Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Complete Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Ankle and foot complaints.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Ankle and foot complaints. Elk Grove Village (IL): American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM); 2004. 27 p. [47 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Harris, J, ed. Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines: American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Beverly Farms, MA: OEM Press; 1997.

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory information has been released.

COMPLETE SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 SCOPE
 METHODOLOGY - including Rating Scheme and Cost Analysis
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS
 QUALIFYING STATEMENTS
 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE
 INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

SCOPE

DISEASE/CONDITION(S)

Ankle and foot complaints

GUIDELINE CATEGORY

Diagnosis
Evaluation
Management
Treatment

CLINICAL SPECIALTY

Family Practice
Internal Medicine
Orthopedic Surgery
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Preventive Medicine
Surgery

INTENDED USERS

Advanced Practice Nurses
Physician Assistants
Physicians
Utilization Management

GUIDELINE OBJECTIVE(S)

  • To provide information and guidance on generally accepted elements of quality care in occupational and environmental medicine
  • To improve the efficiency with which the diagnostic process is conducted, the specificity of each diagnostic test performed, and the effectiveness of each treatment in relieving symptoms and achieving cure
  • To present recommendations on assessing and treating adults with potentially work-related ankle and foot complaints

TARGET POPULATION

Adults with potentially work-related ankle and foot complaints seen in primary care settings

INTERVENTIONS AND PRACTICES CONSIDERED

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC): The following general clinical measures were considered. Refer to the original guideline document for information regarding which specific interventions and practices under these general headings are recommended, optional, or not recommended by the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

  1. History and physical exam
  2. Patient education
  3. Medication
  4. Injections
  5. Physical treatment methods
  6. Rest and immobilization (e.g., braces, supports)
  7. Activity and exercise
  8. Detection of physiologic abnormalities
  9. Radiography
  10. Surgical considerations

MAJOR OUTCOMES CONSIDERED

Missed work days

METHODOLOGY

METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT EVIDENCE

Searches of Electronic Databases

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT THE EVIDENCE

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC): The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine contracted the Work Loss Data Institute to provide medical library research services.

Disability-Duration Data

This edition includes disability-duration data that have been extracted from National Health Interview Survey data. Only data from interviews with individuals without workers' compensation claims has been included.

NUMBER OF SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Not stated

METHODS USED TO ASSESS THE QUALITY AND STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Expert Consensus
Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

A = Strong research-based evidence (multiple relevant, high-quality scientific studies).

B = Moderate research-based evidence (one relevant, high-quality scientific study or multiple adequate scientific studies).

C = Limited research-based evidence (at least one adequate scientific study of patients with foot or ankle complaints).

D = Panel interpretation of evidence not meeting inclusion criteria for research-based evidence.

METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Review
Review of Published Meta-Analyses

DESCRIPTION OF THE METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Contributors reviewed at least one chapter each and reviewed the relevant medical literature that had been published since the creation of the original Guidelines in 1997.

METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Expert Consensus

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Not stated

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Not applicable

COST ANALYSIS

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

Internal Peer Review

DESCRIPTION OF METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

Following the chapter and literature review, participants provided written or verbal comments to the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine's Practice Guidelines Committee.

Verbal comments were in the form of participation in multi-specialty conference calls, during which the issues raised in each chapter were extensively discussed. Draft chapters were prepared and distributed by the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine to all chapter reviewers. Follow-up multi-specialty teleconferences were then held as appropriate, during which time the draft was again reviewed.

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations are followed by evidence classification (A-D) identifying the type of supporting evidence. Definitions for the types of evidence are presented at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Summary of Recommendations for Evaluating and Managing Ankle and Foot Complaints (refer to the original guideline document for more detailed information)

Clinical Measure Recommended Optional Not Recommended
History and physical exam Basic history and physical exam, including evaluation of ability to bear weight, tenderness, and ligament stability (C)    
Patient education Patient education regarding diagnosis, prognosis, and expectations of treatment (D)    
Medication (See Chapter 3 in the original guideline document) Acetaminophen (C)

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (B)
Opioids, short course (C)

NSAID creams (D)
Use of opioids for more than 2 weeks (C)
Injections For patients with point tenderness in the area of a heel spur, plantar fasciitis, or Morton's neuroma, local injection of lidocaine and cortisone solution (D)   Repeated or frequent injections (D)
Physical treatment methods For acute injuries, at-home ice applications, range-of-motion and strengthening exercises, as taught by primary provider (D) Pneumatic or pulse devices to reduce swelling (C)

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for plantar fasciitis (C)

Coupled electrical stimulation or impulse compression for fracture (C)
Passive physical therapy modalities, except as initial aid prior to home exercises (D)

Laser treatment (B)
Rest and immobilization (e.g., braces, supports) For acute injuries, immobilization and weight bearing as tolerated; taping or bracing later to avoid exacerbation or for prevention (C)

For acute swelling, rest and elevation (D)

For appropriate diagnoses, rigid orthotics, metatarsal bars, heel donut, toe separator (C)
Tension night splints for plantar fasciitis (B) Prolonged supports or bracing without exercise (due to risk of debilitation) (D)
Activity and exercise Stretching

Aerobic exercise

Maintenance of general activity to avoid debilitation (C)

Early mobilization of patients with ankle sprain (C)
  Full activity in presence of swelling and other signs of acute trauma (D)
Detection of physiologic abnormalities     Electrical studies for routine foot and ankle problems without clinical evidence of tarsal tunnel syndrome or other entrapment neuropathies (D)
Radiography Plain-film radiographs only for patients with acute ankle injuries who have signs identified in Ottawa Criteria ankle rules (B)

Further evaluation if radiographic films show ankle effusion >13 mm anteriorly (C)
  Routine plain-film radiographs for ankle injuries (B)

Routine radiographic films for soft tissue diagnoses (D)
Surgical considerations Bunionectomy if conservative treatment fails and radiographs are positive for >14-degree intermetatarsal angle (D)

Excision of neuroma if conservative treatment (injections, toe separator) fails (D)

Reconstruction of lateral ankle ligament for symptomatic patients with ankle laxity demonstrated on physical exam and positive stress films (C)
  Diagnostic arthroscopy of ankle if diagnosis obtainable by other non-invasive method (D)

Arthroscopy of ankle for synovial impingement before conservative care, including injections, is tried (D)

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence

A = Strong research-based evidence (multiple relevant, high-quality scientific studies).

B = Moderate research-based evidence (one relevant, high-quality scientific study or multiple adequate scientific studies).

C = Limited research-based evidence (at least one adequate scientific study of patients with foot or ankle complaints).

D = Panel interpretation of evidence not meeting inclusion criteria for research-based evidence.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

The following clinical algorithms are provided in the original guideline document:

  • American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine Guidelines for care of acute and subacute occupational ankle and foot complaints
  • Initial evaluation of occupational ankle and foot complaints
  • Initial and follow-up management of occupational ankle and foot complaints
  • Evaluation of slow-to-recover patients with occupational ankle and foot complaints (symptoms >4 weeks)
  • Surgical considerations for patients with anatomic and physiologic evidence of bunion, or Morton's neuroma, and persistent symptoms
  • Further management of occupational ankle and foot complaints

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS

POTENTIAL BENEFITS

  • Improved efficiency of the diagnostic process
  • Effective treatment resulting in symptom alleviation and cure

POTENTIAL HARMS

Not stated

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

  • The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) provides this segment of guidelines for practitioners and notes that decisions to adopt particular courses of actions must be made by trained practitioners on the basis of the available resources and the particular circumstances presented by the individual patient. Accordingly, the ACOEM disclaims responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from actions taken by practitioners after considering these guidelines.
  • The guidelines for modification of work activities and disability duration (see original guideline document) are general guidelines based on consensus or population sources and are never meant to be applied to an individual case without consideration of workplace factors, concurrent disease or other social or medical factors that can affect recovery.  The parameters for disability duration are ''consensus optimal'' targets as determined by a panel of ACOEM members in 1995, and reaffirmed by a panel of ACOEM members in 2002. In most cases persons with one non-severe extremity injury can return to modified duty immediately. Restrictions should take into consideration the opposite extremity also to prevent strain injuries to the uninjured extremity.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE

DESCRIPTION OF IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

An implementation strategy was not provided.

IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS

Clinical Algorithm

For information about availability, see the "Availability of Companion Documents" and "Patient Resources" fields below.

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES

IOM CARE NEED

Getting Better

IOM DOMAIN

Effectiveness
Patient-centeredness

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Ankle and foot complaints. Elk Grove Village (IL): American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM); 2004. 27 p. [47 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

1997 (revised 2004)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine Practice Guidelines Committee

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Chapter Lead: Jeffrey S. Harris, MD, MPH, MBA, FACOEM

Committee Members: Jennifer H. Christian, MD, MPH, FACPM; Philip I. Harber, MD, MPH, FACOEM, FCCP; John P. Holland, MD, MPH, FACOEM; Kathryn L. Mueller, MD, MPH, FACEP, FACOEM; Douglas J. Patron, MD, MSPH; Bernyce M. Peplowski, DO, MS; and Jack Richman, MD, CCFP, DOHS, FACOEM

Timothy J. Key, MD, MPH, FACOEM, as Responsible Officer and ACOEM President Elect, and Edward A. Emmett, MD, MS, FACOEM, Chair of the ACOEM Council on Occupational and Environmental Medical Practice, contributed to the development of the guidelines as well.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Harris, J, ed. Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines: American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Beverly Farms, MA: OEM Press; 1997.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on May 31, 2006. The information was verified by the guideline developer on November 3, 2006.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, the signator of this license, represent and warrant that they are the publisher of the guidelines and/or possess all rights necessary to grant the license rights to AHRQ and its agents.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo