******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-45 ORDER Adopted: December 14, 2000 Released: December 21, 2000 By the Commission: 1. By this Order, the Commission asks the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service (Joint Board) to review the definition of universal service and to review Lifeline and Link Up service for all low-income customers. Among other things, section 254 of the Communications Act codified the Commission's longstanding commitment to ensuring the preservation and advancement of universal service in rural, high-cost, and insular areas. Pursuant to section 254, the Commission convened a Joint Board. After reviewing the Joint Board's recommendations, the Commission adopted the First Report and Order which, among other things, designated the "core" services eligible for high-cost and low-income universal service support. Specifically, based on consideration of the four criteria set forth in section 254(c)(1), the Commission designated the following "core" services: single-party service; voice grade access to the public switched telephone network; Dual Tone Multifrequency (DTMF) signaling or its functional equivalent; access to emergency services; access to operator services; access to interexchange service; access to directory assistance; and toll limitation services for qualifying low-income consumers. The Commission expressed its intention to "convene a Federal-State Joint Board no later than January 1, 2001, to revisit the definition of universal service, as section 254(c)(2) anticipates." 2. In addition, in the Twelfth Report and Order, the Commission asked the Joint Board, in connection with its review of the definition of supported services, to issue a recommendation as to whether intrastate or interstate toll services or expanded area service should be included within the list of supported services. We also asked the Joint Board to consider the advisability of including prepaid calling plans within the definition of supported services. 3. Consistent with our determination in the First Report and Order and the Twelfth Report and Order, we now request the Joint Board to review the definition of the "core" services supported by the Commission's high-cost and low-income universal service support mechanisms under section 254(c)(1) of the Act. We anticipate that the Joint Board will seek public comment on whether modifications to the definition are warranted and, if so, what the modifications should be and provide a recommended decision to the Commission. As required by section 254(c)(1), the Joint Board should analyze the extent to which the services under consideration "(A) are essential to education, public health, or public safety; (B) have, through the operation of market choices by customers, been subscribed to by a substantial majority of residential customers; (C) are being deployed in public telecommunications networks by telecommunications carriers; and (D) are consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity." The Joint Board also should address the implications of any proposed modifications in terms of section 214(e) of the Act, which requires carriers to provide each of the supported services to be eligible for universal service support. In addition, the Joint Board should consider as part of its review the comments received by the Common Carrier Bureau on requests to redefine "voice grade access" for universal service purposes. 4. In addition, we ask the Joint Board to undertake a review of Lifeline and Link Up service for all low-income customers, including a review of the income eligibility criteria. In the Twelfth Report and Order, we stated our intent to examine, in consultation with the Joint Board, possible revisions to section 54.409 of the Commission's rules to provide for self-certification based solely on income level. We ask the Joint Board to consider this issue, among others, in its review of Lifeline and Link Up service. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 254, and 410(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  151, 154(i), 154(j), 254, and 410(c), that this Order is adopted. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 254, and 410(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  151, 154(i), 154(j), 254, and 410(c), that the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service is requested to review the definition of the services supported by the Commission's high-cost and low-income universal service support mechanisms under section 254(c)(1) of the Act. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 254, and 410(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  151, 154(i), 154(j), 254, and 410(c), that the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service is requested to review Lifeline and Link Up service for all low-income customers. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary