Ironworkers, OSHA Agree: Change Penalty and Save Firm (Taken From "Impact on Construction Safety and Health", Volume XV, Number 2, September 1997, A Joint Publication of the Building & Construction Trades Department and CPWR – Center for Construction Research and Training)

Instead, the union asked OSHA to reconsider the penalty and address a safer worksite for the workers. OSHA (the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration) and the contractor agreed. The fine was cut to $200,000 and Saugus now has a major 5-year safety program. The company is spending about $90,000 yearly on employing an independent safety inspector and on equipment and training. While many OSHA fines are cut by half or more, this settlement ensured a full-scale fall-protection program.

Having a "monetary penalty is important," said Stephen Cooper, executive director, safety and health, for the ironworkers' union. "But safety and health improvement at the workplace comes first."

Cooper and others have asked OSHA to use a similar approach to other safety violations, if a contractor agrees.

Until Saugus was cited for "failing to provide fall protection," the company had never been cited by OSHA. Egregious violations — there were 6 in the US that year — are usually for multiple "willful" violations. And, compared with non-union firms, the Saugus fine looked out of line.



This document appears in the eLCOSH website with the permission of the author and/or copyright holder and may not be reproduced without their consent. eLCOSH is an information clearinghouse. eLCOSH and its sponsors are not responsible for the accuracy of information provided on this web site, nor for its use or misuse.

eLCOSH | CDC | NIOSH | Site Map | Search | Links | Help | Contact Us | Privacy Policy