Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Complete Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with pituitary adenomas.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • IRSA. Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with pituitary adenomas. Harrisburg (PA): IRSA; 2004 Apr. 12 p. (Practice Guideline Report; no. 3-04). [70 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

COMPLETE SUMMARY CONTENT

 
SCOPE
 METHODOLOGY - including Rating Scheme and Cost Analysis
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS
 QUALIFYING STATEMENTS
 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE
 INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

SCOPE

DISEASE/CONDITION(S)

Pituitary adenomas, acromegaly, Cushing's disease, Nelson's syndrome, prolactinoma

GUIDELINE CATEGORY

Management
Treatment

CLINICAL SPECIALTY

Endocrinology
Neurological Surgery
Neurology
Radiation Oncology

INTENDED USERS

Health Care Providers
Hospitals
Managed Care Organizations
Nurses
Physicians
Utilization Management

GUIDELINE OBJECTIVE(S)

To provide guidelines about the use of stereotactic radiosurgery in symptomatic patients with imaging identified pituitary adenomas with treatment recommendations to be used by medical and public health professionals

TARGET POPULATION

Men and women >2 years old with imaging identified functional or nonfunctional pituitary adenomas

Note: Patients may or may not be candidates for alternative management strategies that include observation, medical management, surgical resection via transsphenoidal approach or craniotomy, and fractionated radiation therapy.

INTERVENTIONS AND PRACTICES CONSIDERED

Stereotactic Radiosurgery

  1. Single procedure or occasionally staged procedure (volume staging) techniques
  2. Intraoperative stereotactic guidance
  3. Digitally acquired images (computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI])
  4. Doses ranging from 11 to 16 Gy for non-functional (nonsecretory) adenomas and from 25 to 35 Gy for hormone normalization in cases of functional (secretory) pituitary adenomas

MAJOR OUTCOMES CONSIDERED

Long-term growth control (stabilization or regression) of non-functional pituitary adenomas and pituitary hormone normalization in cases of functional pituitary adenomas are the primary end points of interest. Maintenance of quality of life, employability, and prevention of adverse radiation effects are also considered.

METHODOLOGY

METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT EVIDENCE

Hand-searches of Published Literature (Primary Sources)
Hand-searches of Published Literature (Secondary Sources)
Searches of Electronic Databases

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT THE EVIDENCE

MEDLINE and PUBMED searches were completed for the years 1971 to April 2004. Search terms included pituitary adenomas, acromegaly, Cushing's disease, prolactinoma, stereotactic radiosurgery, Gamma Knife, irradiation, Linac radiosurgery, proton beam radiosurgery, Bragg peak proton therapy, clinical trials, research design, practice guidelines, and meta-analysis. Bibliographies from recently published reviews were reviewed and relevant articles were retrieved.

NUMBER OF SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Not stated

METHODS USED TO ASSESS THE QUALITY AND STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Expert Consensus (Committee)
Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

This classification is based on the Bandolier system (http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/band6/b6-5.html) adapted for a systematic review.

Type & Strength of Evidence in Medical Literature

Type I: Evidence from a systematic review (which includes at least one randomized controlled trial and a summary of all included studies).

Type II: Evidence from a well designed randomized controlled trial of appropriate size.

Type III: Evidence from a well designed intervention study without randomization. A common research design is the before-and-after study.

Type IV: Evidence from a well designed non-experimental study, e.g., cohort, case-control or cross-sectional studies. (Also includes studies using purely qualitative methods. Economic analyses [cost-effectiveness studies] are also classified as Type IV evidence.)

Type V: Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical evidence, descriptive studies or reports of expert consensus committees.

METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Review of Published Meta-Analyses
Systematic Review with Evidence Tables

DESCRIPTION OF THE METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Not stated

METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Expert Consensus

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations were originally suggested by a core group of two members. These recommendations were electronically mailed to all committee members. Feedback was obtained in order to revise the proposed guidelines. Committee members were asked whether the recommendations should serve as a practice guideline. No significant disagreements existed.

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Not applicable

COST ANALYSIS

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

External Peer Review
Internal Peer Review

DESCRIPTION OF METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

The final statement incorporates all relevant evidence obtained by the literature search in conjunction with the final consensus recommendations supported by all working group members. The guideline was approved by the IRSA (International RadioSurgery Association) Board of Directors and issued in April 2004.

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Stereotactic radiosurgery is defined as a relatively high dose of focused radiation delivered precisely to the pituitary adenoma, under the direct supervision of a medical team (neurosurgeon, radiation oncologist, registered nurse, and medical physicist), in one surgical treatment session.

Patient Selection

  • Patients with pituitary adenomas, defined by modern neurodiagnostic imaging (computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] scan) constitute the study group. Such patients typically present with symptoms related to pituitary hormone imbalance (acromegaly, Cushing's disease, prolactinoma, etc.) in cases of functional adenomas, and symptoms of mass effect (headache, visual changes, and progressive neurological deficits) in cases of non-functional adenomas. Pituitary adenomas are considered suitable for multimodal management, including observation, surgical excision, fractionated radiation therapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery. Stereotactic radiosurgery is typically employed in combination with prior surgery but may be employed alone in particular circumstances. The selection of patients suitable for radiosurgery is dependent on the prior treatment history, the age of the patient, existing comorbidities, anatomic location of the tumor, and clinical history. Single session radiosurgery, a minimally invasive, single high-dose, closed skull treatment strategy, may be especially suitable for patients in advanced age groups, those with excessive medical comorbidity risk factors for surgical excision, and those with adenoma involving the cavernous sinus.

Treatment/Management

  • The optimal dose range for volumetric conformal stereotactic pituitary radiosurgery has been largely established based on tumor anatomy (proximity to visual apparatus), hormonal secretory status, volume, estimated adverse radiation risks, pre-existing neurological conditions, and prior history of radiation therapy. Minimum doses to the margin of the non-functional pituitary adenomas typically range from 12 to 16 Gy in a single fraction. For secretory adenomas, minimal margin doses as high as 30 to 35 Gy are optimal if they can be administered safely given the anatomic relationship of the tumor edge to surrounding radiosensitive structures. Stereotactic volumetric imaging (high resolution) is usually necessary for precise conformal dose planning. MRI target imaging is preferred. Depending upon the technology used, the margin of the radiosurgery dose is usually 50 to 90% of the central target dose within the tumor. Sharp fall-off of the radiation dose outside of the target volume is required. Current radiation delivery technologies for volumetric stereotactic conformal single session radiosurgery include Gamma KnifeĀ®, proton beam using Bragg peak effect, and specially modified linear accelerators.
  • Patients may receive a single stress dose of corticosteroids at the conclusion of the radiosurgery procedure. It is recommended that hormone suppression therapy (dopaminergic drugs for prolactinomas and octreotide for acromegaly) be discontinued at least 1 to 2 months prior to radiosurgery. Currently used long acting drugs (e.g., slow release octreotide) should be discontinued 3 to 4 months prior to radiosurgery. These medications can be restarted one week after the radiosurgery procedure. Patients can continue to take other medications as recommended by their physicians.
  • Postradiosurgical clinical examinations and magnetic resonance (MR) studies are requested by referring physicians at six-month intervals for the first year and then annually to assess the effect of radiosurgery for 4 to 5 years. Visual field and acuity testing along with serum and urinary hormone screening are recommended at intervals coinciding with clinical and neuroimaging reevaluations. Tumors proven to be stable over five years can then be subsequently reassessed at 2 to 4 year intervals.
  • For non-functional adenomas, estimated tumor control rates vary from 90 to 100%. Stereotactic radiosurgery should not be considered as the panacea for large volume pituitary adenomas, which are better managed initially by surgery. This is particularly true for patients who present with sudden symptomatic mass effect from pituitary apoplexy.
  • Causes for failure of stereotactic radiosurgery include inadequate visualization of the tumor, lack of intraoperative stereotactic three-dimensional (3-D) (volumetric) imaging, and insufficient dose (due to proximity with optic apparatus) to achieve the growth control response.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

The original guideline contains clinical algorithms for management choices for pituitary adenomas and pituitary adenoma surgical management.

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Type I, II, and III evidence exists in support of stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas. Refer to the "Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence" field.

BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS

POTENTIAL BENEFITS

  • All the published studies have shown a significant tumor control response of stereotactic radiosurgery for non-functioning pituitary adenomas with a low (satisfactory) rate of adverse radiation effect. For functional adenomas, normalization of hormone levels is considered necessary in order to define success. Successful outcomes include complete tumor control (stabilization or regression), symptomatic relief, no new neurological deficits, no long-term complications, and normalization of pituitary hormone levels.
  • Literature has documented the cost savings benefit of stereotactic radiosurgery versus invasive surgical procedures and the lower risk potential of bleeding, anesthesia problems, infections, and side effects which may result in transient or permanent disabilities from open surgery.

Subgroups Most Likely to Benefit

  • Patients with residual or recurrent pituitary adenoma after resection
  • Patients with small pituitary adenoma without any previous surgery

POTENTIAL HARMS

Major adverse effects of radiosurgery are based on location, volume, and dose, and these risks can be estimated based on published data and experience. Individual risks are related to the anatomic proximity of pituitary adenoma with the optic apparatus and structures of cavernous sinus. Risk of delayed hypopituitarism after single session radiosurgery is low.

Subgroups Most Likely to be Harmed:

  • Patients with large volume adenomas causing symptomatic mass effect on optic apparatus who are treated with large doses in a single session radiosurgery as primary management
  • Patients with functional adenomas treated with low dose will benefit least from the surgery.

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

This guideline is not intended as a substitute for professional medical advice and does not address specific treatments or conditions for any patient. Those consulting this guideline are to seek qualified consultation utilizing information specific to their medical situation. Further, the International RadioSurgery Association (IRSA) does not warrant any instrument or equipment nor make any representations concerning its fitness for use in any particular instance nor any other warranties whatsoever.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE

DESCRIPTION OF IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

An implementation strategy was not provided.

IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS

Clinical Algorithm
Patient Resources

For information about availability, see the "Availability of Companion Documents" and "Patient Resources" fields below.

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES

IOM CARE NEED

Getting Better
Living with Illness

IOM DOMAIN

Effectiveness
Patient-centeredness

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • IRSA. Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with pituitary adenomas. Harrisburg (PA): IRSA; 2004 Apr. 12 p. (Practice Guideline Report; no. 3-04). [70 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2004 Apr

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

IRSA - Professional Association

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER COMMENT

IRSA (International RadioSurgery Association) is a non-profit entity dedicated to promoting the development of scientifically relevant practice guidelines for stereotactic radiosurgery. IRSA works to educate and provide support for physicians, hospitals, insurers, and patients.

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

IRSA (International RadioSurgery Association)

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

IRSA (International RadioSurgery Association) Physician Advisory Board Guidelines Committee and other professionals who provide radiosurgery

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Committee Members: L. Dade Lunsford, MD, Neurosurgeon, (Chair); Ajay Niranjan, MBBS, MCh, Neurosurgeon; Tatsuya Kobayashi, MD, PhD, Neurosurgeon; Mark Linskey, MD, Neurosurgeon; Thomas Witt, MD, Neurosurgeon; Alex Landolt, MD, Neurosurgeon; Roman Liscak, MD, Neurosurgeon; Edward R. Laws, Jr., MD, Neurosurgeon; Mary Lee Vance, MD, Endocrinologist; John Buatti, MD, Radiation Oncologist; Jonathan Knisely, MD, Radiation Oncologist; Paul Sperduto, MD, Radiation Oncologist; Sammie Coy, PhD, Medical Physicist; Tonya K. Ledbetter, MS, MFS, Editor; Rebecca L. Emerick, MS, MBA, CPA, ex officio

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the IRSA Web site.

Print copies: Available from the IRSA (International RadioSurgery Association), 3005 Hoffman Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

The following are available:

Print copies: Available from the IRSA, 3005 Hoffman Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110.

Please note: This patient information is intended to provide health professionals with information to share with their patients to help them better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. By providing access to this patient information, it is not the intention of NGC to provide specific medical advice for particular patients. Rather we urge patients and their representatives to review this material and then to consult with a licensed health professional for evaluation of treatment options suitable for them as well as for diagnosis and answers to their personal medical questions. This patient information has been derived and prepared from a guideline for health care professionals included on NGC by the authors or publishers of that original guideline. The patient information is not reviewed by NGC to establish whether or not it accurately reflects the original guideline's content.

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on July 14, 2004.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This guideline is copyrighted by IRSA (International RadioSurgery Association) and may not be reproduced without the written permission of IRSA. IRSA reserves the right to revoke copyright authorization at any time without reason.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo