Skip directly to: content | left navigation | search

PETITIONED HEALTH CONSULTATION

OGDEN MARTIN INCINERATOR COMPANY
BRISTOL, HARTFORD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT



APPENDICES


Figure 1. Intro Map

Screening Method of Determining Annual Averages

Regulatory screening procedures require an examination of a range of stability classes and wind speeds to identify the "worst case" meteorological conditions. For this modeling procedure, the wind speed and stability class combinations preselected by SCREEN were utilized1. The "worst case" condition is the combination of wind speed and stability that results in the maximum ground level concentrations. This value reflects the maximum hourly concentration expected at each receptor. The maximum hourly value is then factored to provide concentrations over longer averaging periods. The U.S. EPA's guidance for screening modeling procedures1 does not provide a factor for converting 1-hour to annual average concentrations, but there have been some values recommended as a result of extensive studies. Air/Superfund 2 suggests a 1-hr to annual concentration conversion factor of 0.025 for point sources. The U.S. EPA recommends a maximum 1-hour to maximum annual conversion factor of 0.08 for both point and area sources within its procedures for assessing risks 3. This value is supported by recent studies 4, researching the dispersion from point sources that undergo initial mixing, which have reported values within the range of 0.06 - 0.10. A conversion factor of 0.10 was used in this study - being on the upper end of the range of the values published, it produces the most conservative results.


  1. Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources, PB89-159396. US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1988.

  2. Guideline for Predictive baseline Emission Estimation Procedures for Superfund Sites, EPA-450/1-92-002, Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series. US Environmental Protection Agency Region III, New York, NY, 1992.

  3. Guinnup DE. A Tiered Modeling Approach for Assessing the Risks Due to Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants, EPA-450/4092-001. US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality and Standards Technical Support Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1992.

  4. Nagler LH. Multiplying Factors to Convert 1-Hour Maximum Concentration Screening Estimates to Annual Averages Estimates for Sources Influenced by Building Wake Effects, Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants. Durham, NC, 1992.

Refined Modeling

Refined modeling is used when the ambient air concentrations predicted using a screening method fail to meet the requirements. In this case the requirements were cursory health thresholds.

The Industrial Source Complex Short Term (ISCST) model was used as the refined modeling tool. Although ISCST is another screening tool, it includes more complex algorithms than the SCREEN model. The ISCST uses three dimensions instead of two. This allows us to evaluate the effect of the variability in the wind direction. Put another way, it allows us to account for the times when the wind is blowing away from, askew to, and toward the receptor of concern.

ISCST allows the modeler to evaluate the ambient concentrations that occur for as many as 8,784 different weather reports. This allows us to predict the average concentrations for a year of 1-hour weather reports. This is a more precise method of estimating exposures. Another advantage to having the ability to evaluate concentrations three-dimensionally is that we can get an illustration of the areas of concern to determine if the area of maximum concentration is in an area where people can be exposed.

Table of Contents















Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1825 Century Blvd, Atlanta, GA 30345
Contact CDC: 800-232-4636 / TTY: 888-232-6348
 
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web Portal