Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Complete Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Major depression in adults in primary care.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). Major depression in adults in primary care. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); May 2008. 84 p. [244 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). Major depression in adults in primary care. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); 2007 May. 87 p.

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory and/or warning information has been released.

  • June 17, 2008, Antipsychotics (conventional and atypical]): The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) notified healthcare professionals that both conventional and atypical antipsychotics are associated with an increased risk of mortality in elderly patients treated for dementia-related psychosis. The prescribing information for all antipsychotic drugs will now include information about the increased risk of death in the BOXED WARNING and WARNING sections.
  • December 12, 2007, Carbamazepine: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has provided recommendations for screening that should be performed on specific patient populations before starting treatment with carbamazepine.

COMPLETE SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 SCOPE
 METHODOLOGY - including Rating Scheme and Cost Analysis
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS
 CONTRAINDICATIONS
 QUALIFYING STATEMENTS
 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE
 INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

SCOPE

DISEASE/CONDITION(S)

Major depression

GUIDELINE CATEGORY

Diagnosis
Evaluation
Management
Screening
Treatment

CLINICAL SPECIALTY

Family Practice
Geriatrics
Internal Medicine
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Psychiatry
Psychology

INTENDED USERS

Advanced Practice Nurses
Allied Health Personnel
Health Care Providers
Health Plans
Hospitals
Managed Care Organizations
Nurses
Physician Assistants
Physicians
Psychologists/Non-physician Behavioral Health Clinicians

GUIDELINE OBJECTIVE(S)

  • To increase the accuracy of diagnosis of major depression
  • To improve the frequency of assessment of response to treatment in patients with major depression
  • To improve the outcomes of treatment for major depression
  • To increase the assessment for major depression of primary care patients presenting with any additional chronic condition such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic pain, or substance abuse
  • To improve communication between the primary care physician and the mental health care provider (if patient is co-managed)
  • To improve the frequency of assessment of patients with major depression for the presence of substance abuse
  • To decrease the number of completed suicides in patients managed for their depression in primary care

TARGET POPULATION

Adults age 18 and over

INTERVENTIONS AND PRACTICES CONSIDERED

Diagnosis/Evaluation/Screening

  1. Use of standardized depression screening instrument (e.g., Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9], the Beck Depression Inventory, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D], the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self Report [QID-SR])
  2. Detailed clinical interview
  3. Use of "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders," 4th Edition Text Revision (DSM-IV TR) criteria for major depression
  4. Consideration of other mood and anxiety disorders or somatoform disorders
  5. Assessment of suicide risk
  6. Consideration of substance abuse or psychiatric comorbidity (the CAGE-AID [AID= Alcohol Illicit Drugs] screen)
  7. Consideration of comorbidities, cultural beliefs, and special populations (geriatrics [e.g., dementia patients], pregnancy)

Treatment/Management

  1. Patient-centered care, education, and self-management programs
  2. Use of collaborative care model
  3. Treatment
    • Psychotherapy
    • Medications, including selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs), secondary amine tricyclics, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs)
    • Herbal/dietary supplements (S-adenosyl-L-methionine [SAM-e])
  4. Follow-up including regular contact, medicine maintenance/tapering
  5. Re-evaluation for remission
  6. Treatment for non-responders
    • Augmentation therapy (including combination of different classes of antidepressants, combination of lithium with antidepressants, and combination of antidepressants with carbamazepine/valproic acid)
    • Hospitalization
    • Bright light therapy
    • Electroconvulsive treatment (ECT)
  7. Referral to mental health provider if necessary
  8. Maintenance therapy

MAJOR OUTCOMES CONSIDERED

  • Prevalence of depression in the general population
  • Symptoms of depression, anxiety, and panic disorder
  • Risk factors for depression, anxiety, and panic disorder
  • Risk for and rate of suicide or suicide attempts
  • Rates of remission, recurrence, relapse, and recovery
  • Adverse effects of treatment options

METHODOLOGY

METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT EVIDENCE

Searches of Electronic Databases

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT THE EVIDENCE

A literature search of clinical trials, meta-analysis, and systematic reviews is performed.

NUMBER OF SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Not stated

METHODS USED TO ASSESS THE QUALITY AND STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Quality of individual research reports is assessed using a hierarchical rating system.

  1. Primary Reports of New Data Collection

    Class A:

    • Randomized, controlled trial

    Class B:

    • Cohort study

    Class C:

    • Non-randomized trial with concurrent or historical controls
    • Case-control study
    • Study of sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test
    • Population-based descriptive study

    Class D:

    • Cross-sectional study
    • Case series
    • Case report
  1. Reports that Synthesize or Reflect upon Collections of Primary Reports

    Class M:

    • Meta-analysis
    • Systematic review
    • Decision analysis
    • Cost-effectiveness analysis

    Class R:

    • Consensus statement
    • Consensus report
    • Narrative review

    Class X:

    • Medical opinion

METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Review of Published Meta-Analyses
Systematic Review

DESCRIPTION OF THE METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Not stated

METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Expert Consensus

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

New Guideline Development Process

A new guideline, order set, and protocol is developed by a 6- to 12-member work group that includes physicians, nurses, pharmacists, other healthcare professionals relevant to the topic, along with an Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI) staff facilitator. Ordinarily, one of the physicians will be the leader. Most work group members are recruited from ICSI member organizations, but if there is expertise not represented by ICSI members, 1 or 2 members may be recruited from medical groups or hospitals outside of ICSI.

The work group will meet for seven to eight three-hour meetings to develop the guideline. A literature search and review is performed and the work group members, under the coordination of the ICSI staff facilitator, develop the algorithm and write the annotations and footnotes and literature citations.

Once the final draft copy of the guideline is developed, the guideline goes to the ICSI members for critical review.

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Not applicable

COST ANALYSIS

The guideline developers reviewed published cost analyses.

Many of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on costs of enhanced care and overall health care costs have shown a slight increase in costs to put the new care in place but then over time, in 2 to 4 years post implementation, there is an overall health care cost savings and an increase in patients reporting depression free days.

Most of these RCT studies resulted in an increase in productivity of the employees defined by employee present and effectively achieving good work results and a decrease in absenteeism defined by number of more hours per week at work.

METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

Internal Peer Review

DESCRIPTION OF METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

Critical Review Process

Every newly developed guideline or a guideline with significant change is sent to the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI) members for Critical Review. The purpose of critical review is to provide an opportunity for the clinicians in the member groups to review the science behind the recommendations and focus on the content of the guideline. Critical review also provides an opportunity for clinicians in each group to come to consensus on feedback they wish to give the work group and to consider changes necessary across systems in their organization to implement the guideline.

All member organizations are expected to respond to critical review guidelines. Critical review of guidelines is a criterion for continued membership within ICSI.

After the critical review period, the guideline work group reconvenes to review the comments and make changes, as appropriate. The work group prepares a written response to all comments.

Approval

Each guideline, order set, and protocol is approved by the appropriate steering committee. There is one steering committee each for Respiratory, Cardiovascular, OB/GYN, and Preventive Services. The Committee for Evidence-based Practice approves guidelines, order sets, and protocols not associated with a particular category. The steering committees review and approve each guideline based on the following:

  • Member comments have been addressed reasonably.
  • There is consensus among all ICSI member organizations on the content of the document.
  • Within the knowledge of the reviewer, the scientific recommendations within the document are current.
  • Either a critical review has been carried out, or to the extent of the knowledge of the reviewer, the changes proposed are sufficiently familiar and sufficiently agreed upon by the users that a new round of critical review is not needed.

Once the guideline, order set, or protocol has been approved, it is posted on the ICSI Web site and released to members for use. Guidelines, order sets, and protocols are reviewed regularly and revised, if warranted.

Revision Process of Existing Guidelines

ICSI scientific documents are revised every 12 to 36 months as indicated by changes in clinical practice and literature. Every 6 months, ICSI checks with the work group to determine if there have been changes in the literature significant enough to cause the document to be revised earlier than scheduled.

Prior to the work group convening to revise the document, ICSI members are asked to review the document and submit comments. During revision, a literature search of clinical trials, meta-analysis, and systematic reviews is performed and reviewed by the work group. The work group will meet for 1 to 2 three-hour meetings to review the literature, respond to member organization comments, and revise the document as appropriate.

If there are changes or additions to the document that would be unfamiliar or unacceptable to member organizations, it is sent to members to review prior to going to the appropriate steering committee for approval.

Review and Comment Process

ICSI members are asked to review and submit comments for every guideline, order set, and protocol prior to the work group convening to revise the document.

The purpose of the Review and Comment process is to provide an opportunity for the clinicians in the member groups to review the science behind the recommendations and focus on the content of the order set and protocol. Review and Comment also provides an opportunity for clinicians in each group to come to consensus on feedback they wish to give the work group and to consider changes needed across systems in their organization to implement the guideline.

All member organizations are encouraged to provide feedback on order sets and protocol, however responding to Review and Comment is not a criterion for continued membership within ICSI.

After the Review and Comment period, the work group reconvenes to review the comments and make changes as appropriate. The work group prepares a written response to all comments.

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) and the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI): For a description of what has changed since the previous version of this guidance, refer to Summary of Changes Report -- May - 2008.

The recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of major depression in adults are presented in the form of an algorithm with 15 components, accompanied by detailed annotations. An algorithm is provided for Major Depression in Adults in Primary Care; clinical highlights and selected annotations (numbered to correspond with the algorithm) follow.

Class of evidence (A-D, M, R, X) ratings are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Clinical Highlights

  • A reasonable way to evaluate whether a system is successfully functioning in its diagnosis, treatment plan, and follow-up of major depression is to consider:
    • How well the diagnosis is documented
    • How well the treatment team engages and educates patients/families
    • How reliably the ongoing patient contacts occur and response/remission to treatment are documented
    • How well the outcomes are measured and documented

    (Introduction, Measures #1a, 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d; see the original guideline document)

  • Use a standardized instrument to document depressive symptoms. Document baseline symptoms and severity to assist in evaluating future progress, including response and remission rates. (Annotation #2; Measures #2b, 2c, 2d, 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d; see the original guideline document for the measures)
  • Additional considerations should be taken into account:
    • Patients with a high risk of common comorbid depression conditions such as substance abuse, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and chronic pain should be screened for depression.
    • Older persons, pregnant women, and the cultural experiences of patients require special considerations regarding risk, assessment and treatment of depression.

    (Annotation #9; Measures # 4a, 4b, 4c, 6a; see the original guideline document for the measures)

  • Antidepressant medications and/or referral for psychotherapy are recommended as treatment for major depression. Factors to consider in making treatment recommendations are symptom severity, presence of psychosocial stressors, presence of comorbid conditions, and patient preferences. Physical activity and active patient engagement are also useful in easing symptoms of major depression. (Annotation #11)
  • If the primary care provider is seeing incremental improvement, continue working with that patient to augment or increase medication dosage to reach remission. This can take up to three months. Don't give up on the patient whether treating in primary care or referring. Studies have shown that primary care can be just as successful as specialty care. (Annotation #11, 12)
    • For medication treatment, patients may show improvement at two weeks but need a longer length of time to really see response and remission. Most people need to be on medication at least 6 to 12 months after adequate response to symptoms.
    • For psychotherapy treatment, it can take 8 to 10 weeks to show improvement.
  • The key objectives of treatment are to:
    • Achieve remission of symptoms in the acute treatment phase for major depression
    • Reduce relapse and reduction of symptoms
    • Return patient to previous level of occupational and psychosocial function

    (Annotation #13; Measures #2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d; see the original guideline document for the measures)

Major Depression in Adults in Primary Care Algorithm Annotations

  1. Suspect and Screen for Major Depression

    Key Points:

    • Many patients with major depression do not initially complain of depressed mood, and providers need to suspect these diagnoses based on a profile of risk factors and common presentations.
    • If depression is suspected on the basis of risk factors or common presentations, use a standardized instrument to document depressive symptoms and track treatment response.

    Presentations for major depression include:

    • Multiple (more than five/year) medical visits
    • Multiple unexplained symptoms
    • Work or relationship dysfunction
    • Changes in interpersonal relationships
    • Dampened affect
    • Poor behavioral follow-through with activities of daily living or prior treatment recommendations
    • Weight gain or loss
    • Sleep disturbance
    • Fatigue
    • Dementia
    • Irritable bowel syndrome
    • Volunteered complaints of stress or mood disturbance

    The close relationship of mind and body results in the presentation of medical illness with major depression in various forms:

    • Medical illness may be a biological cause (e.g., thyroid disorder, stroke).
    • Medical illness or patient's perception of his or her clinical condition and health-related quality of life may trigger a psychological reaction to prognosis, pain or disability (e.g., in a patient with cancer).
    • Medical illness may exist coincidentally in a patient with primary mood or anxiety disorder.

    See also Annotation #9, "Additional Considerations?", "Medical Comorbidity" section.

    Risk Factors for Major Depression Include:

    • Family or personal history of major depression and/or substance abuse
    • Recent loss
    • Chronic medical illness
    • Stressful life events that include loss (death of a loved one, divorce)
    • Domestic abuse/violence
    • Traumatic events (car accident)
    • Major life changes (job change)

    Emotional and behavioral reactions to these social stressors can include symptoms of major depression.

    One previous episode of major depression is associated with a 50% chance of a subsequent episode, two episodes with a 70% chance, and three or more episodes with a 90% chance [R].

    Most studies indicate that in 40% to 60% of patients, a major life event precedes the first episode of major depression [R].

    Perinatal Depression (depression during pregnancy and the first year postpartum)

    Depression in pregnant and postpartum patients can have dire consequences for pregnancy outcome and care of the infant.

    The rate of perinatal depression in the general population has been 10% to 15% [M]. A recent large scale study by Kaiser Permanente [D] concluded that during the time period measured, defined as 39 weeks prior to becoming pregnant through 39 weeks after delivery, the authors found approximately one in seven women was identified with and treated for depression, and more than half of these women had recurring indicators for depression. According to one study, there is an increased incidence as follows [M]:

    • 25% – history of major depressive disorder
    • 35% – history of major depression during pregnancy
    • 50% – history of previous postpartum depression
    • 70% – history of both major depressive disorder and postpartum depression

    Screening

    If depression is suspected, asking the two-question screen about mood and anhedonia may be as effective as using longer questionnaires:

    Over the past month, have you been bothered by:

    • Little interest or pleasure in doing things?
    • Feeling down, depressed or hopeless?

    If the patient answers "yes" to either of the above questions, use a quantitative, standardized instrument to document depressive symptoms and track treatment response [M]. This is used to supple­ment but not replace the clinical interview.

    Multiple, practical questionnaires with reasonable performance characteristics are available to help clinicians identify and diagnose patients with major depression. In case-finding studies, average questionnaire administration times ranged from less than one minute to five minutes. While the two-question screen is effective with a broad population in primary care, a recent meta-analysis [M] concluded that for high-risk patients, screening with a nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is more valid.

    The PHQ-9 has been validated for measuring depression severity [C], as well as for telephonic administration. Other examples that are recognized and validated are the Beck Depression Inventory, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self Report (QID-SR) [C]. Regardless, it is crucial to document that the patient meets at least five symptoms for at least two weeks as defined by the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders," 4th Edition Text Revision (DSM-IV TR) criteria for major depression. One of the symptoms must be depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure. See Appendices B, C, E and F in the original guideline document for example questionnaires.

    Clinicians should choose the method that best fits their personal preference, the patient population served and the practice setting.

    The primary objective is to use a standardized instrument that will quantify and document future progress, including response and remission rates.

    Perinatal Depression Screening Recommendations

    • Complete a social and mental health history on all new prenatal and postpartum patients.
    • As noted in the Introduction section of the original guideline document, routine depression screening is recommended for all patients in clinical practices that have systems in place to assure effective diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [M], [R].

    Those patients identified with depression should be treated and monitored. Treatment options including psychotherapy, medication, nutritional supplementation, and bright light therapy are addressed in Annotation #11, "Treatment Plan."

    For more information about screening, see the NGC summary of the ICSI guideline Preventive Services for Adults.

  1. Diagnose and Characterize Major Depression with Clinical Interview

    Depressed mood or anhedonia (diminished interest or pleasure in activities) is necessary to diagnose major depression.

    The use of a mnemonic may likewise be helpful for remembering the symptoms of major depression and dysthymia. SIGECAPS or SIG + Energy + CAPSules is easily remembered and can be used in the clinical interview. It was developed by Dr. Carey Gross of Massachusetts General Hospital and stands for:

    Sleep disorder (increased or decreased)
    Interest deficit (anhedonia)
    Guilt (worthlessness, hopelessness, regret)
    Energy deficit
    Concentration deficit
    Appetite disorder (increased or decreased)
    Psychomotor retardation or agitation
    Suicidality

    History of Present Illness

    Determine history of present illness including

    • Onset may be gradual over months or years or may be abrupt.
    • Severity of symptoms and degree of functional impairment:

      People diagnosed with major depression have a heterogeneous course from self-limiting to life-threatening. Predictors of poor outcome include higher severity at initial assessment, lack of reduction of social difficulties at follow-up and low educational level. Categorize severity of symptoms and degree of functional impairment as follows:

      Mild: few, if any, symptoms in excess of those required to make the diagnosis and only minor impairment in occupational and/or social functioning

      Moderate: symptoms or functional impairment between mild and severe

      Severe: several symptoms in excess of those necessary to make the diagnosis and marked interference with occupational and/or social functioning

    • Number and severity of previous episodes, treatment responses and suicide attempts.
    • Ask about concurrent psychiatric conditions. Obtaining a past psychiatric history is important in terms of understanding prognosis and risk factors. For example, knowledge of past episodes of major depression, past co-occurring mental/behavioral health conditions, and past self-harm attempts is important for establishing risk and need to involve other mental health professionals.
    • Psychosocial stressors (significant loss, conflict, financial difficulties, life change, abuse).

    Medical History

    A past medical history and brief review of systems is generally sufficient to rule out medical disorders causing major depression. Pertinent medical history that may complicate pharmacological treatments include, for example, prostatism, cardiac conduction abnormalities, and impaired hepatic function.

    Perform a focused physical examination and laboratory testing as indicated by the review of systems. The benefit of screening laboratory tests, including thyroid tests, to evaluate major depression has not been established.

    Reliance on laboratory tests should be greater if:

    • The medical review of systems detects symptoms that are rarely encountered in mood or anxiety disorders.
    • The patient is older.
    • The first major depressive episode occurs after the age of 40.
    • The depression does not respond fully to routine treatment.

    Medication History and Substance Abuse/Dependence

    Determine medication history and substance abuse/dependence:

    • Medications such as steroids, alpha-methyldopa, and hormonal therapy may be associated with major depression.
    • Withdrawal from reserpine and propranolol may be associated with major depression.
    • Use of alcohol and hypnotics might be mimicking depression but comorbidity is common [A].
    • Withdrawal from cocaine, anxiolytics, and amphetamines may be mimicking depression.
    • Idiosyncratic reactions to other medications can occur and if possible, a medication should be stopped or changed if depression develops after beginning its use. If symptoms persist after stopping or changing medication, reevaluate for a primary mood or anxiety disorder.
  1. ≥5 DSM-IV TR Criteria Present?
    1. Five or more of the following symptoms have been present and documented during the same two-week period and represent a change from previous functioning; at least one of the symptoms is either (1) depressed mood or (2) loss of interest or pleasure.

      Note: Do not include symptoms that are clearly due to a general medical condition, or mood-congruent delusions or hallucinations.

      1. Depressed mood most of the day, nearly every day, as indicated by either subjective report (e.g., feels sad or empty) or observation made by others (e.g., appears tearful)
      2. Markedly diminished interest or pleasure in all, or almost all, activities most of the day, nearly every day (as indicated by either subjective account or observation made by others)
      3. Significant weight loss when not dieting or weight gain (e.g., a change of more than 5% of body weight in a month), or decrease or increase in appetite nearly every day
      4. Insomnia or hypersomnia nearly every day
      5. Psychomotor agitation or retardation nearly every day (observable by others, not merely subjective feelings of restlessness or being slowed down)
      6. Fatigue or loss of energy nearly every day
      7. Feelings of worthlessness or excessive or inappropriate guilt (which may be delusional) nearly every day (not merely self-reproach or guilt about being sick)
      8. Diminished ability to think or concentrate, or indecisiveness, nearly every day (either by subjective account or as observed by others)
      9. Recurrent thoughts of death (not just fear of dying), recurrent suicidal ideation without a specific plan, or a suicide attempt or a specific plan for committing suicide
    1. The symptoms do not meet criteria for a mixed episode.
    2. The symptoms cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
    3. The symptoms are not due to the direct physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, a medication) or a general medical condition (e.g., hypothyroidism).
    4. The symptoms are not better accounted for by bereavement (i.e., after the loss of a loved one), the symptoms persist for longer than two months or are characterized by marked functional impairment, morbid preoccupation with worthlessness, suicidal ideation, psychotic symptoms, or psychomotor retardation.

    The assessment of major depressive disorders should include the DSM-IV TR numerical rating of the disorder with all five digits, thus including a severity rating. For example, 296.22 (Major depressive disorder, single episode, moderate severity) [Not Assignable].

    Depressive Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (Depression NOS), with a diagnosis code of 311 is designed for patients who do not meet criteria for Major Depression Disorder, Dysthymic Disorder, Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood or Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood. This is not a homogenous group of patients where there is evidence for best practice. If the patient meets criteria for Major Depressive Disorder or Dysthymic Disorder it is important to diagnose and code them as such in order to proceed with evidence-based treatment.

  1. Consider Other Mood and Anxiety Disorders or Somatoform Disorders

    Patients with some depressive symptoms who do not meet full DSM-IV TR criteria for major depression often respond positively to antidepressant medication and/or psychotherapy. Evidence also supports the use of bright light therapy in some of the cases of milder depression [A], [M].

    Presentations particularly suggestive of an anxiety disorder include:

    • Medically unexplained symptoms of autonomic excitation such as:
      • Cardiac (chest pain, atypical chest pain, palpitations, shortness of breath, hyperventilation)
      • Gastrointestinal (epigastric distress, irritable bowel syndrome)
      • Neurologic (headache, dizziness, paresthesias)
      • Panic attacks
    • Emergency room visit for medically unexplained somatic symptoms, particularly chest pain

    These symptoms can cause significant impairment, suffering, and disability. Antidepressants should be considered, though the evidence for their efficacy is less well established with these disorders than with major depression [M]. See Appendix A, "Other Mood and Anxiety Disorders" in the original guideline document for more information.

  1. Is Patient Unsafe to Self or Others?

    The estimate of the lifetime prevalence of suicide in those ever hospitalized for suicidality is 8.6%. The lifetime risk is 4% for affective disorder patients hospitalized without specification of suicidality [M].

    Assessing suicidal tendencies is a critical but often difficult process with a depressed patient. Consider asking and documenting the following progression of questions:

    1. Do you feel that life is worth living?
    2. Do you wish you were dead?
    3. Have you thought about ending your life?
    4. If yes, have you gone so far as to think about how you would do so?
    5. Do you have access to a way to carry out your plan?
    6. What keeps you from harming yourself?

    Many patients will not answer #4 directly or will add "But I'd never do it." Give them positive feedback (e.g., "I'm glad to hear that") but do not drop the subject until she/he has told you the specific methods considered (e.g., gun, medication overdose, motor vehicle accident).

    It is important for a health care clinic to develop their own suicide protocol, taking into account the organization's workflow and resources. A clear process for risk assessment, when to involve the on-call mental health provider, use of local or national hotlines, next steps, etc., should be determined by each individual clinic.

    A recommended resource for how to establish a clinic-based protocol to assess and minimize suicide risk is: Bonner, L., et al. Suicide Risk Response: Enhancing Patient Safety through Development of Effective Institutional Policies. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation. Vol 3, February 2005 http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/advances/.

    See also Appendix D, "Example Suicidality Screening Flow" in the original guideline document.

    Literature suggests that a past history of self harm attempts, in combination with a history of well developed suicide plans, place the patient at a greater eventual risk of completing a suicide attempt [M]. Circumstances such as clear past examples of a sense of competence to execute an attempt, a sense of courage to make the attempt, behaviors that ensure the availability of means and opportunity to complete, concrete preparations to enact the suicide plan, and a current episode of severe depression combine to pose a greater danger of eventual completed suicide. The clinician should consider previous history of suicide attempts; chemical dependency, personality disorder and/or physical illness; family history of suicide; single status; recent loss by death, divorce or separation; insomnia; panic attacks and/or severe psychic anxiety; diminished concentration; anhedonia; hopelessness; or suicidal ideation [D].

    In addition to the risk factors listed above, The Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study found that previous suicide attempters had more concurrent general medical and psychiatric comorbidities, an earlier age of onset of the first depressive episode, as well as more depressive episodes. However, the study found no racial or ethnic distinctions between previous attempters and non-attempters once they controlled for age, gender and severity of depressive symptoms [D].

  1. Assess Need for Additional Resources: Substance Abuse or Psychiatric Comorbidity, Especially Bipolar Disorder?

    Key Points:

    • Some patients presenting with a major depressive episode have a bipolar disorder, for which effective treatment may differ significantly from other depressed patients.
    • The CAGE-AID is recommended as a routine screening tool for all depressed patients.

    Major depression may be associated with other psychiatric problems including personality disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, eating disorders, and substance abuse. Patients with these conditions need specialty care services and details of treatment are beyond the scope of this guideline.

    Bipolar Disorder

    Some patients presenting with a major depressive episode have a bipolar disorder, for which effective treatment may differ significantly from other depressed patients. When assessing a patient, consider asking about manic or hypomanic episodes, based on DSM-IV TR criteria:

    • Has there been a distinct period of abnormally and persistently elevated, expansive, or irritable mood, lasting at least four days (hypomanic episode) or at least one week (manic episode)?
    • During the period of mood disturbance, three (or more) of the following symptoms have persisted (four if the mood is only irritable) and have been present to a significant degree:
      1. Inflated self-esteem or grandiosity
      2. Decreased need for sleep
      3. More talkative than usual or pressure to keep talking
      4. Flight of ideas or subjective experience that thoughts are racing
      5. Distractibility
      6. Increase in goal-directed activity or psychomotor agitation
      7. Excessive involvement in pleasurable activities that have a high potential for painful consequences

    If these criteria are met, the patient may have a bipolar mood disorder. An example of tool for further assessment is the Mood Disorder Questionnaire [C]. Treatment for bipolar disorder falls out of the scope of this guideline.

    Be aware of ongoing mental illness diagnosis or other mental health illnesses and comorbidities. Patients with a history of manic (bipolar) symptoms now presenting with major depression may be destabilized if treated only with antidepressant drugs. Behavioral health involvement is advised with these patients absent a prior history of successful primary care management.

    History of Substance Abuse

    Alcoholism and major depressive disorder are distinct clinical entities and are not different expressions of the same underlying condition. Substance abuse prevalence ranges from 8% to 21% in people with major depression in the general population [A].

    The medical literature does not support definitive statements about the best way(s) to treat patients who are diagnosed with both major depression and substance abuse/dependence. The majority of studies reviewed indicate that success in treating dependency on alcohol, cocaine, and other abused substances is more likely if accompanying depression is addressed. Fewer investigators have looked at whether treating substance abuse is helpful in reducing depression. There is some evidence that patients with major depression that is secondary to their substance abuse may have remission of their depressed mood once the substance abuse is treated. However, it is difficult to separate secondary depression from primary depression that predates or is separate from the substance use.

    Studies to assess the efficacy of concurrent treatment of major depression and substance abuse are limited in number and of variable quality. Although results are not fully consistent, the preponderance of available evidence suggests that pharmacotherapy can be of benefit in treating both substance abuse and depression in patients who have both disorders. Agents studied include amantadine (a dopamine agonist), desipramine (a tricyclic antidepressant), and fluoxetine (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor [SSRI]) [A], [C].

    The algorithm reflects the uncertainty in this area. At diamond #7 it splits into two possible paths. If yes -- a depressed patient is felt to be chemically dependent and treatment of the substance abuse should be considered, either before or while treating the depression. However, if no -- a depressed patient refuses treatment for substance abuse, has a medical comorbidity, or is of a special population, it is appropriate to focus primarily on the depression keeping the special circumstances in mind. It is reasonable to attempt to treat the depression while continuing to assist the patient to work toward efforts to understand their special needs.

    Evaluation and treatment for chemical dependency is beyond the scope of this guideline. A referral may be appropriate. For more information, see also the NGC summary of the ICSI guideline Primary Prevention of Chronic Disease Risk Factors.

    The CAGE-AID Screen

    Current alcohol or other drug problems can be screened by asking a few questions that can be easily integrated into a clinical interview. The CAGE questions are sensitive and specific for diagnosing alcoholism. One positive response has a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 89%, and two positive responses have a specificity of 96%. The CAGE-AID questionnaire broadens the CAGE to include other drug use. The work group reviewed the literature on instruments designed to screen for substance use disorders. Instruments that were reviewed included MAST, SMAST, SMAST-AID, AUDIT, AUDIT-C, CAGE, & CAGE-AID. Ease and time to administer, utility in heavy users, patients with abuse and patients with dependence; accuracy for current and historical use; and sensitivity and specificity were compared. Ultimately, there was consensus to choose a screening questionnaire that screens for both alcohol and drug abuse or dependence. Among these tools the CAGE-AID with the reduced criterion score (one or more + responses is defined as a positive response) was recommended (sensitivity = .79; specificity = .77) as a routine screening tool for all depressed patients [C].

    CAGE-AID Screen
    Have you ever:

    C felt you ought to cut down on your drinking (or drug use)?
    A had people annoy you by criticizing your drinking (or drug use)?
    G felt bad or guilty about your drinking (or drug use)?
    E had a drink (or drug use) as an eye opener first thing in the morning to steady your nerves or get rid of a hangover or to get the day started?

    Reprinted with permission from the Wisconsin Medical Journal 1995;94(3):135-40.

    Each affirmative response earns one point. One point indicates a possible problem. Two points indicate a probable problem.

    The CAGE-AID screen is short in length and easy to administer, however other screening tools may also be useful. It is important to screen for substance abuse using a validated tool, and which tool to use depends on the provider/system's preferences and needs.

    Refer to the original guideline document for examples of substance abuse screening tools.

  1. Involve Behavioral/Chemical Health

    Involve same-day behavioral health for:

    • Suicidal thoughts and/or plans that make the clinician uncertain of the patient's safety
    • Assaultive or homicidal thoughts and/or plans that make the clinician uncertain about the safety of the patient or others
    • Recent loss of touch with reality (psychosis)
    • Inability to care for self/family

    Involvement could include:

    • Appointment with psychiatrist and/or psychotherapist
    • Phone consultation with psychiatrist and/or psychotherapist
    • Referral to the emergency department [C], [R]
  1. Additional Considerations?

    Key Points:

    • Cardiovascular disease, diabetes and chronic pain are common comorbidities in patients with depression.
    • When a person's cultural and personal experiences are taken into consideration, openness and readiness to change (including readiness to seek and adhere to treatment) will be enhanced.
    • Older patients and pregnant women have special considerations to take into account regarding risk, assessment and treatment of depression.

    Medical Comorbidity

    Be aware of the increased incidence of depression in chronic comorbid conditions such as chronic pain, diabetes, cancer, Parkinson's disease, and cardiovascular disease. In the STAR*D trial, study entry subjects had an average of 3.3 general medical conditions [A]. Depression may increase in frequency with acute conditions such as fractured leg, back pain with disability, acute myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, etc. Difficulties coping with a medical condition may also play a role. A study utilizing the second cohort of STAR*D patients reported a prevalence of significant general medical conditions of 50% in the study population [D].

    The following conditions are particularly important for screening, given the findings.

    Cardiovascular Disease

    Some studies have shown that major depression is associated with an increased risk of developing coronary artery disease [M], and has also been shown to increase the risk of mortality in patients after myocardial infarction by as much as fourfold [D]. More recent analyses have disputed this [M], [R]. Moderate to severe depression before coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and/or persistent depression after surgery increases the risk of death after CABG more than two-fold higher than non-depressed patients [D].

    As yet there are no data to support the hypothesis that antidepressant treatment improves cardiac morbidity and mortality [R]. Nevertheless, consensus opinion is to treat depressed cardiac patients with a safe drug rather than watchful waiting since they would benefit from symptomatic relief of their depressive symptoms and there is a potential improvement in their cardiovascular risk profile [R].

    Although tricyclic antidepressants are effective against depression, they are associated with cardiovascular side effects including orthostatic hypotension, slowed cardiac conduction, antiarrhythmic activity, and increased heart rate. SSRIs, by contrast, are well tolerated and have a more benign cardiovascular profile; they would be preferred initial agents for treatment of depression in individuals with cardiovascular disease [R].

    For more information, see also the NGC summaries of the ICSI guidelines Heart Failure in Adults and Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

    Diabetes

    Major depression is associated with an increased number of known cardiac risk factors in patients with diabetes and a higher incidence of coronary heart disease; therefore, screening and treatment of depression in this patient group should be emphasized [D].

    Individuals with diabetes have two-fold higher odds of depression than those without diabetes. High levels of symptoms associated with diabetes that do not correlate with physical or laboratory assessments should prompt the physician to assess for depression [D].

    Depression earlier in life increases the risk of developing diabetes by two-fold [D].

    Depressive symptom severity is associated with poorer diet, medication compliance, and self-care plus functional impairment and higher health care costs [D].

    For more information, see also the NGC summary of the ICSI guideline Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Adults.

    Chronic Pain

    Depression and pain symptoms commonly coexist, exacerbate or attenuate one another, and appear to share biological pathways and neurotransmitters.

    Key Clinical Practice Recommendations:

    • In those patients presenting with either pain or depressive symptoms, assess both domains. Depression may be more than a facet of chronic pain when significant depression symptoms are present. If comorbidity is found between chronic pain and mild to moderate major depression, treat both conditions for optimal outcomes. If comorbid severe major depressive disorder is diagnosed concurrently with chronic pain, depressive symptoms should be the primary focus of treatment.
    • Given that depression and pain symptoms appear to follow the same descending pathways of the central nervous system involving a functional deficiency of the neurotransmitters serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine, antidepressant medication is warranted, especially the dual-action tricyclic antidepressants such as amitriptyline or dual action atypical antidepressant reuptake inhibitors such as venlafaxine or duloxetine. Duloxetine is indicated for the management of neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Duloxetine dosed orally at 60 mg once or twice daily, improved mean pain scores from baseline and increased the proportion of patients with at least 50% reduction in pain scores from baseline [A].
    • Combining pharmacologic treatment and cognitive-behavioral therapy appears to produce the most favorable treatment outcomes [M].

    For more information, see also the NGC summary of the ICSI guideline Assessment and Management of Chronic Pain.

    Cultural Considerations

    Cultural Beliefs

    • A person's cultural and personal experiences influence his/her beliefs and therefore attitudes and preferences. If these experiences are taken into consideration, openness to and readiness to change (including readiness to seek and adhere to treatment) will be enhanced. People of differing racial/ethnic groups are successfully treated using currently available evidence-based interventions when differential personal elements, from biological to environmental to cultural, are considered during the treatment planning process [R].
    • Health care providers can create a more comfortable environment for a patient of another culture by acknowledging the impact of culture and cultural differences on physical and mental health [C], [D].
    • Symptoms of depression may be perceived differently by various cultures. This may lead to underrecognition or misidentification of psychological distress. In some cultures mood, affect and anxiety symptoms are considered social, moral, or spiritual problems.
    • Assess for other resources the client may have used such as elders, native or spiritual advisors/healers, or whomever is within their frame of reference. Interpreters are also another potential valuable resource. Acknowledge their role and collaborate if possible/appropriate.
    • In a secondary analysis of STAR*D data, blacks and Hispanics were more likely to seek treatment in primary care settings. Also, blacks and whites reported higher major depression reoccurrence rates in comparison to Hispanics [A].

    Common Presentations

    • The most common somatic symptoms of depression and anxiety are musculoskeletal pain and fatigue. A provider might consider starting the conversation with the patient on physical symptoms since this is a common presentation of depression in some cultures.
    • The concept of depression varies across cultures. For example, in many cultures, for depression to become a problem for which a person seeks medical treatment, symptoms may include psychosis, conversion disorders or significant physical ailments [D].

    Psychosocial Issues

      • Be aware that psychosocial stressors may be more prevalent with certain populations and the health care team may want to take these issues into consideration as a treatment plan is made. Examples of possible stressors include:
        • Housing
        • Daycare
        • Employment
        • Financial stability
        • Food
        • Transportation
        • Immigration status
      • Cost implications for patients often affect adherence, including insurance coverage or generic versus brand name medications. Adherence factors are important for providers to discuss with the patient.
      • Recent research on depression in low-income minority women in the United States documents significant improvement of symptoms and social functioning regardless of whether treatment was medication or psychotherapy when treatment was sufficiently accessible (availability of child care and transportation).
      • 10% to 75% of patients are noncompliant with medication use, and rates are higher in intercultural settings because of cultural expectations and communication problems [R].
      • A discrepancy between aspiration and achievement may be a better predictor of psychiatric illness than socioeconomic status. The larger the discrepancy between aspiration and achievement, the greater risk of emotional disturbance [D].

    Assessment and Treatment Tools

      • Many assessment tools may not be useful for certain populations. Screening instruments are validated in certain groups. Use caution when using because a tool may not be applicable to all groups.
      • Most empirically supported therapies have been evaluated with white, middle class, English-speaking populations.

    Another resource for more information is the DSM-IV TR, Appendix I, "Outline for Cultural Formation and Glossary of Culture-Bound Syndromes."

    Special Populations

    Geriatrics

    Depression in the elderly is widespread, often undiagnosed and usually untreated. It is a common misperception that it is a part of normal aging. Losses, social isolation and chronic medical problems that older patients experience can contribute to depression.

    The rate of depression in adults older than 65 years of age ranges from 7% to 36% in medical outpatient clinics and increases to 40% in the hospitalized elderly. Comorbidities are more common in the elderly. The highest rates of depression are found in those with strokes (30% to 60%), coronary artery disease (up to 44%), cancer (up to 40%), Parkinson's disease (40%), and Alzheimer's disease (20% to 40%). The recurrence rate is also extremely high at 40% [R].

    Similar to other groups, the elderly with depression are more likely than younger patients to underreport depressive symptoms. They often present with nonspecific somatic complaints, such as insomnia, appetite disturbances, lack of energy, fatigue, chronic pain, constipation, and musculoskeletal disorders.

    Depression and Dementia

    • The 19-item Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) (see Appendix E in the original guideline document) has the best sensitivity (93%) and specificity (97%) with a cutoff of greater than or equal to six for identifying depression in a demented population. The more commonly used Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) (see Appendix F in the original guideline document) had sensitivity ranging from 90% to 82% (for 15-item version to 4-item version) and specificity of 94% to 75% depending on the version [C]. Sensitivity and specificity represented a typical mix of primary care patients.
    • There is reasonably good evidence that having a major depressive episode increases the risk of developing Alzheimer's dementia (odds ratio of 2.03 with 95% confidence with a range of odds ratio of 4.55 with 95% confidence ratio where depression occurred less than one year before diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia to odds ratio of 1.71 when depression occurred more than 25 years earlier) [C], [M].

    The outlook for recovery for the elderly is similar to that for the young when appropriately treated. However, treatment usually has to be continued for longer periods than for the young, since it may take longer to reach remission.

    Pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy and electroconvulsive therapy are appropriate modalities to treat depression in the elderly. When using pharmacotherapy, the physician must carefully consider how the metabolism of the drug may be affected by physiologic changes in the elderly, their comorbid illnesses and the medications used for them. In those individuals who don't respond to the different antidepressants alone, augmentation therapies may be appropriate. This would include psychostimulants, such as cytomel or methylphenidate, or the addition of lithium. Psychotherapy is also appropriate, limited only by cognitive impairments. Electroconvulsive treatment (ECT) may be the most effective and rapid treatment in this situation [M], [R].

    Recurrent depression is common in the elderly. Maintenance therapy with an SSRI (paroxetine in this study) for two years was shown to be effective in preventing recurrent depression after a first time major depression in the elderly over seventy years of age, Interpersonal psychotherapy alone was ineffective [A].

  1. Address Secondary Causes and/or Adapt a Plan for the Special Population

    People with secondary causes for major depression may also have an underlying primary mood or anxiety disorder. Understanding and addressing nuances of special populations may enhance treatment outcomes. See Annotation #7, "Assess Need for Additional Resources" and Annotation #9, "Additional Considerations?"

  1. Treatment Plan

    Key Points:

    • The Collaborative Care Model is recommended for depression in primary care because it has demonstrated improvement in treatment adherence, patient quality of life and depression outcomes.
    • Successful programs for the treatment of depression include organized treatment protocols, structured follow-up protocols, systematic monitoring of treatment adherence and effectiveness.
    • When considering treatment options, the primary goal is to achieve remission.

    Collaborative Care

    More than 37 randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of the Collaborative Care Model. The work group recommends three key references (see original guideline document [A], [M]) in which primary care treatment of depression is provided by a team (depression care manager, primary physician, consulting psychiatrist, others). This model has demonstrated improvement in treatment adherence, patient quality of life, and depression outcomes. Preliminary evidence suggests the collaborative care model is also effective for depression during pregnancy and postpartum [M].

    The redesign to a team-based collaborative care approach involves:

    • Primary care providers using evidence-based approaches to depression care and a standard tool for measuring severity, response to treatment plan and remission
    • A systematic way of tracking and reminding patients at appropriate intervals of visits with their primary care physician and monitoring of treatment adherence and effectiveness
    • A team member (care manager role) to utilize the tracking system and make frequent contacts with the patients to provide further education, self-management support, and monitor for response in order to aid in facilitating treatment changes and in relapse prevention
    • Communication between primary care team and psychiatry to consult frequently and regularly regarding patient under clinical supervision, as well as direct patient visits as needed [A].

    See the Key Implementation Recommendations in the "Description of Implementation Strategy" field and Resources Available section in the original guideline document for suggestions and information on implementing the Collaborative Care Model.

    Educate and Engage Patient

    Successful care of major depression as an illness requires active engagement of each patient and his/her family and ongoing patient education, beginning at the time of diagnosis.

    Often, the depressed patient's pessimism, low motivation, low energy, and sense of social isolation and guilt may lead to nonadherence with treatment [R].

    Education topics should include:

    • The cause, symptoms and natural history of major depression
    • Treatment options and the process of finding the best fit for a given individual
    • Information on what to expect during the course of treatment
    • How to monitor symptoms and side effects
    • Follow-up protocol (office visits and/or telephone contacts)
    • Early warning signs of relapse or recurrence
    • Length of treatment
    • Communication with the caregiver. A patient should plan to make appointments for six months to one year. Frequency of visits will depend on depression severity. See "Establish Follow-Up Plan" further in this annotation.

    Patient education should include diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment options including costs, duration, side effects, and expected benefits. Emphasize the following six points:

    • Depression is a medical illness, not a character defect.
    • Recovery is the rule, not the exception.
    • Treatment is effective for nearly all patients.
    • The aim of treatment is complete remission, not just getting better but staying well.
    • The risk of recurrence is significant: 50% after one episode, 70% after two episodes, 90% after three episodes [R].
    • Patient and family should be alert to early signs and symptoms of recurrence and seek treatment early if depression returns.

    People of differing racial/ethnic groups can be successfully treated using currently available evidence-based interventions when differential personal elements, from biological to environmental to cultural, are considered during the treatment planning process [R].

    Patient Self-Management

    It is important for the patient to consider and adopt some self-care responsibilities, which may range from simply demonstrating reliable behavior in taking medications and calling the provider with side effects to agreeing to participate in sessions, journaling and completing homework, which is necessary for some cognitive behavioral therapies. Written materials are helpful to reinforce information shared during the discussion. Patients who commit to some self-care responsibilities and receive this education compared with those who do not are more likely to continue treatment, rather than prematurely abandon it, and are more likely to attain better outcomes.

    Exercise

    Evidence suggests that physical activity at a dose consistent with public health recommendations is a useful tool for easing major depression symptoms. Among individuals with major depression, exercise therapy is feasible and is associated with significant therapeutic benefit, especially if exercise is continued over time [A], [C], [R]. When prescribing exercise either alone or as an adjunct to medication and psychotherapy, the complexity and the individual circumstances of each patient must be considered. When prescribing an exercise prescription, several caveats apply:

    • Anticipate barriers - hopelessness and fatigue can make physical exertion difficult.
    • Keep expectations realistic - some patients are vulnerable to guilt and self-blame if they fail to carry out the regime.
    • Introduce a feasible plan - walking, alone or in a group, is often a good option.
    • Accentuate pleasurable aspects - the specific choice of exercise should be guided by the patient's preferences, and must be pleasurable.
    • A goal of 30 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, three to five days a week is recommended for otherwise healthy adults (17.5 kcal/kg/week of total energy expenditure). For more information see the NGC summary of the ICSI guideline Prevention and Management of Obesity.
    • Encourage adherence - greater antidepressant effects are seen when training continues beyond 16 weeks.

    Discuss Treatment Options

    When considering treatment options, the primary goal is to achieve remission or to get the patient to be virtually symptom free (i.e., a PHQ-9 score of less than five or a HAM-D score of less than seven).

    Psychotherapy versus Pharmacotherapy

    Pharmacologic and/or psychotherapy interventions are effective in treating depression. Factors to consider in making treatment recommendations are symptom severity, presence of psychosocial stressors, presence of comorbid conditions, and patient preferences. If the initial presentation is mild to moderate, either an antidepressant or psychotherapy (or both) is indicated. If the presenting symptoms of depression are severe, the initial recommendation is to treat with antidepressants and psychotherapy. See the table "Depression Treatment and Follow-Up Intervals Based on Severity" in the original guideline document.

    It is useful to also take into consideration cultural beliefs and sufficiency of (or lack of) resources such as transportation, finances and child care when making a decision whether to treat with medication and/or psychotherapy.

    Depression treatment should take health beliefs into account. Patients who perceive more self-control of their health experience greater reduction in depressive symptoms, whether treated with psychotherapy or an antidepressant [C]. Therefore, it is important to adequately assess a patient's expectations and beliefs in the controllability of depressive symptoms and functioning in order to treat major depression effectively and to minimize the risk of relapse and recurrence.

    Psychotherapy

    Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), interpersonal therapy (IPT), short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) and problem-solving treatment (PST) have documented efficacy [A], [C], [D], [M]. In mild to moderate levels of depression, psychotherapy can be equally as effective as medication [A]. With severe depression, antidepressant medication may be necessary [A]. There is documentation to support lower relapse rates and outcomes among patients receiving psychotherapy [A], [M].

    • Psychotherapy, especially focused psychotherapy, can significantly reduce symptoms, restore psychosocial and occupational functioning, and prevent relapse in patients with major depression [M].
    • Offer a referral for psychotherapy whenever psychological or psychosocial issues are prominent, or if the patient requests it.
    • Support and education in the primary care setting are critical and contribute to the likelihood of good follow-through on treatment. It may help patients understand their options and resources if the primary care clinic explains that this is not the same as a course of psychotherapy.
    • Maintenance psychotherapy is useful in managing chronic forms of major depressive disorder [A].
    • Because both antidepressants and psychotherapy are effective, careful consideration to patient preference for mode of treatment is appropriate [A].

    Medications

    Acute treatment (usually the first three months of treatment) refers to treating with antidepressant medication in order to achieve remission of major depressive symptoms. Remission is defined as having minimal residual symptoms.

    For antidepressant medications, adherence to a therapeutic dose and meeting clinical goals are more important than the specific drug selected. Successful treatment often involves dosage adjustments and/or trial of a different medication at some point, to maximize response and minimize side effects [R].

    When antidepressant therapy is prescribed, the following key messages should be highlighted to support medication adherence and completion:

    • Side effects from medication often precede therapeutic benefit and typically recede over time. It is important to expect some discomfort prior to the benefit.
    • Successful treatment often involves dosage adjustments and/or trial of a different medication at some point, to maximize response and minimize side effects.
    • Most people need to be on medication at least 6 to 12 months after adequate response to symptoms.
    • Patients may show improvement at two weeks but need a longer length of time to really see response and remission.
    • Take the medication as prescribed, even after one feels better. Premature discontinuation of antidepressant treatment has been associated with a 77% increase in the risk of relapse/recurrence of symptoms [B]. On average, 50% to 85% of patients with a single episode of major depressive disorder will have at least one or more episode within 15 years of their first diagnosis [R]. The probability of recurrence of depressive symptoms was found to be 25% after one year, 42% after two years, and 60% after five years in one study [B]. Each episode of recurrence increased the risk of subsequent episodes by 16% [B].
    • Do not stop taking the medication without calling your provider. Side effects can be managed by changes in the dosage or dosage schedule.

    Patient adherence is critical. In addition to medication monitoring, clinical management of patients placed on antidepressants should include the provider's support and reassurance.

    Health care providers should carefully evaluate their patient in whom depression persistently worsens, or emergent suicidality is severe, abrupt in onset, or was not part of the presenting symptoms to determine what intervention, including discontinuing or modifying the current drug therapy, is indicated.

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has requested that manufacturers of antidepressants include a warning statement regarding antidepressants increasing the risk compared to placebo of suicidal thinking and behavior (suicidality) in children, adolescents, and young adults in short-term studies of major depressive disorder (MDD) and other psychiatric disorders. The full warning statement can be found at http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/antidepressants/default.htm.

    The provider should instruct the patient and the patient's caregiver to be alert for the emergence of agitation, irritability, and the other symptoms. The emergence of suicidality and worsening depression should be closely monitored and reported immediately to the health care provider.

    See also Annotation #5, "Is Patient Unsafe to Self or Others?" above.

    Selection of an Antidepressant Medication

    Antidepressant drug selection should be based on:

    • The patient's history of response to previous antidepressant medications (if any)
    • The patient's comorbid psychiatric or medical conditions
    • Clinician familiarity with specific antidepressants

    The Texas Medication Algorithms which can be found at http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/mhprograms/disclaimer.shtm provide good overall parameters for care. The STAR*D Study has updated data on treatment response timelines and follow-ups.

    There is no evidence regarding choice of brand versus generic based on adverse clinical outcomes.

    While genetic differences in the metabolism of certain medications including antidepressants can be determined by genetic testing, the clinical significance and applicability to practice has not yet been established.

    For up-to-date prescribing information, the work group recommends the following references:

    Refer to the original guideline document for information regarding pharmaceutical and therapeutic equivalents.

    Consider discussing with the patient the specific side effect profiles, costs, and benefits of different antidepressants, including generics. Cost implications for patients need to be discussed between provider and patient.

    1. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI); venlafaxine, duloxetine, mirtazapine, and bupropion

      SSRIs, venlafaxine, duloxetine, mirtazapine and bupropion are frequently chosen as first-line therapy because of simplicity, side effect profiles, and community standards.

      They generally lack the common adverse reactions (anticholinergic, sedative effects) of the tricyclics and cause fewer problems when taken in overdose. However, they may cause headache, nervousness, insomnia, and sexual side effects and may be more expensive because some may not yet be available as generics. Care must be taken to remain with either the brand name product or the same general product.

    1. Secondary Amine Tricyclics

      The literature clearly supports the effectiveness of tricyclics. Because of associated side effects, they are used less frequently as first-line agents.

      Secondary amine tricyclics cause less orthostatic hypotension and sedation than tertiary amine tricyclics.

      These medications should be monitored cautiously in patients with heart problems, or in patients with potential for drug interactions. Monitoring blood levels and electrocardiogram (EKG) may be advised.

    1. Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor (MAOI)

      MAOIs, in general, should be restricted for patients who do not respond to other treatments because of their potential for serious side effects and the necessity of dietary restrictions. Patients with major depressive disorders with atypical features are one group for whom several studies suggest MAOIs may be particularly effective. However, in clinical practice, many psychiatrists start with SSRIs in such patients because of the more favorable adverse effect profile.

    Medication interactions with antidepressant agents: Many antidepressant agents have clinically significant drug interactions, particularly those agents which undergo cytochrome P450 enzymatic metabolism in the liver. A complete discussion of this topic is beyond the scope of this guideline. Practitioners are advised to consult references such as the Physician's Desk Reference, American Hospital Formulary Service, Epocrates, or Micromedex for more information about drug interactions with specific agents, and to assess the significance of the interaction prior to prescribing antidepressants.

    Elderly patients: Because of the potential for decreased renal and hepatic function, concomitant diseases and medications, the elderly are at higher risk of significant side effects or drug interactions with antidepressant medications. For elderly patients with moderate to severe depression, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) such as nortriptyline continue to be regarded as the most effective treatment [A], [C]. Consider starting at the lowest possible dose and increasing slowly to effective dose or until side effects appear. Tertiary amine tricyclics should generally be avoided in elderly patients because of the high incidence of orthostatic hypotension, sedation, cognitive problems, and cardiac effects with these agents.

    Perinatal Depression Treatment

    • Patient participation in shared treatment decision-making improves depression treatment adherence and clinical outcomes in depressed patients [C].
    • Evidence of treatment success using psychotherapy alone [M].
    • In order to assure optimal dosing and safety, medication management in the perinatal patient is best handled by a health professional with this specific expertise.

    See the "Resources Available" section in the original guideline document for Wisner's Model and risk-benefit analysis decision-making tool.

    Approximately 5% to 14% of women experience significant mood or anxiety symptoms during pregnancy [C]. Physicians must help patients weigh the risk of prenatal exposure to psychotropic medications against the risks of untreated psychiatric illness. The first line of treatment for mild to moderate depression includes increased instrumental support, which includes household tasks, childcare, etc., as well as interpersonal psychotherapy. When these non-medication options have failed or if patients have severe major depression or other Axis I (clinical disorders, other conditions that may be a focus of clinical attention) diagnoses, then the risks of untreated illness may outweigh the potential detrimental effects of certain antidepressant medications.

    Risks of untreated maternal depression during pregnancy include:

    • Preterm labor through increases in hormones [B]
    • Preeclampsia – one study found depression was associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk [C]
    • Increased risk of spontaneous abortion due to imbalance of nervous and endocrine systems [D], [R]

    Maternal depression and impact on children [A], [C], [R]:

    • Parental depression is among the most consistent and well-replicated risk factors for depression, anxiety and disruptive disorders in children. The best data thus far comes from the STAR*D Child Report, where untreated depressed mothers showed an 8% increase of psychiatric diagnoses in their children ages 7 to 17 years versus an 11% reduction in rates of psychiatric diagnoses when mothers were treated and reached remission. There was no improvement at all before mothers responded to treatment (response equals 50% reduction in symptoms) and more improvement as a mother reached remission. This highlights another important reason to treat depressed mothers and to treat remission.

    Information is limited about the long-term neurobehavioral effects on children exposed in utero to antidepressants. Two studies have found that preschool children who had been exposed in utero to SSRIs or TCAs during the first trimester or throughout pregnancy had no difference in language, behavioral or intellectual development compared to non-exposed children.

    There is no evidence that the tricyclic antidepressants or the SSRIs increase the risk of intrauterine death, fetal malformations, pregnancy complications or behavioral toxicity, except possibly paroxetine. Therefore, decisions regarding the treatment of depression during pregnancy must balance the risk to the mother and fetus secondary to untreated depression with the relative (although not absolute) safety of antidepressant treatment for this condition. Fetal or infant exposure to maternal depression may represent a stressful life event and increase the risk of future psychopathology in children [R].

    Patients commonly underestimate the risks of untreated maternal psychiatric illness while over emphasizing the risks of their psychotropic medications. In a recent prospective study of women with a history of depression, 43% relapsed during their pregnancy. Half of these relapses occurred during the first trimester. Women who discontinued their antidepressant medication during the study period had a fivefold risk of relapse during their pregnancy compared to women who continued their antidepressant [B].

    Misperception about risk can lead both providers and patients to terminate otherwise wanted pregnancies or avoid needed pharmacotherapy. By informing patients about the nature and magnitude of medication risks as well the risks of untreated illness, providers can help patients reach their own decisions. The clinician's goal is to provide a thorough risk-benefit assessment in order to minimize the risks of both depression and its treatment to the mother and child [R].

    U.S. FDA Pregnancy Risk Categories:

    (A) Controlled studies show no risk. Adequate, well-controlled studies in pregnant women have failed to demonstrate risk to the fetus. No currently available antidepressant medication is rated A.

    (B) No evidence of risk in humans. Either animal findings show risk, but human findings do not; or if no adequate human studies have been done, animal findings are negative. Bupropion and maprotiline are rated B.

    (C) Risk cannot be ruled out. Human studies are lacking, and animal studies are either positive for fetal risk or lacking. However, potential benefits may justify the potential risks. Amitriptyline, amoxapine, protriptyline, sertraline, trazodone, trimipramine, venlafaxine are rated C.

    (D) Positive evidence of risk. Investigational or postmarketing data show risk to the fetus. Nevertheless, potential benefits may outweigh the potential risks. If needed in a life-threatening situation or a serious disease, the drug may be acceptable if safer drugs cannot be used or are ineffective. Imipramine and nortriptyline are rated D.

    (X) Contraindicated in pregnancy. Studies in animals or human, or investigational or postmarketing reports have shown fetal risk which clearly outweighs any possible benefit to the patient. None of the currently available antidepressant medications are rated X.

    The most reproductive safety information is available for the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and SSRIs [B], [R]. Among the available pregnancy data, there is no evidence that these medications are associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations. This is also true for sertraline, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, venlafaxine, and bupropion; however, there are fewer documented pregnancies with these medications.

    In 2006 the FDA issued a warning for paroxetine due to an increased risk for cardiovascular malformations, primarily ventricular and atrial septal defects, compared to other antidepressants. Only first-trimester exposure to paroxetine at doses greater than 25 mg a day was associated with a greater risk of cardiac malformations in one study. Daily doses lower than 25 mg of paroxetine were not found to have an increased risk of any malformations in this study. Women of child-bearing age on paroxetine should be advised of the potential risk and other treatment options should be considered. The risk to infants exposed to paroxetine ranged from 1.5% to 2% compared to 1% in control groups [C], [R].

    There have been many case reports of perinatal syndromes with TCAs (e.g., jitteriness, irritability, bowel obstruction, urinary retention) as well as different SSRIs. Other studies have found an association between prenatal SSRI exposure and preterm delivery. In general, these reports have been limited to case reports and small case series. There is also concern about the lack of control groups in these studies. In effect, some neonates in these reports may be exhibiting symptoms due to SSRI toxicity or withdrawal at birth, or alternatively, be more irritable and difficult to settle due to maternal depression and anxiety [B], [C], [R]. To avoid perinatal withdrawal syndromes, some support slowly tapering antidepressants in the weeks prior to delivery. This is a debated treatment strategy since it also theoretically withdraws antidepressants just as women are entering the postpartum period, a time of increased risk for mood or anxiety symptoms. There is currently no clear evidence to suggest that reducing or discontinuing antidepressants in late pregnancy will reduce adverse neonatal effects [R].

    Persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN) was not found to be a risk of SSRIs or non-SSRIs by mothers prior to the 20th week of gestation. However, use of SSRIs in late pregnancy may increase the risk of PPHN. The absolute risk of developing PPHN is relatively small (6 to 12/1,000). Further studies are needed to evaluate the true risk of this potential complication [C], [R].

    Exposure to SSRIs in pregnancy may be associated with adverse neonatal effects [R]. However, these are predominantly mild and short lived. Discontinuing antidepressants in women with a history of recurrent or severe depression is also associated with potentially adverse outcomes for both the mother and infant. Women with a history of depression who are planning to become pregnant should carefully consider the choice and timing of an antidepressant [B]. It is recommended that throughout the pregnancy if a medication is continued, the minimum effective dose of an antidepressant needed to get remission should be used with ongoing maternal monitoring [R]. The decision to continue treatment during the pregnancy should balance the risks and benefits to the mother and child and should be made on case-by-case basis [B], [C], [R].

    Lactation: Current knowledge on the use of antidepressants during lactation is insufficient. No randomized controlled trials have been completed due to ethical concerns. Existing knowledge is based on case reports, case series and pharmacokinetic studies. Adverse events may be more likely to be reported than non-effects [R].

    Antidepressants may appear in breast milk in low concentrations. Because of the long half-life of these drugs and their metabolites, nursing infants may have measurable amounts in their plasma and tissues, such as the brain. This is particularly important during the first few months of life, with immature hepatic and renal function. Because these drugs affect neurotransmitter function in the developing central nervous system, it may not be possible to predict long-term neurodevelopmental effects. Use only when clearly needed and potential benefits outweigh the risks to the nursing infant. (Adapted from American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Policy Statement, Transfer of Drugs and Other Chemicals Into Human Milk, Pediatrics 2001;108:776-789). Breast-feeding offers several advantages: a) Breast-fed infants have lower rates of gastrointestinal disease, anemia, respiratory ailments, and otitis media compared to formula-fed infants; b) Nursing provides a unique opportunity for maternal-infant bonding. At the same time, the postpartum period (first 3 months following childbirth) is a particularly vulnerable period for psychiatric illness in women. Issues to be addressed when assessing the risks and benefits of psychotropic drug use during breast-feeding include the documented benefits of nursing, the potential adverse impact of untreated maternal mental illness on infant attachment and cognitive and behavioral development, and the effects of untreated mental illness on the mother.

    Depression in the postpartum period can be disabling. Trials of cognitive behavioral therapy or interpersonal therapy, while safe, may not be effective--resulting in the need for antidepressant trials and/or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The use of antidepressants by nursing mothers is often acceptable as long as the mother-infant pair is monitored for the emergence of adverse effects or complications. Tricyclic antidepressants appear to be safe. However, there was one case report of respiratory distress in an infant of a mother treated with doxepin suggesting that this antidepressant should be avoided during lactation. Data on the SSRIs suggest that sertraline and paroxetine are safe to use in nursing mothers suffering from depression.

    There have been isolated case reports of infant toxicity in nursing mothers taking either doxepin or fluoxetine; however, studies have not revealed a consistent association between infant toxicity and any specific TCAs or SSRIs. The lack of adverse effects in 180 infants exposed to fluoxetine justifies its use especially if prescribed during the pregnancy or if there is a preferential history of response to this medication. Data on citalopram, fluvoxamine, bupropion and venlafaxine are more limited and their use cannot be recommended during breast-feeding at this time. Based on multiple case series, some researchers have recommended that the SSRI sertraline be considered the first-line treatment for nursing mothers with depression; however, sertraline may also carry risk in some mothers as demonstrated in one case report of an excessively high infant sertraline level in one mother-infant pair. Among the TCAs, nortriptyline has been the most studied treatment for nursing mothers, and no evidence of infant toxicity has been reported. Few studies have been done to evaluate the long-term consequences in children following antidepressant exposure through breast milk. One study followed children whose mothers nursed while taking TCAs. At preschool age these children were developmentally similar to non-exposed children. There have been no similar studies following children whose mother nursed while taking SSRIs [C], [R].

    Herbals and Dietary Supplements

    Caution: many drugs interact with St. John's wort, including other antidepressants, warfarin, oral contraceptives, antiretroviral, anti-cancer and anti-rejection drugs. Care should be taken to ask all patients what medications they are taking, including over-the-counter and supplements, to avoid these interactions.

    Hypericum perforatum (St. John's wort) is popularly thought to be an herbal remedy for depression. The Hypericum Depression Trial Study Group concluded that the data does not support the use of Hypericum perforatum instead of antidepressants or psychotherapy. It has no proven efficacy in standard clinical care of patients with major depression.

    SAM-e (S-adenosyl methionine). S-Adenosyl - L-methionine (SAM-e) is a natural compound that has been studied as a treatment option for depression. As of 2002, there were 11 controlled against placebo studies, 14 controlled against tricyclic antidepressant studies, and 2 meta-analyses. Essentially these studies show that SAM-e is superior to placebo and comparable to tricyclics in the treatment of outpatients with major depression. Effective oral doses seem to be in the 400 to 1,600 mg a day range as compared to doses of 400 mg a day of tricyclics. Side effects are less common than with tricyclics (7% with oral and intramuscular SAM-e versus 28% with oral tricyclic) and include mild insomnia, lack of appetite, constipation, nausea, dry mouth, diaphoresis, dizziness, and nervousness. Increased anxiety and hypomania have been reported in patients with bipolar depression. Interactions with other medications have not been studied and are unknown. Comparisons to newer antidepressants have not yet been done.

    Other herbal remedies and dietary supplements, such as kava-kava, Omega-3 fatty acid, (docosahexaenoic acid) and valerian root, have not been proven effective for the treatment of depression and may or may not be safe [M], [R].

    Herbal products and nutritional supplements are not evaluated or regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for safety, efficacy or bioavailability.

    Establish Follow-Up Plan

    Proactive follow-up contacts (in person, telephone) based on the Collaborative Care Model has been shown to significantly lower depression severity [A]. In the available clinical effectiveness trials conducted in real clinical practice settings, even the addition of a care manager leads to modest remission rates [A]. Interventions are critical to educating the patient regarding the importance of preventing relapse, safety and efficacy of medications and management of potential side effects. Establish and maintain initial follow-up contact intervals (office, phone, other) [A].

    Depression Treatment and Follow-Up Based on Severity

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Depression Severity Treatment Recommendation Follow-up Interval
    10-14 Moderate Education, pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy

    Start treatment and follow-up plan, regularly re-evaluate and revise treatment plan
    All depressed patients initially need weekly follow-up (phone or in person) for engagement in treatment, determining if following treatment plan, addressing side effects, and check if following through on any referrals.

    If patient is responding, contacts can extend as far as monthly.
    15-19 Moderately severe Education, pharmacotherapy and/or psychotherapy

    Start treatment and follow-up plan, regularly re-evaluate and revise treatment plan
    All depressed patients initially need weekly follow-up (phone or in person) for engagement in treatment, determining if following treatment plan, addressing side effects, and check if following through on any referrals.

    If patient is responding, contacts can extend to every 2 to 4 weeks.
    >20 Severe Education, pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy

    Start treatment and follow-up plan, regularly re-evaluate and revise treatment plan
    All depressed patients initially need weekly follow-up (phone or in person) for engagement in treatment, determining if following treatment plan, addressing side effects, and check if following through on any referrals.

    Until significant response is achieved, contacts should remain weekly. Referral to mental health specialist may be warranted by primary care physician (PCP) or psychiatrist.

    Adapted from Kroenke and Spitzer, Psychiatric Annals 32:9 / September 2002

    If the primary care provider is seeing some improvement, continue working with that patient to augment or increase medication dosage to reach remission. This can take up to three months. Don't give up on the patient whether treating in primary care or referring. Stay connected through consultation or collaboration and take the steps needed to get the patient to remission. This can take longer and can take several medication interventions or other steps. The STAR*D studies have shown that primary care can be just as successful as specialty care [A].

    Relapse Prevention

    The prevention of relapse is of primary importance in the treatment of major depression. From 50% to 85% of people who suffer an episode of major depression will have a recurrence, usually within two or three years. Patients who have had three or more episodes of major depression are at 90% risk of having another episode. Relapse prevention interventions resulted in 13.9 additional depression-free days during a 12 month period [A].

    Focused psychotherapy through cognitive-behavioral therapy can reduce relapse by assisting patients with their depression-related beliefs [A].

    One study found that improving attitudes towards antidepressant medications along with the patient's ability to handle medication side effects are key factors in promoting greater adherence to maintenance treatment and thus greater likelihood of preventing relapse [A].

    Collaboration with Mental Health

    Consider collaborating with a behavioral health care provider for the following:

    • Patient request for psychotherapy
    • Presence of severe symptoms and impairment in patient, or high suicide risk
    • Presence of other psychiatric condition (e.g., personality disorder, history of mania)
    • Suspicion or history of substance abuse
    • Clinician discomfort with the case
    • Medication advice (psychiatrist or other mental health prescriber)
    • Patient request for more specialized treatment
  1. Is Patient Responding Adequately?

    The goal of treatment should be to achieve remission reduce relapse and recurrence, and return to previous level of occupational and psychosocial function.

    Remission is defined as the absence of depressive symptoms, or the presence of minimal depressive symptoms such as Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score of less than 7 or a Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score of less than 5. Response is defined as a 50% or greater reduction in symptoms (as measured on a standardized rating scale) and partial response is defined as a 25% to 50% reduction in symptoms.

    Results from the STAR*D study showed that remission rates lowered with more treatment steps, but the overall cumulative rate was 67% [A].

    In the STAR*D study, longer times than expected were needed to reach response or remission. In fact, 1/3 of those who ultimately responded did so after six weeks. Of those who achieved Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) remission, 50% did so only at or after six weeks of treatment [A]. If primary care provider is seeing some improvement, continue working with that patient to augment or increase dosage to reach remission. This can take up to three months.

    A reasonable criterion for extending the initial treatment is if the patient is experiencing a 25% or greater reduction in baseline symptom severity at six weeks of therapeutic dose. If the patient's symptoms are reduced by 25% or more, but the patient is not yet at remission, and if medication has been well tolerated, continue to prescribe. Raising the dose is recommended [A]. Improvement with psychotherapy is often a bit slower than with pharmacotherapy. A decision regarding progress with psychotherapy and the need to change or augment this type of treatment may require 8 to 10 weeks before evaluation [R].

  1. Evaluate Dose, Duration, Type and Adherence with Medication and/or Psychotherapy. Reconsider Accuracy of Diagnosis or Impact of Comorbidities

    If remission has not been achieved when reevaluated up to six weeks later, consider:

    • Reevaluating the diagnosis.
    • The possibility of a bipolar diathesis. Bipolar patients require a different treatment approach and may not consistently come forward with their hypomanic, mixed or manic histories [D].
    • Looking for comorbidities, such as substance abuse issues, and involve addiction specialists as needed.
    • Consult with a behavioral health provider if there are personality disorders present.
    • Whether adequate engagement of patient/family is present and that recommendations are being followed (adherence).
    • Adding cognitive psychotherapy or adding another medication such as buspirone or bupropion showed similar improvement rates, however, the addition of medication resulted in a significantly more rapid response [A].
    • Switching to a different antidepressant medication. After a failed trial of citalopram, remission rates in the STAR*D studies were 21.3% for bupropion sustained release (SR), 17.6% for sertraline and 24.8% for venlafaxine XR [A]. Failure of a drug in one family does not rule out possible benefit from other drugs in that family. This is particularly true for SSRIs [B], [D].
    • Augmentation strategies (such as lithium or low-dose thyroid). See Annotation #14, "Consider Other Strategies" below.
    • Referral to psychiatry for possible MAOI, ECT treatment. Many patients unresponsive to tricyclics are responsive to monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Rarely, the combination of tricyclics and MAO inhibitors is used. This combination should be undertaken with extreme caution. Studies measuring response to MAO inhibitors in SSRI non-responders have not been done [A], [D]. See Annotation #14, "Consider Other Strategies."

    A switch from an antidepressant to psychotherapy or vice versa appears useful for non-responders to initial treatment [C]. If there is less than 25% reduction of symptoms after six weeks at therapeutic dose (i.e., partial positive response to medication), add, switch or substitute another treatment modality. If there is a partial medication response and side effects are not prohibitive, increase the dose. As part of the evaluation, using a standardized assessment tool will serve as a documentation of progress.

    Pharmacologic Therapy

    Without long-term antidepressant treatment, major depressive relapses and recurrences occur in 50% to 80% of patients. Double-blind discontinuation studies reveal that antidepressants decrease the risk of relapse and recurrence and have repeatedly shown antidepressants to be more efficacious than placebo substitution.

    It has been estimated that patients recovering from primary major depression have a relapse rate of 40% to 50%. Data also shows that patients who have three or more episodes of depression actually have a 90% risk of relapse.

    It has been well established that raising the dose of tricyclics or MAO inhibitors may improve response. Similarly, a controlled study showed that raising the dose of fluoxetine (from 20 mg to 40 or 60 mg) in partially responsive patients was more effective than adding desipramine (25 to 50 mg per day) or lithium (300 to 600 mg per day). In non-responders, raising the fluoxetine dose was as effective as adding lithium, and both were more effective than adding desipramine [A], [R].

    One study with a tricyclic antidepressant showed decreased risk of relapse after 18 months of treatment [C].

    Surveys of patient populations have indicated that patients receiving prescriptions for one of the benzodiazepines or other minor tranquilizers or hypnotics tend to use less than prescribed and to reduce their use over time. Benzodiazepine abuse is usually seen as part of a pattern of abuse of multiple drugs often involving alcohol and sometimes opioids [R].

    See also "Treatment Plan" section in Annotation #11 and Annotation #15, "Continuation and Maintenance Treatment Duration Based on Episode."

    Psychotherapy

    Psychotherapy may provide better outcomes on adjustment/functional measures such as mood, suicidal ideation, work and interests; medication treatment may be superior on vegetative symptoms such as sleep and appetite [R].

    There are numerous types of psychotherapy, just as there are numerous types of medication. If a patient has received psychotherapy and not responded, evaluate the treatment he/she received and consider another type.

    If the patient is newly involved in psychotherapy, the following are important:

    • Contact with patient in four to six weeks
    • Communicate with therapist in four to six weeks
    • Return visit in eight to ten weeks to evaluate progress
    • Therapy can take eight to ten weeks to show improvement
  1. Consider Other Strategies

    Key Points:

    • Augmentation strategies may be used for partial responders and combinations of antidepressants (when each has a different mechanism) have been shown to be options in those who fail to achieve remission.
    • Partial or full hospitalization may be indicated in patients who have failed outpatient management, particularly if safety issues are a concern.
    • Use of bright light therapy for treatment of major depression with a seasonal specifier is well established.
    • Electroconvulsive treatment is very effective and can sometimes be administered safely in an outpatient setting.

    Treatment-resistant depression has several definitions in the literature. It is important to distinguish treatment resistance from a lack of completion of a full course of treatment. The literature further tends to focus on pharmacological treatments in the definition of treatment resistance without consistently incorporating psychotherapeutic modalities. True treatment resistance is seen as occurring on a continuum, from failure to reach remission after an adequate trial of a single antidepressant to failure to achieve remission despite several trials of antidepressants, augmentation strategies, ECT and psychotherapy. For our purposes of making recommendations for primary care providers, the guideline developers define true treatment resistance as failure to achieve remission with an adequate trial of therapy and three different classes of antidepressants at adequate duration and dosage [A], [M], [R].

    Augmentation Therapy

    Augmentation therapy is used for those situations where the patient's depression is either treatment-resistant or partially responsive to treatment. This is a good time to consult and/or refer to a behavioral health specialist.

    Augmentation methods include:

    • Bupropion and buspirone -- SSRI combination [A], [C], [D].
    • Mirtazapine -- SSRI combination [A], [D]
    • Triiodothyronine (T3) augmentation of TCA [A], [R].
    • Stimulant drugs augmentation of TCA-SSRI ("jump-start response")
    • TCA-SSRI combination (caution -- elevated TCA level – to be monitored) [C], [D].
    • Lithium augmentation with TCAs. Lithium augmentation with SSRI (caution -- case reports of serotonin syndrome) [A], [D].
    • Carbamazepine/valproic acid -- TCA combination (caution - may decrease TCA level). Carbamazepine/valproic acid -- SSRI combination [D]
    • Atypical antipsychotic -- antidepressant combination [D]

    Hospitalization

    Partial or full hospitalization may be indicated in patients who have failed outpatient management, particularly if safety issues are a concern.

    Other Therapies

    Based on work group consensus, the following other strategies are in order of the likely clinical judgment and decision process of a primary care provider.

    Light Therapy

    Use of bright light therapy for treatment of major depression with a seasonal specifier is well established [A], [M]. Additionally, there is evidence of the efficacy of bright light therapy for some other types of depressive symptom patterns, including non-seasonal depression and milder variations of seasonal depressive patterns [A], [M]. Bright light therapy may also quicken and enhance the effects of antidepressant medication [A]. Evidence suggests efficacy in pregnant and postpartum women [A], [D]. Although the light exposure dosage (typically 5,000 to 10,000 lux) and exposure length (typically 30 to 60 minutes) have been fairly standard for seasonal affective disorder treatment, research on bright light therapy for other types of depression has not necessarily utilized standard dosages and exposure times. Light therapy cannot be endorsed as an evidence-based treatment for antepartum and postpartum depressed women [D]. It is important that any light therapy treatment utilize equipment that eliminates ultraviolet frequencies and produces bright light of known spectrum and intensity. For these reasons, use of client-constructed light therapy units is contraindicated.

    Electroconvulsive Treatment (ECT)

    Electroconvulsive treatment is effective and can sometimes be administered safely in an outpatient setting. A patient considering ECT would need to be able to tolerate anesthesia, and should consult with a psychiatrist about the risks and benefits [A], [M].

    Factors that may suggest a given patient may be an ECT candidate include:

    • Geriatric depression
    • If antidepressant medications have not been tolerated or pose a significant medical risk
    • If antidepressant medication trials have not been successful
    • If ECT has been successful in previous episodes
    • If Catatonia is present
    • When a rapid response is needed because of severe suicide risk or because the patient's health has been significantly compromised by the depression (e.g., severe cachexia, inability to attend to the activities of everyday living). ECT has been shown to be effective in resolving expressed suicidal intent [A].
    • If depression with psychotic features
    • If melancholic symptoms are predominant
    • Depression and Parkinsonism [R]

    Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS)

    VNS involves the use of an implantable device, which provides intermittent stimulation to the left vagus nerve (80% afferent to the central nervous system). It is used as an adjunctive treatment along with other modalities such as use of psychotropic medications. It has only been studied only in refractory or treatment resistant depression.

    Side effects include voice alterations (generally just while one is receiving the 30 seconds of stimulation each 5 minutes), increased rate of neck pain, cough, dyspnea, and dysphagia. At this point in time, VNS is approved by the FDA for treatment of resistant depression. However, given the lack of double blind controlled studies and the somewhat disappointing result in the one available, this does not meet the threshold for category A evidenced-based at this point in time. This is a promising new therapy which remains to be fully proven [A], [D].

    Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive technique that stimulates the brain in vivo using high intensity, pulsed electron-magnetic fields. Recent research has examined the use of rTMS in the treatment of major depressive disorder. In the procedure, a handheld stimulating coil is applied directly to the patient's head and delivers a magnetic pulse to the cortex. Results of research studies to date have been inconsistent and inconclusive [C], [M].

    The FDA has not yet approved rTMS for general clinic use, and it must be considered, at this time, investigational [A].

    Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST)

    Magnetic seizure therapy uses focused stimulation (generally of the right frontal area) to induce a focal seizure. This is designed to obtain efficacy of ECT without the cognitive side effects (which generally occur when seizures spread to the hippocampus). One open label trial [R] showed less amnesia and faster reorientation than ECT and some improvement in depression scores.

    At this time, MST holds research promise but is not yet evidence-based.

    Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)

    Deep brain stimulation is the process of implanting an electrode to stimulate the subgenual cingulated gyrus with high-frequency impulses to diminish depression in treatment refractory patients with major clinical depression. One open label trial [D] showed four out of six patients achieved remission after surgery (and those with sham sessions did not). At two months, five out of six patients were in remission and four out of six were in remission at six months.

    At this time, DBS is an interesting and promising research approach but cannot be considered evidence-based.

    Acupuncture

    Although acupuncture is known to be an alternative therapy for the treatment of depression, it has shown mixed results. Acupuncture may be an alternative for those who reject traditional treatments, for those who do not show adequate response to traditional treatments or for those in whom antidepressants may be contraindicated (frail, elderly or pregnant women). Electro-acupuncture may be a treatment of choice for those who are unable to comply with classic tricyclic antidepressants because of their anticholinergic side effects. It is felt that additional larger controlled and longitudinal studies need to be done for endorsement as a recommended treatment for depression.

    Nutritional Supplements

    While there are nutritional benefits of omega-3 fatty acids for pregnant women, evidence of additional benefits for treating or preventing postpartum depression is inconclusive [A].

  1. Continuation and Maintenance Treatment Duration Based on Episode

    Continuation therapy is the phase where one continues to treat with antidepressants in order to keep the patient free of symptoms for the duration of the current episode. By definition this is considered to be at least 6 months long, but lately the evidence supports a 6 to 12 months duration. However, consider in elderly populations it may take longer to respond to acute treatment. Therefore, the maintenance period of treatment may need to be extended.

    Maintenance therapy is designed to prevent recurrence of new or future episodes of major depression [R]. The best candidates for maintenance therapy are patients who have two previous episodes of major depression, or who have had two episodes of major depression but have also had rapid recurrence of episodes, or are older in age at the onset of major depression (more than 60 years of age), have had severe episodes of major depression or a family history of a mood disorder. Maintenance therapy should also be considered for at-risk patients with double depression and patients with comorbid anxiety disorder or substance abuse. Patients whose major depression has a seasonal pattern are also at risk for recurrence. For maintenance medication, contacts can occur every 3 to 12 months if everything else is stable [A], [R].

    It is suggested that the dose of antidepressant medication that leads to satisfactory acute therapeutic response should be maintained during long-term treatment to prevent relapse and recurrence of depression [D], [R].

    When considering how long to continue medication after the remission of acute symptoms, two issues need to be considered: maintenance and prophylactic treatment. Patients who require several medication changes to achieve remission of an acute major depressive episode have a higher rate of relapse and a shorter period of time until relapse in comparison to patients who require fewer medication changes to achieve remission [A].

    There are significant data to support the efficacy of antidepressants in preventing the recurrence of a major depressive episode. Although more research needs to be conducted, findings indicate that patients who are at highest risk of future episodes have had multiple prior episodes or were older at the time of the initial episode [A]. These patients are candidates for long-term or lifetime prophylactic treatment.

    Depression Treatment Duration Based on Episode

    Episode Treatment Duration
    1st episode Continue medication treatment for 6 to 12 months (including acute and continuation therapy). Withdraw gradually.
    2nd episode Continue medication treatment for 3 years. Withdraw gradually.
    3+ episodes or 2 episodes with complicating factors (such as rapid recurrence of episodes, more than 60 years of age at onset of major depression, severe episodes, or family history) Continue medication treatment indefinitely.

    [M], [R]

    Analysis suggests that recurrence rates are reduced by 70% when patients are maintained on antidepressants for three years following their previous episode (average recurrence on placebo 41% versus 18% on active treatment) [R].

    Premature treatment discontinuation can be triggered by a number of factors, including lack of adequate education about the disease, failure on the part of either physician or the patient to establish goals for follow-up, psychosocial factors and adverse side effects. Appropriate ongoing collaborative care for depression can increase remission rates to as much as 76% by 24 months [A].

    Complicating factors are those situations where evidence either shows or suggests higher rates of recurrence after stopping antidepressants and include:

    • Pre-existing dysthymia
    • Inability to achieve remission
    • Recurrence of symptoms in response to previously attempted lowering dose or discontinuation [C]

    If discontinuation of treatment is thought to be appropriate or necessary despite the known risks, a plan of action should be in place for prompt intervention if relapse occurs [R].

    With the wide array of half-lives and therapeutic dose ranges for the various existing antidepressants, it is beyond the scope of this guideline to discuss detailed discontinuation strategies.

    When feasible (e.g., the starting dose is not the same as therapeutic doses), it is recommended that the dose be tapered over a period of weeks to several months when discontinuing an antidepressant.

    See also "Establish Follow-Up Plan" in Annotation #11 and Annotation #13: "Evaluate Dose, Duration, Type and Adherence with Medication and/or Psychotherapy. Reconsider Accuracy of Diagnosis and Impact of Comorbidities."

Definitions:

Evidence Grading System

  1. Primary Reports of New Data Collection

    Class A:

    • Randomized, controlled trial

    Class B:

    • Cohort study

    Class C:

    • Non-randomized trial with concurrent or historical controls
    • Case-control study
    • Study of sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test
    • Population-based descriptive study

    Class D:

    • Cross-sectional study
    • Case series
    • Case report
  1. Reports that Synthesize or Reflect upon Collections of Primary Reports

    Class M:

    • Meta-analysis
    • Systematic review
    • Decision analysis
    • Cost-effectiveness analysis

    Class R:

    • Consensus statement
    • Consensus report
    • Narrative review

    Class X:

    • Medical opinion

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is classified for selected recommendations (see "Major Recommendations").

BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS

POTENTIAL BENEFITS

  • Improved diagnosis of primary care patients with major depression
  • Effective treatment/management of patients with major depression
  • Reduced relapse and recurrence of major depression

POTENTIAL HARMS

Side Effects of Anti-depressant Medication

  • Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs), venlafaxine, duloxetine, mirtazapine and bupropion may cause headache, nervousness, insomnia, and sexual side effects and may be more expensive because some may not yet be available as generics. Care must be taken to remain with either brand name product or the same generic product.
  • Secondary amine tricyclics are used less frequently as first-line therapy because of associated side effects. These medications should be monitored cautiously in patients with heart problems, or in patients with potential for drug interactions. Monitoring blood levels and electrocardiogram may be advised.
  • Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) should be restricted for patients who do not respond to other treatments because of their potential for serious side effects and the necessity of dietary restrictions.
  • Lithium augmentation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors poses the risk of serotonin syndrome.
  • Many antidepressant agents have clinically significant drug interactions, particularly those agents which undergo cytochrome P450 enzymatic metabolism in the liver.
  • Tricyclic antidepressant (TCA)-SSRI combination should be given with caution as it increases TCA levels
  • Stimulant drugs augmentation of TCA-SSRI: cases of sudden death, stroke, and myocardial infarction have been reported in adults taking stimulant medication at usual doses for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Adults with serious structural cardiac abnormalities, cardiomyopathy, serious heart rhythm abnormalities, coronary artery disease or other serious cardiac problems should not be treated with stimulant medications.
  • Side effects of S-Adenosyl-L- methionine (SAM-e) include mild insomnia, lack of appetite, constipation, nausea, dry mouth, diaphoresis, dizziness, and nervousness. Increased anxiety and hypomania have been reported in patients with bipolar depression.

Subgroups Most Likely to Be Harmed

  • Elderly patients: Because of the potential for decreased renal and hepatic function, concomitant diseases and medications, the elderly are at higher risk of significant side effects or drug interactions with antidepressant medications. Tertiary amine tricyclics should generally be avoided in elderly patients because of the high incidence of orthostatic hypotension, sedation, cognitive problems, and cardiac effects with these agents.
  • Pregnant Women: There have been many case reports of perinatal syndromes with TCAs (e.g., jitteriness, irritability, bowel obstruction, urinary retention) as well as most SSRIs. Other studies have found an association between prenatal SSRI exposure and preterm delivery. In general, however, these reports have been limited to case reports and small case series. Use of SSRIs in late pregnancy may increase the risk of persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN).

    In 2006 the FDA issued a warning for paroxetine due to an increased risk for cardiovascular malformations, primarily ventricular and atrial septal defects, compared to other antidepressants. Only first-trimester exposure to paroxetine at doses greater than 25 mg a day was associated with a greater risk of cardiac malformations in one study. Women of child-bearing age on paroxetine should be advised of the potential risk and other treatment options should be considered. The risk to infants exposed to paroxetine ranged from 1.5% to 2% compared to 1% in control groups.

  • Nursing infants: Antidepressants may appear in breast milk in low concentrations. Because of the long half-life of these drugs and their metabolites, nursing infants may have measurable amounts in their plasma and tissues, such as the brain. Because these drugs affect neurotransmitter function in the developing central nervous system, it may not be possible to predict long-term neurodevelopmental effects. Use only when clearly needed and potential benefits outweigh the risks to the nursing infant. Sertraline may carry risk in some mothers as demonstrated in one case report of an excessively high infant sertraline level in one mother-infant pair. There was one case report of respiratory distress in an infant of a mother treated with doxepin, suggesting that this antidepressant should be avoided during lactation.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Use of client-constructed light therapy units is contraindicated.

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

  • These clinical guidelines are designed to assist clinicians by proving an analytical framework for the evaluation and treatment of patients, and are not intended either to replace a clinician's judgment or to establish a protocol for all patients with a particular condition. A guideline will rarely establish the only approach to a problem.
  • This clinical guideline should not be construed as medical advice or medical opinion related to any specific facts or circumstances. Patients are urged to consult a health care professional regarding their own situation and any specific medical questions they may have.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE

DESCRIPTION OF IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

Once a guideline is approved for general implementation, a medical group can choose to concentrate on the implementation of that guideline. When four or more groups choose the same guideline to implement and they wish to collaborate with others, they may form an action group.

In the action group, each medical group sets specific goals they plan to achieve in improving patient care based on the particular guideline(s). Each medical group shares its experiences and supporting measurement results within the action group. This sharing facilitates a collaborative learning environment. Action group learnings are also documented and shared with interested medical groups within the collaborative.

Currently, action groups may focus on one guideline or a set of guidelines such as hypertension, lipid treatment and tobacco cessation.

Detailed measurement strategies are presented in the original guideline document to help close the gap between clinical practice and the guideline recommendations. Summaries of the measures are provided in the National Quality Measures Clearinghouse (NQMC).

Key Implementation Recommendations

The following system changes were identified by the guideline work group and represent a collaborative care model as key strategies for health care delivery systems to incorporate in support of the implementation of this guideline.

  1. Detection and diagnosis
    • Systems in place to reliably determine if a patient is depressed
    • Use of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV TR) criteria and structured questionnaires (such as Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9])
  1. Patient-centered care, education and self-management programs
    • Structured attention to patient preferences
    • Patient and family education materials/protocols
    • Patient self-management skills such as journal writing or self-monitoring
    • Involving families as well in care management programs
    • Care manager role to coordinate the disease management for patients with depression including such things as patient contacts, education, self-management tools and tips
  1. Mental health/behavioral medicine specialist involvement
    • Shared care – collaborative care between behavioral health specialists and primary care providers in the primary care setting. Care manager and/or primary care provider consulting with psychiatry on a regular basis regarding the case load of patients with depression managed in the depression care management program
    • Appointment availability – access to behavioral health in timely manner
  1. Outcomes measurement
    • Build in plans for outcome measures as well as ongoing process measures
    • Response rate to various treatments
    • Remission rates – improvement in response is stable over time
  1. Systems to coordinate care, ensure continuity and keep providers informed of status
    • Build automated processes for the first four core elements wherever possible
    • Reduce dependence on human behavior to ensure delivery of patient care processes
    • Use of components of the chronic care model for depression care (e.g., use of registries, community outreach, etc)
    • Structured frequent monitoring and follow-up with patient
    • Nurse/care manager phone care and use of other modalities for patient follow-up

Many of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on costs of enhanced care and overall health care costs have shown a slight increase in costs to put the new care in place but then over time, in 2 to 4 years post implementation, there is an overall health care cost savings and an increase in patients reporting depression free days.

Most of these RCT studies resulted in an increase in productivity of the employees defined by employee present and effectively achieving good work results and a decrease in absenteeism defined by number of more hours per week at work.

IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS

RELATED NQMC MEASURES

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES

IOM CARE NEED

Getting Better
Living with Illness

IOM DOMAIN

Effectiveness
Patient-centeredness

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). Major depression in adults in primary care. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); May 2008. 84 p. [244 references]

ADAPTATION

Recommendations for the use of antidepressants during lactation were adapted from:

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Policy Statement, Transfer of Drugs and Other Chemicals Into Human Milk, Pediatrics 2001;108:776-789

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

1996 Jan (revised 2008 May)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement - Private Nonprofit Organization

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER COMMENT

Organizations participating in the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI): Affiliated Community Medical Centers, Allina Medical Clinic, Altru Health System, Aspen Medical Group, Avera Health, CentraCare, Columbia Park Medical Group, Community-University Health Care Center, Dakota Clinic, ENT Specialty Care, Fairview Health Services, Family HealthServices Minnesota, Family Practice Medical Center, Gateway Family Health Clinic, Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, Grand Itasca Clinic and Hospital, HealthEast Care System, HealthPartners Central Minnesota Clinics, HealthPartners Medical Group and Clinics, Hutchinson Area Health Care, Hutchinson Medical Center, Lakeview Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Mercy Hospital and Health Care Center, MeritCare, Mille Lacs Health System, Minnesota Gastroenterology, Montevideo Clinic, North Clinic, North Memorial Care System, North Suburban Family Physicians, Northwest Family Physicians, Olmsted Medical Center, Park Nicollet Health Services, Pilot City Health Center, Quello Clinic, Ridgeview Medical Center, River Falls Medical Clinic, Saint Mary's/Duluth Clinic Health System, St. Paul Heart Clinic, Sioux Valley Hospitals and Health System, Southside Community Health Services, Stillwater Medical Group, SuperiorHealth Medical Group, University of Minnesota Physicians, Winona Clinic, Ltd., Winona Health

ICSI, 8009 34th Avenue South, Suite 1200, Bloomington, MN 55425; telephone, (952) 814-7060; fax, (952) 858-9675; e-mail: icsi.info@icsi.org; Web site: www.icsi.org.

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

The following Minnesota health plans provide direct financial support: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, HealthPartners, Medica, Metropolitan Health Plan, PreferredOne and UCare Minnesota. In-kind support is provided by the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement's (ICSI) members.

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Committee on Evidence-Based Medicine

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Work Group Members: Mary Ellen Jaehne, LICSW (Work Group Leader) (Hamm Clinic) (Mental Health); Michael Trangle, MD (Work Group Leader) (HealthPartners/Regions Hospital) (Psychiatry); Craig Anderson, MD (SuperiorHealth Medical Group) (Family Medicine); Barbara Bank, MD (Fairview Health Services) (Family Medicine); Joel Haugen, MD (Dakota Clinic) (Family Medicine); Jay Mitchell, MD (Mayo Clinic) (Family Medicine); David Rossmiller, MD (Family HealthServices Minnesota) (Family Medicine; Bob Haight, PharmD, BCPP (Fairview Health Services) (Pharmacy); Cedric Skillon, MD (Park Nicollet Health Services) (Psychiatry); Amitabh Tipnis, MD (Hennepin County Medical Center) (Psychiatry); Jeffrey Boyd, PhD (Hennepin County Medical Center) (Psychology); Deb Rich, PhD (Fairview Health Services) (Psychology); Heidi Novak, WHNP (North Point Health & Wellness Center) (Women's Health OB/GYN); Nancy Jaeckels (Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement) (Measurement Advisor); Pam Pietruszewski, MA (Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement) (Facilitator)

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

ICSI has adopted a policy of transparency, disclosing potential conflict and competing interests of all individuals who participate in the development, revision and approval of ICSI documents (guidelines, order sets and protocols). This applies to all work groups (guidelines, order sets and protocols) and committees (Committee on Evidence-Based Practice, Cardiovascular Steering Committee, Women's Health Steering Committee, Preventive & Health Maintenance Steering Committee, Respiratory Steering Committee and the Patient Safety & Reliability Steering Committee).

Participants must disclose any potential conflict and competing interests they or their dependents (spouse, dependent children, or others claimed as dependents) may have with any organization with commercial, proprietary, or political interests relevant to the topics covered by ICSI documents. Such disclosures will be shared with all individuals who prepare, review and approve ICSI documents.

No work group members have potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). Major depression in adults in primary care. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); 2007 May. 87 p.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available from the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI) Web site.

Print copies: Available from ICSI, 8009 34th Avenue South, Suite 1200, Bloomington, MN 55425; telephone, (952) 814-7060; fax, (952) 858-9675; Web site: www.icsi.org; e-mail: icsi.info@icsi.org.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

Print copies: Available from ICSI, 8009 34th Avenue South, Suite 1200, Bloomington, MN 55425; telephone, (952) 814-7060; fax, (952) 858-9675; Web site: www.icsi.org; e-mail: icsi.info@icsi.org.

Additionally, the appendices to the original guideline document include the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (available in English and Spanish), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) as well as other resources.

PATIENT RESOURCES

The following is available:

Please note: This patient information is intended to provide health professionals with information to share with their patients to help them better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. By providing access to this patient information, it is not the intention of NGC to provide specific medical advice for particular patients. Rather we urge patients and their representatives to review this material and then to consult with a licensed health professional for evaluation of treatment options suitable for them as well as for diagnosis and answers to their personal medical questions. This patient information has been derived and prepared from a guideline for health care professionals included on NGC by the authors or publishers of that original guideline. The patient information is not reviewed by NGC to establish whether or not it accurately reflects the original guideline's content.

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on April 30, 1999. The information was verified by the guideline developer as of April 30, 1999. This summary was updated on December 4, 2002. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on December 24, 2002. This summary was updated again on August 17, 2004. This summary was updated by ECRI on August 15, 2005, following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory on antidepressant medications. This summary was updated by ECRI on October 3, 2005, following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory on Paxil (paroxetine). This summary was updated by ECRI on December 12, 2005, following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory on Paroxetine HCL - Paxil and generic paroxetine. This summary was updated by ECRI on June 13, 2006. This summary was updated by ECRI on November 22, 2006, following the FDA advisory on Effexor (venlafaxine HCl). This NGC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on July 6, 2007. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on September 13, 2007. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on November 9, 2007, following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory on Antidepressant drugs. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on January 10, 2008, following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory on Carbamazepine. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on July 18, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary (abstracted Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement [ICSI] Guideline) is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

The abstracted ICSI Guidelines contained in this Web site may be downloaded by any individual or organization. If the abstracted ICSI Guidelines are downloaded by an individual, the individual may not distribute copies to third parties.

If the abstracted ICSI Guidelines are downloaded by an organization, copies may be distributed to the organization's employees but may not be distributed outside of the organization without the prior written consent of the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Inc.

All other copyright rights in the abstracted ICSI Guidelines are reserved by the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Inc. The Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Inc. assumes no liability for any adaptations or revisions or modifications made to the abstracts of the ICSI Guidelines.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo