CDC logoSafer Healthier People  CDC HomeCDC SearchCDC Health Topics A-Z
NIOSH - National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

NIOSH Docket Number 100:

Explosion Pressure Design Criteria for New Seals in U.S. Coal Mines

 

Seals are dam-like structures constructed in underground coal mines throughout the U.S. to isolate abandoned mining panels or groups of panels from the active workings. Historically, mining regulations required seals to withstand a 140 kPa (20 psi) explosion pressure; however, the 2006 MINER Act requires MSHA to increase this design standard by the end of 2007. This report provides a sound scientific and engineering justification to recommend a three-tiered explosion pressure design criteria for new seals in coal mines in response to the MINER Act. Much of the information contained in this report also applies to existing seals.

The free Adobe Acrobat Reader is needed to view these files. get acrobat reader


Materials Under Evaluation
Draft NIOSH document, “Explosion Pressure Design Criteria for New Seals in U.S. Coal Mines” by R. Karl Zipf, PhD, Michael J. Sapko, M.Sc., and Jürgen F. Brune, PhD (127 pages, 24,880kb)
Notice of public input opportunity; 72 FR 10765; 03/09/07 (1 page, 509kb)
Submissions from the Public in Order of Receipt
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Baer (Sandia National Laboratories) – 2/1/07 (2 pages, 44kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Kuhl (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) –2/1/07 (2 pages, 656kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Arguello (Sandia National Laboratories) – 2/2/07 (2 pages, 42kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Hermuelheim (Deutsche Steinkohle) – 2/13/07 (2 pages, 951kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Denning (MSHA Coal Mine Safety and Health District 9) – 2/13/07 (1 pages, 23kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Tasillo (MSHA Technical Support) – 2/13/07 (3 pages, 1,030kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Wala (University of Kentucky) – 2/15/07 (1 page, 675kb)

Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from McNider (Jim Walter Resources) – 2/16/07 (3 pages, 1,240kb)

Submission to NIOSH Docket Office from Worthington (Sick Maihak) – 2/22/07 (17 pages, 3,430kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Hansen (GexCon AS) – 2/27/07 (2 pages, 1,040kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Heuze (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory – 2/28/07 (13 pages, 314kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Sherer (MSHA Coal Mine Safety and Health – 2/28/07 (82 pages, 50,310kb)
Submission to NIOSH Docket Office from Campoli (Minova USA, Inc.) – 03/06/07 (1 page, 47kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Schiefelbein (AngloCoal) – 03/06/07 (1 page, 414kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Lyne (Queensland Mines Inspectorate, Australia) – 03/08/07 (10 pages, 2,380kb)
Submission to NIOSH Docket Office from Lusk (University of Kentucky) – 03/08/07 (4 pages, 200kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Harvey (AngloCoal) – 03/09/07 (2 pages, 973kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Conaway (Arch Coal, Inc.) – 03/10/07 (2 pages, 59kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Grayson (University of Missouri) – 3/11/07 (5 pages, 2,660kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Dyduch (Central Mining Research Institute) – 03/12/07 (3 pages, 1,340kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Bessinger (San Juan Coal Company) – 03/12/07 (6 pages, 142kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Gillies (The Mineserve Group) – 03/13/07 (6 pages, 2,910kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Beerbower (Peabody Energy Co.) – 03/13/07 (16 pages, 4,810kb)
Submission to Guturnca (NIOSH) from Skiles (MSHA Technical Support) – 03/13/07 (19 pages, 9,120kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Spearing (Excel Mining Systems, Inc.) – 03/14/07 (3 pages, 1,080kb)
Submission to NIOSH Docket Office from Watzman (National Mining Association) – 03/14/07 (61 pages, 26,230kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Esterhuizen (NIOSH/PRL) – 03/16/07 (83 pages, 3,810kb)
Submission to Zipf (NIOSH) from Barbee (International Union of Operating Engineers) – 03/26/07 (5 pages, 1,270kb)
Submission to NIOSH Docket Office from Baker (United Mine Workers of America) – 04/18/07 (4 pages, 2,310kb)
Submission to ZIpf (NIOSH) from Wieland (Uncertainty Ink) – 04/24/07 (3 pages, 743kb)
Compilation of reviews and responses to the reviews from Karl Zipf (NIOSH) – 05/01/07 (146 pages, 5,190kb)
Final NIOSH document, “Explosion Pressure Design Criteria for New Seals in U.S. Coal Mines” by R. Karl Zipf, PhD, Michael J. Sapko, M.Sc., and Jürgen F. Brune, PhD; 05/25/07 (91 pages, 8,415kb)

 

The NIOSH Docket