Skip Standard Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z
peer-reviewed.gif (582 bytes)
eid_header.gif (2942 bytes)
Past Issue

Vol. 9, No. 12
December 2003

EID Home | Ahead of Print | Past Issues | EID Search | Contact Us | Announcements | Suggested Citation | Submit Manuscript

PDF Version | Download Adobe Acrobat | Comments | Email this article Email this article



Results
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
Figure 1
Figure 2
Table 1
Table 2

Dispatch

West Nile Virus in Mexico: Evidence of Widespread Circulation since July 2002

José G. Estrada-Franco,* Roberto Navarro-Lopez,† David W.C. Beasley,* Lark Coffey,* Anne-Sophie Carrara,* Amelia Travassos da Rosa,* Tamara Clements,‡ Eryu Wang,* George V. Ludwig,‡ Arturo Campomanes Cortes,† Pedro Paz Ramirez,† Robert B. Tesh,* Alan D.T. Barrett,* and Scott C. Weaver*
*University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA; †Comision Mexico-Estados Unidos para la Prevencion de la Fiebre Aftosa y Otras Enfermedades Exoticas de los Animales, Mexico City, Mexico; and ‡U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland, USA

Suggested citation for this article: Estrada-Franco JG, Navarro-Lopez R, Beasley DWC, Coffey L, Carrara A-S, Travassos da Rosa A, et al. West Nile virus in Mexico: evidence of widespread circulation since July 2002. Emerg Infect Dis [serial online] 2003 Dec [date cited]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol9no12/03-0564.htm


West Nile virus (WNV) antibodies were detected in horses from five Mexican states, and WNV was isolated from a Common Raven in the state of Tabasco. Phylogenetic studies indicate that this isolate, the first from Mexico, is related to strains from the central United States but has a relatively high degree of sequence divergence.

During the summer of 2002, the Agricultural Ministry of Mexico (SAGARPA) received reports of encephalitis-like illness in horses from several different areas of Mexico, concurrent with reports of West Nile virus (WNV) encephalitis outbreaks in horses along the Texas border in the states of Coahuila, Tamaulipas, and Chihuahua. Other suspected cases were reported from several southern, tropical states. We report the results of an equine serosurvey conducted from July 2002 to March 2003 by the Office of Exotic Diseases of the Agricultural Ministry (CPA-SAGARPA). We also describe the first isolation of WNV in Mexico, in a Common Raven (Corvus corax) from the state of Tabasco.

Figure 1
Figure 1.

Click to view enlarged image

Figure 1. Map showing the Mexican states sampled for antibodies to West Nile virus and Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus in equines...

  

Figure 2

Figure 2.
Click to view enlarged image

Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree, derived by maximum likelihood (ML) by using prM-E sequences for West Nile virus (WNV) isolates...

The Republic of Mexico is divided by the Tropic of Cancer, with temperate, arid climate zones in the north and at higher elevations and humid, subtropical, and tropical climate zones in the south. Our study encompassed most of these climatic zones, as equine serum samples were collected from 3 border states, 1 state on the Tropic of Cancer, and 10 states south of the Tropic of Cancer (Figure 1). Sampled equine populations were chosen on the basis of a history of clinical encephalitis; medical history was provided by owners and corroborated by CPA-SAGARPA veterinarians. In total, 441 serum samples were analyzed for WNV antibodies.

Because most serum samples were collected late in the probable virus transmission season, all were first screened for immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibodies, using IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) with a recombinant, envelope protein domain III antigen expressed and purified from Escherichia coli (D.W.C. Beasley, et al., submitted for pub.). Positive samples were confirmed by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) tests against WNV and St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV), by 90% plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT) against WNV (1), and by ELISA with WNV, SLEV, and Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) antigens and viruses. (The presence of several endemic arboviruses, including SLEV and VEEV, necessitated additional testing.) WNV infection was confirmed if the WNV antibody titer was >fourfold higher than the SLEV titer. To investigate evidence of recent WNV infection, 198 samples were also tested by using both IgG- and IgM-specific ELISA with WNV-infected cell culture antigens (2). Selected samples were tested by ELISA and PRNT for VEEV antibodies to determine if this virus was circulating in areas reporting equine encephalitis.

Results

A total of 441 equine serum samples from 14 states of Mexico were tested (Figure 1). WNV-specific antibodies were detected in 97 (22%) of the samples. These data probably overestimate the true equine seropositivity rate because sampling focused on herds with a history of clinical encephalitis. Representative data from 22 of the WNV-positive samples obtained in five different states are presented in Table 1. No evidence was obtained of SLEV infection in equines, but VEEV-specific antibodies were detected in serum samples from the states of Veracruz and Yucatán. (Horses are vaccinated against VEEV in the states of Chiapas and Oaxaca, so samples from these locations were not tested for VEEV antibodies.) The positive samples, several of which also contained WNV IgG, represent natural VEEV circulation and infection of horses, presumably with enzootic subtype IE strains (3,4).

On May 5, 2003, the CPA-SAGARPA received a report of a dead Common Raven from the El Yumka wildlife preserve in the city of Villahermosa, state of Tabasco. Although this species is native to Tabasco and other regions of Mexico, this bird was one of two ravens imported from the United States in 1999. A necropsy was performed, and virus isolation was attempted on tissue samples at the CPA-SAGARPA biosafety level 3 facility in Palo Alto, Mexico City. On May 16, 2003, cytopathic effects were detected in Vero cells injected with brain suspension. Viral RNA from the isolate was genetically characterized at the National Institute for Epidemiology and Diagnostics (InDre) in Mexico City and at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston. A 2,004-nt genome portion, including the prM-E protein region, was amplified by using a reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction as described previously (5); the resulting amplicons were sequenced directly with the Big Dye sequencing kit and model 3100 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The sequence of this WNV isolate (TM171-03, submitted to GenBank under accession no. AY371271) was aligned with all homologous WNV sequences of the same length available from the GenBank library (homologous to nt 466–2,469 in the Flamingo382 strain, GenBank accession no. AF196835), and phylogenetic trees were constructed by using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood (incorporating empirical base frequencies, a general time-reversible substitution model with the following frequencies: AC 1.34263; AG 4.18575; AU 1.55497; CG 0.044980; CT 15.08737; GU 1.00000, a shape parameter of 0.228), and neighbor joining programs implemented in the PAUP 4.0 software package (6). All trees had nearly identical branching orders; the maximum parsimony tree is presented in Figure 2. All trees placed the Mexican raven isolate as a sister to a clade that comprises most WNV strains isolated in Texas during 2002. Two other WNV strains from the Bolivar Peninsula, Texas (362, 476), were positioned basally to a 1998 Israeli stork isolate that grouped with all other North American isolates, suggesting that the North American strains may not all have originated from a point source introduction into the New York area in 1999. This topologic finding was the result of a single synonymous, third codon position (genomic position 969 by using the numbering of the Flamingo382 isolate, GenBank accession no. AF196835) U nucleotide (synapomorphy) shared by the 1998 Israeli and all North American strains except the Bolivar Peninsula isolates. However, the relatively poor support, represented by bootstrap values (1,000 replicates) of only 56–59 by using the three different phylogenetic methods, suggests that this topologic finding is not necessarily correct. More robust phylogenetic analyses using complete genomic sequences are needed to clarify these relationships.

Comparison of nucleotide sequences indicated mutations at 9 nt (0.45%) of the Mexican TM171-03 sequence compared to the prototype NY99 strain (Flamingo382, GenBank accession no. AF196835). Some of these nucleotide positions vary among other strains sampled worldwide, suggesting that they are not under strong purifying selection. Comparison with sequences of Year 2002 Texas strains showed only one shared mutation (genomic position 2466 CU). WNV has remained genetically conserved in the New World; however, based on our limited sequencing, the Mexican strain appears to be the most divergent WNV isolate identified to date in the Americas (Table 2). Two of the mutations resulted in amino acid changes at prM141 (IleThr) and E156 (SerPro), which have not been reported to date in North American isolates. The SerPro amino acid substitution at residue E156 is of interest, as it abolishes a potential glycosylation site that is a putative WNV virulence determinant (7–9). This report is the first of a New World WNV isolate with probable altered E protein glycosylation. Further studies are in progress to assess the possible phenotypic effects of this mutation.

Conclusions

Two recent publications reported serologic evidence of WNV infection among equines in the states of Yucatán and Coahuila from serum samples collected beginning in July and December 2002, respectively (10,11). We obtained serologic evidence of more widespread circulation of WNV in five other Mexican states, also dating back to July 2002. We also report the first isolation of WNV from Mexico from a dead Common Raven that resided in a wildlife preserve in Tabasco.

Genetic studies indicated that the Mexican WNV strain was likely introduced from the central United States. The level of genetic divergence (9 nt) of the Mexican isolate and the unique amino acid substitutions in the prM and E proteins when compared to all other North American WNV isolates suggest that the Mexican strain has been evolving independently for some time and did not simply enter Mexico recently from Texas. We speculate that this strain descended from a WNV strain introduced into the Yucatán peninsula by migrating birds. Nucleotide sequences of viruses isolated from Mexican states close to the U.S. border, once obtained, may more closely resemble strains isolated in Texas during 2002.

Of particular interest is the overlap in distribution of WNV and VEEV (serologic data for VEEV not shown) in the southern Mexican states of Veracruz and Yucatán; the presence of other flaviviruses like SLEV in these states is also likely. Both WNV and VEEV produce clinically similar neurologic disease in horses, and past, presumptive diagnoses of VEEV may have been inaccurate. Steps are now in place at the Mexico City headquarters of the Animal Health Division of SAGARPA to implement appropriate laboratory diagnosis for flaviviruses and alphaviruses. Additionally, field personnel are instructed to investigate epidemiologic signs of possible WNV infection including avian death and unusual human neurologic syndromes.

The biologic and epidemiologic consequences of mosquito-borne encephalitis viruses (12) cocirculating in the same ecosystem should be examined. The impact of WNV on human health in regions (such as Mexico) where inhabitants may have extensive prior exposure to other flaviviruses such as dengue, SLEV, Ilheus, Bussuquara, Jutiapa, and Yellow fever viruses may differ from that in regions (e.g., the United States and Canada) where human exposure to flaviviruses is very limited. WNV infection in persons with previous flavivirus immunity, which could either attenuate disease because of cross-protective antibodies (13) or potentially worsen disease because of immune enhancement (14), should be studied. Our ongoing VEEV surveillance in southern Mexico may identify differences in transmission habitats for VEEV and WNV and assist with optimizing virus containment efforts.

Acknowledgments

We thank Igor Romero Sosa and many CPA-SAGARPA veterinarians for their contributions to this project, and Wenli Kang for technical assistance.

This research was supported by grant NO1-AI-25489 from the National Institutes of Health and grant U90 CCU 618754 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Dr. Estrada-Franco is an assistant professor at the University of Texas Medical Branch. His research interests include the ecology and epidemiology of vector-borne diseases, their human impact, vector genetics, and vector-host-pathogen interactions of arboviruses and parasitic diseases.

References

  1. Beaty BJ, Calisher CH, Shope RE. Arboviruses. In: Schmidt NJ, RW Emmons, editors. Diagnostic procedures for viral, rickettsial and chlamydial infections, 6th edition. Washington: American Public Health Association; 1989. p. 797–855.
  2. Rossi CA, Drabick JJ, Gambel JM, Sun W, Lewis TE, Henchal EA. Laboratory diagnosis of acute dengue fever during the United Nations Mission in Haiti, 1995–1996. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998;59:275–8.
  3. Oberste MS, Schmura SM, Weaver SC, Smith JF. Geographic distribution of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus subtype IE genotypes in Central America and Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1999;60:630–4.
  4. Scherer WF, Dickerman RW, Chia CW, Ventura A, Moorhouse A, Geiger R, et al. Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus in Veracruz, Mexico, and the use of hamsters as sentinels. Science 1963;145:274–5.
  5. Beasley DW, Davis CT, Guzman H, Vanlandingham DL, Travassos da Rosa AP, Parsons RE, et al. Limited evolution of West Nile virus has occurred during its southwesterly spread in the United States. Virology 2003;309:190–5.
  6. Swofford DL. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; 1998.
  7. Scherret JH, Mackenzie JS, Khromykh AA, Hall RA. Biological significance of glycosylation of the envelope protein of Kunjin virus. Ann NY Acad Sci 2001;951:361–3.
  8. Chambers TJ, Halevy M, Nestorowicz A, Rice CM, Lustig S. West Nile virus envelope proteins: nucleotide sequence analysis of strains differing in mouse neuroinvasiveness. J Gen Virol 1998;79(Pt 10):2375–80.
  9. Halevy M, Akov Y, Ben-Nathan D, Kobiler D, Lachmi B, Lustig S. Loss of active neuroinvasiveness in attenuated strains of West Nile virus: pathogenicity in immunocompetent and SCID mice. Arch Virol 1994;137:355–70.
  10. Lorono-Pino MA, Blitvich BJ, Farfan-Ale JA, Puerto FI, Blanco JM, Marlenee NL, et al. Serologic evidence of West Nile virus infection in horses, Yucatan State, Mexico. Emerg Infect Dis 2003;9:857–9.
  11. Blitvich BJ, Fernandez-Salas I, Contreras-Cordero JF, Marlenee NL, Gonzalez-Rojas JI, Komar N, et al. Serologic evidence of West Nile virus infection in horses, Coahuila State, Mexico. Emerg Infect Dis 2003;9:853–6.
  12. Monath TP. The arboviruses: epidemiology and ecology, Vol. I-V. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1988.
  13. Tesh RB, Travassos da Rosa AP, Guzman H, Araujo TP, Xiao SY. Immunization with heterologous flaviviruses protective against fatal West Nile encephalitis. Emerg Infect Dis 2002;8:245–51.
  14. Kurane I, Ennis FE. Immunity and immunopathology in dengue virus infections. Semin Immunol 1992;4:121–7.

 

Table 1. Serologic analysisa of 22 horse serum samples from five Mexican states, positive for West Nile virus antibodies, July 2002–March 2003b

 

WNV serologic findings

HI SLEV


State, locality

Sample no.

Date

Age

Sex

IgG-E

IgM

IgG

PRNT

HI


Veracruz, Minatitlan

VER-015

Oct 28, 2002

7 y

M

pos

1,600

400

>320

20

20

Veracruz, Minatitlan

VER-011

Oct 28, 2002

18 m

M

pos

neg

400

>320

160

neg

Veracruz, Hidalgotitlan

VER-017

Oct 29, 2002

8 m

M

pos

12,800

neg

>320

>640

160

Veracruz, Texistepec

VER-26

Oct 29, 2002

2 y

M

pos

neg

100

40

160

neg

Veracruz, Texistepec

VER-025

Nov 7, 2002

18 m

M

pos

6,400

neg

>320

>640

160

Veracruz, J. Carranza

VER-036

Nov 11, 2002

7 m

M

pos

neg

6,400

>320

>640

40

Veracruz, Angel R. Cabada

406

Mar 20, 2003

13 m

F

pos

neg

400

>320

80

neg

Veracruz, Cosamaloapan

187

Aug 28, 2002

5 y

F

pos

neg

1,600

>320

160

20

Yucatan, Merida

389

Mar 7, 2003

4 y

F

pos

neg

1,600

nt

80

20

Yucatan, Tizimin

391

Mar 1, 2003

5 y

M

pos

neg

1,600

160

40

20

Chihuahua, Ojinaga

210

Oct 20, 2002

2 y

M

neg

1,600

neg

40

320

40

Coahuila, Cd Acuna

112

Oct 14, 2002

3 y

M

pos

1,600

neg

80

20

20

Coahuila, Hidalgo

4

Sep 1, 2002

5

F

pos

400

100

>320

>640

20

Coahuila, Villa Union

26

Nov 2, 2002

4 y

M

pos

400

100

>320

320

80

Coahuila, Nava

67

Jul 11, 2002

7 y

M

pos

400

100

>320

320

20

Coahuila, P. Negras

56

Nov 5, 2002

2 y

M

pos

6,400

100

>320

>640

40

Coahuila, Zaragoza

39

Oct 10, 2002

5 y

F

pos

neg

400

>160

320

20

Coahuila, Morelos

51

Oct 5, 2002

7 y

M

pos

neg

100

>160

160

40

Tamaulipas, Diaz Ordaz

268

Nov 7, 2002

8 y

F

pos

12,800

1,600

40

320

40

Tamaulipas, Camargo

279

Nov 11, 2002

4 y

F

pos

12,800

3,200

>320

320

80

Tamaulipas, Rio Bravo

349

Nov 5, 2002

8 y

M

pos

neg

400

80

80

neg

Tamaulipas, Victoria

344

Nov 7, 2002

2 y

M

pos

neg

6,400

>320

160

20


aTiters expressed as reciprocal of dilution; all tests were enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays unless otherwise noted; all tests were against WNV (West Nile virus) unless otherwise noted.
b
SLEV, St. Louis encephalitis virus; Ig, immunoglobin; G-E, recombinant domain III of E protein; PRNT, plaque reduction neutralization test; HI, hemagglutination inhibition test.

 

Table 2. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid differences in the prM-E gene region between the prototype New York (382-99) and Mexican (TM171-03) West Nile virus strains

Nucleotide (amino acid)a

Strain 382-99

Strain TM171-03


483

C

U

858

C

U

887 (prM141)

U (Ile)

C (Thr)

1137

C

U

1432 (E156)

U (Ser)

C (Pro)

1626

C

U

2328

C

U

2388

C

U

2466

C

U


aNucleotide numbering used for the New York flamingo 382-99 sequence (Genbank accession no. AF196835); locations of encoded amino acid differences are shown in parentheses.
   
     
   
Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Scott Weaver, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0609, USA; fax 409-747-2415; email: sweaver@utmb.edu

Return email address optional:


 


Comments to the EID Editors
Please contact the EID Editors at eideditor@cdc.gov

Email this article

Your email:

Your friend's email:

Message (optional):

 

 

 

EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page posted October 16, 2003
This page last reviewed April 13, 2004

Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal
National Center for Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention