Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Complete Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Routine preventive services for infants and children (birth - 24 months).

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium. Routine preventive services for infants and children (birth-24 months). Southfield (MI): Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium; 2007 May. 1 p.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory and/or warning information has been released.

COMPLETE SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 SCOPE
 METHODOLOGY - including Rating Scheme and Cost Analysis
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS
 QUALIFYING STATEMENTS
 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE
 INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

SCOPE

DISEASE/CONDITION(S)

Preventable diseases or conditions such as:

  • Infectious diseases such as diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis A and B, varicella, influenza, pneumococcal pneumonia, Haemophilus influenza b (Hib) infection, rotavirus infection
  • Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)
  • Injuries due to motor vehicles, burns, and poisoning, and other preventable causes
  • Tobacco use/exposure to second-hand smoke
  • Newborn metabolic disorders
  • Lead in blood

GUIDELINE CATEGORY

Counseling
Prevention
Risk Assessment
Screening

CLINICAL SPECIALTY

Family Practice
Pediatrics
Preventive Medicine

INTENDED USERS

Advanced Practice Nurses
Health Plans
Physician Assistants
Physicians

GUIDELINE OBJECTIVE(S)

  • To achieve significant, measurable improvements in the routine preventive services for infants and children (birth to 24 months) through the development and implementation of common evidence-based clinical practice guidelines
  • To design concise guidelines that are focused on key management components of routine preventive services for infants and children to improve outcomes

TARGET POPULATION

All infants and children from birth to 24 months

INTERVENTIONS AND PRACTICES CONSIDERED

Counseling/Screening/Prevention/Risk Assessment

  1. Risk assessment
  2. Parental education and counseling regarding:
    • Immunizations, nutrition, breast-feeding, physical activity, dental health, child abuse, depression, alcohol/drug abuse, anxiety, stress reduction, coping skills
    • Motor-vehicle safety, poison prevention, burn and injury prevention
    • Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and infant sleep positioning
  3. Newborn metabolic screening
  4. Tobacco use screening
  5. Blood lead testing
  6. Immunizations
    • Diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP)
    • Inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV)
    • Measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) or measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine (MMRV)
    • Varicella vaccine
    • Pneumococcal 7 valent conjugated polysaccharide vaccine (PCV7)
    • Haemophilus influenzae b (Hib) conjugate vaccine
    • Rotavirus vaccine
    • Hepatitis A vaccine
    • Hepatitis B vaccine
    • Influenza vaccine

MAJOR OUTCOMES CONSIDERED

Not stated

METHODOLOGY

METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT EVIDENCE

Searches of Electronic Databases

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT THE EVIDENCE

The Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) project leader conducts a search of current literature in support of the guideline topic. Computer database searches are used to identify published studies, existing protocols and/or national guidelines on the selected topic developed by organizations such as the American Diabetes Association, American Heart Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, etc. If available, clinical practice guidelines from participating MQIC health plans and Michigan health systems are also used to develop a framework for the new guideline.

NUMBER OF SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Not stated

METHODS USED TO ASSESS THE QUALITY AND STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Levels of Evidence for the Most Significant Recommendations

  1. Randomized controlled trials
  2. Controlled trials, no randomization
  3. Observational studies
  4. Opinion of expert panel

METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Review

DESCRIPTION OF THE METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Not stated

METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Expert Consensus

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Using information obtained from literature searches and available health plan guidelines on the designated topic, the Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) project leader prepares a draft guideline to be reviewed by the medical directors' committee at one of their scheduled meetings. Priority is given to recommendations with [A] and [B] levels of evidence (see "Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence" field).

The initial draft guideline is reviewed, evaluated, and revised by the committee resulting in draft two of the guideline. Additionally, the Michigan Academy of Family Physicians participates in guideline development at the onset of the process and throughout the guideline development procedure. The MQIC guideline feedback form and draft two of the guideline are distributed to the medical directors, as well as the MQIC measurement and implementation group members, for review and comments. Feedback from members is collected by the MQIC project leader and prepared for review by the medical directors' committee at their next scheduled meeting. The review, evaluation, and revision process with several iterations of the guideline may be repeated over several meetings before consensus is reached on a final draft guideline.

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Not applicable

COST ANALYSIS

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

External Peer Review
Internal Peer Review

DESCRIPTION OF METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

When consensus is reached on the final draft guideline, the medical directors approve the guideline for external distribution to practitioners with review and comments requested via the Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) health plans (project leader distributes final draft to medical directors' committee, measurement and implementation groups to solicit feedback).

The MQIC project leader also forwards the approved guideline draft to appropriate state medical specialty societies for their input. After all feedback is received from external reviews, it is presented for discussion at the next scheduled committee meeting. Based on feedback, subsequent guideline review, evaluation, and revision may be required prior to final guideline approval.

The MQIC Medical Directors approved this guideline in May 2007.

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The level of evidence grades (A-D) are provided for the most significant recommendations and are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Recommendations Birth 1 mo 2 mos 4 mos 6 mos 12
mos
15
mos
18
mos
24
mos
Health, developmental and risk assessments X X X X X X X X X
Parental education and counseling:
  • Immunizations, nutrition, breast-feeding [A], physical activity, dental health, child abuse, depression, alcohol/drug abuse, anxiety, stress reduction, coping skills
  • Motor vehicle safety - Rear facing car seat when riding in a motor vehicle until 1 year and 20 pounds [B].
  • Poison prevention - Keep National Poison Control numbers readily accessible; use child resistant containers
  • Burn prevention - Install smoke detectors and test bi-annually; carbon monoxide detectors; water heater temperature and fire prevention
  • Injury prevention - Use of gates; never leave infant unattended on changing table; water safety; CPR training
  • SIDS and infant sleep positioning - Place infants on their back [B]
X X X X X X X X X
Tobacco Use Screening: Establish tobacco use and second-hand exposure X X X X X X X X X
Neonatal Screening: Newborn metabolic screening prior to hospital discharge >24 hours of age [D] X
>24 hours of age
               
Blood Lead Testing [B]           X      

Abbreviations: CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome

Immunizations

Vaccines Birth 1 mo 2 mos 4 mos 6 mos 12
mos
15
mos
18
mos
24
mos
DTaP [A]     X X X X  
IPV     X X X  
MMR (MMRV) [A]           X    
Varicella [A]           X    
Pneumococcal (PCV7)     X X X X    
Hib [A]     X X X X    
Rotavirus     X X X        
Hep B [A]
Schedule 1
X X   X  
Hep B [A]
Schedule 2
  X X X  
Hep A           X X
Influenza [B]         X (6 to 59 months, annually)

Abbreviations: DTaP, diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis; Hep A, hepatitis A; Hep B, hepatitis B; Hib, Haemophilus influenzae type b; IPV, inactivated poliovirus vaccine; MMR, measles, mumps, rubella; MMRV, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella; PCV7, pneumococcal 7 valent conjugated polysaccharide vaccine

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence for the Most Significant Recommendations

  1. Randomized controlled trials
  2. Controlled trials, no randomization
  3. Observational studies
  4. Opinion of expert panel

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS

POTENTIAL BENEFITS

Through a collaborative approach to developing and implementing common clinical practice guidelines and performance measures for routine preventive services for infants and children from birth to 24 months, Michigan health plans will achieve consistent delivery of evidence-based services and better health outcomes. This approach also will augment the practice environment for physicians by reducing the administrative burdens imposed by compliance with diverse health plan guidelines and associated requirements.

POTENTIAL HARMS

Not stated

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

This guideline lists core management steps. Individual patient considerations and advances in medical science may supersede or modify these recommendations.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE

DESCRIPTION OF IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

Approved Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) guidelines are disseminated through email, U.S. mail, and websites.

The MQIC project leader prepares approved guidelines for distribution. Portable Document Format (PDF) versions of the guidelines are used for distribution.

The MQIC project leader distributes approved guidelines to MQIC membership via email.

The MQIC project leader submits request to website vendor to post approved guidelines to MQIC website (www.mqic.org).

The MQIC project leader completes a statewide mailing of the comprehensive set of approved guidelines and educational tools annually. The guidelines and tools are distributed in February of each year to physicians in the following medical specialties:

  • Family Practice
  • General Practice
  • Internal Medicine
  • Other Specialists for which the guideline is applicable (e.g. endocrinologists, allergists, pediatricians, cardiologists, etc.)

The statewide mailing list is derived from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM) provider database. Approximately 95% of the state's M.D.'s and 96% of the state's D.O.'s are included in the database.

The MQIC project leader submits request to the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) to post approved guidelines to NGC website (www.guideline.gov).

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES

IOM CARE NEED

Staying Healthy

IOM DOMAIN

Effectiveness
Patient-centeredness

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium. Routine preventive services for infants and children (birth-24 months). Southfield (MI): Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium; 2007 May. 1 p.

ADAPTATION

DATE RELEASED

2007 May

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium - Professional Association

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium Medical Director's Committee

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Physician representatives from participating Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium health plans, Michigan State Medical Society, Michigan Osteopathic Association, Michigan Association of Health Plans, Michigan Department of Community Health and Michigan Peer Review Organization

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Standard disclosure is requested from all individuals participating in the Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) guideline development process, including those parties who are solicited for guideline feedback (e.g. health plans, medical specialty societies). Additionally, members of the MQIC Medical Directors' Committee are asked to disclose all commercial relationships.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on March 5, 2008. The information was verified by the guideline developer on March 12, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which may be reproduced with the citation developed by the Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo