Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Complete Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Steps to reduce surgical risk. In: I guidelines for perioperative evaluation.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Committee on Perioperative Evaluation (CAPO), Brazilian Society of Cardiology. Steps to reduce surgical risk. In: I guidelines for perioperative evaluation. Arq Bras Cardiol 2007;89(6):e197-208.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory information has been released.

  • December 3, 2008, Innohep (tinzaparin): The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has requested that the labeling for Innohep be revised to better describe overall study results which suggest that, when compared to unfractionated heparin, Innohep increases the risk of death for elderly patients (i.e., 70 years of age and older) with renal insufficiency. Healthcare professionals should consider the use of alternative treatments to Innohep when treating elderly patients over 70 years of age with renal insufficiency and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), or both.
  • February 28, 2008, Heparin Sodium Injection: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) informed the public that Baxter Healthcare Corporation has voluntarily recalled all of their multi-dose and single-use vials of heparin sodium for injection and their heparin lock flush solutions. Alternate heparin manufacturers are expected to be able to increase heparin products sufficiently to supply the U.S. market. There have been reports of serious adverse events including allergic or hypersensitivity-type reactions, with symptoms of oral swelling, nausea, vomiting, sweating, shortness of breath, and cases of severe hypotension.

COMPLETE SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 SCOPE
 METHODOLOGY - including Rating Scheme and Cost Analysis
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS
 QUALIFYING STATEMENTS
 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE
 INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

SCOPE

DISEASE/CONDITION(S)

Any condition requiring surgery

GUIDELINE CATEGORY

Evaluation
Management
Prevention
Risk Assessment
Treatment

CLINICAL SPECIALTY

Anesthesiology
Cardiology
Critical Care
Dentistry
Endocrinology
Gastroenterology
Hematology
Neurology
Nuclear Medicine
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ophthalmology
Orthopedic Surgery
Preventive Medicine
Pulmonary Medicine
Surgery
Thoracic Surgery
Urology

INTENDED USERS

Physicians

GUIDELINE OBJECTIVE(S)

  • To refine and unify the terminology used by the entire multidisciplinary team, including the patients and their family
  • To establish new routines, change indication for surgery according to the information obtained during the perioperative evaluation

TARGET POPULATION

Any patient who requires surgery

INTERVENTIONS AND PRACTICES CONSIDERED

Perioperative Medication/Prophylaxis/Management

  1. Management of existing medications (beta-blockers, statins, aspirin, anticoagulation therapy)
  2. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (heparin, warfarin, enoxaparin, compression stockings, intermittent pneumatic compression, mobilization, inferior vena cava filter)
  3. Assessment of perioperative risk levels for complications
  4. Endocarditis prophylaxis (antibiotics)
  5. Glycemic control (hypoglycemic agents and insulin NPH)
  6. Choice of anesthetic agent
  7. Nitroglycerin during surgery

Perioperative Patient Management

  1. Specialist referral
  2. Choice of anesthetic technique (regional versus general)
  3. Management of body temperature and catheters
  4. Use of invasive pressure monitoring
  5. Perioperative electrocardiography monitoring
  6. Acute myocardial infarction management

Management of Type and Timing of Surgery

  1. Myocardial revascularization
  2. Elective hip or knee arthroplasty
  3. Hip fracture surgery
  4. Neurosurgery
  5. Trauma
  6. Acute spinal cord surgery
  7. Gynecologic surgery
  8. Urologic surgery

MAJOR OUTCOMES CONSIDERED

  • Perioperative cardiovascular complications
  • Perioperative cardiovascular mortality
  • Venous thromboembolism

METHODOLOGY

METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT EVIDENCE

Searches of Electronic Databases

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT THE EVIDENCE

Not stated

NUMBER OF SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Not stated

METHODS USED TO ASSESS THE QUALITY AND STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Levels of Evidence

  1. Sufficient evidence from multiple randomized trials or meta-analyses
  2. Limited evidence from single randomized trial or non-randomized studies
  3. Evidence only from case reports and series
  4. Expert opinion or standard of care

METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Systematic Review

DESCRIPTION OF THE METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Not stated

METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Expert Consensus

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The participants of these guidelines were chosen among health sciences specialists with hands on and academic experience, thus being characterized as clinical researchers.

The adopted methodology and evidence levels were the same as those used in earlier documents by the Brazilian Society of Cardiology.

Recommendations

  • The guidelines must be based on evidences.
  • Class division must be used when applicable.
  • Degrees of recommendation must be used when applicable, according to the levels of evidence.

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Degree or Class of Recommendation

Class I: Conditions for which there is evidence for and/or general agreement that the procedure/therapy is useful and effective

Class II: Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of performing the procedure/therapy

Class IIa: Weight of evidence/opinion is in favor of usefulness/efficacy

Class IIb: Usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence/opinion

Class III: Conditions for which there is evidence for and/or general agreement that the procedure/therapy is not useful/effective and in some cases may be harmful

COST ANALYSIS

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

Peer Review

DESCRIPTION OF METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

Not stated

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The definitions for levels of evidence (A-D) and classes of recommendation (I-III) are provided at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Perioperative Medication Therapy

Recommendations for Perioperative Beta-Blocker Use

Class I

  • High-risk (American College of Physicians [ACP] Classes II and III) and coronary artery disease (CAD) patients; Level of Evidence A.

Class IIb

  • Two or more cardiovascular risk factors (>65 years, hypertension, smoking, diabetes and total cholesterol >240 mg/dl) (Mangano et al., 1996); Level of Evidence B.

Class III

  • Patients with contraindication to beta-blockers; Level of Evidence B.

Recommendations for Perioperative Statin Use

Class I

  • Patients undergoing vascular surgeries; Level of Evidence B.
  • Patients with known CAD or those who already use statins; Level of Evidence D.

Class IIb

  • High-risk patients (ACP Classes II and III); Level of Evidence D.

Recommendations for Aspirin Use

  • Patients on lifelong acetylsalicylic acid (AAS) therapy should not discontinue its use before surgery except in cases of neurological surgery or transurethral prostatectomy (Burger et al., 2005); Class I, Level of Evidence B.
  • Consider reducing the dose of patients taking higher doses of AAS (325 mg); Class IIa, Level of Evidence D.

Myocardial Revascularization

Recommendations for Myocardial Revascularization (Surgical or Percutaneous) Before Non-Cardiac Surgeries

Class I

  • Angioplasty should only be done when there is proof of artery-related ischemia. It should not be done when it is based exclusively on anatomical findings; Level of Evidence A.
  • Patients with indication of myocardial revascularization, regardless of perioperative context who are scheduled to undergo elective non-cardiac surgeries; Level of Evidence D.
  • Evidence of extensive ischemic areas, low ischemic threshold and high-risk coronary anatomy (lesion of the left coronary artery and triple-vessel disease with ventricular dysfunction); Level of Evidence D.

Class IIa

  • Patients without high-risk functional or anatomical markers for perioperative cardiac complications but with indication of myocardial revascularization before major non-cardiac surgeries (vascular, intraperitoneal or intrathoracic surgeries); Level of Evidence D.

Class IIb

  • Patients without high-risk functional or anatomical markers for perioperative cardiac complications but with indication of myocardial revascularization before surgeries other than major vascular, intraperitoneal or intrathoracic surgeries; Level of Evidence D.

Class III

  • Patients in need of emergency, non-cardiac surgery regardless of symptom severity or degree of coronary artery obstruction; Level of Evidence D.
  • Patients with diseases that require non-cardiac surgeries and greatly increase the risk of general complications during the perioperative period of myocardial revascularization, such as intestinal neoplasias with considerable bleeding, severe dyspeptic symptoms, intra or extracavitary infections, head injury or brain tumors that may bleed; Level of Evidence D.
  • Patients with bad prognoses because of severe non-cardiac illness who may be submitted to palliative surgeries such as gastrostomy, gastric/intestinal bypass, tracheotomy, etc.; Level of Evidence D.

Recommendations Regarding Safe Intervals Between Myocardial Revascularization and Non-Cardiac Surgery

Class I

  • After surgical myocardial revascularization
    • Ideal interval: 30 days; Level of Evidence D.
    • Minimum interval: depends on the clinical condition of the patient; Level of Evidence D.
  • After balloon angioplasty without stenting
    • Ideal interval: 14 days; Level of Evidence B
    • Minimum interval: 7 days; Level of Evidence B.
  • After angioplasty with stenting
    • Ideal interval: 6 weeks; Level of Evidence B.
    • Minimum interval: 14 days; Level of Evidence B.
  • After angioplasty with drug-eluting stenting
    • Ideal interval: not established; Level of Evidence D.
    • Minimum interval: 30 days (Daeman et al., 2007); Level of Evidence D.

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis

Classification of VTE Risk According to Patient and Surgery Characteristics

  • Low risk: minor surgery, patient under 40 years and without risk factors.
  • Moderate risk
    • Minor surgery and patient with risk factors
    • Major surgery, patient between 40 and 60 years and without risk factors
    • Major surgery, patient under 40 years and without risk factors
  • High risk
    • Major surgery, patient above 60 years or with risk factors
    • Major surgery, patient above 40 years or with risk factors
  • Very high risk
    • Major surgery, patient above 40 years, previous VTE, cancer or hypercoagulation
    • Patient with many risk factors

Recommendations for the Perioperative Prophylaxis of VTE (Geerts et al., 2001)

  1. Low Risk
    • Early mobilization; Class I, Level of Evidence C.
  1. Moderate Risk
    • Heparin 5000 IU subcutaneously at 12-hour intervals, starting 1 to 2 hours before surgery; Class I, Level of Evidence A.
    • Enoxaparin 20 mg subcutaneously at 24-hour intervals, starting 1 to 2 hours before surgery; Class I, Level of Evidence A.
    • Compression stockings: start immediately before surgery until outpatient follow-up or intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) – start immediately before surgery until hospital discharge; Class I, Level of Evidence A.
  1. High Risk
    • Heparin 5000 IU subcutaneously at 8-hour intervals, starting 1 to 2 hours before surgery Class I, Level of Evidence A.
    • Enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously at 24-hour intervals, starting 1 to 2 hours before surgery; Class I, Level of Evidence A.
    • IPC – start immediately before surgery until hospital discharge Class I, Level of Evidence A.
  1. Very High Risk
    • Enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously at 24-hour intervals, starting 1 to 2 hours before surgery plus IPC or compression stockings; Class I, Level of Evidence C.
    • Heparin 5000 IU subcutaneously at 8-hour intervals, starting 1 to 2 hours before surgery plus IPC or compression stockings; Class I, Level of Evidence C.
    • Warfarin in selected patients -- start with 5 mg/day on the day of surgery or on the next day and adjust the dose to keep international normalized ratio (INR) between 2 and 3. Class IIa, Level of Evidence C.
  1. Elective Hip Arthroplasty
    • Enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously 12 hours before or 12 to 24 hours after surgery or 20 mg subcutaneously 4 to 6 hours after surgery; then 40 mg/day on the days following surgery; Class I, Level of Evidence A.
    • Warfarin: adjust dose to keep INR between 2 and 3; start administration before surgery or immediately after surgery; Class I, Level of Evidence A.
    • Heparin subcutaneously at 8-hour intervals, loading dose of 3500 IU ± 500 IU per dose to keep arterial partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) above normal; Class IIa, Level of Evidence A.
    • Prophylactic measures associated with IPC or compression stockings Class IIa, Level of Evidence C.
    • Prophylaxis should last at least 7 days. Class I, Level of Evidence A.
  1. Elective Knee Arthroplasty
    • Enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously 12 hours before or 12 to 24 hours after surgery, or 20 mg subcutaneously 4 to 6 hours after surgery, then 40 mg/day on the days following surgery; Class I, Level of Evidence A.
    • Warfarin: adjust dose to keep INR between 2 and 3. Start before surgery or immediately after surgery; Class I, Level of Evidence A.
    • IPC – start immediately before surgery until hospital discharge; Class I, Level of Evidence B.
    • Prophylaxis should last at least 7 to 10 days; Class I, Level of Evidence A.
  1. Hip Fracture Surgery
    • Enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously 12 hours before or 12 to 24 hours after surgery or 20 mg subcutaneously 4 to 6 hours after surgery, then 40 mg/day on the days following surgery; Class I, Level of Evidence B.
    • Warfarin: adjust dose to keep INR between 2 and 3. Start before surgery or immediately after surgery; Class I, Level of Evidence B.
    • Heparin 5000 IU subcutaneously at 8-hour intervals, starting 1 to 2 hours before surgery; Class IIa, Level of Evidence B.
  1. Neurosurgery
    • IPC with or without compression stockings; Class I, Level of Evidence A.
    • Heparin 5000 IU subcutaneously at 8-hour intervals starting 1 to 2 hours before surgery; Class IIa, Level of Evidence A.
    • Enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously/day after surgery; Class IIa, Level of Evidence A.
    • IPC or compression stockings associated with prophylactic enoxaparin or heparin; Class I, Level of Evidence B.
  1. Trauma
    • Enoxaparin 30 mg subcutaneously at 12-hour intervals starting 12 to 36 hours after the trauma if the patient is hemodynamically stable; Class I, Level of Evidence A.
    • IPC or compression stockings if enoxaparin is contraindicated (risk of bleeding); Class I, Level of Evidence C.
    • Inferior vena cava filter if there is proven deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and contraindication of anticoagulation therapy; Class I, Level of Evidence C.
  1. Acute Spinal Cord Injury
    • Enoxaparin 30 mg subcutaneously at 12-hour intervals; Class I, level of Evidence B.
    • IPC or compression stockings associated with prophylactic enoxaparin or heparin or if anticoagulation therapy is contraindicated right after the lesion; Class IIa, Level of Evidence B.
    • Continue enoxaparin therapy during rehabilitation or use full anticoagulation with warfarin (INR between 2 and 3); Class I, Level of Evidence C.
  1. Gynecological Surgeries

    11.A. Small Interventions for Benign Diseases

    • Early mobilization; Class I, Level of Evidence C.

    11.B. Major for Benign Diseases Without Risk Factors

    • Heparin 5000 IU subcutaneously at 12-hour intervals; Class I, Level of Evidence A.
    • Enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously at 24-hour intervals or IPC before surgery and at least many days after surgery; Class I, Level of Evidence C.

    11.C. Major Cancer Surgeries

    • Heparin 5000 IU subcutaneously at 8-hour intervals; Class I, Level of Evidence A.
    • Heparin 5000 IU subcutaneously at 8-hour intervals associated with IPC or compression stockings to provide additional protection; Class I, Level of Evidence C.
  1. Urological Surgeries

    12.A. Low-Risk or Transurethral Surgery

    • Early mobilization; Class I, Level of Evidence C.

    12.B. Major or Open-Cavity Surgery

    • Heparin 5000 IU subcutaneously at 8-hour intervals, 1 to 2 hours before surgery; Class I, Level of Evidence B.
    • Enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously at 24-hour intervals, starting 1 to 2 hours before surgery; Class I, Level of Evidence B.
    • IPC – start immediately before surgery until hospital discharge; Class I, Level of Evidence B.
    • Compression stockings – start immediately before surgery until outpatient follow-up; Class I, Level of Evidence B.

    13.C. High-Risk Patients

    • IPC or compression stockings associated with prophylactic enoxaparin or heparin; Class I, Level of Evidence C.

Patients Already Taking Anticoagulation Therapy Because of a Previous VTE

See Table below.

Table: Recommendations for the Management of Pre and Postoperative Coagulation Therapy in Patients Taking Oral Anticoagulation Because of a History of VTE (Kearon & Hirsch, 1997)*

Indication Before Surgery After Surgery
Acute VTE – month 1 IV heparin** (suspend 6h before) IV heparin** (restart 12h after major surgery or later if there is risk of bleeding)
VTE – month 2 and 3 Prophylactic sub-Q LMWH in inpatients*** IV heparin (until INR=2.0 with warfarin)
VTE – after 3 months Prophylactic sub-Q LMWH in inpatients*** Sub-Q LMWH
VTE recurrent # Prophylactic sub-Q LMWH in inpatients*** Sub-Q LMWH

Class I, Level of Evidence C.

*IV heparin refers to intravenous heparin in therapeutic doses and LMWH Sub-Q refers to the use of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin in prophylactic doses to prevent VTE in high-risk patients.

**Consider using an inferior vena cava filter when acute VTE occurred within the previous two weeks or when there is a high risk of bleeding with i.v. heparin.

***Hospitalization is not recommended for this reason alone.

#Patients who require long-term oral anticoagulation therapy because of a high risk of recurrence but whose last VTE episode occurred more than 3 months before surgery.

Perioperative Anticoagulation Therapy

Patients at Low Risk of Thromboembolism (Ansell et al., 2004)

  • Discontinue warfarin 4 days before surgery; wait for INR to return to almost normal values (<1.5); Class IIa, Level of Evidence C.
  • Non-fractionated (NFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis can be used before surgery if indicated; Class IIa, Level of Evidence C.
  • NFH or LMWH prophylaxis can be used after surgery if the type of procedure indicates its use and simultaneously reintroduce warfarin; Class IIa, Level of Evidence C.

Patients at High Risk of Thromboembolism

  • Discontinue warfarin 4 days before surgery and wait for INR to normalize; Class IIa, Level of Evidence C.
  • Start full-dose NFH or LMWH when INR <2.0; Class IIa, Level of Evidence C.
  • Discontinue intravenous NFH 5 hours before surgery and subcutaneous NFH or LMWH 12 to 24 hours before surgery; Class IIa, Level of Evidence C.
  • Simultaneously reintroduce full-dose NFH or LMWH and warfarin after surgery until INR is within therapeutic range; Class IIa, Level of Evidence C.

Patients at Intermediate Risk of Thromboembolism

  • The management of these patients can follow the recommendations for patients with low or high-risk at the physician's discretion. Class IIa, Level of Evidence C.

Procedures with Low Risk of Bleeding

  • The procedure can be done when INR is around 2.0. Discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy is not necessary; Class IIa, Level of Evidence C.
  • If INR >3.0, discontinue anticoagulation therapy one or two days before surgery and reintroduce it the night after surgery; Class IIa, Level of Evidence C.

Urgent Procedures (Machado, 2004)

  • Vitamin K and fresh plasma can be used to reverse anticoagulation. Avoid high doses of vitamin K as it may inhibit anticoagulation later on.

Endocarditis Prophylaxis

Recommendations for the Antibiotic Prophylaxis of Infective Endocarditis (Dajani et al,. 1997; Durack, 1995; Dajani, Bawdon, & Berry, 1994)

See Table, below.

Table: Antibiotic Prophylaxis of Infective Endocarditis

Dental, Respiratory Tract and Esophageal Procedures
Situation Antibiotic Regimen
General Amoxicillin or Ampicillin 2 g or 50 mg/kg OA/1 hour before procedure (BP) or

2 g intramuscular (IM)/ intravenous (IV) or 50 mg/kg 30 min BP
Allergic Clindamycin or Cephalexin 600 mg or 20 mg/Kg OA/1 hour BP or IM 30 min BP
  Azithromycin/clarithromycin 2 g or 50 mg/kg OA/1 hour BP 500 mg 1 hour BP
Gastrointestinal (except Esophagus) and Genitourinary Procedures
High risk Ampicillin + Gentamicin 2 g (IM/IV) or 50 mg/kg 30 min BP + 6 hours later 1 g or

25 mg/kg (or Amoxicillin 1 g OA) 1.5 mg/kg (up to 120 mg) IM/IV 30 min BP
High risk allergic Vancomycin + Gentamicin 1 g or 20 mg/kg IV (infusion in 1 hour) 30 min BP + 1.5 mg/kg (up to 120 mg) IM/IV 30 min BP
Moderate risk Amoxicillin or Ampicillin 2 g or 50 mg/kg AO 1 hour BP or 2 g (IM/IV) or 50 mg/kg 30 min BP
Moderate risk and allergic Vancomycin 1 g or 20 mg/kg IV (infusion in 1 hour) 30 min BP

IE Prophylaxis Is NOT Recommended for

  • Interatrial communication (IAC) alone
  • Corrected IAC, interventricular communication (IVC) or patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and without residual shunt
  • Previous myocardial revascularization surgery
  • Mitral valve prolapse without regurgitation
  • Innocent heart murmurs
  • Patients with pacemakers or implantable cardiac devices (ICDs)
  • History of Kawasaki disease or rheumatic fever without valvular dysfunction

Glycemic Control

Recommendations for the Preoperative Period

  • Screen all patients and respective medical records for risk factors of diabetes mellitus (DM); Class I, Level of Evidence D.
  • Patients older than 45 years, overweight or with symptoms that suggest DM should be at least submitted to a fasting glucose test; Class I, Level of Evidence D.
  • Glycemia <100 mg/dL: Patient can undergo surgery without any special preoperative measure; Class I, Level of Evidence D.
  • Glycemia between 100 and 125 mg/dL: patient should have a creatinine test done in the previous 12 months, baseline electrocardiogram and be more attentive to blood pressure control. After surgery, consider referring the patient to an endocrinologist; Class I, Level of Evidence D.
  • Glycemia >125 mg/dL or has diagnosed DM: patient should have a creatinine test done in the previous 12 months, baseline electrocardiogram and be more attentive to blood pressure control including screening for dysautonomia (blood pressure and heart rate while sitting and after standing for 3 minutes). After surgery, consider referring the patient to an endocrinologist; Class I, Level of Evidence D.
  • Glycemia >220 mg/dL, consider postponing surgery until better glycemic control is achieved. Class I, Level of Evidence D.
  • Best times to discontinue oral medications before (Class I, Level of Evidence D)

    Biguanides: 24 to 48 hours before surgery

    Sulfonylureas: of 1st generation – 48 to 72 hours before surgery; of 2nd and 3rd generation – on the day of surgery

    Glitazones: 24 to 48 hours before surgery

    Thiazolidinediones: on the day of surgery

    Acarbose: 24 hours before surgery

    Glinides: on the day of surgery

    Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin (insulin NPH): patient may take the normal bedtime dose the night before surgery; on the morning of surgery, administer 1/3 to 2/3 of the normal dose, depending on what time the surgery will be done.

  • If glycemic control is too hard to achieve, consider working with an endocrinologist.

Recommendations for the Intra and Postoperative Periods

  • If surgery will last more than one hour or if patient is of high risk (ACP Classes II and III), capillary blood glucose level should be determined at induction of anesthesia; Class IIa, Level of Evidence D.
  • Intravenous insulin infusion to all type I diabetics regardless of surgery classification and to all type II diabetics submitted to surgeries that last more than one hour or when their glycemia is out of control; Class IIa, Level of Evidence D.
  • Control glycemia strictly with regular insulin in an infusion pump to keep capillary insulin between 80 and 110 mg/dL; determine capillary glucose level as often as needed. If glycemia rises above 110 mg/dL, it is advisable to determine serum potassium level and monitor it at least daily; Class IIa, Level of Evidence B.
  • Transition from insulin pumps to oral medication can be done outside the intensive care unit (ICU). Target glycemia remains the same (between 80 and 110 mg/dL). Consider endocrinologist follow-up. Capillary blood glucose level should be determined one hour after discontinuation of insulin pump and at least three times per day before meals or at 6-hour intervals in fasting patients; Class IIa, Level of Evidence B.

Considerations on Anesthesia and Surgery

Choosing the Anesthetic Technique

  • Whenever possible, prefer neuraxial blockade to general anesthesia. Class IIa, Level of Evidence A.

Choosing the Anesthetic Agent

  • Always prefer fast-acting and short-lasting anesthetics and anesthetics whose residual effects are minimal. Class I, Level of Evidence B.

Management of Body Temperature

  • Maintain normothermia during the perioperative period to prevent cardiac events. Class I, Level of Evidence A.

Nitroglycerin During Surgery

  • Intraoperative nitroglycerin should only be used to control blood pressure of coronary artery disease patients, not to prevent perioperative ischemia. Class I, Level of Evidence C.

Catheters

Pulmonary Artery Catheters

  • Surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm; Class IIa, Level of Evidence D.
  • Patients with decompensated heart disease who will undergo major surgery; Class IIa, Level of Evidence C.
  • Patients with myocardial dysfunction who will undergo major surgery; Class IIb, Level of Evidence C.

Invasive Pressure Monitoring

  • Patients with heart disease, hemodynamic instability and/or undergoing major surgery; Class I, Level of Evidence D.
  • Patients with permanent pacemakers; Class IIb, Level of Evidence D.

Intra-aortic Balloon Pump

  • Patients at high cardiac risk and high-risk non-cardiac surgeries; Class IIb, Level of Evidence D.

Perioperative Monitoring

Monitoring the ST Segment

  • Monitor the ST segment of high-risk patients during the perioperative period; Class IIB, Level of Evidence C.

Perioperative Acute Myocardial Infarction

  • Patients with an estimated moderate or high perioperative cardiac risk of ischemic nature must be continuously monitored in semi-intensive or intensive care unit. Electrocardiogram and troponin assay must be done daily until the third day after surgery since most events occur in this period. Class I, Level of Evidence A.
  • If troponin testing is not available, it should be substituted by a creatine kinase (CK)-myocardial fraction (MB)/CK curve (8/8 hours). Class I, Level of Evidence B.

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence

  1. Sufficient evidence from multiple randomized trials or meta-analyses
  2. Limited evidence from single randomized trial or non-randomized studies
  3. Evidence only from case reports and series
  4. Expert opinion or standard of care

Class of Recommendation

Class I: Conditions for which there is evidence for and/or general agreement that the procedure/therapy is useful and effective

Class II: Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of performing the procedure/therapy

Class IIa: Weight of evidence/opinion is in favor of usefulness/efficacy

Class IIb: Usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence/opinion

Class III: Conditions for which there is evidence for and/or general agreement that the procedure/therapy is not useful/effective and in some cases may be harmful

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

REFERENCES SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for most of the recommendations (see the "Major Recommendations" field).

BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS

POTENTIAL BENEFITS

  • Reduction of risk of perioperative complications and mortality
  • Prevention of perioperative complications
  • Prevention of perioperative mortality

POTENTIAL HARMS

  • Risk of hemorrhagic complications from anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents
  • Risk of thromboembolism from inadequate anticoagulation
  • Risk of hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia due to inadequate glycemic control
  • Propofol-induced intraoperative hypotension

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

  • Data or scientific evidences are not always available to allow all the different situations to be analyzed. As customary in medical practice, minute analysis of the patient and problem and the common sense of the team must prevail.
  • The surgical intervention does not finish when the patient is bandaged or leaves the operating room. The concept of the word perioperative includes the need for a postoperative surveillance whose intensity is determined by the individual level of risk of the patient.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE

DESCRIPTION OF IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

An implementation strategy was not provided.

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES

IOM CARE NEED

Getting Better
Living with Illness
Staying Healthy

IOM DOMAIN

Effectiveness
Safety

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Committee on Perioperative Evaluation (CAPO), Brazilian Society of Cardiology. Steps to reduce surgical risk. In: I guidelines for perioperative evaluation. Arq Bras Cardiol 2007;89(6):e197-208.

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2007

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Brazilian Society of Cardiology

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Brazilian Society of Cardiology

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Not stated

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Writing Committee Members: Danielle Menosi Gualandro; Claudio Pinho; Gilson Feitosa; Bruno Caramelli

Task Force Members: Alina Coutinho Rodrigues Feitosa; Beatriz Ayub; Bruno Caramelli; Carisi A. Polanczyk; Carolina L. Zilli Vieira; Claudio Pinho; Daniela Calderaro; Danielle Menosi Gualandro; Denise Iezzi; Dirk Schreen; Dimas T. Ikeoka; Elbio Antonio D'Amico; Elcio Pfeferman; Emerson Quintino de Lima; Emmanuel de Almeida Burdmann; Fábio Santana Machado; Filomena Regina Barbosa Gomes Galas; Gilson Soares Feitosa-Filho; Heno Ferreira Lopes; Henrique Pachón; João César Nunes Sbano; José Augusto Soares Barreto Filho; José L. Andrade; Roberto Henrique Heinisch; Luciana Moraes dos Santos; Luciana S. Fornari; Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar; Luis Eduardo P. Rohde; Luiz Francisco Cardoso; Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira; Maristela C. Monachini; Pai Ching Yu; Paula Ribeiro Villaça; Paulo Grandini; Renato S. Bagnatori; Roseny dos Reis Rodrigues; Sandra F. Menosi Gualandro; Walkiria Samuel Avila; Wilson Mathias Jr.

Support: Committee on Perioperative Evaluation (CAPO), Brazilian Society of Cardiology

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on June 3, 2008. The information was verified by the guideline developer on July 2, 2008. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on December 26, 2008 following the FDA advisory on Innohep (tinzaparin).

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions. For reproduction of these guidelines, please contact Bruno Caramelli, Comissão de Avaliacão Perioperatória da Brasileira de Cardiologia – CAPO, Alameda Santos, 705 - 11° andar, São Paulo SP, Brazil CEP: 01419-001.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo