Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) and the American Dietetic Association (ADA): Recommendations for the determination of energy expenditure and energy requirements for children and adolescents draw from 2005 US Institutes of Medicine Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients) (available online at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10490.html -- especially Chapter 5 and Appendix I).

Ratings for the strength of the recommendations (Strong, Fair, Weak, Consensus, Insufficient Evidence), conclusion grades (I-V), and statement labels (Conditional versus Imperative) are defined at the end of "Major Recommendations."

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Comprehensive, Multicomponent Weight Management Program for Treating Childhood Overweight

PWM: Multicomponent Program

Interventions to reduce pediatric overweight should be multicomponent and include diet, physical activity, nutrition counseling, and parent/caregiver participation. A large body of strong research indicates that clinically supervised, multicomponent weight management programs are more successful than single component programs for short-term and longer-term (>1 year) improvement in child and adolescent overweight.

Strong, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statements are Grades I and II

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Treating Overweight in Children Ages 2-5

PWM: Children Ages 2-5 Years Old

Weight maintenance is generally recommended in overweight children 2-5 years old within a multicomponent weight management intervention with active participation of parent/caregiver. Weight loss may be recommended when the child has serious medical complications. Research was not identified on the efficacy and safety of weight loss interventions among children ages 2-5.

Consensus, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• No evidence grade given

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Assessing Foods and Pediatric Overweight

PWM: Foods Associated with an Increased Risk of Overweight

Dietary factors that may be associated with an increase in the risk of overweight and should be included in Nutrition Assessment are: increased total dietary fat intake and increased calorically sweetened beverages. American Dietetic Association (ADA) Evidence Analysis has shown that these factors are positively associated with childhood overweight.

Strong, Imperative

PWM: Foods Associated with a Decreased Risk of Overweight

Dietary factors that may be associated with a decrease in the risk of overweight and should be included in Nutrition Assessment are: increased fruit and vegetable intake. ADA Evidence Analysis has shown that these factors may be negatively associated with childhood overweight.

Strong, Imperative

PWM: Assessment - Total Energy Intake and 100% Fruit Juice

Dietitians should be aware of the research on the following dietary factors when carrying out their Nutrition Assessment: reported total energy intake and 100% fruit juice intake. ADA Evidence Analysis has found that these factors may or may not be related to pediatric overweight, but the research is still unclear on the relationship.

Fair, Imperative

PWM: Assessment - Dairy and Calcium

Dietitians should be aware of the observational research that indicates an inadequate intake of dairy and calcium may be related to an increase in the risk of pediatric overweight. Consideration should be given to including dairy and calcium intake as part of the nutrition assessment.

Fair, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statements are Grades II and III

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Assessing Child and Family Diet Behaviors in Pediatric Overweight

PWM: Family Diet Behaviors - Increased Risk of Overweight

Child and family diet behavior factors that may be associated with an increase in the risk of overweight and should be included in Nutrition Assessment are: parental restriction of highly palatable foods, consumption of food away from home, increased portion size of meals, breakfast skipping. ADA Evidence Analysis has shown that these factors are positively associated with childhood overweight.

Fair, Imperative

PWM: Family Diet Behaviors - Relationship Unclear

Dietitians should be aware of the research on the following child and family diet behavior factors when carrying out their Nutrition Assessment: parental encouragement/pressure to eat, parental control over child's dietary intake, meal frequency, snacking frequency or snack food intake, and using food as a reward. ADA Evidence Analysis has found that these factors may not be related to pediatric overweight, or that the research is still unclear on the relationship.

Fair, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statements are Grades II and III

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviors

PWM: Behavior - Increase the Risk of Pediatric Overweight

Physical activity and sedentary behavior factors that may be associated with an increase in the risk of overweight and should be included in Nutrition Assessment are: excessive television viewing and excessive use of video games. ADA Evidence Analysis has shown that these factors are positively associated with childhood overweight.

Fair, Imperative

PWM: Behavior - Decrease the Risk of Pediatric Overweight

Physical activity and sedentary behavior factors that may be associated with a decrease in the risk of overweight and should be included in Nutrition Assessment are: regular physical activity and sports participation. ADA Evidence Analysis has shown that these factors may be negatively associated with childhood overweight.

Fair, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statements are Grades II and III

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Determination of Total Energy Expenditure

PWM: Option for Determining Energy Expenditure

If possible, resting metabolic rate (RMR) should be measured (e.g., indirect calorimetry). If RMR cannot be measured, then the equations for estimating total energy expenditure in overweight youth provided in the 2005 US Institutes of Medicine "Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients)," may be used. Estimated energy needs should be based on Total Energy Expenditure (TEE).

Refer to the original guideline document for types of TEE indices and calculations.

Consensus, Conditional

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• No evidence grade given

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Assessing Family Climate Factors

PWM: Family Climate - Increased Risk of Overweight

Family climate factors that may be associated with an increase in the risk of overweight and should be included in Nutrition Assessment are: parental dietary disinhibition and restraint, negative aspects of family functioning (such as lack of parental support or over-possessiveness), and parental concern about child's weight status. ADA Evidence Analysis has shown that these factors are positively associated with childhood overweight.

Fair, Imperative

PWM: Family Climate - Decreased Risk of Overweight

Family climate factors that may be associated with a decrease in the risk of overweight and should be included in Nutrition Assessment are: positive aspects of family functioning (such as family cohesion, expressiveness, democratic style, parental support and cognitive stimulation at home). ADA Evidence Analysis has shown that these factors may be negatively associated with childhood overweight.

Fair, Imperative

PWM: Family Climate - Relationship Unclear

Dietitians should be aware of the research on the following family climate factors when carrying out their Nutrition Assessment: household food insecurity. ADA Evidence Analysis has found that these factors may not be related to pediatric overweight, or that the research is still unclear on the relationship.

Fair, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statements are Grades II and III

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Nutrition Prescription in the Treatment of Pediatric Overweight

PWM: Nutrition Prescription

A nutrition prescription should be formulated as part of the dietary intervention in a multicomponent pediatric weight management program. The exact specification of nutrients and energy is often translated into a specific eating plan. Nutrition interventions are selected based on the nutrition prescription. Research shows that when individualized nutrition prescription is included, improvements in weight status in children and adolescents are consistent. When an individualized nutrition prescription is not included, results are less consistent.

Strong, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statements are Grades I, II and III

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Energy Restricted Diets

PWM: Energy-Restricted Diets - Children 6 to 12 years Old

If energy restriction is appropriate based on the registered dietitian's professional judgment, then a balanced macronutrient diet that contains no fewer than 900 kilocalories (kcal) per day is recommended to improve weight status within a multicomponent pediatric weight management program in children ages 6 -12 who are medically monitored. Research indicates that balanced macronutrient diets at 900 to 1200 kcal per day are associated with both short term and longer term (>1 year) improved weight status and body composition among 6 to 12-year-old children.

Strong, Conditional

PWM: Energy-Restricted Diets - Adolescents

If energy restriction is appropriate based on the registered dietitian's professional judgment, then a balanced macronutrient diet that contains no fewer than 1200 kcal per day is recommended to improve weight status within a multicomponent pediatric weight management program in adolescents ages 13-18 who are medically monitored. Research indicates that energy restricted balanced macronutrient diets no lower than 1200 kcal per day are associated with both short term and longer term (>1 year) improved weight status and body composition among 13 to 18-year-old adolescents.

Strong, Conditional

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statements are Grade I

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Reduced Glycemic Load Diet

PWM: Reduced Glycemic Load Diet - Children 6 to 12 Years

If an ad libitum reduced glycemic load diet is selected for use in children (age 6-12), then this diet could be used to produce modest, short term improvement in weight status. Limited research shows that an ad libitum reduced glycemic load diet results in short term improvement in weight status in this age group.

Weak, Conditional

PWM: Reduced Glycemic Load Diet - Adolescents

If an ad libitum reduced glycemic load diet is selected for use in adolescents (age 13-18), then this diet could be used to produce modest, short term and longer term improvement in weight status and body composition. Limited research shows that an ad libitum reduced glycemic load diet results in short term improvement in weight status and body composition in this age group. One study shows weight status improvement at 1 year.

Fair, Conditional

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statements are Grade III

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Very Low Carbohydrate Diet

PWM: Very Low Carbohydrate Diet - Adolescents

If a low carbohydrate diet is selected for use in adolescents, then it is recommended for short term (up to 12 weeks) use. The use of an ad libitum very low carbohydrate diet which is defined as a diet containing 20 to 60 grams of carbohydrates to treat overweight adolescents has shown short-term improvement in weight status. However, due to the lack of evidence, it is not recommended for long-term treatment of pediatric overweight.

Weak, Conditional

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• No evidence grade given

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Using Protein Sparing Modified Fast Diets for Pediatric Weight Loss

PWM: Protein Sparing Modified Fast Diets: Short-term Treatment

If overweight (>120% ideal body weight [IBW]) children and adolescents with serious medical complications would benefit from rapid weight loss, then a Protein Sparing Modified Fast Diet (PSMF) could be utilized in a short-term intervention (typically 10 weeks) under the supervision of a multidisciplinary team of healthcare providers who specialize in pediatric overweight. Research shows that short term use of a PSMF brings about short term and longer term improvement in weight status and body composition when part of a medically supervised, multicomponent program.

Weak, Conditional

PWM: Protein Sparing Modified Fast Diets: Long-term Treatment

The Protein Sparing Modified Fast Diet is not recommended for long-term weight management for overweight children or adolescents. There are few well designed studies to support the use of this intervention for longer than 10 weeks.

Weak, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statements are Grades III and V

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Very Low Fat Diet (Less than 20% Daily Energy Intake from Fat)

PWM: Very Low Fat Diet

Use of a very low fat diet (<20% of total daily energy) is not recommended for use in pediatric weight management. The efficacy of a very low fat diet defined as <20% of total daily energy intake from fat in the treatment of pediatric overweight has not been studied.

Insufficient Evidence, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statement is Grade V

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Nutrition Education in the Treatment of Pediatric Overweight

PWM: Tailor Nutrition Education to Nutrition Prescription

In a multicomponent program, if there is a nutrition diagnosis for food and nutrition-related knowledge deficit, then Nutrition education should be tailored to the nutrition prescription. Research shows that if nutrition education is not tailored to nutrition prescription, improvement in weight status is not consistent.

Fair, Conditional

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statements are Grades I, II, and III

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Nutrition Counseling and Behavior Therapy Strategies in the Treatment of Overweight in Children and Adolescents

PWM: Nutrition Counseling

Nutrition counseling delivered by a registered dietitian (RD) (which is inclusive of goal setting, self monitoring, stimulus control, problem solving, contingency management, cognitive restructuring, use of incentives and rewards, and social supports) should be a part of the behavior therapy component of a multicomponent pediatric weight management program.

Consensus, Imperative

PWM: Behavioral Therapy

Behavior therapy strategies should be included as part of a multicomponent pediatric weight management program. Research shows that when behavior therapy strategies are included within the context of a multidisciplinary team, weight status and body composition improve.

Strong, Imperative

PWM: Family-Based Counseling

Family-based counseling that includes parent training or modeling should be included as part of a multicomponent weight management program that targets children ages 6 to 12 years. During the development of a multicomponent treatment program for children ages 12 years and younger, the registered dietitian should advise the health care team on the advantages of incorporating parent training or modeling as part of the treatment program. Research studies including parent training or modeling as part of a multicomponent weight management program for children 12 years and younger showed positive changes in a child's weight status and adiposity.

Strong, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statements are Grade I

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Family Participation in Treating Pediatric Overweight in Children and Adolescents

PWM: Family Participation - Children 6 to 12 Years Old

Parent/caregiver should be included in multicomponent pediatric weight management programs as an agent of change when treating children ages 6-12. A strong body of research indicates that including parents/caregivers as agents of change in the treatment of their child's overweight is associated with both short-term and longer term (>1 year) improvements in weight status. A more limited body of research indicates that treating 6 to 12-year-old children without parental participation is not effective.

Strong, Imperative

PWM: Family Participation - Adolescents

Parent/caregiver may be included in multicomponent pediatric weight management programs when treating adolescents. A limited body of research indicates that programs with or without parent/caregiver participation may be effective for improvements in weight status and adiposity in adolescents.

Fair, Conditional

PWM: Family Participation - Treatment Format

If parent/caregiver participation is included in child and adolescent weight management programs, health professionals should tailor the format (e.g., group versus individual format, parent/caregiver with child versus parent/caregiver and child separate, etc.) to meet individual, family, and program needs. Research does not show a clear superiority of one format versus another for parent/caregiver participation.

Consensus, Conditional

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statements are Grades I, II, and III

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Nutrition Counseling: Setting Weight Goals with Patient and Family

PWM: Weight Goals

Weight goals should be individualized for the child. Because of growth occurring within children and adolescents, the goal of pediatric weight management programs may be weight stabilization rather than weight loss. Research indicates that weight stabilization in children and adolescents may be associated with improvements in body mass index (BMI) and other measures of adiposity.

Consensus, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• No evidence grade given

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Coordination of Care in Pediatric Weight Management

PWM: Coordination of Care

Dietitian should collaborate with members of the healthcare team (as available) in planning and implementing behavior, physical activity, and adjunct therapy strategies. Effective multicomponent pediatric weight management interventions benefit from the diverse expertise of different healthcare professionals.

Consensus, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statements are Grades I, II, and III

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Decreasing Sedentary Behaviors in Children and Adolescents

PWM: Decreasing Sedentary Behaviors - Children

Children should be counseled to reduce or limit sedentary activities (e.g., TV, video games, "screen time"). Intervention research indicates that reducing sedentary activities may have both short term and longer term benefits in terms of pediatric overweight. Observational research also indicates that TV time may also be associated with increased consumption of energy dense foods.

Fair, Imperative

PWM: Decreasing Sedentary Behaviors - Adolescents

Adolescents should be counseled to reduce or limit sedentary activities (e.g., TV, video games, "screen time"). Limited intervention research indicates that reducing sedentary activities may have both short term benefits in terms of overweight.

Weak, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statements are Grades II and III

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Physical Activity in the Treatment of Childhood and Adolescent Overweight

PWM: Physical Activity

Physical activity should be included as part of a multicomponent pediatric weight management program. Research indicates that increasing physical activity as part of a multicomponent program results in significant improvements in weight status and/or body composition in children and adolescents.

Strong, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statement is Grade III

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Adjunct Therapies: Use of Weight Loss Medications in Treating Overweight in Adolescents

PWM: Collaboration with Health Care Team

The dietitian should collaborate with the health care team regarding the use of weight loss medications as an adjunct therapy within a multicomponent pediatric weight management program for adolescents. Clinical outcomes are likely to be enhanced with the participation of a dietitian.

Consensus, Imperative

PWM: Weight Loss Medication

If a weight loss medication is selected as an adjunct therapy, then an over the counter or prescription gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor (e.g., orlistat) approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in adolescents may be recommended to treat overweight adolescents participating in a multicomponent pediatric weight management program. Research indicates that a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor further improves weight status and body composition in some individuals within a multicomponent adolescent weight management program. However, the FDA has not studied or approved the use of this class of medication for children under the age of 12.

Fair, Conditional

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statement is Grade II

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Adjunct Therapies: Weight Loss Surgery and Adolescent Overweight

PWM: Weight Loss Surgery

Dietitians should collaborate with other members of the health care team regarding the appropriateness of weight loss surgery for severely overweight adolescents who have not achieved weight loss goals with less invasive weight loss methods and who meet specified criteria (see Conditions of Application in the original guideline document). Research indicates that for a subset of adolescents who meet the recommended criteria, weight loss surgery may be effective in bringing about significant short term and long term weight loss. Overweight children (< 13 years of age) are generally not considered to be appropriate candidates for weight loss surgery.

Consensus, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• No evidence grade given

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Treatment Format Options: Group versus Individual Intervention

PWM: Group Versus Individual Interventions

Either group or individual nutrition intervention may be used as part of a multicomponent pediatric weight management program. Limited research that compares individual versus group format does not indicate differences in overall pediatric weight status. However, two studies suggest that some dietary outcome measures may be improved with an individual counseling format.

Weak, Imperative

Recommendation Strength Rationale

• Conclusion statement is Grade III

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Optimal Length of Weight Management Therapy in Children and Adolescents

PWM: Optimal Length of Treatment

During the intensive treatment phase, Medical Nutrition Therapy for pediatric overweight should last at least three months or until initial weight management goals are achieved. Because overweight is a chronic, often life-long, condition, it is critical that a weight management plan be implemented after the intensive phase of treatment. A greater frequency of contacts between the patient and practitioner may lead to more successful weight loss and maintenance.

Consensus, Imperative

Definitions:

Conditional versus Imperative Recommendations

Recommendations can be worded as conditional or imperative statements. Conditional statements clearly define a specific situation, while imperative statements are broadly applicable to the target population without restraints on their pertinence. More specifically, a conditional recommendation can be stated in if/then terminology (e.g., If an individual does not eat food sources of omega-3 fatty acids, then 1g of EPA and DHA omega-3 fatty acid supplements may be recommended for secondary prevention).

In contrast, imperative recommendations "require," or "must," or "should achieve certain goals," but do not contain conditional text that would limit their applicability to specified circumstances. (e.g., Portion control should be included as part of a comprehensive weight management program. Portion control at meals and snacks results in reduced energy intake and weight loss).

Levels of Evidence

This grading system was based on the grading system from: Greer N, Mosser G, Logan G, Wagstrom Halaas G. A practical approach to evidence grading. Jt Comm. J Qual Improv. 2000; 26:700-712. In September 2004, The ADA Research Committee modified the grading system to this current version.

Criteria for Recommendation Rating

*Conclusion statements are assigned a grade based on the strength of the evidence. Grade I is good; grade II, fair; grade III, limited; grade IV signifies expert opinion only and grade V indicates that a grade is not assignable because there is no evidence to support or refute the conclusion. The evidence and these grades are considered when assigning a rating (Strong, Fair, Weak, Consensus, Insufficient Evidence - see chart above) to a recommendation.

Adapted by the American Dietetic Association from the American Academy of Pediatrics, Classifying Recommendations for Clinical Practice Guideline, Pediatrics. 2004;114;874-877.

In addition, recommendations for the determination of energy expenditure and energy requirements for children and adolescents draw from the 2005 US Institutes of Medicine Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients) (available online at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10490.html --especially chapter 5 and Appendix I).

Electronic copies: Available from the American Dietetic Association Web site.

• Executive summary of recommendations. Chicago (IL): American Dietetic Association; April 2008. Available from the American Dietetic Association Web site.

The American Dietetic Association encourages the free exchange of evidence in nutrition practice guidelines and promotes the adaptation of the guidelines for local conditions. However, please note that guidelines are subject to copyright provisions. To replicate or reproduce this guideline, in part or in full, please obtain agreement from the American Dietetic Association. Please contact Kari Kren at kkren@eatright.org for copyright permission.

When modifying the guidelines for local circumstances, significant departures from these comprehensive guidelines should be fully documented and the reasons for the differences explicitly detailed.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.