Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Management of acute low back pain.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium. Management of acute low back pain. Southfield (MI): Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium; 2008 Mar. 1 p.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The level of evidence grades (A-D) are provided for the most significant recommendations and are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Eligible Population

Adults with low back pain or back-related leg symptoms for < 6 weeks

Patients with Low Risk of Serious Pathology (No Red Flags)

Reassure patient that 90% of episodes resolve within six weeks regardless of treatment [C]. Advise that minor flare-ups may occur in the subsequent year.

Therapy

  • Stay active and continue ordinary activity within the limits permitted by pain. Avoid bedrest [A]. Early return to work is associated with less disability.
  • Injury prevention (e.g., use of proper body mechanics, safe back exercises)
  • Recommend ice for painful areas and stretching exercises [D].
  • McKenzie exercises [A] are helpful for pain radiating below the knee.

Referral

  • If no improvement at 1 to 2 weeks, refer for goal-directed manual physical therapy, not modalities such as heat, traction, ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
  • Surgical referral usually not required if no "red flags."

Medication Strategies

  • Medication treatment depending on pain severity with acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [A]
  • COX-2 inhibitors and muscle relaxants have not been shown to be more effective than NSAIDs [A].
  • Opiate analgesics have not been shown to be more effective than NSAIDS in acute low back pain.

Testing

  • Diagnostic tests or imaging usually not required.
  • If no improvement after 6 weeks, consider imaging.

Assessment to Identify Potential Serious Pathology

Assess for "Red Flag" Indications of Serious Disease

Cauda Equina

  • Severe or progressive neurologic deficit
  • Recent bowel or bladder dysfunction
  • Saddle anesthesia

Cancer

  • Men and women age >50
  • Cancer history
  • Insidious onset
  • No relief at bedtime or worsening when supine
  • Constitutional symptoms (e.g., fever, weight loss)
  • Male with diffuse osteoporosis or compression fracture

Fracture

  • Traumatic injury or onset, cumulative trauma
  • Steroid use history
  • Women age >50

Infection

  • Steroid use history
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Immune suppression
  • History of urinary tract infection (UTI) or other infection
  • Constitutional symptoms (e.g., fever, weight loss)
  • No relief at bedtime or worsening when supine
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Previous surgery
  • Insidious onset
  • Intravenous (IV) drug use

Patients with High Risk of Serious Pathology (Red Flags)

  • Cauda Equina syndrome or severe or progressive neurologic deficit — Refer for emergency studies and definitive care [C]
  • Spinal fracture or compressions — Plain lumbosacral (LS) spine X-ray [B]. After 10 days, if fracture still suspected or multiple sites of pain, consider either bone scan [C] or referral [D] before considering computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  • Cancer or infection — complete blood count (CBC), urinalysis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) [C]. If still suspicious consider referral or seek further evidence (e.g., bone scan [C], other labs — negative plain film X-ray does not rule out disease).

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence for the Most Significant Recommendations

  1. Randomized controlled trials
  2. Controlled trials, no randomization
  3. Observational studies
  4. Opinion of expert panel

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium. Management of acute low back pain. Southfield (MI): Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium; 2008 Mar. 1 p.

ADAPTATION

DATE RELEASED

2008 Mar

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium - Professional Association

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium Medical Directors' Committee

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Physician representatives from participating Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium health plans, Michigan State Medical Society, Michigan Osteopathic Association, Michigan Association of Health Plans, Michigan Department of Community Health and Michigan Peer Review Organization

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Standard disclosure is requested from all individuals participating in the Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) guideline development process, including those parties who are solicited for guideline feedback (e.g., health plans, medical specialty societies). Additionally, members of the MQIC Medical Directors' Committee are asked to disclose all commercial relationships as well.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on July 18, 2008. The information was verified by the guideline developer on July 21, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which may be reproduced with the citation developed by the Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo