Reducing
strains in meat processing
A
large meat processing plant developed an intervention to reduce the
high incidence of body aches and pains experienced by plant workers.
They instituted an ergonomics program. The managers conducted an ergonomics
evaluation to help figure out how to redesign jobs that presented
strain hazards for workers’ backs, arms, and hands.
The consultant found that meat cutting, meat wrapping, and meat
packaging were high-risk jobs because they had short-cycle repetition,
little variety, and production pace determined by machine, not the
employee. These factors are known to be related to over-use injuries
and job stress.
The consultant recommended work station and tool redesign, improved
work methods, and job rotation. Management and representatives of
the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union organized
discussions with the workforce regarding these recommendations.
For 2 months, weekly worker brainstorming sessions were held in
each department to
- address the appropriateness of the consultant's recommendations
for change,
- improve the recommendations and provide additional ones, and
- help determine the best ways to implement the changes.
Results from the sessions were presented and discussed with other
workers.
After careful consideration, management and labor agreed to try
rotating cutting, wrapping, and packaging jobs among workers. This
rotation was designed to reduce exposure to any one repetitive task
and to increase task variety and skill development. It also gave
all workers the opportunity to perform meat cutting, which was considered
a more prestigious position. It is important to note that pay rates
were hourly (not piece rate) and were negotiated through collective
bargaining for the entire line; that is, all three job classifications
were paid at the same hourly rate. Thus rotating jobs on the meat
processing line had no effect on wages.
Workers completed a survey of health status and working conditions
before the change was implemented and again a year later. The consultant
also interviewed workers and supervisors before and after the change.
All workers reported that overall working conditions improved under
the job rotation program. Meat wrappers and packagers were most
satisfied with the program because it allowed them to perform more
challenging tasks. Meat cutters liked the program because it gave
them a break from the more physically demanding task of cutting
meat, but they disliked having to work in the lower-prestige jobs.
Supervisors were satisfied with the change because it allowed greater
flexibility in job assignments when key workers were absent and
the machine pacing of the majority of the work was left intact.
The job rotation program also allowed the workers to better tolerate
the demanding work conditions.
Improvement
was also measured by a reduction in recordable injuries and illnesses.
(Cumulative trauma is an occupational illness under OSHA definitions.
Recordable cases require medical treatment beyond first aid or result
in restricted work activity or days away from work and are assessed
continuously.) Before the intervention, recordable cases averaged
15.7 per 100 full time workers, per year. Two years after the intervention,
recordable cases were reduced to 6.8 per 100 full time workers.
The reduction in injuries and illnesses 2 years after the intervention
is a good indication of long term effectiveness of the intervention.
In this example, once the company began improvement activities,
the management went far beyond anything specified in the agreement.
This case study is also important for what was not changed:
- The machine pacing of the majority of the work was left intact.
- High productivity and high workload were maintained.
- The job rotation program effectively enabled the meat processing
workers to better tolerate the demanding conditions of cutting
because this assignment was time-limited each day.
In this case, management, the union, and workers responded in a
proactive and positive fashion, and made improvements that benefited
all the workers.
Download and view the sample questionnaire
from this case study (PDF)
You must have Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the questionnaire - if
you do not have this plug-in, please install
Adobe Acrobat Reader
[Source for Case 2: Smith MJ, Zehel D [1992]. Case
study no. 9: a stress reduction intervention programme for meat
processors emphasizing job design and work organization (United
States). Conditions of Work Digest 11(2): 204-213.]
Acknowledgements
|