Bessie Bradwell, written in 1926, and Mary Kehoe, written in 1942, form convenient pair from this anthology. Both were teenagers at the time of the fire but they came from different social backgrounds, Bessie Bradwell was the daughter of a judge while Mary Kehoe was from the working class. In this exercise students will be asked to contemplate the strengths, weaknesses, and differences of these accounts.

As in the previous activity, have students work individually or in groups to analyze these two eyewitness accounts using the Written Document Analysis Worksheet. Compare their responses to selected sections of the worksheet in a class discussion. Ask the students to compare these personal recollections of the fire with the newspaper reports written within days of the event.

  • Are there similarities in the selection of episodes? In vocabulary?
  • How do these narratives differ from the news reports? Students should focus on issues of scope, point of view, purpose, and the significance writers draw from the event in their accounts.
Invite students to re-write a passage or incident from one of the personal narratives to show how one of the news reporters might have presented it.

Next, have students explore the impact of reflection and memory on these two narratives, written decades after the event they describe. Ask students to answer the following questions. They should provide examples of all the evidence they find within the narratives that answer these questions, which are also available as a Student Launchpad:

  • What evidence is there that these eyewitness accounts are factually unreliable?
  • Is there reason to consider them more reliable than the newspaper reports?
  • How do these accounts seem "tinted" by memory?
  • What indications are there that the writers have shaped their experiences into stories, introduced elements of plotting and characterization to organize and add meaning to the event?
  • How do they compare with the news accounts in this respect?
  • For what reason do you consider these memoirs more accurate as portrayals of the unvarnished facts, or not?
Finally, discuss how an historian might use these eyewitness narratives of the Chicago Fire.
  • What kinds of historical evidence do they provide that is unavailable through the newspaper reports?
  • To what extent can these personal views of the fire be combined into one account?
  • How might the age of these witnesses, at the time of the fire and when they composed their memoirs, affect historical assessment of their accounts?
  • How would a witness who was older at the time of the fire have noted different incidents, or expressed a different attitude toward this disaster?
  • How would these witnesses have provided different reports if they had written their accounts while still teenagers?

Assessment

Have students prepare a researcher's report on the four firsthand accounts of the Chicago Fire that they have read in the previous activities, explaining what they might contribute to three different histories of the event. This should include:
  • A factual account of the fire describing what happened in Chicago on October 8 and 9, 1871;
  • A description of what it was like in Chicago when the fire was raging there; and
  • An explanation of the fire's significance as a landmark event in 19th-century American history.
Have students note also in their reports any inadequacies of these primary documents for these kinds of history. What other types of evidence would an historian look for? What other sorts of witnesses could be called on to add their testimony?

If you have time you might have students put their new analytic skills to work by having them collect eyewitness reports from present-day newspapers or conduct their own interviews of family members who have witnessed some significant event (for example, an athletic competition, a natural disaster, a public celebration, the coming of some new technology like the Internet). Have students use the Written Document Analysis Worksheet to evaluate their eyewitness accounts and then prepare a researcher's report explaining how their document might be used by some future historian.

Selected EDSITEment Websites



Standards Alignment

View your state’s standards