Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Complete Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Guideline for the evaluation of cholestatic jaundice in infants: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

COMPLETE SUMMARY CONTENT

 
SCOPE
 METHODOLOGY - including Rating Scheme and Cost Analysis
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS
 QUALIFYING STATEMENTS
 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE
 INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

SCOPE

DISEASE/CONDITION(S)

Cholestatic jaundice

GUIDELINE CATEGORY

Diagnosis
Evaluation

CLINICAL SPECIALTY

Family Practice
Gastroenterology
Pediatrics

INTENDED USERS

Advanced Practice Nurses
Nurses
Physician Assistants
Physicians

GUIDELINE OBJECTIVE(S)

To provide a guideline for the diagnostic evaluation of cholestatic jaundice in infants

TARGET POPULATION

Two- to 8-week-old infants with cholestatic jaundice in primary care outpatient settings and specialty referral facilities

Note: This guideline is not intended for the care of the ill premature infant in the intensive care setting.

INTERVENTIONS AND PRACTICES CONSIDERED

  1. Measurement of total and direct serum bilirubin
  2. Medical history (cholestasis of pregnancy, consanguinity, urine color, stool color)
  3. Physical examination (vital signs, assessment of general health, skin condition)
  4. Consultation with a pediatric gastroenterologist
  5. Laboratory tests: complete blood count, platelet count, prothrombin time, albumin, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, alpha-1 antitrypsin, urine reducing substances
  6. Abdominal ultrasound
  7. Percutaneous liver biopsy

Note: The following diagnostic tests were considered but not routinely recommended: gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGTP), lipoprotein X, scintigraphy, duodenal aspirate, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

MAJOR OUTCOMES CONSIDERED

Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and safety of diagnostic procedures used to diagnose cholestatic jaundice in infants

METHODOLOGY

METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT EVIDENCE

Hand-searches of Published Literature (Secondary Sources)
Searches of Electronic Databases

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT THE EVIDENCE

To develop evidence-based estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the diagnostic tests under consideration, Medline (1966--2002) was searched without language restriction using the terms listed in Table 2 of the original guideline document. Unpublished literature was not sought.

Abstracts for articles found in each search were reviewed for relevance. After editorials, letters, and review articles were eliminated, original studies that appeared to address the accuracy and reliability of the tests in question for the diagnosis of biliary atresia were retrieved in full and independently reviewed by two committee members.

NUMBER OF SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Not stated

METHODS USED TO ASSESS THE QUALITY AND STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Coding Scheme for Quality of Evidence

Level A

Recommendation based on 2 or more studies that compared the test to a criterion standard in an independent, blind manner in an unselected population of infants similar to those addressed in the guideline.

Level B

Recommendation based on a single study that compared the test to a criterion standard in an independent, blind manner in an unselected population of infants similar to those addressed in the guideline.

Level C

Recommendation based on lower quality studies or studies for which inadequate information is provided to assess quality, together with expert opinion and consensus of the committee.

Level D

No studies available; recommendations based on expert opinion and consensus of the committee.

METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Systematic Review with Evidence Tables

DESCRIPTION OF THE METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Two guideline committee members independently reviewed studies using previously published criteria for the validity of studies of diagnostic tests (refer to Table 3 in the original guideline document). The key criteria include an independent, blind comparison of the diagnostic test to a criterion standard, performed in nonselected, consecutive patients at risk for the condition of interest. Studies were considered to meet minimum criteria for validity if the test was performed in consecutive patients and did not appear to influence the determination of the final diagnosis. Each article was assigned a score based on these criteria, and the quality of evidence underlying each of the recommendations made by the Cholestasis Guideline Committee was determined.

METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Expert Consensus (Nominal Group Technique)

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The Cholestasis Guideline Committee based its recommendations on a comprehensive and systematic review of the medical literature integrated with expert opinion. Consensus was achieved through the Nominal Group Technique, a structured quantitative method.

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Not applicable

COST ANALYSIS

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

External Peer Review
Internal Peer Review

DESCRIPTION OF METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

The guidelines were reviewed by primary care physicians in community and academic practices. In addition, the guidelines were distributed to the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) membership for review and comment and were officially endorsed by the NASPGHAN Executive Council.

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC): The following key points summarize the content of the guideline recommendations. Refer to the full text for additional information, including detailed information about the initial evaluation of the jaundiced infant, the initial evaluation of the infant with conjugated hyperbilirubinemia, and diagnostic tests used for further evaluation of the infant with cholestasis.

Levels of evidence (A-D) are defined at the end of "Major Recommendations" field.

It is recommended that any infant noted to be jaundiced at 2 weeks of age be clinically evaluated for cholestasis with measurement of total and direct serum bilirubin. However, breast-fed infants who can be reliably monitored and who have an otherwise normal history (no dark urine or light stools) and physical examination may be asked to return at 3 weeks of age and, if jaundice persists, have measurement of total and direct serum bilirubin at that time. (C)

Retest any infant with an acute condition or other explanation for jaundice whose jaundice does not resolve with appropriate management of the diagnosed condition. (D)

Ultrasound is recommended for infants with cholestasis of unknown etiology. (A)

Liver biopsy is recommended for most infants with cholestasis of unknown etiology. (A)

Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGTP) and lipoprotein X are not routinely recommended in the evaluation of cholestasis in young infants. (C)

Scintigraphy and duodenal aspirate are not routinely recommended but may be useful in situations in which other tests are not readily available. (A)

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are not routinely recommended, although ERCP may be useful in experienced hands. (C)

Definitions:

Coding Scheme for Quality of Evidence

Level A

Recommendation based on 2 or more studies that compared the test to a criterion standard in an independent, blind manner in an unselected population of infants similar to those addressed in the guideline.

Level B

Recommendation based on a single study that compared the test to a criterion standard in an independent, blind manner in an unselected population of infants similar to those addressed in he guideline.

Level C

Recommendation based on lower quality studies or studies for which inadequate information is provided to assess quality, together with expert opinion and consensus of the committee.

Level D

No studies available; recommendations based on expert opinion and consensus of the committee.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

An algorithm is provided in the original guideline document for diagnostic evaluation of cholestatic jaundice for a 2- to 8-week-old infant.

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations" field).

BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS

POTENTIAL BENEFITS

Early detection of cholestatic jaundice by the primary care provider and timely, accurate diagnosis by the pediatric gastroenterologist are important for successful treatment and a favorable prognosis.

POTENTIAL HARMS

Not stated

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

These recommendations are a general guideline and are not intended as a substitute for clinical judgment or as a protocol for the care of all patients with this problem.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE

DESCRIPTION OF IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

An implementation strategy was not provided.

IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS

Clinical Algorithm

For information about availability, see the "Availability of Companion Documents" and "Patient Resources" fields below.

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES

IOM CARE NEED

Getting Better

IOM DOMAIN

Effectiveness
Timeliness

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2004 Aug

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition - Professional Association

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Cholestasis Guideline Committee

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Authors: Virginia Moyer, MD, MPH, Houston, Texas; Deborah K. Freese, MD, Rochester, Minnesota; Peter F. Whitington, MD, Chicago, Illinois; Alan D. Olson, MD, Malvern, Pennsylvania; Fred Brewer, MD, Santa Rosa, California; Richard B. Colletti, MD, Burlington, Vermont; Melvin B. Heyman, MD, MPH, San Francisco, California

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

ENDORSER(S)

American Academy of Pediatrics - Medical Specialty Society

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on May 19, 2005.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions. Please contact the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) at (215) 233-0808.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo