Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Assessment processes for older people.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG). Assessment processes for older people. Wellington (NZ): New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG); 2003 Oct. 82 p. [211 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Definitions for the Levels of Evidence (+, ~, x) and Grades of Recommendation (A - C, I, and Good Practice Points [GPP]) are given at the end of the Major Recommendations field.

Domains and Dimensions of Assessment

A: Screening, proactive assessment, and assessment of older people with complex needs should assess for risk factors, physical health and function; mental health; social circumstances; social support, including family/whanau; and the presence, role, and potential needs of carers.

B: Carers of older people should be assessed for health, training, and support needs.

B: Assessment of older people with pre-existing intellectual or other disabilities must detect impairment in those domains and dimensions in which they have been shown to be at particular risk in addition to those domains assessed in people without pre-existing disabilities.

GPP: Any screening and assessment should include assessment for abuse of the older person and/or their carer.

Screening

C: Screening of older people for impairment and risk factors for developing future impairment should be piloted to determine its effectiveness in the New Zealand setting.

C: Any screening tool used in New Zealand should be adapted appropriately, piloted, and evaluated before regional or national screening programmes are considered.

A: To achieve the greatest benefits in terms of improved health and well-being, screening for impairment and risk factors for developing future impairment for older people should involve all members of the defined population (e.g., all people aged 75 years and over).

A: Any screening must be performed, monitored, and evaluated systematically.

A: Any screening must be supported by appropriately planned, adequately resourced, further interventions for treatment/care for older people identified by the screening as in need.

B: Any screening should address those areas of need of most importance to older people.

A: To be effective, screening should cover both domains of potential impairment and risk factors for health or functional impairment.

Proactive Assessment

A: Proactive assessment of older people should be comprehensive and multidimensional.

B: An older person should receive a proactive assessment if the person has any risk factors: is referred after screening; is referred by community workers, family/whanau or carer; or is in contact with health or social services.

A: Proactive assessment must be supported by timely, effective interventions to address any issues identified.

A: The assessment process should use standardised tools and standard methods of collecting, reporting, and comparing data.

A: Regular follow-up should form part of the process of proactive assessment of older people.

GPP: The proactive assessment process should be used as an opportunity for health promotion, disease prevention, treatment, and care management.

Assessment of Complex Needs

A: A comprehensive, multidimensional assessment should be available for older people with complex needs.

A: Assessment must be supported by resourcing for interventions to address the needs identified.

A: Assessment must be supported with regular follow-up.

GPP: Comprehensive assessment should inform and assist an ongoing treatment, rehabilitation, and care plan that includes strategies to encourage implementation of the treatment/care plan.

Carers

B: Carers of older people should be assessed for health, training, and support needs.

B: Older people who are carers of people with intellectual or other disabilities should be assessed for health and support needs.

B: A specifically designed tool for the assessment of carer needs should be used.

I: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether carer assessment is more effective when conducted independently or as part of an assessment of the older person receiving care.

I: There is insufficient evidence to determine who should perform assessments of the needs of carers.

GPP: Assessment of the needs of carers should be linked with the assessment of older people.

Assessment Tools

A: A standardised comprehensive, multidimensional assessment tool with standard methods of collecting, reporting, and comparing data should be used for screening and assessment of older people.

B: A specifically designed assessment of carer needs should be used when assessing carers.

B: Any tools used must be able to assess the domains and dimensions indicated.

A: Screening and Proactive Assessment: the Minimum Data Set for Home Care (MDS-HC) Overview and Overview+, and EASY-Care most closely meet guideline specifications.

A: Comprehensive Assessment: The MDS-HC comprehensive assessment with additional modules for those domains not currently addressed should be used for the comprehensive assessment of older people.

B: The needs of carers should be assessed using a purpose-designed tool after adaptation for use in New Zealand where necessary.

GPP: Any screening and proactive assessment tool selected should be modified in collaboration with the developers to meet the needs of older people in New Zealand.

GPP: Before selection of a national tool, pilot studies using the tools within New Zealand should be conducted to determine costs, training needs, and any modifications of the tools required.

Location of Assessment

A: Screening should usually be located within the older person’s home.

A: Proactive assessments of people should usually take place within the older person’s home, unless the older person is in an emergency department (ED). Attendance at an ED should trigger a comprehensive assessment prior to discharge.

A: Complex needs assessment of people within hospital settings or in residential care should be initiated in that setting.

A: All complex needs assessments should include a home visit by a trained assessor.

C: Screening and assessment of older Maori should be done at the home of the older person and their whanau.

B: A specialist trained assessor must be available in or on call for any ED.

GPP: A rural network of assessors should be developed for assessment of non-urban-dwelling older people.

Assessors and Multidisciplinary Teams

A: Assessors should have specialist training in the assessment process, including training in consent issues.

B: Assessors of older people need the following attributes:

  • good communication skills
  • ability to facilitate the older person’s communication with other health care professionals
  • good interpersonal and relationship management skills
  • sensitivity to the older person’s beliefs and attitudes
  • awareness of spiritual aspects of the person’s care

A: Assessors of older people should be part of (or have ready access to) a wider multidisciplinary team (MDT) to whom they can quickly refer the older person for more in-depth assessment or for help in any particular domain.

B: The MDT should comprise registered nurses with competence in gerontological nursing, geriatricians, psychogeriatricians and clinical psychologists with expertise in mental health of older people, physiotherapists, social workers with competency in working with older people, speech-language therapists, audiologists, dieticians, neurologists, occupational therapists, and pharmacists.

GPP: The core MDT for initial contact and assessment of older people with complex needs in a primary health care setting should comprise a primary care physician, a nurse, and a social worker, all with training and/or experience in working with older people.

GPP: All staff involved in screening, assessment, and treatment of older people (including ED staff) should undergo training to enhance their sensitivity, knowledge and skills in dealing with older people and their issues.

Working Together

B: Implementation of a comprehensive assessment tool must be supported by a programme of education for specialists and other health care professionals.

A: Implementation of a comprehensive assessment tool must be supported by strategies to improve physician implementation of the recommended interventions.

B: An assessment of the older person’s likelihood of following the recommendations should be made, and strategies should be initiated to support implementation of the recommendations by both the older person and health care and social service professionals.

A: Comprehensive assessment should result in a treatment/management plan that includes a process to promote concordance and implementation of that plan by the older person and health care professionals.

Older People with Pre-Existing Disabilities

A: Older people with pre-existing disabilities should be eligible for any screening programme at 55 years.

A: Assessors of people with pre-existing intellectual or other disabilities must have specialist training in the area, in addition to specialist training in the assessment process and consent issues.

A: The MDT supporting the assessment of people with pre-existing disabilities should include specialists with expertise in the disability.

B: Any assessment process for people with disabilities should be designed to ensure that the older person with disability is involved in the assessment process.

Assessment Processes for Older Maori

A: Assessment processes should be made available at age 55 years for older Maori.

A: A holistic model such as Te Whare Tapa Wha or a similar model should be used when assessing older Maori.

B: All decisions should be made collectively with the older person’s whanau or hapu.

B: Assessors of older Maori should be fluent in te reo Maori me ona tikanga where the older person and/or their whanau prefers its use.

B: Assessment of older Maori people requires mature Maori assessors who are well-known and respected within their community.

C: Where a Maori assessor with the necessary skills is not available, a skilled assessor should be supported by someone who is fluent in te reo Maori me ona tikanga and who is well-known and respected within the community.

B: When assessing older Maori the assessor should be of the same sex as the person being assessed whenever possible.

GPP: Assessment services must be equally available to older Maori who do not have Maori-specific programmes available, or choose not to access them.

Pacific Peoples

B: Assessment processes should be initiated at age 55 years for older Pacific people.

B: Information relating to an assessment should be produced in Pacific languages as well as English, and produced in oral form (through videos and radio and as part of Pacific health promotion and health education forums) rather than relying on written formats.

C: Assessment programmes for older Pacific people should be actively offered rather than being made available and expecting the older people to initiate contact.

C: Assessors of older Pacific people should as far as possible be from the same ethnic background and able to speak the same language as the person to be assessed, or be supported by someone with these attributes.

C: It should be publicised to Pacific peoples that assessors of older people have professional skills and status to encourage acceptance by the older people and their families.

C: The MDT supporting the assessor of older Pacific people should include a Pacific health care professional.

B: Consent to the process of assessment needs to be revisited periodically during the assessment process because consent is understood to be a dynamic relationship rather than a single event.

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence

+

Assigned when all or most of the criteria are met

~

Assigned when some of the criteria are met and where unmet criteria are not likely to affect the validity, magnitude or applicability of the results markedly

x

Assigned when few or none of the criteria are met

Grades of Recommendations

A

The recommendation is supported by good evidence.

B

The recommendation is supported by fair evidence.

C

The recommendation is supported by expert opinion only.

I

No recommendation can be made because the evidence is insufficient (i.e., evidence is lacking, of poor quality, or conflicting) and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined.

Good Practice Point

Recommended practice based on the professional experience of the Guideline Development Team

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

Algorithms are provided in the original guideline document and companions for:

  • Assessment Processes for Older People.
  • Screening for Impairment and Risk Factors for Developing Future Impairment
  • Proactive Assessment
  • Assessment of People with Complex Needs
  • Carer Support and Assessment

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations were based on the highest quality studies available. Where there was a lack of evidence from high quality studies, then recommendations were based on the best available evidence or expert opinion.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG). Assessment processes for older people. Wellington (NZ): New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG); 2003 Oct. 82 p. [211 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2003 Oct

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

New Zealand Guidelines Group - Private Nonprofit Organization

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG)

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Guideline Development Team

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Team Members: Sally Keeling, Lecturer in Health Care for Older People, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences (Convenor); Margaret Guthrie, CNZM, Consumer advocate (Convenor); Anne Bray, Director, Donald Beasley Institute; Keith Carey-Smith, General Practitioner, Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners (RNZCGP); Karen Coutts, Analyst, Disability Policy, Disability Services Directorate; Keita Dawson, Support Service Manager; Crawford Duncan, Psychogeriatrician, Capital and Coast DHB; Paulette Finlay, Senior Policy Analyst, Health of Older People Policy, Ministry of Health; Beatrice Hale, Carer Advocate, Carers New Zealand and Presbyterian Support Services; Stephen Jacobs, Senior Advisor, Service Development, Health of Older People, Ministry of Health; Sandie Kirkman, Manager, Services for Older People, Northland DHB; Mairi Lauchland, Regional Manager, Support Net Kupenga Hao Ite Ora; Daphne Marshall, Assessor; Julie Martin, Clinical Services Manager, Macpherson Group Auckland, primary health care nursing representative; Dennis Paget, MNZM, Consumer advocate, Grey Power, Pharmac and AgeCare forum; Karen Palmer, Geriatrician, Capital and Coast DHB; Maree Pierce, Project Manager, AGEWISE Development and Support Unit, Waikato DHB; Lauren Prosser, Rehabilitation Analyst; Hemi Ririnui-Horne, Manager, Maori Development, Disability Services Directorate; Margaret Sanders, AT&R Social Work representative, Capital and Coast DHB; Tim Slow, NASC, Capital Support Wellington; Valerie Smith, Senior Advisor, Disability Policy, Disability Services Directorate; Denise Udy, Rehabilitation Advisor, ACC; Rowena Cave, Guideline Development Project Manager, New Zealand Guidelines Group, Inc. (Project Manager)

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All members of the guideline development team stated that they had vested interests in the guideline’s subject matter through their professional roles and their own families, but none had any competing interests to report.

ENDORSER(S)

Age Concern New Zealand, Inc. - Medical Specialty Society
Arthritis New Zealand - Medical Specialty Society
Australasian College for Emergency Medicine - Medical Specialty Society
Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand - Disease Specific Society
Carersnetnz - Professional Association
College of Nurses Aotearoa NZ - Academic Institution
Grey Power-New Zealand Federation Inc. - Professional Association
Mental Health Commission (NZ) - Disease Specific Society
New Zealand Home and Health Association, Inc. - Professional Association
Pharmacy Guild of New Zealand, Inc. - Private For Profit Organization
Royal Australasian College of Physicians - Professional Association
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists - Professional Association
Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners - Medical Specialty Society
Women's Health Action - Medical Specialty Society

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the New Zealand Guidelines Group Web site.

Print copies: Available from the New Zealand Guidelines Group Inc., Level 10, 40 Mercer Street, PO Box 10 665, The Terrace, Wellington, New Zealand; Tel: 64 4 471 4180; Fax: 64 4 471 4185; e-mail: info@nzgg.org.nz

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

Print copies: Available from the New Zealand Guidelines Group Inc., Level 10, 40 Mercer Street, PO Box 10 665, The Terrace, Wellington, New Zealand; Tel: 64 4 471 4180; Fax: 64 4 471 4185; e-mail: info@nzgg.org.nz

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on June 17, 2004. The information was verified by the guideline developer on July 19, 2004.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

These guidelines are copyrighted by the New Zealand Guidelines Group. They may be downloaded and printed for personal use or for producing local protocols in New Zealand. Re-publication or adaptation of these guidelines in any form requires specific permission from the Chief Executive of the New Zealand Guidelines Group.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo