New Rules home
Agriculture
Electricity
Environment
Equity
Finance
Governance
Information
Retail
Taxation

The New Rules Project - Designing Rules As If Community Matters

Washington D.C. Anti-Privatization Law

Efforts to privatize government services in cities do not always save the city money, and can put municipal workers out of a job, often to be replaced with non-unionized workers or workers from out of town. In 1993, the District of Columbia passed an anti-privatization law. The law states that before a government service can be contracted out, the government must show it would save at least 10 percent of existing costs over the contract's duration. The private contractor must offer displaced employees comparable employment for six months at the prevailing wage. The city must also offer employees the chance to bid to do the work themselves. These stringent requirements have curbed privatization efforts in D.C. since passage of the law. Departing chief procurement officer, Elliot B. Branch says that in his tenure, he has submitted for council approval just one privatization contract, for ready-to-eat meals in D.C. public school cafeterias.

More:

  • Washington, DC Home Page
  • Council of the District of Columbia Home Page
  • Reclaim Democracy! - is dedicated to restoring democratic authority over corporations, reviving grassroots democracy, and revoking the power of money and corporations to control government and civic society.
  • Program on Corporations, Law, and Democracy - activists who have spent the last several years researching corporate, labor and legal histories, rethinking our past organizing strategies and talking with people about democracy movements.
  • The Corporations & Democracy Program of the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF) - direct and indirect support for grassroots efforts that attempt to reassert citizen sovereignty over the corporation. Specifically, CELDF attempts to support regional efforts to use corporate charter revocation statutes to convince state Attorneys General to prosecute corporations that have a consistent history of violating local, state, and federal environmental law. Another important part of the Program is assisting community groups and local governments with drafting local laws which assert democratic control over corporations.
  • Alliance for Democracy - a progressive populist movement setting forth to end the domination of our economy, our government, our culture, our media and the environment by large corporations.

COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NOTICE

D.C. LAW 10-79

"Privatization Procurement and Contract

Procedures Amendment Act of 1993".

Pursuant to Section 412 of the District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act, P. L. 93-198, "the Act", the Council of the District of Columbia adopted Bill No. 10-285 on first, amended first and second readings, September 21, 1993, October 5, 1993 and November 2, 1993, respectively. On November 19, 19P3, Rill No. 10-285 was vetoed by the Mayor. The Council overrode the Mayor's veto on December 7, 1993. As a result of the Council's override, Bill No. 10-285 was re-enacted and assigned Act No. 10-153. The Act was published in the December 24 1993, edition of the D.C. Register, (Vol. 40 page 8696) and transmitted to Congress on December 17, 1993 for a 30-day review, in accordance with Section 602(c)(l) of the Act.

The Council of the District of Columbia hereby gives notice that the 30-day Congressional Review Period has expired, and therefore, cites this enactment as D.C. Law 10-79, effective March 19, 1994.

(Signed)

DAVID A. CLARKE

Chairman of the Council

AN ACT

D.C. ACT 10-153

IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DECEMBER 7, 1993

To amend the District of Columbia Procurement Practices Act of 1985 and the Nursing Home and Community Residence Facility Residents' Protection Act of 1985 to establish policies and procedures for any contract, including any lease or other agreement for privatization or contracting-out, with the private sector to provide goods or services to or on behalf of the District of Columbia that currently are provided by employees, departments, or agencies of the District government.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,

That this act may be cited as the "Privatization Procurement and Contract Procedures Amendment Act of 1993"

Sec. 2. The District of Columbia Procurement Practices Act of 1985, effective February 21, 1986 (D.C. Law 6-85; D.C. Code § 1-1181.1 et seq.), is amended as follows:

(a) Section 104 (a) (D.C. Code § 1-1181.4(a)) is amended as follows:

      1. By striking the word "Nothing" and inserting in its place the phrase "Except as provided in this subsection, nothing"; and
      2. By adding at the end of the subsection the following sentence to read as follows:
        "Any contract, including a lease or other agreement, or any contracting policies and procedures relating to such contracts, to provide goods and services to or on behalf of the District government that currently are provided by employees, agencies, or branches of the District government shall comply with the privatization contracts and procedures requirements of section 105b."

(b) A new section 105b is added to read as follows:".

"Sec. 105b. Privatization contracts and procedures requirements.

"(a) Any contract, including a lease or other agreement, or any contracting policies and procedures relating to such contracts, to provide goods and services to or on behalf of the District government that currently are provided by employees, departments, or agencies of the District government shall provide that:

"(1) A cost analysis comparing the in-house costs of providing the service with the costs associated with contracting for the service shall be completed for each contract proposed pursuant to this section;

"(2) Contracting out will provide savings over the duration of the contract of at least 10%;

"(3) Any contractor who is awarded a contract that displaces District government employees shall offer comparable employment to the displaced employees at rates of wages and benefits comparable to the wages and benefits paid to District government employees;

"(4) Any solicitation for proposed contracts issued pursuant to this section shall include information concerning the procedure by which current District government employees msy exercise the right to bid on the contracts;

"(5) An assessment of the economic impact on the District shall be completed for each contract proposed pursuant to this section;

"(6) Prior notification shall be provided to affected District government employees 6 months prior to any adverse impact on the employees or on the date the contract is signed, whichever is sooner; and

"(7) For these contracts which provide services essential to the health or safety of District residents, a determination and findings that the contracting out will not adversely affect the recipients.

"(b) The Mayor shall submit to the Council the cost analysis comparing the in-house costs of providing goods and services with the costs associated with any contract for goods and services for any contract described in subsection (a)(l) of this section made by any agency of the District government which is subordinate to the Mayor.

"(c) The Mayor shall submit to the Council any assessment of the economic impact an the District made pursuant to subsection (a)(5) of this section.

"(d) Prior to the award of any contract, and unless otherwise prohibited by statute or the District Charter, the Mayor, and all independent agencies and entities of the District government, shall submit to the Council any contract, including a lease or other agreement, or any other contracting policies and procedures relating to such contracts, to provide goods and services to or on behalf of the District that currently are provided by employees, departments, or agencies of the District government for a 45-day review period, during which the Council may approve or disapprove the contract. If the Council takes no action during the 45-day review period, the contract will be deemed approved.

"(e) No cost analysis or economic impact assessment shall be submitted to the Council under this section during any time that the Council is on recess, according to its rules, nor shall any time period provided In this section or in the Council' rules continue to run during s II any time that the Council is on recess.

Sec. 3. The Nursing Home and Community Residence Facility Residents' Protection Act of 1985, effective February 24, 1986 (D.C. Law 6-108; D.C. Code O 32-1401 et seq.), is amended by adding a new section 501a to read as follows:

"Sec. 501a. Privatization contracts, leases, provider agreements, and procedures requirements.

"(a) Any contract, lease, or provider agreement relative to any facility covered by this act, or any policies or procedures relating to such contracts, leases, or provider agreements, to provide goods and services to or on behalf of the District of Columbia that currently are provided by employees, departments, or agencies of the District of Columbia shall provide that:

"(1) A cost analysis comparing the in-house costs of providing the service with the costs associated with contracting for the service shall be completed for each contract proposed pursuant to this section;

"(2) Contracting out will provide savings over the duration of the contract of at least 10%;

"(3) Any contractor who is awarded B contract that displaces District government employees shall offer comparable employment to the displaced employees at rates of wages and benefits comparable to the wages and benefits paid to District government employees;

"(4) Any solicitation for proposed contracts issued pursuant to this section shall include information concerning the procedure by which current District government employees may exercise the right to bid on the contracts;

"(5) An assessment of the economic impact on the District shall be completed for each contract proposed pursuant to this section;

"(6) Prior notification shall be provided to affected District government employees 6 months prior to any adverse impact on the or on the date the contract is signed, whichever is sooner; employees and

"(7) For those contracts which provide services essential to the health or safety of District residents, a determination and findings that the contracting out will not adversely affect the recipients.

"(b) The Mayor shall submit to the Council the cast analysis comparing the in-house costs of providing goods and services with the costs associated with any contract for goods and services for any contract described in subsection (a)(l) of this section made by any agency of the District government which is subordinate to the Mayor.

"(c) The Mayor shall submit to the Council any assessment of the economic impact on the District of Columbia for any contract that is described in subsection (a)(5) of this section made by any agency which is subordinate to the Mayor.

"(d) Prior to the award of any contract, and unless otherwise prohibited by statute or the District Charter, the Mayor, and all independent agencies and entities of the District government, shall submit to the Council any contract, including a lease or other agreement, or any other contracting policies and procedures relating to such contracts, to provide goods and services to or on behalf of the District that currently are provided by employees, departments, or agencies of the District government for a 45-day review period, during which the Council may approve or disapprove the contract. If the Council takes no action during the 45-day review period, the contract will be deemed approved.

"(e) No cost analysis or economic impact assessment shall be submitted to the Council under this section during any time that the Council is on recess, according to its rules, nor shall any time period provided in this section or in the Council's rules continue to run during any time that the Council is on recess.

Sec. 4. (a) The District of Columbia Village Expenditure Prohibition Emergency Act of 1993, Council override of Mayoral veto July 13, 1993 (D.C. Act 10-45; 40 DCR 5444), is repealed.

(b) The District of Columbia Expenditure Prohibition Temporary Act of 1993, Council override of Mayoral veto July 21, 1993 (D.C. Act 10-60; 40 DCR 5506), is repealed.

Sec. 5. This act shall take effect after a 30-day period of Congressional review following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, section by the Council of the District of Columbia to override the veto) as provided in section 602(c)(l) of the District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Code § 1-233(c)(1)), and publication in either the District at Columbia Register, the District of Columbia Statutes-at-Large, or the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations.

(Signed)

Chairman

Council of the District of Columbia

Mayor

District of Columbia

November 19, 1993

COUNCIL OVERRIDE, 12-7-93

COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Council Period

RECORD OF OFFICIAL COUNCIL VOTE

DOCKET NO: Bill 10-285

Search the site


What's New - by date

Local Rules

Banning Water Withdrawal by Corporations

Campaign Finance Reform

Regional Governance

Initiative and Referendum

Proportional Representation

Town Meetings

Unified Development Budgets

Civil Rights Protection

Municipal Employee Residency Requirements

Devolution and Preemption

Privatization Procedures

Anti-Piracy Ordinances

Corporate Accountability

Purchasing Preferences

State Rules

Campaign Finance Reform

Initiative and Referendum

Proportional Representation

Unified Development Budgets

Civil Rights Protection

In-State Processing Requirements

Devolution and Preemption

Anti-Piracy Ordinances

Corporate Accountability

Purchasing Preferences

Federal Rules

Campaign Finance Reform

Corporate Accountability