Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Complete Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV).

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • New York State Department of Health. Lymphogranuloma venereum (LVG). New York (NY): New York State Department of Health; 2007 Aug. 11 p. [2 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

COMPLETE SUMMARY CONTENT

 
SCOPE
 METHODOLOGY - including Rating Scheme and Cost Analysis
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE
 INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

SCOPE

DISEASE/CONDITION(S)

  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV)

GUIDELINE CATEGORY

Diagnosis
Management
Treatment

CLINICAL SPECIALTY

Allergy and Immunology
Family Practice
Infectious Diseases
Internal Medicine

INTENDED USERS

Advanced Practice Nurses
Nurses
Physician Assistants
Physicians

GUIDELINE OBJECTIVE(S)

To provide guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of lymphogranuloma in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients

TARGET POPULATION

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV)

INTERVENTIONS AND PRACTICES CONSIDERED

Diagnosis

  1. Physical examination and assessment of signs and symptoms
  2. Serologic testing for chlamydia

Management/Treatment

  1. Antibiotic treatment, including doxycycline or other tetracyclines, erythromycin
  2. Aspiration or incision and drainage for inguinal lymphadenopathy
  3. Management of partners including partner notification and management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) exposure and lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) exposure

MAJOR OUTCOMES CONSIDERED

Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests

METHODOLOGY

METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT EVIDENCE

Hand-searches of Published Literature (Primary Sources)
Hand-searches of Published Literature (Secondary Sources)
Searches of Electronic Databases

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT THE EVIDENCE

Not stated

NUMBER OF SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Not stated

METHODS USED TO ASSESS THE QUALITY AND STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Expert Consensus (Committee)

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Not applicable

METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Review

DESCRIPTION OF THE METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Not stated

METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Expert Consensus

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

AIDS Institute clinical guidelines are developed by distinguished committees of clinicians and others with extensive experience providing care to people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Committees* meet regularly to assess current recommendations and to write and update guidelines in accordance with newly emerging clinical and research developments.

The Committees rely on evidence to the extent possible in formulating recommendations. When data from randomized clinical trials are not available, Committees rely on developing guidelines based on consensus, balancing the use of new information with sound clinical judgment that results in recommendations that are in the best interest of patients.

Current committees include:

  • Medical Care Criteria Committee
  • Committee for the Care of Children and Adolescents with HIV Infection
  • Dental Standards of Care Committee
  • Mental Health Committee
  • Women's Health Committee
  • Substance Use Committee
  • Physician's Prevention Advisory Committee
  • Pharmacy Committee

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Not applicable

COST ANALYSIS

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

External Peer Review

DESCRIPTION OF METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

All guidelines developed by the Committee are externally peer reviewed by at least two experts in that particular area of patient care, which ensures depth and quality of the guidelines.

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Presentation

Clinicians should include lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) as part of the differential diagnosis of genital ulcer disease, inguinal lymphadenopathy, or proctocolitis, especially in men who have sex with men.

Diagnosis

Clinicians should diagnose LGV through the presence of consistent clinical findings, such as inguinal lymphadenopathy and erosive proctocolitis, as well as the absence of other definable pathologies.

Treatment

Doxycycline (100 mg orally [PO] twice daily [bid]) for 21 days is the preferred treatment regimen for LGV.

Treatment should not await LGV serovar determination, even in the context of clinicians electing to investigate LGV-specific genotyping.

Management of Partners

Clinicians should consider both the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) exposure and the sexually transmitted infection (STI) exposure to partners when HIV-infected patients present with a new STI. Clinicians should also assess for the presence of other STIs.

Management of HIV Exposure

When HIV-infected patients present with a new STI, clinicians should encourage their partner(s) to undergo HIV testing at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. In New York State, if the test result is positive, a Western blot assay must be performed to confirm diagnosis of HIV infection.

Clinicians should be vigilant for any post-exposure acute febrile illness accompanied by rash, lymphadenopathy, myalgias, and/or sore throat. If the partner presents with signs or symptoms of acute HIV seroconversion, a quantitative ribonucleic acid polymerase chain reaction (RNA PCR) should be obtained, and consultation with an HIV Specialist should be sought. Positive RNA tests should be confirmed with HIV antibody testing performed within 6 weeks of the RNA test.

Clinicians should offer assistance with partner notification if needed.

Management of LGV Exposure

Clinicians should encourage partners of patients with LGV whose exposure occurred within 60 days prior to symptom onset to be examined and treated with a full 21-day course of doxycycline.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is not specifically stated for each recommendation.

BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS

POTENTIAL BENEFITS

Appropriate diagnosis and management of lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients

POTENTIAL HARMS

Erythromycin is associated with gastrointestinal upset.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE

DESCRIPTION OF IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

The AIDS Institute's Office of the Medical Director directly oversees the development, publication, dissemination and implementation of clinical practice guidelines, in collaboration with The Johns Hopkins University, Division of Infectious Diseases. These guidelines address the medical management of adults, adolescents and children with HIV infection; primary and secondary prevention in medical settings; and include informational brochures for care providers and the public.

The HIV Clinical Guidelines Program works with other programs in the AIDS Institute to promote adoption of guidelines. Clinicians, for example, are targeted through the Clinical Education Initiative (CEI) and the AIDS Education and Training Centers (AETC). The CEI provides tailored educational programming on site for health care providers on important topics in HIV care, including those addressed by the HIV Clinical Guidelines Program. The AETC provides conferences, grand rounds and other programs that cover topics contained in AIDS Institute guidelines.

Support service providers are targeted through the HIV Education and Training initiative which provides training on important HIV topics to non-physician health and human services providers. Education is carried out across the State as well as through video conferencing and audio conferencing.

The HIV Clinical Guidelines Program also works in a coordinated manner with the HIV Quality of Care Program to promote implementation of HIV guidelines in New York State. By developing quality indicators based on the guidelines, the AIDS Institute has created a mechanism for measurement of performance that allows providers and consumers to know to what extent specific guidelines have been implemented.

Finally, best practices booklets are developed through the HIV Clinical Guidelines Program. These contain practical solutions to common problems related to access, delivery or coordination of care, in an effort to ensure that HIV guidelines are implemented and that patients receive the highest level of HIV care possible.

IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS

Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) Downloads
Resources

For information about availability, see the "Availability of Companion Documents" and "Patient Resources" fields below.

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES

IOM CARE NEED

Getting Better
Living with Illness

IOM DOMAIN

Effectiveness

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • New York State Department of Health. Lymphogranuloma venereum (LVG). New York (NY): New York State Department of Health; 2007 Aug. 11 p. [2 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2007 Aug

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

New York State Department of Health - State/Local Government Agency [U.S.]

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

New York State Department of Health

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Not stated

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Not stated

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on October 12, 2007.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo