Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Complete Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Prevention of progression of kidney disease: dietary protein restriction.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Harris D, Thomas M, Johnson D, Nicholls K, Gillin A. Prevention of progression of kidney disease. Westmead NSW (Australia): CARI - Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment; 2006 Apr. 16 p. [46 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

COMPLETE SUMMARY CONTENT

 
SCOPE
 METHODOLOGY - including Rating Scheme and Cost Analysis
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE
 INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

SCOPE

DISEASE/CONDITION(S)

  • Chronic kidney disease (CKD)
  • Renal failure

GUIDELINE CATEGORY

Assessment of Therapeutic Effectiveness
Management
Prevention
Treatment

CLINICAL SPECIALTY

Family Practice
Internal Medicine
Nephrology
Nutrition
Pediatrics

INTENDED USERS

Dietitians
Physicians

GUIDELINE OBJECTIVE(S)

To evaluate the available clinical evidence pertaining to the effect of protein-restricted diets on the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD)

TARGET POPULATION

Adults and children with chronic kidney disease (CKD)

INTERVENTIONS AND PRACTICES CONSIDERED

Dietary protein restriction

MAJOR OUTCOMES CONSIDERED

  • Glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
  • Progression of chronic kidney disease
  • Effect of restricted protein diets on nutrition

METHODOLOGY

METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT EVIDENCE

Searches of Electronic Databases

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT THE EVIDENCE

Databases Searched: Medline (1999 to November Week 2, 2003). Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms for kidney diseases were combined with MeSH terms and text words for dietary protein restriction. The results were then combined with the Cochrane highly sensitive search strategy for randomised controlled trials and MeSH terms and text words for identifying meta-analyses and systematic reviews. The Cochrane Renal Group Specialised Register of Randomised Controlled Trials was also searched for relevant trials not indexed by Medline.

Date Searched: 16 December 2003

NUMBER OF SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Not stated

METHODS USED TO ASSESS THE QUALITY AND STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Levels of Evidence

Level I: Evidence obtained from a systematic review of all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs)

Level II: Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed RCT

Level III: Evidence obtained from well-designed pseudo-randomized controlled trials (alternate allocation or some other method); comparative studies with concurrent controls and allocation not randomized, cohort studies, case-control studies, interrupted time series with a control group; comparative studies with historical control, two or more single arm studies, interrupted time series without a parallel control group

Level IV: Evidence obtained from case series, either post-test or pretest/post-test

METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Review of Published Meta-Analyses
Systematic Review with Evidence Tables

DESCRIPTION OF THE METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Not stated

METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Expert Consensus

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Not stated

COST ANALYSIS

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

Comparison with Guidelines from Other Groups
Peer Review

DESCRIPTION OF METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

Recommendations of Others. Recommendations regarding dietary protein restriction for prevention of progression of kidney disease from the following groups were discussed: Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative, British Dietetic Association Renal Nutrition Group, European Dialysis and Transplant Nurses Association – European Renal Care Association, and European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Definitions for the levels of evidence (I–IV) can be found at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

  1. A protein-controlled diet consisting of 0.75 to 1.0 g/kg/day, is recommended for adults with chronic renal disease (CKD). The administration of a low protein diet (<0.6 g/kg/day) to slow renal failure progression is not justified when the reported clinically modest benefit on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline is weighed against the concomitant significant declines in clinical and biochemical parameters of nutrition. (Level I evidence)
  2. For children, reduction of dietary protein intake to the lowest safe amounts recommended by the World Health Organisation (0.8 to 1.1 g/kg/day depending on age) has not been shown in a small randomised controlled trial (RCT) to decrease the progression of CKD and is therefore not currently recommended. (Level II evidence)

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence

Level I: Evidence obtained from a systematic review of all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs)

Level II: Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed RCT

Level III: Evidence obtained from well-designed pseudo-randomized controlled trials (alternate allocation or some other method); comparative studies with concurrent controls and allocation not randomized, cohort studies, case-control studies, interrupted time series with a control group; comparative studies with historical control, two or more single arm studies, interrupted time series without a parallel control group

Level IV: Evidence obtained from case series, either post-test or pretest/post-test

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS

POTENTIAL BENEFITS

Appropriate use of dietary protein restriction for the prevention of progression of chronic kidney disease

POTENTIAL HARMS

Low or restricted protein diets may have an adverse effect on clinical and biochemical parameters of nutrition.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE

DESCRIPTION OF IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

An implementation strategy was not provided.

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES

IOM CARE NEED

Living with Illness

IOM DOMAIN

Effectiveness

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Harris D, Thomas M, Johnson D, Nicholls K, Gillin A. Prevention of progression of kidney disease. Westmead NSW (Australia): CARI - Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment; 2006 Apr. 16 p. [46 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2006 Apr

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment - Disease Specific Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Not stated

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Not stated

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

David Harris, Convenor (Westmead, New South Wales); Merlin Thomas (Prahran, Victoria); David Johnson (Woolloongabba, Queensland); Kathy Nicholls (Parkville, Victoria); Adrian Gillin (Camperdown, New South Wales)

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All guideline writers are required to fill out a declaration of conflict of interest.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on July 27, 2007.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo