Reader comments: Huntsman ready to revisit sales tax on services
253 comments | Read story
I am not sure about the $2.30 increase of the $0.70 tax on smokes. If the only reason to raise it is to kill the tax on food, I say leave it alone.
Just what we need to do is increase taxes on buying a house, going to the doctor, designing a house, or having the lawn mowed. Would you add baby sitters to the sales tax list?
Just another mad man in office
I would be ashamed to put my name on this one
I hope he does not run for a third term.
Taxes on all levels are far exceeding many peoples' ability to pay them.
Government needs to stop spending like drunken sailors, and live within a set budget. We, the people do. So should Government. NO NEW TAXES!!!
Get over yourselves. He's doing a good job at trying to fairly balance the budget. I agree that government spends too much...that's practically a given. At least he's trying to actually have the money to spend as opposed to running up a huge deficit to leave on the shoulders of the next governor. At least he realizes it and he's throwing out a legitimate idea of how to cover the shortfall.
If you're going to criticize, go right ahead...but at least have the intestinal fortitude to propose a different solution instead of firing holes in the propositions given by others.
Governor Huntsman is a fine leader. If you take two seconds to read the article, you'll notice that he's CONSIDERING the taxation of services (i.e. it's not a definite thing; i.e. he's open to other approaches; i.e. he's not a nutcase).
I agree that taxation of services has its negatives. I think we should raise the tobacco tax; this will increase revenues, possibly decrease smoking (a nasty habit), and possibly decrease health-related costs of smoking.
We should keep in a mind a simple fact. Huntsman has done something that almost no one thought possible. He has spent more money, more rapidly than even Mike Leavitt. If you go back to the 1960's Huntsman has grown government at an amazingly fast rate. In fact, he has spent money more rapidly than even George Bush and his massive debts. Huntsman is another neo-con, big government Republican.
And now he needs to find a new source for his spending.
The small tax is horrible! It will be measured not just in the amount of the next tax but the time for filing it, enforcement, etc. And it is 1.2% now, wait until it is raised by a future neo-con Governor.
Since Huntsman has already stated he is not running in 2012 he is not worried about the voter. He has already auditioned for the Obama administration through extreme environmentalism and is likely doing it again. He realizes the legislature will not pass a tax increase but is now publicly on record as saying he supports tax increases. This is a must-have in order to work in a Democratic Administration.
As for the severe Tobacco tax, call it what it is: a tax on the poor. In general smokers tend to be lower on the income ladder, so this is a very regressive tax. Maybe we should go after other minorities, like a special tax on Spanish language media, or let's tax people who drive older cars. We could come up with all sorts of mean-spirited taxes that punish minority groups who can't afford it.
As 'A LAWYER' said, he will raise his fees and the consumer will pay in the end. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure that out. When will the public wake up?
Huntsman is a democrat posing as a republican. When will be people stop voting for people just because they claim to be a republican and have a famous name?
Wouldn't it be nice if they were by law forced to make do with what we already give them in so many taxable ways and quit trying to think of other ways to get into our pockets.
Admittedly, alcohol "destroys families, income, and kills.", but in only fairly rare circumstances. The vast majority of gentiles can use it responsibly. This is one of the falacies that you've learned form being sheltered from reality too long. Adults can and will act responsibly if given the opportunity.
How about this: we increase the 'sin' taxes, but include a few other things as sins:
A tax on the great and evil sins of ice cream, Mcdonalds, funeral potatoes, partially hydrogenated oil, pink creamy jello with nuts, soda and movie pop corn. They are all really bad for you and extract a health premium on society. And you can now (hopefully) see the slippery slope. Think it's not possible? Well, it's happening in New York, Chicago and dozens of other places as we speak.
Thanks
Bad Housing Market -> Raise Taxes to increase cost to construct homes?
This guy is just trying to make up for their tax recodification screw up.
P.S. Can we see more talk about ideas and alternatives regarding this topic rather than critical moral banter? Let's try to focus here.
I understand you're in a tight spot with the current state of the economy; however, taxing professional services is only going to hurt the economy and all the professionals that are in service oriented careers. Adding extra fees and taxes to an individual for using a professional will only discourage people from using professionals. This in turn will only move the economy in the wrong direction.
If you really want to stimulate the economy, cut the state income taxes. I'm getting ready to send in my 4th quarter taxes, if I didn't have to send in so much dang money in taxes, I would go buy a new GM or Ford car; but, unfortunately, I have to send it to government to spend on bailing out banks rather than helping the car dealership make some money.
I beg you to please not raise taxes, please, please, please. Talk to the professionals from the fields you plan on whom you plan on raising the taxes and fees, I promise they'll tell you that it will just hurt them even more.
Thanks for your time & consideration.
to now create a "new" tax would drive the, already wary and petrified Utah buyers, completely away
we cannot afford to burden an already burdened industry without some serious negative impact
please find some other way to get the revenue ot better still, find a way to improve government so it will no longer need to the revenues!!
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
- Actor Freeman foots prom bill 6:10 p.m.
- Thousands gather for Utes 5:50 p.m.
- Man sentenced for child porn 5:38 p.m.
- LDS leaders to attend inauguration 5:34 p.m.
- Kennecott cuts 10% in Utah 3:29 p.m.
- Cost of living drops slightly 3:26 p.m.
- Honoring MLK with service 3:09 p.m.
- Charge in treasurer's race probe 3:08 p.m.
- Former Layton doc strikes deal 3:04 p.m.
- Wall Street rebounds 3:03 p.m.
- Service sales tax revisited253
- Letter: Don't legalize polygamy218
- Pulse of a (Cougar) nation183
- Hanks: Mormons 'un-American'153
- Man accidentally shoots toilet149
- Letter: Palin was persecuted127
- SLC cops Taser 14-year-old boy120
- Utes on parade111
- Brown's anti-Prop. 8 argument92
- U.'s Kruger will enter draft85
Congrats Waddoups for his support of the U. Maybe you can back off your nefarious…
Now I know where Mitt Romney learned his "then & now" political plays. Maybe…
When I hear the word's from a liberal "Dramatic action" means to them for the middleclass…
re John Pack Lambert 5:29pm please explain how "the Holy Ghost" provides testimony…
Can we please stop comparing the gay marriage issue to slavery? It's insulting.…
To the guy that said "Kyle would rather beat BYU than work for them..." If I'm correct…
A bogus call by the refs to win against OSU, let me miss a few field goals by TCU…
Dear Mr. President Bush, I am not better off since you have been in office. My nation…
To: 'Great Speaker...best out of the G.A's at speaking?": Oh I think Elder Holland…
Be careful, Larry, you liberals vote in "mindless blocks," too. How many black…
While I am in favor of taxing all activity on an equal basis, if this tax is implemented it will follow the same kind of pattern other taxes have had.
There will be a complicated formula for figuring out which services will be exempt and for those not exempt, what the rate will be for each kind of service. Lots of lobbying efforts will be spent to convince the state legislature to grant special status to certain kinds of services.
So instead of a flat 5% tax on all services, we will get a 10% tax on "luxury services" and a 2% tax on "essential services" and a bunch of other rates in between. Then the counties, cities, water districts, and other taxing entities will want a cut.
More laws will have to be passed for enforcement, fines set up for those who fail to comply, and lots of regulations set up.
In the end it will add another layer of bureaucratic paperwork on our society and be another bale of straw on the camel's back (i.e. productive companies and citizens).