Use Environmentally Preferable Products

by the WBDG Sustainable Committee

Last updated: 10-14-2008

Overview

The composition of materials used in a building is a major factor in its life-cycle environmental impact. Federal facilities must lead the way in the use of environmentally preferable products and processes that do not pollute or unnecessarily contribute to the waste stream, do not adversely affect health, and do not deplete limited natural resources. As the growing global economy expands the demand for raw materials, it is no longer sensible to throw away much of what we consider construction waste. Using a "cradle-to-cradle" approach, the "waste" from one generation can become the "raw material" of the next.

Executive Order 13423 "Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy and Transportation Management" consolidates several earlier executive orders and directs Federal agencies to use recycled content (see EPA's Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines and Environmentally Preferable Purchasing (EPP) Program.) When developing specifications, product descriptions and standards, agencies must consider a broad range of environmental factors including: waste prevention, recyclability, the use of recycled content, environmentally preferable, and bio-based products, life-cycle cost, and ultimate disposal.

During the facility design and development process, federal projects must have a comprehensive, integrated perspective that seeks to:

Recommendations

Renovate Existing Facilities, Products, and Equipment

Evaluate Environmental Preferability Using LCA

Maximize the Recycled Content of All New Materials

Specify Materials Harvested on a Sustainable Yield Basis

Encourage the Use of Recyclable Assemblies and Products

Limit Construction Debris

Eliminate the Use of Materials that Pollute or are Toxic During Their Manufacture, Use, or Reuse

Give Preference to Locally Produced Materials with Low Embodied Energy Content

Related Issues

Durability of Environmentally Preferable Materials

It is important that 'green' products perform the same as 'standard' products over their expected lives, therefore, it is valuable to develop a durability plan, which informs material and systems decisions assessing potential risk factors and damage functions. Once identified, measures can be made in the building design to address the risk factors. This process follows every phase from pre-design to building occupancy. Durability plans consider effects related to moisture, heat, sunlight, insects, material failure, ozone and acid rain, building function, style and natural disasters.

Balancing Sustainability and Security/Safety

To ensure that security strategies are appropriately implemented for the desired level of protection, designers are encouraged to conduct threat/vulnerability assessments and risk analysis. To prevent unnecessary use of resources in a project, include only the security measures identified by assessment and analysis. Evaluate the cost of comparable security measures before making your final decision. For high-risk and critical facilities, the increased use of materials and products is inevitable. In such cases, designers and builders are encouraged to specify and use environmentally preferable products to the maximum extent feasible. For example, as part of the Pentagon renovation work after the 9/11 terrorist attacks concrete rubble from damaged parts of the building were crushed into gravel and reused as aggregate under concrete slabs. More

Preferring Bio-based Products

Section 9002 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-171, May 13, 2002) confers Federal purchasing preference to bio-based products on the basis of five criteria: environmental performance, cost performance, bio-based content, technical performance, and availability. In support of this legislation, a Federal rule was developed specifying that the USDA establish a "USDA Certified Bio-based Product" label. To qualify for the label, bio-based products must be evaluated for life-cycle environmental and cost performance by the NIST BEES tool.

Emerging Issues

Many new products have appeared on the market in recent years, all claiming to be 'green,' yet they sometimes offer little proof to back up those claims. The term 'Greenwashing' has come into vogue to describe products having unsubstantiated and misleading green characteristics. It is a challenge to specifiers and purchasers to determine the validity and relevance of environmental claims. Evaluate green products using recognized testing laboratories and test methods and read the Terrachoice article "The Six Sins of Greenwashing."

Relevant Codes and Standards

Major Resources

WBDG

Building / Space Types

Applicable to most building types and space types.

Design Objectives

Aesthetics—Engage the Integrated Design Process, Cost-Effective, Functional / Operational, Historic Preservation—Update Building Systems Appropriately, Productive, Secure / Safe, Sustainable—Optimize Site Potential, Optimize Energy Use, Sustainable—Protect and Conserve Water, Sustainable—Enhance Indoor Environmental Quality, Sustainable—Optimize Operational and Maintenance Practices

Products and Systems

Section 07 41 13:Metal Roofing, Section 07 92 00: Joint Sealants, Building Envelope Design Guide—Sustainability of the Building Envelope
Federal Green Construction Guide for Specifiers

Project Management

Project Planning and Development, Building Commissioning

Tools

Construction Waste Management Database, LEED® Version 2.1 Credit / WBDG Resource Page Matrix, LEED®-DoD Antiterrorism Standards Tool

Use Green Products

Federal

Magazines and E-Newsletters

Other

Renovate Existing Facilities, Products, and Equipment

Evaluate Environmental Preferability Using LCA

Maximize the Recycled Content of All New Materials

Specify Materials Harvested on a Sustained Yield Basis

Limit Construction Debris

Others

WBDG Services Construction Criteria Base